Lind Capital Partners Municipal Credit Income Fund
10/06/2025 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 10/06/2025 08:17
Semi-Annual Report by Investment Company (Form N-CSRS)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENT COMPANIES
| Investment Company Act file number | 811-23711 |
| Lind Capital Partners Municipal Credit Income Fund |
| (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) |
| 500 Davis Center Suite 1004 Evanston, IL | 60201 |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip code) |
| Karen Jacoppo-Wood, Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC. |
| 225 Pictoria Drive Suite 450, Cincinnati, OH 45246 |
| (Name and address of agent for service) |
| Registrants telephone number, including area code: | 513-577-1693 |
| Date of fiscal year end: | 1/31 |
| Date of reporting period: | 7/31/2025 |
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.
| (a) | Not applicable |
| (b) |
| LIND CAPITAL PARTNERS MUNICIPAL CREDIT INCOME FUND |
| (Symbol: LCPMX) |
| Semi-Annual Report |
| July 31, 2025 |
| 1-833-615-3031 |
| www.LCPMX.com |
| Distributed by Ultimus Fund Distributors, LLC |
| Member FINRA |
| Lind Capital Partners Municipal Credit Income Fund |
| PORTFOLIO REVIEW (Unaudited) |
| July 31, 2025 |
The Funds performance figures(*) for the periods ended July 31, 2025, compared to its benchmark:
| Annualized | ||||
| 6 Month | 1 Year | 5 Year** | Since Inception** | |
| Lind Capital Partners Municipal Credit Income Fund | (4.42)% | (2.77)% | 2.54% | 2.60% |
| Bloomberg Municipal High Yield Index^ | (2.57)% | (0.86)% | 2.29% | 3.70% |
| * | The performance data quoted here represents past performance. The performance comparison includes reinvestment of all dividends and capital gain distributions. Total returns would have been lower had the Adviser not waived its fees or reimbursed other expenses. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted above. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. The returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or on the redemptions of Fund shares. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Per the fee table in the prospectus dated May 30, 2025 the Funds total annual operating expenses are 2.37%. For performance information current to the most recent month-end, please call toll-free 1-833-615-3031 or visit www.LCPMX.com. |
| ** | The Fund acquired all of the assets and liabilities of Backcountry Investment Partners 3 LP (the Predecessor Fund) in a tax free reorganization on February 2, 2022. In connection with this acquisition, shares of the Predecessor Fund were exchanged for shares of the Fund. The Funds investment objective, policies and guidelines are in all material respects, equivalent to the Predecessor Funds investment objectives, policies and guidelines. The Predecessor Fund commenced operations on June 1, 2017. Updated performance information will be available at no cost by calling 1-833-615-3031 or visiting the Funds website at www.LCPMX.com. |
| ^ | The Bloomberg Municipal High Yield Index (the Index) is market value-weighted and designed to measure the performance of U.S. dollar-denominated high-yield municipal bonds issues by U.S. states, the District of Columbia, U.S. territories and local governments or agencies. The Index includes fully tax-exempt investment grade, non-investment grade and non-rated bonds, but does not include defaulted securities. You cannot invest directly in an index and unmanaged index returns do not reflect any fees, expenses or sales charges. |
| Portfolio Composition+ as of July 31, 2025: | ||||
| Municipal Bonds | ||||
| Wisconsin | 19.5 | % | ||
| Arizona | 10.1 | % | ||
| Texas | 8.0 | % | ||
| Michigan | 5.9 | % | ||
| Illinois | 4.1 | % | ||
| Pennsylvania | 3.9 | % | ||
| Vermont | 3.6 | % | ||
| Colorado | 3.4 | % | ||
| Ohio | 3.1 | % | ||
| Florida | 2.7 | % | ||
| Other/Short-Term Investments | 35.7 | % | ||
| 100.0 | % | |||
+ Based on Total Net Assets as of July 31, 2025
Please refer to the Schedule of Investments in this report for a detailed listing of the Funds holdings.
1
| LIND CAPITAL PARTNERS MUNICIPAL CREDIT INCOME FUND |
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) |
| July 31, 2025 |
| Principal | Coupon Rate | |||||||||||
| Amount ($) | (%) | Maturity | Fair Value | |||||||||
| MUNICIPAL BONDS - 98.5% | ||||||||||||
| ALABAMA - 0.5% | ||||||||||||
| 325,000 | Pell City Square Cooperative District | 7.0000 | 04/01/44 | $ | 299,015 | |||||||
| ARIZONA - 10.1% | ||||||||||||
| 1,320,000 | Arizona Industrial Development Authority (Arizona Christian University) | 5.6250 | 10/01/49 | 1,082,709 | ||||||||
| 300,000 | Arizona Industrial Development Authority (Pinecrest Academy of Northern Nevada) | 4.5000 | 07/15/29 | 291,897 | ||||||||
| 750,000 | Arizona Industrial Development Authority (San Tan Montessori School Inc Obligated Group)(a) | 6.8750 | 02/01/65 | 719,782 | ||||||||
| 275,000 | Industrial Development Authority of the County of Pima (Career Success Schools) | 5.7500 | 05/01/50 | 252,983 | ||||||||
| 100,000 | Industrial Development Authority of the County of Pima (La Posada at Park Centre Inc Obligated Group) | 6.8750 | 11/15/52 | 102,883 | ||||||||
| 590,000 | Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority (Arizona Christian University) | 6.3750 | 10/01/54 | 552,730 | ||||||||
| 625,000 | Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority (Prescott Valley Charter School) | 7.1250 | 07/01/54 | 574,697 | ||||||||
| 250,000 | Sierra Vista Industrial Development Authority (American Leadership Academy Inc)(a) | 5.0000 | 06/15/64 | 205,685 | ||||||||
| 250,000 | Sierra Vista Industrial Development Authority (Fit Kids Inc)(a) | 6.3000 | 06/15/54 | 252,125 | ||||||||
| 200,000 | Sierra Vista Industrial Development Authority (Fit Kids Inc)(a) | 6.3750 | 06/15/64 | 201,352 | ||||||||
| 1,330,000 | Sierra Vista Industrial Development Authority (Fit Kids Inc)(a) | 5.7500 | 06/15/64 | 1,211,144 | ||||||||
| 800,000 | Sierra Vista Industrial Development Authority (Wake Preparatory Academy) | 6.5000 | 06/15/60 | 785,482 | ||||||||
| 6,233,469 | ||||||||||||
| CALIFORNIA - 2.1% | ||||||||||||
| 50,000 | California Municipal Finance Authority (St Mary and All Angels Christian Church/CA)(a) | 5.8750 | 05/01/59 | 49,000 | ||||||||
| 1,350,000 | California Public Finance Authority (P3 Irvine SL Holdings LLC Obligated Group) | 6.5000 | 06/01/54 | 1,238,673 | ||||||||
| 1,287,673 | ||||||||||||
| COLORADO - 3.4% | ||||||||||||
| 750,000 | Colorado Health Facilities Authority (American Baptist Homes of the Midwest Obligated Group) | 8.0000 | 08/01/43 | 468,360 | ||||||||
| 760,000 | Haymeadow Metropolitan District No 1 (Haymeadow Metropolitan District No 1) | 6.1250 | 12/01/54 | 761,736 | ||||||||
| 875,000 | Mineral Business Improvement District(a) | 5.7500 | 12/01/54 | 838,401 | ||||||||
| 2,068,497 | ||||||||||||
| CONNECTICUT - 0.6% | ||||||||||||
| 365,000 | Stamford Housing Authority (TJH Senior Living LLC Obligated Group) | 6.5000 | 10/01/55 | 359,577 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes which are an integral part of these financial statements.
