04/13/2026 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 04/13/2026 16:22
What you need to know: California is calling on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to approve the state's application to update its essential health benefits (EHBs), which includes the expansion of coverage requirements for In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) and withdraw a proposed rule that would pass these costs onto the state.
SACRAMENTO - Governor Gavin Newsom today called on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to resume its review of current benchmark plan applications, approve California's proposal to expand access to IVF and other essential services, and withdraw a proposed rule that would create new financial barriers to expanded coverage.
"President Trump calls himself the 'father of IVF,' yet his actions threaten IVF access to fertility care for millions of Californians. The President's HHS must withdraw this proposed rule now and approve California's updated essential health benefits so our state can expand fertility care services and other critical services, including expanded access to wheelchairs and hearing aids for children."
Governor Gavin Newsom
HHS says its proposed rule is aimed at reducing rising premiums. However, California's proposed additions to its benchmark plan are not a primary driver of premium increases.
In effect, the new proposed rule would lock states into outdated benefit standards, freezing benefits at levels established more than a decade ago, despite significant advances in medicine and technology. California's proposal reflects modern care needs, including expanded access to fertility treatments and assistive devices.
California's updated benchmark plan, developed in partnership with the Legislature and submitted in May 2025, would expand coverage beginning in 2027 to include:
The proposal fully complies with federal actuarial requirements that severely limit premium increases.
Millions of Californians in the individual and small group markets could be denied access to these critical services if HHS proceeds with its proposed rule and continues to delay review of state applications. This runs counter to federal commitments to expand IVF access, including the President's February 2025 Executive Order calling for ensuring reliable access to IVF treatment.
The HHS delay in reviewing EHB applications will result in a waste of resources for both states and federal staff who have begun reviewing those existing EHB applications. Unless HHS removes its pause immediately, California and other states with pending EHB applications will have to restart a years-long process of developing a new benchmark plan because the values of the "typical" employer plan will likely have changed.
In addition, the HHS failed to provide a reasonable amount of time for interested persons to participate in the proposed rulemaking. The HHS deadline for submission of comments in response to its proposed rule barely meets the minimum time of 30-days and is less than the comment period provided by HHS in previous years.
California remains committed to expanding access to modern, evidence-based care and ensuring families have access to the services they need to thrive.