Labor Markets and the Future of Work

Labor Markets and the Future of Work

This is the third installment in our four-part series examining artificial intelligence (AI) through a wide-angle economic lens. In the first essay, we explored the historical development of artificial intelligence and the recurring cycles of enthusiasm and disappointment that have shaped the field's development. The second examined how major technological innovations diffuse through the economy and why productivity gains often take years or decades to fully materialize. If you have not yet read those pieces, we encourage you to explore them as well.

Across this series, we examine four related questions: the origins of modern AI technologies, the economic dynamics that shape technological adoption, the implications for labor markets and the future of work, and the potential consequences for productivity and long-term economic growth.

Executive Summary

The third installment of this series examines how generative artificial intelligence may reshape labor markets and the future of work.

Historically, technological revolutions have triggered fears of mass unemployment that have ultimately always proved exaggerated. While individual occupations were displaced, new industries and roles emerged, and the growth generated by new technology lifted living standards across the board.. Economists often point to this historical pattern as evidence that automation ultimately complements human labor rather than replacing it.

Generative AI may challenge that assumption. Unlike previous waves of automation that targeted routine manual work, modern AI systems are increasingly capable of performing cognitive tasks once dominated with highly educated professionals. Lawyers, analysts, programmers, marketers, and other knowledge workers now face potential automation of the key workflows that define their careers.

Early research suggests the effects may be uneven. In routine tasks, AI tools appear to help less experienced, junior workers improve productivity. In more complex, judgment-based work, however, the technology may amplify differences in expertise, benefiting highly skilled professionals while displacing junior workers whose roles traditionally served as training grounds. From drug discovery to scientific research to legal and financial services, AI increasingly doesn't just automate; it breaks new ground. Benefits are likely to accrue to the highest-paid, most senior talent and to the owners of capital.

At the same time, corporate incentives are increasingly aligned with labor substitution. Firms are adopting AI tools to reduce headcount, slow hiring, and improve margins. This shift is occurring alongside structural labor market trends such as declining mobility, rising education costs, and slower workforce adaptation.

Whether generative AI will obviate most human skills, necessitating a one-day workweek and universal basic income, or will simply shift the frontiers of what humans and computers can do together cannot be known with certainty. The trajectory will depend not only on technological capabilities but also on policy choices, organizational strategies, and how institutions adapt to the changing nature of work.

For investors, these dynamics matter because changes in productivity and labor costs ultimately shape corporate profitability, economic growth, and long-term market returns.

About the Author

Josh Rowe, Managing Director of Research at HB Wealth, wrote a PhD thesis in the history and economics of technology, focusing on computer automation of office work in the 20th century. He has studied the history of AI, venture capital's funding of technological innovation, and the impact of technological change on financial markets-both as a resident of the ivory tower and as an investor. This surprising moment in history is the first time that he can say with any confidence that the years he spent in libraries and databases working on a doctoral dissertation might be of any practical use. He used AI in organizing and editing these essays, but the ideas (right and wrong) here are his own.

Read the full whitepaper here.

This article may not be copied, reproduced, or distributed without HB Wealth's prior written consent.

All information is as of the date above unless otherwise disclosed. The information is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered a recommendation to purchase or sell any financial instrument, product, or service sponsored by HB Wealth or its affiliates or agents. The information does not represent legal, tax, accounting, or investment advice; recipients should consult their respective advisors regarding such matters. This material may not be suitable for all investors. Neither HB Wealth nor any affiliates make any representation or warranty as to the accuracy or merit of this analysis for individual use. This information contains forward-looking statements, predictions, and forecasts ("forward-looking statements") concerning our belief and opinions in respect to the future. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and undue reliance should not be placed on them. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Certain information herein is based on third-party sources believed to be reliable, but which have not been independently verified. Past performance is not a guarantee or indicator of future results; inherent in any investment is the risk of loss. Specific investments described herein do not represent all investment decisions made by the above date. The reader should not assume that investment decisions identified and discussed were or will be profitable. Specific investment advice references provided herein are for illustrative purposes only and are not necessarily representative of investments that will be made in the future. Investors are advised to consult with their investment professional about their specific financial needs and goals before making any investment decision. HB may hold positions (long or short) in the companies mentioned in this paper.