2
| LIND CAPITAL PARTNERS MUNICIPAL CREDIT INCOME FUND |
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued) |
| July 31, 2025 |
| Principal | Coupon Rate | |||||||||||
| Amount ($) | (%) | Maturity | Fair Value | |||||||||
| MUNICIPAL BONDS - 98.5% (Continued) | ||||||||||||
| DELAWARE - 0.2% | ||||||||||||
| 150,000 | Delaware State Economic Development Authority (Academia Antonia Alonso Inc)(a) | 6.0000 | 07/01/65 | $ | 144,645 | |||||||
| FLORIDA - 2.7% | ||||||||||||
| 200,000 | Capital Projects Finance Authority (Imagine School At North Port Inc)(a) | 6.7500 | 06/15/65 | 196,898 | ||||||||
| 415,000 | Capital Trust Agency, Inc. (Atlantic Housing Foundation Properties Obligated Group) | 6.0000 | 07/01/42 | 327,036 | ||||||||
| 800,000 | Capital Trust Agency, Inc. (Atlantic Housing Foundation Properties Obligated Group) | 6.3750 | 05/01/53 | 791,432 | ||||||||
| 200,000 | Capital Trust Agency, Inc. (Franklin Academy Series 2020 Obligated Group) | 5.0000 | 12/15/50 | 169,092 | ||||||||
| 100,000 | Capital Trust Agency, Inc. (Franklin Academy Series 2020 Obligated Group)(a) | 5.0000 | 12/15/55 | 83,038 | ||||||||
| 93,212 | Collier County Industrial Development Authority (Arlington of Naples Obligated Group)(a),(b) | 8.2500 | 05/15/49 | 1 | ||||||||
| 325,353 | Highlands County Health Facilities Authority (Trousdale Foundation Obligated Group)(b) | 6.0000 | 04/01/38 | 4,067 | ||||||||
| 150,000 | Palm Beach County Health Facilities Authority (Jupiter Medical Center Obligated Group) | 5.2500 | 11/01/55 | 144,203 | ||||||||
| 1,715,767 | ||||||||||||
| GEORGIA - 1.3% | ||||||||||||
| 360,000 | Development Authority of Bulloch County (Charter Conservatory for Liberal Arts & Technology Inc)(a) | 6.7500 | 06/15/64 | 338,303 | ||||||||
| 435,000 | Fulton County Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly Authority (All Saints-St Lukes Episcopal Home for the Retired Obligated Group) | 4.0000 | 04/01/56 | 312,051 | ||||||||
| 195,000 | Macon-Bibb County Urban Development Authority (Academy for Classical Education Inc) | 5.8750 | 06/15/47 | 194,566 | ||||||||
| 844,920 | ||||||||||||
| IDAHO - 1.9% | ||||||||||||
| 150,000 | Avimor Community Infrastructure District No 1(a) | 5.8750 | 09/01/53 | 150,518 | ||||||||
| 1,150,000 | Avimor Community Infrastructure District No 1(a) | 5.5000 | 09/01/53 | 1,105,253 | ||||||||
| 1,255,771 | ||||||||||||
| ILLINOIS - 4.1% | ||||||||||||
| 100,000 | City of Evanston IL (Roycemore School) | 4.3750 | 04/01/41 | 77,940 | ||||||||
| 250,000 | City of Evanston IL (Roycemore School) | 4.6250 | 04/01/51 | 181,018 | ||||||||
| 300,000 | Illinois Finance Authority (Chicago Theatre Group Inc)(a) | 6.1250 | 10/01/50 | 292,527 | ||||||||
| 100,000 | Illinois Finance Authority (DePaul College Prep)(a) | 5.6250 | 08/01/53 | 100,284 | ||||||||
| 150,000 | Illinois Finance Authority (Plymouth Place Obligated Group) | 5.0000 | 05/15/36 | 145,638 | ||||||||
| 150,000 | Illinois Finance Authority (Plymouth Place Obligated Group) | 5.0000 | 05/15/41 | 136,943 | ||||||||
| 910,000 | Illinois Finance Authority (Plymouth Place Obligated Group) | 5.0000 | 05/15/51 | 752,699 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes which are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
| LIND CAPITAL PARTNERS MUNICIPAL CREDIT INCOME FUND |
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued) |
| July 31, 2025 |
| Principal | Coupon Rate | |||||||||||
| Amount ($) | (%) | Maturity | Fair Value | |||||||||
| MUNICIPAL BONDS - 98.5% (Continued) | ||||||||||||
| ILLINOIS - 4.1% (Continued) | ||||||||||||
| 850,000 | Illinois Finance Authority (Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science)(a) | 5.2500 | 08/01/35 | $ | 842,255 | |||||||
| 2,529,304 | ||||||||||||
| INDIANA - 2.6% | ||||||||||||
| 2,620,000 | City of Anderson IN (Anderson University Inc/Indiana) | 6.0000 | 10/01/42 | 1,691,920 | ||||||||
| IOWA - 0.9% | ||||||||||||
| 200,000 | Iowa Finance Authority (Union at the Marina LP)(a) | 6.0000 | 11/01/42 | 187,944 | ||||||||
| 455,000 | Iowa Higher Education Loan Authority (Simpson College) | 5.5000 | 11/01/51 | 380,136 | ||||||||
| 568,080 | ||||||||||||
| KANSAS - 0.9% | ||||||||||||
| 360,000 | City of Wichita KS (Presbyterian Manors Obligated Group) | 5.8750 | 05/15/50 | 326,345 | ||||||||
| 300,000 | City of Wichita KS (Presbyterian Manors Obligated Group) | 6.0000 | 05/15/54 | 272,627 | ||||||||
| 598,972 | ||||||||||||
| KENTUCKY - 2.2% | ||||||||||||
| 380,000 | Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority (Baptist Convalescent Center Obligated Group) | 5.5000 | 11/15/27 | 355,415 | ||||||||
| 800,000 | Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority (Baptist Convalescent Center Obligated Group) | 6.0000 | 11/15/36 | 626,664 | ||||||||
| 520,000 | Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority (Baptist Convalescent Center Obligated Group) | 6.2500 | 11/15/46 | 360,629 | ||||||||
| 1,342,708 | ||||||||||||
| LOUISIANA - 0.4% | ||||||||||||
| 300,000 | Louisiana Public Facilities Authority (Grambling High Foundation Inc) | 5.2500 | 06/01/51 | 229,675 | ||||||||
| MARYLAND - 0.0%(c) | ||||||||||||
| 25,000 | Maryland Economic Development Corporation (Maryland Economic Development Corp Morgan View & Thurgood Marshall Student Hsg) | 5.7500 | 07/01/53 | 25,715 | ||||||||
| MICHIGAN - 5.9% | ||||||||||||
| 300,000 | Academy of Warren (Academy of Warren)(a) | 5.5000 | 05/01/50 | 258,110 | ||||||||
| 1 ,295,000 | Grand Rapids Economic Development Corporation (Clark Retirement Community Obligated Group) | 5.5000 | 04/01/39 | 1,114,463 | ||||||||
| 795,000 | Grand Rapids Economic Development Corporation (Clark Retirement Community Obligated Group) | 5.7500 | 04/01/49 | 619,177 | ||||||||
| 380,000 | Grand Rapids Economic Development Corporation (Clark Retirement Community Obligated Group) | 5.7500 | 04/01/54 | 286,448 | ||||||||
| 250,000 | Michigan Finance Authority (Aquinas College) | 4.0000 | 05/01/31 | 199,701 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes which are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
| LIND CAPITAL PARTNERS MUNICIPAL CREDIT INCOME FUND |
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued) |
| July 31, 2025 |
| Principal | Coupon Rate | |||||||||||
| Amount ($) | (%) | Maturity | Fair Value | |||||||||
| MUNICIPAL BONDS - 98.5% (Continued) | ||||||||||||
| MICHIGAN - 5.9% (Continued) | ||||||||||||
| 700,000 | Michigan Finance Authority (Aquinas College) | 5.0000 | 05/01/36 | $ | 533,097 | |||||||
| 875,000 | Michigan Finance Authority (Aquinas College) | 5.0000 | 05/01/46 | 634,192 | ||||||||
| 3,645,188 | ||||||||||||
| MINNESOTA - 1.6% | ||||||||||||
| 100,000 | City of Apple Valley MN (PHS Apple Valley Senior Housing Inc) | 5.6250 | 09/01/65 | 95,736 | ||||||||
| 559,926 | City of Blaine MN (Crest View Obligated Group)(b) | 6.1250 | 07/01/45 | 307,959 | ||||||||
| 111,714 | City of Blaine MN (Crest View Obligated Group)(b) | 6.1250 | 07/01/50 | 61,443 | ||||||||
| 500,000 | City of Woodbury MN (Woodbury Leadership Academy) | 6.0000 | 07/01/65 | 476,526 | ||||||||
| 941,664 | ||||||||||||
| MONTANA - 2.4% | ||||||||||||
| 500,000 | City of Kalispell MT (Immanuel Living at Buffalo Hill Obligated Group) | 6.0000 | 05/15/60 | 484,123 | ||||||||
| 400,000 | County of Gallatin MT (Bozeman Fiber Inc) | 4.0000 | 10/15/51 | 245,514 | ||||||||
| 1,000,000 | County of Gallatin MT (Bozeman Fiber Inc)(a) | 0.0000 | 10/15/55 | 747,251 | ||||||||
| 1,476,888 | ||||||||||||
| NEBRASKA - 2.1% | ||||||||||||
