Social Media Influencers and Health Misinformation — Why We Must Be Cautious

The Rise of the Influencer Era

In today's digital world, social media influencers play a significant role in shaping how people think, feel, and act - especially when it comes to health and wellness. Their reach is enormous, and their content often feels more personal and relatable than that of public health authorities. But there's a growing concern that comes with this influence: misinformation.

From anti-vaccine posts to unproven dietary fads, social media has become a breeding ground for false or misleading health information. And the consequences can be serious - even life-threatening.

Why Health Misinformation Is So Dangerous

Health misinformation spreads faster and more widely than the truth. According to a landmark study by MIT, false news stories on Twitter were 70% more likely to be retweeted than true ones, and it took true stories about six times as long to reach 1,500 people compared to false ones.

This rapid spread, combined with the influence of popular figures, has the potential to sway public opinion and behavior on critical health issues. During the COVID-19 pandemic, for example, some wellness influencers were instrumental in spreading conspiracy theories that downplayed the virus, promoted "natural cures," and discouraged vaccination.

A 2020 analysis by Avaaz reported that global health misinformation networks generated 3.8 billion views on Facebook in a single year during the pandemic.

Wellness Culture Meets Conspiracy

Wellness influencers often package their content with themes of "authenticity," "natural living," and "freedom from the system." While this may appeal to those who feel disillusioned with mainstream medicine, it opens the door to what scholars call "conspirituality" - the blending of wellness language with conspiracy ideologies.

These influencers tend to present themselves as relatable and "outside the system," creating parasocial relationships with their followers. This perceived intimacy builds trust - but without the safeguards of scientific integrity. As a result, personal anecdotes are often mistaken for evidence-based advice.

One example cited by Dr. Stephanie Alice Baker is Pete Evans, an Australian wellness influencer who promoted unapproved COVID-19 treatments and spread anti-vaccine rhetoric, ultimately leading to platform bans and government fines.

Misinformation in Nutrition and Diet

Nutrition is another area where misinformation flourishes. A Canadian report found that nearly 6 in 10 Canadians under 35 use social media as a source of health information, yet only 5% report being very knowledgeable about health research.

Unqualified influencers sell diet plans and make bold claims about the benefits of keto, raw veganism, or other trending diets - often without scientific backing. Their popularity may stem from appearance-based trust: followers assume that a fit, healthy-looking influencer must be an expert. This visual appeal can override the need for credentials.

Repeated exposure to misinformation - even without clear intent to deceive - makes people more likely to believe it. This is known as the mere exposure effect, and it reinforces echo chambers where misinformation circulates unchallenged.

The Business of Misinformation

Influencers and social media platforms alike are incentivized to keep misinformation alive. Misinformation often draws more engagement, which translates into higher earnings for influencers (via ad revenue, product sales, or brand deals) and more time-on-site for platforms like Instagram and YouTube.

Some influencers even use anti-science or anti-government sentiments to market products - from detox teas to anti-5G pendants - tapping into followers' fears and frustrations for profit.

What Can We Do?

As individuals:

• Always check the source of health claims.
• Look for content created by registered health professionals.
• Be wary of posts that promise simple solutions to complex health issues - especially when they're selling something.

As a community:

• Support media literacy education, particularly for younger audiences.
• Advocate for stronger regulation of health-related content on social platforms.
• Encourage responsible social media use, where science and compassion coexist.

As public health professionals:

• Engage on social media with clear, science-based, and empathetic messaging.
• Partner with credible influencers who align with evidence-based practices.
• Call out misinformation respectfully, offering corrections rather than confrontation.

Final Thought

Social media influencers have the power to shape public health - for better or for worse. By approaching their content with curiosity and critical thinking, we can protect ourselves and others from harm.

In a time when truth struggles to go viral, your skepticism is your superpower.

Sources:

• Baker, S. A. (2022). Alt. Health Influencers: How wellness culture and web culture have been weaponised to promote conspiracy theories. European Journal of Cultural Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494211062623
• Lofft, Z. (2020). When Social Media Met Nutrition.
• Denniss, E., & Lindberg, R. (2025). Social media and the spread of misinformation: infectious and a threat to public health. Health Promotion International, 40. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaf023

Would you like a shortened version for Instagram or Facebook?