Hoover Institution

10/20/2026 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 10/20/2026 02:38

Reforming the 340B Drug Pricing Program

  • Health Care
  • Answering Challenges to Advanced Economies

The federal 340B drug pricing program lets hospitals buy outpatient drugs at steep discounts and keep the difference when insurers pay full price. It requires no proof that the savings reach low-income patients. The program rewards costlier drugs, drives hospital acquisitions of independent physician practices, and pushes clinics into wealthier neighborhoods. This brief proposes ending 340B discounts for hospitals and replacing them with a patient-centered fund financed by drug manufacturers.

Key Takeaways

  • The 340B drug pricing program is not a discount program but an arbitrage program that creates opportunities for profit: Hospitals keep the gap between the 340B price and what Medicare, Medicaid, and private plans reimburse. Nothing in the statute requires the revenue to reach patients or fund low-income care.
  • The incentives are predictable: Because margins rise with drug price and volume, 340B encourages costlier drugs, acquisition of independent physician practices, and expansion into affluent areas.
  • The eligibility test measures the wrong thing: Hospitals qualify based on inpatient Medicaid utilization, but they use the discount on outpatient clinic drugs. With no incentive beyond the qualifying threshold to serve more low-income patients, many hospitals game the system by expanding into more profitable areas while keeping their inpatient Medicaid numbers just high enough to stay qualified.
  • The costs of 340B go beyond the discounts manufacturers are required to provide. Employers, Medicare, Medicaid, and state budgets all pay more through higher list prices, lost rebates, and consolidation.
  • Congress should end 340B discounts for hospitals and replace them with a safety-net fund financed by manufacturers and distributed to healthcare providers based on low-income outpatient volume. Independent clinics should be eligible, and safety-net clinics, the original beneficiaries of the 340B program, should retain access.

Cite this essay:

Anthony DiGiorgio, "Reforming the 340B Drug Pricing Program," Healthcare Policy Working Group, Hoover Institution, October 2026.

About the Author

Anthony M. DiGiorgio, DO, MHA, is an associate professor of neurological surgery at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF). He practices at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, the city's safety-net trauma center, and is affiliated faculty at the UCSF Institute for Health Policy Studies. His research focuses on Medicaid, access to care, and hospital finances.

Hoover Institution published this content on October 20, 2026, and is solely responsible for the information contained herein. Distributed via Public Technologies (PUBT), unedited and unaltered, on October 20, 2026 at 08:39 UTC. If you believe the information included in the content is inaccurate or outdated and requires editing or removal, please contact us at [email protected]