| 440,000 | Douglas County Sanitary & Improvement District No 608 | 6.0000 | 12/15/32 | 429,759 | ||||||||
| 100,000 | Douglas County Sanitary & Improvement District No 608 | 7.0000 | 10/15/38 | 99,986 | ||||||||
| 775,000 | Douglas County Sanitary & Improvement District No 608 | 7.1250 | 10/15/43 | 768,947 | ||||||||
| 1,298,692 | ||||||||||||
| NEW HAMPSHIRE - 2.0% | ||||||||||||
| 935,000 | New Hampshire Business Finance Authority (Christian Health Care Center Obligated Group) | 5.6250 | 07/01/46 | 889,254 | ||||||||
| 370,000 | New Hampshire Business Finance Authority (Christian Health Care Center Obligated Group) | 5.7500 | 07/01/54 | 348,608 | ||||||||
| 1,237,862 | ||||||||||||
| NEW JERSEY - 1.0% | ||||||||||||
| 750,000 | New Jersey Economic Development Authority (Jersey City Community Charter School Inc) | 5.7500 | 07/01/47 | 645,340 | ||||||||
| NEW YORK - 1.1% | ||||||||||||
| 140,000 | Otsego County Capital Resource Corporation (Hartwick College) | 5.0000 | 10/01/45 | 94,709 | ||||||||
| 500,000 | Ulster County Capital Resource Corporation (Woodland Pond Inc Obligated Group) | 5.2500 | 09/15/42 | 418,863 | ||||||||
| 150,000 | Ulster County Capital Resource Corporation (Woodland Pond Inc Obligated Group) | 5.2500 | 09/15/53 | 112,590 | ||||||||
| 626,162 | ||||||||||||
See accompanying notes which are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
| LIND CAPITAL PARTNERS MUNICIPAL CREDIT INCOME FUND |
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued) |
| July 31, 2025 |
| Principal | Coupon Rate | |||||||||||
| Amount ($) | (%) | Maturity | Fair Value | |||||||||
| MUNICIPAL BONDS - 98.5% (Continued) | ||||||||||||
| OHIO - 3.1% | ||||||||||||
| 175,000 | City of Norwood OH (City of Norwood OH Rockwood Exchange Tax Increment Fund) | 5.0000 | 12/01/41 | $ | 169,768 | |||||||
| 325,000 | County of Hardin OH (Ohio Northern University) | 5.5000 | 05/01/50 | 276,148 | ||||||||
| 180,752 | County of Montgomery OH (Trousdale Foundation Obligated Group)(b) | 6.2500 | 04/01/49 | 2,259 | ||||||||
| 190,000 | County of Washington OH (Marietta Area Health Care Inc Obligated Group) | 6.7500 | 12/01/52 | 195,515 | ||||||||
| 1 ,110,000 | Marion Port Authority (Buckeye Community Schools Obligated Group)(a) | 6.8750 | 12/01/59 | 1,088,590 | ||||||||
| 250,000 | Ohio Housing Finance Agency (Middletown Phase Two LP) | 6.2500 | 03/01/26 | 250,258 | ||||||||
| 1,982,538 | ||||||||||||
| OKLAHOMA - 0.9% | ||||||||||||
| 630,000 | Oklahoma County Finance Authority (Santa Fe South Schools Inc) | 6.1250 | 07/01/48 | 589,573 | ||||||||
| OREGON - 0.5% | ||||||||||||
| 370,000 | Oregon State Facilities Authority (Southern Oregon Goodwill Industries) | 5.5000 | 12/01/54 | 339,541 | ||||||||
| PENNSYLVANIA - 3.9% | ||||||||||||
| 480,000 | Lehigh County General Purpose Authority (Lehigh Valley Dual Language Charter School) | 7.0000 | 06/01/53 | 500,513 | ||||||||
| 835,000 | Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development (Greater Philadelphia Health Action Inc) | 6.3750 | 06/01/40 | 817,967 | ||||||||
| 950,000 | Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development (Greater Philadelphia Health Action Inc) | 6.5000 | 06/01/45 | 911,398 | ||||||||
| 30,000 | Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development (Greater Philadelphia Health Action Inc) | 6.6250 | 06/01/50 | 28,513 | ||||||||
| 150,000 | Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development (Mathematics Science and Technology Community Charter School) | 5.6250 | 08/01/36 | 150,543 | ||||||||
| 2,408,934 | ||||||||||||
| PUERTO RICO - 0.2% | ||||||||||||
| 6,000 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp Sales Tax | 4.5360 | 07/01/53 | 5,157 | ||||||||
| 105,000 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp Sales Tax | 5.0000 | 07/01/58 | 96,108 | ||||||||
| 101,265 | ||||||||||||
| SOUTH CAROLINA - 1.8% | ||||||||||||
| 125,000 | South Carolina Jobs-Economic Development Authority (Hampton Regional Medical Center Obligated Group) | 5.0000 | 11/01/42 | 106,710 | ||||||||
| 500,000 | South Carolina Jobs-Economic Development Authority (Kiawah Life Plan Village Inc) | 7.7500 | 11/15/58 | 522,456 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes which are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
| LIND CAPITAL PARTNERS MUNICIPAL CREDIT INCOME FUND |
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued) |
| July 31, 2025 |
| Principal | Coupon Rate | |||||||||||
| Amount ($) | (%) | Maturity | Fair Value | |||||||||
| MUNICIPAL BONDS - 98.5% (Continued) | ||||||||||||
| SOUTH CAROLINA - 1.8% (Continued) | ||||||||||||
| 500,000 | South Carolina Jobs-Economic Development Authority (Palms At Wildewood LLC/The)(a) | 6.7500 | 12/01/60 | $ | 491,784 | |||||||
| 1,120,950 | ||||||||||||
| TENNESSEE - 1.9% | ||||||||||||
| 495,000 | Shelby County Health Educational & Housing Facilities (Luke Inc Obligated Group) | 5.5000 | 10/01/39 | 355,971 | ||||||||
| 645,000 | Shelby County Health Educational & Housing Facilities (Luke Inc Obligated Group) | 5.7500 | 10/01/49 | 444,205 | ||||||||
| 535,000 | Shelby County Health Educational & Housing Facilities (Luke Inc Obligated Group) | 5.7500 | 10/01/54 | 363,047 | ||||||||
| 1,163,223 | ||||||||||||
| TEXAS - 8.0% | ||||||||||||
| 165,000 | Arlington Higher Education Finance Corporation (School of Excellence in Education) | 6.3750 | 02/15/52 | 152,767 | ||||||||
| 1,050,000 | Beaumont Housing Authority(a) | 6.5000 | 07/01/55 | 994,202 | ||||||||
| 250,000 | Bexar County Health Facilities Development (Army Retirement Residence Obligated Group) | 4.0000 | 07/15/45 | 184,629 | ||||||||
| 165,000 | City of Rowlett TX (City of Rowlett TX Bayside Public Improvement District North Improvement Area) | 6.0000 | 09/15/46 | 159,627 | ||||||||
| 50,000 | Houston Higher Education Finance Corporation (Houston Baptist University) | 5.2500 | 10/01/54 | 46,267 | ||||||||
| 225,000 | New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance (Bella Vida Forefront Living Obligated Group) | 6.5000 | 10/01/55 | 217,764 | ||||||||
| 110,000 | New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation (Army Retirement Residence Obligated Group) | 5.7500 | 07/15/52 | 102,898 | ||||||||
| 220,000 | Newark Higher Education Finance Corporation (A+ Charter Schools Inc) | 5.7500 | 08/15/45 | 220,254 | ||||||||
| 895,000 | Port Beaumont Navigation District (Allegiant Industrial Island Park LLC)(b) | 8.0000 | 02/01/39 | 671,250 | ||||||||
| 60,000 | San Antonio Education Facilities Corporation (Hallmark University Inc) | 5.0000 | 10/01/31 | 57,169 | ||||||||
| 765,000 | San Antonio Education Facilities Corporation (Hallmark University Inc) | 5.0000 | 10/01/41 | 607,382 | ||||||||
| 1,935,000 | San Antonio Education Facilities Corporation (Hallmark University Inc) | 5.0000 | 10/01/51 | 1,401,284 | ||||||||
| 4,815,493 | ||||||||||||
| UTAH - 1.8% | ||||||||||||
| 500,000 | Firefly Public Infrastructure District No 1(a) | 6.6250 | 03/01/54 | 502,752 | ||||||||
| 500,000 | GLH Public Infrastructure District No 1 (GLH Public Infrastructure District No 1)(a) | 6.8750 | 03/01/55 | 500,324 | ||||||||
| 130,000 | Utah Infrastructure Agency | 5.0000 | 10/15/46 | 124,367 | ||||||||
| 1,127,443 | ||||||||||||
| VERMONT - 3.6% | ||||||||||||
| 1,200,000 | East Central Vermont Telecommunications District | 6.1250 | 12/01/40 | 1,199,875 | ||||||||
| 225,000 | East Central Vermont Telecommunications District | 5.6000 | 12/01/43 | 204,097 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes which are an integral part of these financial statements.
