Gold ETF Flows: February 2026

Highlights

• Global investors continued to allocate to gold ETFs in February, marking the ninth consecutive month of inflows.
• North America dominated global inflows, Asian demand remained positive, and Europe was the only region to record outflows.
• Gold market trading volumes pulled-back to US$478bn/day but remain elevated relative to 2025 activity.

February in review

Global physically backed gold ETFs¹ registered another month of inflows in February, adding US$5.3bn - the strongest two-month start to a year and the ninth consecutive monthly increase, as investors continued to build allocations amid elevated geopolitical risk and shifting macro conditions (Chart 1). Total global holdings rose to a new all-time high, increasing 26t in the month to 4,171t, while a further rise in gold prices lifted global AUM to a record US$701bn.

North America once again led global demand; Asia extended its steady run of inflows, and Europe stood out as the only region to record net outflows following heavy early-month redemptions tied to the late-January precious metals sell-off.

Chart 1: Global gold ETF momentum builds early in the year

Regional gold ETF flows and the gold price*

*As of 28 February 2026. Gold price based on the monthly average LBMA Gold Price PM in USD.
Source: Bloomberg, Company Filings, ICE Benchmark Administration, World Gold Council

Regional overview

North America added US$4.7bn in February, marking its ninth consecutive month of inflows. While this may not surprise many investors, given the current environment, such a sustained run is notable and shouldn't be overlooked.

Outside of the initial conditions phase² there have only been two other periods in which the region recorded at least nine straight months of inflows - during the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) and the COVID-19 pandemic. Although these episodes were driven by different dynamics, both were characterised by elevated systemic risk. As a result, diversification into safe-haven assets remains a consistent theme for investors.

The recent rally in gold prices, following the late-January pullback and early-February softness, also helped attract new buyers and contributed to inflows.

It was the usual suspects that helped drive these inflows:

• Heightened geopolitical risk, particularly involving Iran³
• A more favourable opportunity cost for holding gold, driven by dollar weakness and lower rates
• Ongoing trade and policy uncertainty following the Supreme Court's ruling on tariffs⁴
• Equity market concern, as software and SaaS-related names continued to weigh on the broader market.

Europe was the only region to record outflows of US$1.8bn in February, driven almost entirely by heavy redemptions during the first week as the late-January precious metals sell-off spilled into early February. Although flows turned positive in subsequent weeks, including a notable rebound of roughly US$0.9bn in the second week, the early-month liquidation remained too large to offset.

Within Europe, the UK accounted for the bulk of redemptions (-US$1.9bn), reflecting its outsized share of the region's gold ETF market; Germany followed at a distant second (-US$291mn). As the bulk of outflows on 30 January and 2 February was concentrated in UK-listed funds - and not tied to a wider regional or country-specific macro event - we do not interpret this divergence as the start of a longer-term structural trend.

Asian funds expanded inflows to six months in a row, albeit at a slower pace, attracting US$2.3bn in February. Japan led inflows in the region. Political uncertainty earlier in the month, escalating tensions with China, the weakening yen, and gold's strong performance in the currency (+6%) all supported Japanese gold ETF demand. China saw mild inflows, partially due to fewer trading days amid the Chinese New Year holiday. Gold's muted performance in RMB also discouraged further buying. It is worth noting that the new gold ETF launched in Hong Kong SAR is attracting attention as it offers both listed shares and tokenised units; this contributed to the area's inflows.⁵

India recorded healthy inflows of US$565mn, although this represented a moderation from the elevated prior two-month average of US$2bn. Redemptions from some of the larger funds earlier in the month were likely driven by profit taking as the gold price pulled back, but these were gradually offset as the month progressed, underscoring sustained interest in gold ETFs. This growing interest was further supported by the SEBI's recent overhaul of the mutual fund scheme-categorisation framework, which now gives funds greater flexibility to increase exposure to gold and silver instruments within defined limits.⁶

Funds in other regions saw further net buying, adding a modest US$17mn. The third consecutive monthly inflow was mainly from Australia, but this was partially offset by South African outflows.

Downloads:

• Download pdf ETF Commentary: February 2026
• Download xlsx ETF Flows: February 2026
• Download pdf ETF Flows Data Methodology

Data as of 6 March, 2026

Demand captures changes in global/regional gold holdings; fund flows capture the net amount of money (in USD) that comes in or out of gold ETFs globally/regionally. See methodology note.

*We monitor how fund assets change through time by looking at two key metrics: demand and fund flows.

• Gold ETF demand is the change in gold holdings during a given period. We use this metric to calculate the quarterly demand estimates reported in Gold Demand Trends.

• Fund flows represent the amount of money - reported in US dollars - that investors have put into (or retrieved from) a fund during a given period. For more details, see our methodology note.

† 'Global Inflows/positive demand' refers to the sum of changes of all funds that saw a net increase in holdings over a given period (e.g., month, quarter, etc.). Conversely, 'global outflows/negative demand' aggregates changes from funds that saw holdings decline over the same period.

Sources: Bloomberg, Company Filings, ICE Benchmark Administration, World Gold Council; Disclaimer

See methodology note

ETF Commentary Disclaimer