7
| LIND CAPITAL PARTNERS MUNICIPAL CREDIT INCOME FUND |
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued) |
| July 31, 2025 |
| Principal | Coupon Rate | |||||||||||
| Amount ($) | (%) | Maturity | Fair Value | |||||||||
| MUNICIPAL BONDS - 98.5% (Continued) | ||||||||||||
| VERMONT - 3.6% (Continued) | ||||||||||||
| 170,000 | East Central Vermont Telecommunications District | 6.8750 | 12/01/46 | $ | 173,201 | |||||||
| 930,000 | East Central Vermont Telecommunications District(a) | 4.5000 | 12/01/50 | 662,940 | ||||||||
| 2,240,113 | ||||||||||||
| VIRGINIA - 1.0% | ||||||||||||
| 130,000 | James City County Economic Development Authority (Williamsburg Landing Inc Obligated Group) | 6.8750 | 12/01/58 | 135,772 | ||||||||
| 300,000 | Peninsula Town Center Community Development | 5.0000 | 09/01/45 | 280,780 | ||||||||
| 160,000 | Virginia Beach Development Authority (Westminster-Canterbury on Chesapeake Bay Obligated Group) | 7.0000 | 09/01/53 | 173,395 | ||||||||
| 589,947 | ||||||||||||
| WASHINGTON - 2.2% | ||||||||||||
| 400,000 | Washington State Housing Finance Commission (Bayview Manor Homes Obligated Group) | 6.0000 | 07/01/59 | 386,318 | ||||||||
| 275,000 | Washington State Housing Finance Commission (Bayview Manor Homes Obligated Group)(a) | 6.0000 | 07/01/60 | 265,136 | ||||||||
| 875,000 | Washington State Housing Finance Commission (German Retirement Home of the State of Washington Obligated Group) | 5.8750 | 01/01/59 | 800,355 | ||||||||
| 1,451,809 | ||||||||||||
| WEST VIRGINIA - 0.1% | ||||||||||||
| City of Huntington WV (City of Huntington WV Downtown | ||||||||||||
| 60,000 | 5.5000 | 06/01/49 | 56,380 | |||||||||
| Development/Redevelopment District No 1) | ||||||||||||
| WISCONSIN - 19.5% | ||||||||||||
| 300,000 | Public Finance Authority(a) | 5.5000 | 11/15/32 | 297,904 | ||||||||
| 55,000 | Public Finance Authority (Campus Real Estate Holding Corp LLC) | 5.5000 | 06/01/55 | 53,171 | ||||||||
| 195,000 | Public Finance Authority (Carver Gardens LLC) | 4.6500 | 12/01/35 | 163,466 | ||||||||
| 200,000 | Public Finance Authority (Cedars Obligated Group)(a) | 4.2500 | 05/01/29 | 182,286 | ||||||||
| 945,000 | Public Finance Authority (Cedars Obligated Group)(a) | 5.5000 | 05/01/39 | 726,982 | ||||||||
| 3,755,000 | Public Finance Authority (Cedars Obligated Group) | 5.7500 | 05/01/54 | 2,439,350 | ||||||||
| 55,000 | Public Finance Authority (CFC-SA LLC) | 5.0000 | 02/01/62 | 50,824 | ||||||||
| 45,000 | Public Finance Authority (Cincinnati Classical Academy)(a) | 5.8750 | 06/15/54 | 42,463 | ||||||||
| 410,000 | Public Finance Authority (Cincinnati Classical Academy) | 6.0000 | 06/15/64 | 386,362 | ||||||||
| 721,354 | Public Finance Authority (Goodwill Industries of Southern Nevada Inc) | 5.7500 | 12/01/48 | 611,044 | ||||||||
| 325,000 | Public Finance Authority (Guilford Charter School Corp) | 5.0000 | 04/01/47 | 270,591 | ||||||||
| 695,000 | Public Finance Authority (Guilford Charter School Corp) | 5.0000 | 04/01/57 | 551,575 | ||||||||
| 600,000 | Public Finance Authority (Hozho Academy)(a) | 7.1250 | 05/01/55 | 573,216 | ||||||||
| 100,000 | Public Finance Authority (Hutsonwood at Spring Hill Obligated Group) | 12.0000 | 05/16/29 | 111,059 | ||||||||
| 50,000 | Public Finance Authority (Lehigh Valley Health Network Inc)(a) | 7.2500 | 12/01/42 | 49,944 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes which are an integral part of these financial statements.
8
| LIND CAPITAL PARTNERS MUNICIPAL CREDIT INCOME FUND |
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued) |
| July 31, 2025 |
| Principal | Coupon Rate | |||||||||||
| Amount ($) | (%) | Maturity | Fair Value | |||||||||
| MUNICIPAL BONDS - 98.5% (Continued) | ||||||||||||
| WISCONSIN - 19.5% (Continued) | ||||||||||||
| 575,000 | Public Finance Authority (Lehigh Valley Health Network Inc) | 7.5000 | 12/01/52 | $ | 579,413 | |||||||
| 175,000 | Public Finance Authority (Town of Scarborough ME Downtown Omnibus Municipal Development & TIF District) | 5.0000 | 08/01/39 | 169,284 | ||||||||
| 195,000 | Public Finance Authority (Unity Classical Charter School; A Challenge Foundation Academy) | 6.8750 | 07/01/53 | 195,995 | ||||||||
| 1,975,000 | Public Finance Authority (WFCS Holdings LLC) | 5.0000 | 01/01/55 | 1,617,986 | ||||||||
| 325,000 | Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities (American Baptist Homes of the Midwest Obligated Group) | 5.0000 | 08/01/37 | 215,797 | ||||||||
| 395,000 | Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities (Chiara Communities Inc) | 7.0000 | 07/01/43 | 334,074 | ||||||||
| 75,000 | Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities (Chiara Communities Inc) | 7.5000 | 07/01/53 | 62,973 | ||||||||
| 300,000 | Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities (Chiara Communities Inc) | 5.0000 | 07/01/53 | 242,052 | ||||||||
| 1,135,000 | Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities (Chiara Housing & Services Inc Obligated Group) | 5.8750 | 07/01/55 | 1,077,265 | ||||||||
| 290,000 | Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities (Chiara Housing & Services Inc Obligated Group) | 6.6250 | 07/01/60 | 293,901 | ||||||||
| 545,000 | Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities (HOPE Christian Schools Obligated Group) | 4.0000 | 12/01/51 | 340,781 | ||||||||
| 445,000 | Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities (PHW Menomonee Falls Inc) | 6.0000 | 10/01/54 | 439,882 | ||||||||
| 12,079,640 | ||||||||||||
| TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS (Cost $64,931,141) | 61,134,353 | |||||||||||
| Shares | ||||||||
| SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS - 0.2% | ||||||||
| MONEY MARKET FUNDS - 0.2% | ||||||||
| 131,039 | Federated Institutional Tax-Free Cash Trust, 2.62% (Cost $131,039)(d) | 131,039 | ||||||
| TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 98.7% (Cost $65,062,180) | $ | 61,265,392 | ||||||
| OTHER ASSETS IN EXCESS OF LIABILITIES - 1.3% | 806,789 | |||||||
| NET ASSETS - 100.0% | $ | 62,072,181 | ||||||
| LLC | - Limited Liability Company |
| (a) | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. The security may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. As of July 31, 2025 the total market value of 144A securities is 14,414,098 or 23.2% of net assets. |
| (b) | Represents issuer in default on interest payments; non-income producing security. |
| (c) | Percentage rounds to less than 0.1%. |
| (d) | Rate disclosed is the seven day effective yield as of July 31, 2025. |
See accompanying notes which are an integral part of these financial statements.
9
| Lind Capital Partners Municipal Credit Income Fund |
| STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES (Unaudited) |
| July 31, 2025 |
| ASSETS | ||||
| Investment securities: | ||||
| At cost | $ | 65,062,180 | ||
| At fair value | $ | 61,265,392 | ||
| Interest receivable | 937,736 | |||
| Receivable for Fund shares sold | 26,715 | |||
| Prepaid expenses | 23,038 | |||
| TOTAL ASSETS | 62,252,881 | |||
| LIABILITIES | ||||
| Distribution payable | 106,586 | |||
| Payable to related parties | 44,701 | |||
| Investment advisory fees payable | 28,482 | |||
| Other accrued expenses | 931 | |||
| TOTAL LIABILITIES | 180,700 | |||
| NET ASSETS | $ | 62,072,181 | ||
| Net Assets Consist Of: | ||||
| Paid in capital | $ | 66,558,626 | ||
| Accumulated deficit | (4,486,445 | ) | ||
| NET ASSETS | $ | 62,072,181 | ||
| Net Asset Value Per Share: | ||||
| Shares: | ||||
| Net Assets | $ | 62,072,181 | ||
| Shares of beneficial interest outstanding ($0 par value. unlimited shares authorized) | 7,500,808 | |||
| Net asset value (Net Assets ÷ Shares Outstanding), offering price and redemption price per share | $ | 8.28 |
See accompanying notes which are an integral part of these financial statements.
10
| Lind Capital Partners Municipal Credit Income Fund |
| STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited) |
| For the Six Months Ended July 31, 2025 |
| INVESTMENT INCOME | ||||
| Interest | $ | 1,439,477 | ||
| TOTAL INVESTMENT INCOME | 1,439,477 | |||
| EXPENSES | ||||
| Investment advisory fees | 227,116 | |||
| Administrative services fees | 72,741 | |||
| Transfer agent fees | 30,315 | |||
| Chief compliance officer fees | 21,816 | |||
| Trustees fees and expenses | 16,173 | |||
| Legal fees | 19,375 | |||
| Audit fees | 11,937 | |||
| Registration fees | 11,613 | |||
| Printing | 8,495 | |||
| Insurance expense | 2,729 | |||
| Custodian fees | 2,952 | |||
| Other expenses | 1,418 | |||
| TOTAL EXPENSES | 426,680 | |||
| Less: Fees waived by the Adviser | (141,860 | ) | ||
| NET EXPENSES | 284,820 | |||
| NET INVESTMENT INCOME | 1,154,657 | |||
| REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) FROM INVESTMENTS | ||||
| Net realized loss from investments | 12,176 | |||
| Net change in unrealized depreciation on investments | (3,133,979 | ) | ||
| NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED LOSS FROM INVESTMENTS | (3,121,803 | ) | ||
| NET DECREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS | $ | (1,967,146 | ) |
See accompanying notes which are an integral part of these financial statements.
11
| Lind Capital Partners Municipal Credit Income Fund |
| STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS (Unaudited) |
| Six Months Ended | Year Ended | |||||||
| July 31, 2025 | January 31, 2025 | |||||||
| FROM OPERATIONS | ||||||||
| Net investment income | $ | 1,154,657 | $ | 1,359,445 | ||||
| Net realized loss from investments | 12,176 | (200,274 | ) | |||||
| Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | (3,133,979 | ) | 507,288 | |||||
| Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | (1,967,146 | ) | 1,666,459 | |||||
| DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS | ||||||||
| Total distribution paid from earnings: | (1,108,695 | ) | (1,431,662 | ) | ||||
| Decrease in net assets from distributions to shareholders | (1,108,695 | ) | (1,431,662 | ) | ||||
| FROM SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST | ||||||||
| Proceeds from shares sold | 31,122,815 | 12,499,817 | ||||||
| Reinvestment of distributions to shareholders | 607,640 | 836,853 | ||||||
| Payments for shares redeemed | (903,725 | ) | (2,843,348 | ) | ||||
| Net increase in net assets from shares of beneficial interest | 30,826,730 | 10,493,322 | ||||||
| TOTAL INCREASE IN NET ASSETS | 27,750,889 | 10,728,119 | ||||||
| NET ASSETS | ||||||||
| Beginning of Year/Period | 34,321,292 | 23,593,173 | ||||||
| End of Year/Period | $ | 62,072,181 | $ | 34,321,292 | ||||
| SHARE ACTIVITY | ||||||||
| Shares Sold | 3,664,450 | 1,407,092 | ||||||
| Shares Reinvested | 71,704 | 94,137 | ||||||
| Shares Redeemed | (105,251 | ) | (321,618 | ) | ||||
| Net increase from share activity | 3,630,903 | 1,179,611 | ||||||
See accompanying notes which are an integral part of these financial statements.
12
| Lind Capital Partners Municipal Credit Income Fund |
| FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS |
| Per Share Data and Ratios for a Share of Beneficial Interest Outstanding Throughout the Year/Period Presented |
| Six Months Ended | Year Ended | Year Ended | Period Ended | |||||||||||||
| July 31, | January 31, | January 31, | January 31, | |||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 (a) | |||||||||||||
| Net asset value, beginning of year/period | $ | 8.87 | $ | 8.77 | $ | 8.96 | $ | 10.00 | ||||||||
| Activity from investment operations: | ||||||||||||||||
| Net investment income (b) | 0.21 | 0.45 | 0.58 | 0.41 | ||||||||||||
| Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | (0.60 | ) | 0.12 | (0.22 | ) | (1.06 | ) | |||||||||
| Total from investment operations | (0.39 | ) | 0.57 | 0.36 | (0.65 | ) | ||||||||||
| Less distributions from: | ||||||||||||||||
| Net investment income | (0.20 | ) | (0.47 | ) | (0.55 | ) | (0.38 | ) | ||||||||
| Net realized gains | - | - | - | (0.01 | ) | |||||||||||
| Total distributions | (0.20 | ) | (0.47 | ) | (0.55 | ) | (0.39 | ) | ||||||||
| Net asset value, end of year/period | $ | 8.28 | $ | 8.87 | $ | 8.77 | $ | 8.96 | ||||||||
| Total return (c) | (4.42 | )% (d) | 6.58 | % | 4.22 | % | (6.51 | )% (d) | ||||||||
| Net assets, end of year/period (000s) | $ | 62,072 | $ | 34,321 | $ | 23,593 | $ | 16,227 | ||||||||
| Ratio of gross expenses to average net assets | 1.87 | % (e) | 2.36 | % | 2.77 | % | 3.00 | % (e) | ||||||||
| Ratio of net expenses to average net assets | 1.25 | % (e) | 1.25 | % | 1.25 | % | 1.25 | % (e) | ||||||||
| Ratio of net investment income to average net assets | 5.07 | % (e) | 5.02 | % | 6.63 | % | 4.54 | % (e) | ||||||||
| Portfolio Turnover Rate | 1 | % (d) | 12 | % | 10 | % | 30 | % (d) | ||||||||
| (a) | Lind Capital Partners Municipal Credit Income Fund commencement of operations was February 2, 2022. |
| (b) | Per share amounts calculated using the average shares method, which more appropriately presents the per share data for the year/period. |
| (c) |
Total return is calculated assuming a purchase of shares at net asset value on the first day and a sale at net asset value on the last day of the period. Distributions are assumed, for the purpose of this calculation, to be reinvested at the ex-dividend date net asset value per share on their respective payment dates. Had the Adviser not waived its fees and reimbursed expenses, total return would have been lower. |
| (d) | Not annualized. |
| (e) | Annualized. |
See accompanying notes which are an integral part of these financial statements.
13
| Lind Capital Partners Municipal Credit Income Fund |
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) |
| July 31, 2025 |
| 1. | ORGANIZATION |
Lind Capital Partners Municipal Credit Income Fund (the Fund) was organized as a Delaware statutory trust on May 13, 2021 and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, (the 1940 Act), as a non-diversified, closed-end management investment company that operates as an interval fund with a continuous offering of Fund shares. The investment objectives of the Fund is to generate high current income from investments in municipal securities exempt from federal income tax and capital preservation. Additional return via capital appreciation is a secondary investment objective of the Fund.
| 2. | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in preparation of its financial statements. These policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Fund is an investment company and accordingly follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standard Codification Topic 946 Financial Services - Investment Companies.
Operating Segments - The Fund has adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Update 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280) - Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures (ASU 2023-07). Adoption of the standard impacted financial statement disclosures only and did not affect the Funds financial position or the results of its operations. An operating segment is defined in Topic 280 as a component of a public entity that engages in business activities from which it may recognize revenues and incur expenses, has operating results that are regularly reviewed by the public entitys chief operating decision maker (CODM) to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance, and has discrete financial information available. The CODM is comprised of the portfolio manager and Chief or Principal Financial Officer of the Fund. The Fund operates as a single operating segment. The Funds income, expenses, assets, changes in net assets resulting from operations and performance are regularly monitored and assessed as a whole by the CODM responsible for oversight functions of the Fund, using the information presented in the financial statements and financial highlights.
Security Valuation - Pursuant to the valuation procedures approved by the Funds Board of Trustees (the Board) pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act, the Fund relies on certain security pricing services to provide the current market value of securities. Securities listed on an exchange are valued at the last reported sale price at the close of the regular trading session of the primary exchange on the business day the value is being determined, or in the case of securities listed on NASDAQ at the NASDAQ Official Closing Price. In the absence of a sale such securities shall be valued at the mean between the current bid and ask prices on the day of valuation. Debt securities not traded on an exchange may be valued at prices supplied by a pricing agent(s) based on broker or dealer supplied valuations or matrix pricing, a method of valuing securities by reference to the value of other securities with similar characteristics, such as rating, interest rate and maturity. The independent pricing service does not distinguish between smaller-sized bond positions known as odd lots and larger institutional-sized bond positions known as round lots. The Fund may fair value a particular bond if the adviser does not believe that the round lot value provided by the independent pricing service reflects fair value of the Funds holding. Short-term debt obligations having 60 days or less remaining until maturity, at time of purchase, may be valued at amortized cost.
When the Fund uses fair valuation to determine the value of a portfolio security or other asset for purposes of calculating its net asset value (NAV), such investments will not be priced on the basis of quotes from the primary market in which they are traded, but rather may be priced by the valuation designee pursuant to Rule 2a-5. Fair valuation may require subjective determinations about the value of a security. Although the Funds policy is intended to result in a calculation of the Funds NAV that fairly reflects security values as of the time of pricing, the Fund cannot ensure that fair values determined by the Board or persons acting at its direction will accurately reflect the price that the Fund could obtain for a security if it were to dispose of that security as of the time of pricing (for instance, in a forced or distressed sale). The prices used by the Fund may differ from the value that would be realized if the securities were sold.
14
| Lind Capital Partners Municipal Credit Income Fund |
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued) |
| July 31, 2025 |
There is no single standard for determining fair value of a security. Rather, the valuation designees fair value calculations will involve significant professional judgment in the application of both observable and unobservable attributes, and as a result, the fair value determined for a security may differ from its actual realizable value or future fair value. As part of its due diligence, the Valuation Designee will attempt to obtain current information on an ongoing basis from market sources or issuers to value all fair valued securities.
The Fund utilizes various methods to measure the fair value of its investments on a recurring basis. GAAP establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation methods. The three levels of input are:
Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that the Fund has the ability to access.
Level 2 - Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data.
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Funds own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available.
The availability of observable inputs can vary from security to security and is affected by a wide variety of factors, including, for example, the type of security, whether the security is new and not yet established in the marketplace, the liquidity of markets, and other characteristics particular to the security. To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in Level 3.
The inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement falls in its entirety, is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. The following tables summarize the inputs used as of July 31, 2025 for the Funds assets measured at fair value:
| Assets* | Level I | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
| Municipal Bonds | $ | - | $ | 61,134,353 | $ | - | $ | 61,134,353 | ||||||||
| Short-Term Investments | 131,039 | - | - | 131,039 | ||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 131,039 | $ | 61,134,353 | $ | - | $ | 61,265,392 | ||||||||
| * | Refer to the Schedule of Investments for state classifications. |
The Fund did not hold any Level 3 securities.
Security Transactions and Investment Income - Investment security transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Cost is determined and gains and losses are based upon the specific identification method for both financial statement and federal income tax purposes. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date and interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. Purchase discounts and premiums on securities are accreted and amortized over the life of the respective securities using the effective interest method or where applicable, the first call date of the security.
Federal Income Taxes - The Fund intends to continue to comply with the requirements of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and will distribute all of its taxable income, if any, to shareholders. Accordingly, no provision for Federal income taxes is required in the financial statements.
The Fund recognizes the tax benefits of uncertain tax positions only when the position is more likely than not to be sustained assuming examination by tax authorities. Management has analyzed the Funds tax positions and has concluded that no liability for unrecognized tax benefits should be recorded related to uncertain tax positions taken on returns filed for the open tax year
15
| Lind Capital Partners Municipal Credit Income Fund |
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued) |
| July 31, 2025 |
ended January 31, 2024 and January 31, 2025 or expected to be taken in the Funds January 31, 2026 year-end tax returns. The Fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. During the year, the Fund did not incur any interest or penalties.
Distributions to Shareholders - Distributions from investment income are declared and recorded on a daily basis and paid monthly. Distributions from net realized capital gains, if any, are declared and paid annually and are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The character of income and gains to be distributed is determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP. These book/tax differences are considered either temporary (e.g., deferred losses) or permanent in nature. To the extent these differences are permanent in nature, such amounts are reclassified within the composition of net assets based on their federal tax-basis treatment; temporary differences do not require reclassification. All or a portion of a distribution may consist of return of capital, shareholders should not assume that the source of a distribution is net income.
Indemnification - The Fund indemnifies its officers and the Board for certain liabilities that may arise from the performance of their duties to the Fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of representations and warranties and which provide general indemnities. The Funds maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss due to these warranties and indemnities to be remote.
| 3. | PRINCIPAL INVESTMENT RISKS |
Credit Risk - the risk that the Fund could lose money if the issuer, guarantor, or insurers of a fixed-income security, or the counterparty to a derivative considered primarily speculative regarding the issuers continuing ability to make principal and interest payments and may be more volatile than higher-rated securities of similar maturity. Changes in the actual or perceived creditworthiness of an issuer, or a downgrade or default affecting any of the Funds securities could affect the Funds performance. Generally, the longer the maturity and the lower the credit quality of a security, the more sensitive it is to credit risk.
Municipal Bond Risk - the risk that a Fund may be affected significantly by the economic, regulatory, or political developments affecting the ability of obligors of Municipal Bonds to pay interest or repay principal. The values of Municipal Bonds held by the Fund may be adversely affected by local political and economic conditions and developments. The Fund may make significant investments in a particular segment of the municipal bond market or in the debt of issuers located in the same state or territory. Adverse conditions in such industry or location could have a correspondingly adverse effect on the financial condition of issuers. These conditions may cause the value of the Funds shares to fluctuate more than the values of shares of funds that invest in a greater variety of investments. The amount of public information available about municipal bonds is generally less than for certain corporate equities or bonds, meaning that the investment performance of the Fund may be more dependent on the analytical abilities of the Funds Adviser than funds that invest in stock or other corporate investments.
Interest Rate Risk - the risk that fixed-income securities will decline in value because of an increase in interest rates. The values of debt instruments, including Municipal Bonds, usually rise and fall in response to changes in interest rates. Declining interest rates generally increase the value of existing debt instruments, and rising interest rates generally decrease the value of existing debt instruments. Securities with floating interest rates generally are less sensitive to interest rate changes but may decline in value if their interest rates do not rise as much, or as quickly, as interest rates in general. Conversely, floating rate instruments will not generally increase in value if interest rates decline. Changes in interest rates will also affect the amount of interest income the fund earns on its floating rate investments.
High Yield Risk - Lower-quality bonds, known as high yield or junk bonds, present greater risk than bonds of higher quality, including an increased risk of default. Such bonds are considered predominantly speculative and may be questionable as to principal and interest payments. An economic downturn or period of rising interest rates could adversely affect the market for these bonds and reduce the Funds ability to sell its bonds. The lack of a liquid market for these bonds could decrease the Funds share price. Unrated municipal bonds determined by the Funds Adviser to be of comparable quality to rated municipal bonds which the Fund may purchase may pay a higher interest rate than such rated municipal bonds and be subject to a greater
16
| Lind Capital Partners Municipal Credit Income Fund |
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued) |
| July 31, 2025 |
risk of illiquidity or price changes. Less public information is typically available about unrated municipal bonds or issuers than rated bonds or issuers.
Liquidity Risk - the risk that a particular investment may be difficult to purchase or sell and that the Fund may be unable to sell illiquid investments at an advantageous time or price or achieve its desired level of exposure to a certain sector. Liquidity risk may result from the lack of an active market, reduced number and capacity of traditional market participants to make a market in fixed income securities. Inventories of municipal bonds held by brokers and dealers have decreased in recent years, lessening their ability to make a market in these securities. This reduction in market making capacity has the potential to decrease the Funds ability to buy or sell bonds, and increase bond price volatility and trading costs, particularly during periods of economic or market stress. In addition, recent federal banking regulations may cause certain dealers to reduce their inventories of municipal bonds, which may further decrease the Funds ability to buy or sell bonds. As a result, the Fund may be forced to accept a lower price to sell a security, to sell other securities to raise cash, or to give up an investment opportunity, any of which could have a negative effect on performance. If the Fund needed to sell large blocks of bonds to raise cash (such as to meet heavy shareholder redemptions), those sales could further reduce the bonds prices and hurt performance. The Fund may invest in securities which are, or which become, illiquid. Illiquid securities may trade at a discount from comparable, more liquid investments, and may be subject to wide fluctuations in market value. Also, the Fund may not be able to dispose readily of illiquid securities when that would be beneficial at a favorable time or price or at prices approximating those at which the Fund currently values them. Further, the lack of an established secondary market for illiquid securities may make it more difficult to value such securities, which may negatively affect the price the Fund would receive upon disposition of such securities.
| 4. | INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT AND TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES |
Advisory Fees - Lind Capital Partners, LLC serves as the Funds investment adviser (the Adviser). Pursuant to an investment advisory agreement with the Fund, the Adviser, under the oversight of the Board, directs the daily operations of the Fund and supervises the performance of administrative and professional services provided by others. As compensation for these services and the related expenses borne by the Adviser, the Fund has agreed to pay the Adviser as compensation under the Investment Management Agreement (the Management Fee). The management fee is calculated and payable monthly in arrears at the annual rate of 1.00% of the Funds average daily net assets.
The Adviser and the Fund have entered into an expense limitation and reimbursement agreement (the Expense Limitation Agreement) under which the Adviser has agreed contractually to waive its fees and to pay or absorb the ordinary operating expenses of the Fund (excluding brokerage costs, taxes, interest, borrowing costs such as interest and dividend expenses on securities sold short, acquired fund fees and expenses, other expenditures which are capitalized in accordance with GAAP, extraordinary expenses such as litigation and merger or reorganization costs, and other expenses not incurred in the ordinary course of such Funds business), to the extent that they exceed 1.25% per annum of the Funds average daily net assets of the Fund (the Expense Limitation). In consideration of the Advisers agreement to limit the Funds expenses, the Fund has agreed to repay the Adviser in the amount of any fees waived and Fund expenses paid or absorbed, subject to the limitations that: (1) the reimbursement for fees and expenses will be made only if payable not more than 36 months from when they were incurred; and (2) the reimbursement may not be made if it would cause the expense limitation (at the time of waiver/reimbursement or recapture) to be exceeded. The expense limitation will be in effect through May 31, 2026. During the period ended July 31, 2025, the Adviser waived its fees and reimbursed other expenses in the amount of $141,860. As of July 31, 2025 the cumulative expenses subject to recapture amounted to $897,696, of which $299,594 expires January 31, 2028, $302,063 expires January 31, 2027, and $296,039 expires January 31, 2026.
Ultimus Fund Distributors, LLC (the Distributor) acts as the Funds distributor and principal underwriter in a continuous public offering of the Fund shares. During the period ended July 31, 2025, the Distributor received $0 in underwriting commissions.
In addition, certain affiliates of the Distributor provide services to the Fund as follows:
Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC (UFS), an affiliate of the Distributor, provides administration, fund accounting, and transfer agent services to the Fund. Pursuant to an administrative servicing agreement with UFS, the Fund pays UFS customary fees based on aggregate net assets of the Fund as described in the servicing agreement for providing administration, fund accounting, and
17
| Lind Capital Partners Municipal Credit Income Fund |
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued) |
| July 31, 2025 |
transfer agency services to the Fund. Certain officers of the Fund are also officers of UFS and are not paid any fees directly by the Fund for serving in such capacities.
Northern Lights Compliance Services, LLC (NLCS) - NLCS, an affiliate of UFS and the Distributor, provides a Chief Compliance Officer to the Fund, as well as related compliance services, pursuant to a consulting agreement between NLCS and the Fund. Under the terms of such agreement, NLCS receives customary fees from the Fund.
Blu Giant, LLC (Blu Giant) - Blu Giant, an affiliate of UFS and the Distributor, provides EDGAR conversion and filing services as well as print management services for the Fund on an ad-hoc basis. For the provision of these services, Blu Giant receives customary fees from the Fund.
| 5. | INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS |
The cost of purchases and proceeds from the sale of securities, other than short-term securities, for the period ended July 31, 2025, amounted to $33,878,767 and $460,756 respectively.
| 6. | AGGREGATE UNREALIZED APPRECIATION AND DEPRECIATION - TAX BASIS |
The identified cost of investments in securities owned by the Fund for federal income tax purposes and its respective gross unrealized appreciation and depreciation at July 31, 2025, was as follows:
| Total Unrealized | ||||||||||||||
| Unrealized | Unrealized | Appreciation/ | ||||||||||||
| Cost | Appreciation | Depreciation | Depreciation | |||||||||||
| $ | 64,956,362 | $ | 346,400 | $ | (4,037,370 | ) | $ | (3,690,970 | ) | |||||
| 7. | DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS AND TAX COMPONENTS OF CAPITAL |
The tax character of fund distributions paid for the years ended January 31, 2025 and January 31, 2024 were as follows:
| Fiscal Year Ended | Fiscal Year Ended | |||||||
| January 31, 2025 | January 31, 2024 | |||||||
| Ordinary Income | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
| Tax-exempt Income | 1,431,662 | 1,284,017 | ||||||
| Long-Term Capital Gain | - | - | ||||||
| Return of Capital | - | - | ||||||
| $ | 1,431,662 | $ | 1,284,017 | |||||
As of January 31, 2025, the components of accumulated earnings/ (deficit) on a tax basis were as follows:
| Tax-exempt | Undistributed | Post | Capital Loss | Other | Unrealized | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Ordinary | Long-Term | October | Carry | Book/Tax | Appreciation/ | Distributable Earnings/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Income | Gains | Loss | Forwards | Differences | (Depreciation) | (Accumulated Deficit) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 60,112 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (853,600 | ) | $ | (60,125 | ) | $ | (556,991 | ) | $ | (1,410,604 | ) | |||||||||
The difference between book basis and tax basis undistributed net investment income, accumulated net realized losses and unrealized depreciation is due to book/tax differences in the treatment bond amortization. The difference between book basis and tax basis undistributed net investment income and other book/tax adjustments is primarily attributable to the adjustments for accrued dividends payable.
18
| Lind Capital Partners Municipal Credit Income Fund |
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued) |
| July 31, 2025 |
At January 31, 2025, the Fund had capital loss carry forwards for federal income tax purposes available to offset future capital gains as follows:
| Short-Term | Long-Term | Total | ||||||||
| $ | 136,828 | $ | 716,772 | $ | 853,600 | |||||
| 8. | CONTROL OWNERSHIP |
The beneficial ownership, either directly or indirectly, of more than 25% of the voting securities of the Fund creates presumption of the control of the Fund, under section 2[a] 9 of the Act. As of July 31, 2025, National Financial Services, LLC held 60.48% of the voting securities of the Fund. The Fund has no knowledge as to whether all or any portion of the shares owned by National Financial Services, LLC are also beneficially owned by National Financial Services, LLC.
| 9. | REPURCHASE OFFERS |
The Fund is an interval fund and, in order to provide liquidity to shareholders, it intends to conduct quarterly repurchase offers of the outstanding shares at NAV, subject to approval of the Board. In each quarter, such repurchase offers will be at least 5% of its outstanding shares at NAV, pursuant to Rule 23c-3 under the 1940 Act. The Fund currently expects to conduct quarterly repurchase offers for 5% of its outstanding shares under ordinary circumstances. If shareholders tender for repurchase more than 5% of the outstanding shares (the Repurchase Offer Amount), the Fund may, but is not required to, repurchase an additional amount of shares not to exceed 2% of the outstanding shares on the repurchase request deadline. If the Fund determines not to repurchase more than the Repurchase Offer Amount, or if shareholders tender shares in an amount exceeding the Repurchase Offer Amount plus 2% of the outstanding shares on the repurchase request deadline, the Fund will repurchase shares pro rata based upon the number of shares tendered by each shareholder. Repurchase offers and the need to fund repurchase obligations may affect the Funds ability to be fully invested or force the Fund to maintain a higher percentage of its assets in liquid investments, which may harm the Funds investment performance. Moreover, diminution in the size of the Fund through repurchases may result in untimely sales of portfolio securities (with associated imputed transaction costs, which may be significant), and may limit the ability of the Fund to participate in new investment opportunities or to achieve its investment objectives. The Fund may accumulate cash by holding back (i.e., not reinvesting) payments received in connection with the Funds investments.
During the period ended July 31, 2025, the Fund completed two quarterly repurchase offers. In those offers, the Fund offered to repurchase up to 5% of the number of its outstanding shares as of the repurchase pricing dates. The results of those repurchase offers were as follows:
| Repurchase Offer #1 | Repurchase Offer #2 | |||
| Commencement Date | February 3, 2025 | May 1, 2025 | ||
| Repurchase Request Deadline | February 25, 2025 | May 28, 2025 | ||
| Repurchase Pricing Date | February 25, 2025 | May 28, 2025 | ||
| Net Asset Value as of Repurchase | ||||
| Offer Date | $8.88 | $8.47 | ||
| Amount Repurchased | $265,316 | $638,409 | ||
| Percentage of Outstanding | ||||
| Shares Repurchased | 0.75% | 1.05% |
19
| Lind Capital Partners Municipal Credit Income Fund |
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued) |
| July 31, 2025 |
| 10. | SUBSEQUENT EVENTS |
Subsequent events after the date of the Statement of Assets and Liabilities have been evaluated through the date the financial statements were issued. Management has determined that the below events or transactions occurred requiring adjustment or disclosure in the financial statements.
Subsequent to period end the Fund completed a quarterly repurchase offer. The results of this repurchase offer was as follows:
| Repurchase Offer | ||
| Commencement Date | August 1, 2025 | |
| Repurchase Request Deadline | August 28, 2025 | |
| Repurchase Pricing Date | August 28, 2025 | |
| Net Asset Value as of Repurchase Offer Date | $8.29 | |
| Amount Repurchased | $2,217,828 | |
| Percentage of Outstanding Shares Repurchased | 3.53% |
20
| Lind Capital Partners Municipal Credit Income Fund |
| SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION (Unaudited) |
| July 31, 2025 |
LIND CAPITAL PARTNERS MUNICIPAL CREDIT INCOME FUND DISCLOSURE REGARDING APPROVAL OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
The Board, including those Trustees who were determined not to be interested persons (the Independent Trustees) of the Fund, as such term is defined under Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act, voting separately, reviewed and approved the renewal of the Funds Investment Advisory Agreement with the Adviser dated December 1, 2021, for an additional year (the Advisory Agreement). The Board unanimously approved the Advisory Agreement at a meeting held on March 25, 2025, where all Trustees were present (the Meeting).
The Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, considered a variety of factors. In assessing these factors and reaching its decisions, the Board took into consideration information furnished for its review and consideration throughout the year at regular Board meetings, as well as information prepared or presented in connection with the annual renewal process, including information in the Advisers presentation at the Meeting. The Board requested, and was provided with, information and reports relevant to the annual renewal of the Advisory Agreement, including: (i) reports regarding the services and support provided by the Adviser to the Fund and its shareholders; (ii) quarterly assessments of the investment performance of the Fund; (iii) periodic commentary on the reasons for the performance; (iv) presentations by the Adviser addressing its investment philosophy, investment strategy, personnel, and operations; (v) compliance and audit reports concerning the Fund and the Adviser; (vi) disclosure information contained in the registration statement of the Fund; and (vii) a memorandum from Fund counsel that summarized the fiduciary duties and responsibilities of the Board in reviewing and approving the Advisory Agreement, including the material factors set forth above and the types of information included in each factor that should be considered by the Board to make an informed decision.
The Board also requested and received various informational materials including, without limitation: (i) documents containing information about the Adviser, including financial information, a description of personnel and the services provided to the Fund, information on investment advice, performance, summaries of the Funds expenses, compliance program, current legal matters, and other general information; (ii) comparative expense and performance information for other mutual funds with strategies similar to the Fund; and (iii) benefits to be realized by the Adviser from its relationship with the Fund. In addition, the Board had an extensive discussion with representatives from the Adviser and Fund counsel regarding the matters discussed below.
The nature, extent, and quality of the services provided by the Adviser to the Fund. The Board reviewed the services provided by the Adviser to the Fund, including, without limitation, its investment advisory services since the Funds inception; compliance and operational procedures and practices; efforts to promote the Fund and assist in its distribution; key personnel and support staff; and management of the Funds daily operations. The Board noted the need to conduct credit quality, ongoing credit surveillance, and other analyses on the Funds portfolio positions, and the Advisers expertise and industry experience in conducting such analyses. After reviewing the foregoing and further information in the Meeting materials, the Board concluded that the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided by the Adviser to the Fund were satisfactory and adequate.
The investment performance of the Fund and the Adviser. The Board compared the performance of the Fund with the performance of its benchmark index and peer group for the period ended January 31, 2025. The Board also considered the consistency of the Advisers management with the Funds investment objective and policies. The Board noted that the Fund had slightly underperformed its benchmark for the one-, three-, and five-year periods ended January 31, 2025. The Board also noted that the Fund outperformed the peer groups average performance
21
| Lind Capital Partners Municipal Credit Income Fund |
| SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION (Unaudited) (Continued) |
| July 31, 2025 |
and its category for the one-, three-, and five-year periods ended January 31, 2025. Following a discussion of the Funds investment performance, the Advisers experience in managing the strategy, and other factors, the Board concluded that the Funds investment performance was satisfactory.
The costs of the services provided and profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates from their relationship with the Fund. The Board considered the following: (i) the Advisers staffing; (ii) its methods of operating; (iii) the education and experience of its personnel; (iv) its compliance program; (v) its financial condition and the level of commitment to the Fund and, generally, the Advisers advisory business; (vi) the asset levels of the Fund; (vii) the overall expenses of the Fund, including the advisory fee; and (viii) the differences in fees and services to the Advisers other similar clients. The Board compared the Funds advisory fee and overall expense ratio to its respective peer group and the fees charged to the Advisers other client separate accounts.
In considering the comparison in fees and expense ratios between the Fund and other comparable funds, the Board looked at the differences in the types of funds being compared, the style of investment management, the size of the funds, and the nature of the investment strategies. For the Fund, the Board noted that the 1.00% management fee was higher than the peer groups average, but within the range of the peer group. The Board further noted that the Funds 1.25% net expense ratio was below the peer groups average but above median. The Board considered the Advisers statement that the Funds peer group included funds with significantly larger net assets, which allow their management fees and overall expense ratios to be reduced beyond what is currently feasible for the Fund given its size. The Board considered its discussion with the Adviser regarding the expense limitation agreement between the Fund and the Adviser (the ELA), the Advisers efforts to grow Fund assets, and the Advisers past fee reductions and expense reimbursements for the Fund. The Board further considered the Advisers willingness to continue the ELA through at least May 31, 2026, which immediately benefits the Funds shareholders. The Board also considered the benefits for the Adviser in managing the Fund, including promoting the Advisers name.
The Board also compared the fees paid by the Fund to those paid by other clients of the Adviser and considered the similarities and differences in services received by such other clients compared to those received by the Fund. The Board noted that the Adviser does not manage any other pooled investment vehicles and that the fee structures applicable to its separately managed accounts were not indicative of any unreasonableness concerning the advisory fees payable by the Fund. The Board further considered the investment strategy and style used by the Adviser in managing the Fund. Following these comparisons and considerations, and upon further discussion of the preceding, the Board determined that the Funds management fee and net expense ratio were within a reasonable range and concluded that the advisory fees paid to the Adviser by the Fund are fair and reasonable.
The Board then reviewed the information provided by the Adviser regarding its profitability in managing the Fund. The Board noted that the Adviser is no longer subsidizing the Funds expenses and considered the Advisers net revenue. The Board further considered the Advisers management of the Fund is not profitable at current asset levels, but it is committed to maintaining and growing the Funds assets. Based on the information provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the profits realized by the Adviser from its relationship with the Fund, if any, were reasonable.
The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Fund grows and whether advisory fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of the Funds shareholders. The Board considered that the Funds fee arrangements with the Adviser involve the advisory fee and the ELA. The Board determined that, while the advisory
22
| Lind Capital Partners Municipal Credit Income Fund |
| SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION (Unaudited) (Continued) |
| July 31, 2025 |
fee remained the same as asset levels increased, the shareholders of the Fund have experienced, and will experience, benefits from the ELA. The Board noted that the Advisers investment process requires evaluating each potential investment, and such analysis does not necessarily scale with the growth in Fund assets. Following further discussion of the Funds asset levels, expectations for asset growth, and level of fees, the Board determined that the fee arrangements with the Adviser are fair and reasonable considering the nature and quality of services being provided by it.
Possible conflicts of interest and benefits derived by the Adviser. The Board evaluated the potential for conflicts of interest and considered such matters as the experience and ability of the advisory and compliance personnel assigned to the Fund; the fact that the Adviser does not utilize soft dollars; the basis of decisions to buy or sell securities for the Fund; and the substance and administration of the Advisers Code of Ethics. The Board considered the potential for conflicts of interest from the Advisers management of separate accounts that invest in similar securities. The Board noted the Advisers established controls to address such conflicts. Based on the preceding, the Board determined that the Advisers standards and practices for identifying and mitigating possible conflicts of interest were satisfactory.
After reviewing the above factors and other factors, such as the Advisers trading practices and possible conflicts of interest, the Board determined that it had received enough information from the Adviser to evaluate the terms of the Advisory Agreement. After considering all the information presented to the Board at this Meeting and prior meetings, the Board unanimously concluded that the approval of the renewal of the Advisory Agreement was in the best interests of the Fund and its shareholders. The Board did not identify any information that was most relevant to its consideration to approve the Advisory Agreement, and each Trustee may have afforded different weights to the various factors.
23
PRIVACY NOTICE
Lind Capital Partners
| FACTS | WHAT DOES LIND CAPITAL PARTNERS DO WITH YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION? |
| Why? | Financial companies choose how they share your personal information. Federal law gives consumers the right to limit some, but not all sharing. Federal law also requires us to tell you how we collect, share, and protect your personal information. Please read this notice carefully to understand what we do. |
| What? |
The types of personal information we collect and share depend on the product or service that you have with us. This information can include: ● social security number and wire transfer instructions ● account transactions and transaction history ● investment experience and purchase history When you are no longer our customer, we continue to share your information as described in this notice. |
| How? | All financial companies need to share customers personal information to run their everyday business. In the section below, we list the reasons financial companies can share their customers personal information; the reasons Lind Capital Partners chooses to share; and whether you can limit this sharing. |
| Reasons we can share your personal information: |
Does Lind Capital Partners share information? |
Can you limit this sharing? |
| For our everyday business purposes - such as to process your transactions, maintain your account(s), respond to court orders and legal investigations, or report to credit bureaus. | YES | NO |
| For our marketing purposes - to offer our products and services to you. | NO |
We dont share |
| For joint marketing with other financial companies. | NO |
We dont share |
| For our affiliates everyday business purposes - information about your transactions and records. | NO |
We dont share |
| For our affiliates everyday business purposes - information about your credit worthiness. | NO |
We dont share |
| For nonaffiliates to market to you | NO |
We dont share |
| QUESTIONS? | Call 1-312-361-3446 |
24
PRIVACY NOTICE
Lind Capital Partners
| What we do: | |
| How does Lind Capital Partners protect my personal information? |
To protect your personal information from unauthorized access and use, we use security measures that comply with federal law. These measures include computer safeguards and secured files and buildings. Our service providers are held accountable for adhering to strict policies and procedures to prevent any misuse of your nonpublic personal information. |
| How does Lind Capital Partners collect my personal information? |
We collect your personal information, for example, when you ● open an account or deposit money ● direct us to buy securities or direct us to sell your securities ● seek advice about your investments We also collect your personal information from others, such as credit bureaus, affiliates, or other companies. |
| Why cant I limit all sharing? |
Federal law gives you the right to limit only: ● sharing for affiliates everyday business purposes - information about your creditworthiness. ● affiliates from using your information to market to you. ● sharing for nonaffiliates to market to you. State laws and individual companies may give you additional rights to limit sharing. |
| Definitions | |
| Affiliates |
Companies related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies. ● Lind Capital Partners does not share with our affiliates. |
| Nonaffiliates |
Companies not related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies. ● Lind Capital Partners does not share with nonaffiliates so they can market to you. |
| Joint marketing |
A formal agreement between nonaffiliated financial companies that together market financial products or services to you. ● Lind Capital Partners isnt joint market. |
25
How to Obtain Proxy Voting Information
Information regarding how the Fund votes proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ending June 30th as well as a description of the policies and procedures that the Fund used to determine how to vote proxies is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-833-615-3031 or by referring to the Securities and Exchange Commissions (SEC) website at http://www.sec.gov.
How to Obtain 1st and 3rd Fiscal Quarter Portfolio Holdings
The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year as an exhibit to its reports on Form N-PORT, within sixty days after the end of the period. Form N-PORT reports are available on the SECs website at http://www.sec.gov. The information on Form N-PORT is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-833-615-3031.
| Investment Adviser |
| Lind Capital Partners, LLC |
| 500 Davis Center, Suite 1004 |
| Evanston, Illinois 60201 |
| Administrator |
| Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC |
| 225 Pictoria Drive, Suite 450 |
| Cincinnati, OH 45246 |
| Lind-SAR25 |
Item 2. Code of Ethics. Not applicable for semi-annual reports
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert. Not applicable for semi-annual reports
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services. Not applicable for semi-annual reports
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants. Not applicable
Item 6. Investments.
The Registrants schedule of investments in unaffiliated issuers is included in the Financial Statements under Item 1 of this form.
Item 7. Financial Statements and Financial Highlights for Open-End Management Investment Companies.
| (a) | Not Applicable |
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Advisory Contract.
Included under Item 1
Item 12. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable for semi-annual reports
Item 13. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable for semi-annual reports
Item 14. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
None
Item 15. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None
Item 16. Controls and Procedures
(a) The registrants Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that the registrants disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Act) are effective in design and operation and are sufficient to form the basis of the certifications required by Rule 30a-(2) under the Act, based on their evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of this report on Form N-CSR.
(b) There were no changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act) during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Item 17. Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable
Item 18. Recovery of Erroneously Awarded Compensation.
| (a) | Not applicable |
| (b) | Not applicable |
Item 19. Exhibits.
(a)(1) Not applicable
(a)(2) Not applicable
(a)(3) A separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2(a)): Attached hereto.
(a)(4) Not applicable
(b) Certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2(b)): Attached hereto
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| (Registrant) | Lind Capital Partners Municipal Credit Income Fund |
| By | (Signature and Title) |
| /s/ J.Robert Lind |
| J.Robert Lind, Principal Executive Officer/President |
| Date | 10/1/2025 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| By | (Signature and Title) |
| /s/ Erik Naviloff |
| Erik Naviloff, Principal Financial Officer/Treasurer |
| Date | 10/1/2025 |
Lind Capital Partners Municipal Credit Income Fund published this content on October 06, 2025, and is solely responsible for the information contained herein. Distributed via Public Technologies (PUBT) on October 06, 2025 at 14:18 UTC. If you believe the information included in the content is inaccurate or outdated and requires editing or removal, please contact us at [email protected]