Dentons Lee Secures Complete Victory in KRW 500 Million (USD 330,000) Common Area Maintenance Fee Dispute, Confirming That “Tenants Cannot Be Charged Without Explicit[...]

A landmark ruling curbing unilateral imposition of common area maintenance fees by landlords

Dentons Lee recently secured a complete victory in a dispute concerning common area maintenance fees arising from the Gwangmyeong Station Complex Transfer Center project, adjudicated by the Seoul Central District Court. Representing the tenant, a parking facility operator, Dentons Lee successfully defended against the landlord's claim for approximately KRW 500 million in common area maintenance fees, with the court dismissing all claims in their entirety.

The court held that, absent an explicit agreement in the lease regarding the allocation of common area maintenance fees, a landlord may not unilaterally impose building-wide common area costs on a tenant based solely on the tenant's usage ratio or occupied area. This ruling brought an end to a long-standing maintenance fee dispute and provided clear guidance on the contractual limits of cost allocation in commercial leases.

The case was handled by Dentons Lee's Seon-Ae Choi and Seul-Ah Kim. The successful outcome was achieved through a strategic interpretation of the lease agreement and a detailed legal analysis of the principles governing common area maintenance fees under the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings. Beyond a simple monetary dispute, the decision is expected to have meaningful practical implications, as it clarifies fundamental principles of lease interpretation and delineates the boundaries of tenants' cost-sharing obligations.

In this matter, the plaintiff argued that the tenant should bear a proportional share of the building's common area maintenance fees, relying on certain provisions of the lease, customary practices, statutory provisions under the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings, and general principles of equity.

Dentons Lee countered these arguments by emphasizing that, under the express language of the lease, the tenant's maintenance fee obligations were limited to costs directly incurred through the tenant's own use of the premises. The firm argued that this contractual language did not extend to building-wide common area maintenance fees that were not expressly agreed upon by the parties.

Dentons Lee further challenged the landlord's proposed calculation method, which was based on the floor area of the underground parking facility. The firm highlighted that the lease was structured based on the number of parking spaces, not floor area, and that parking facilities fundamentally differ from general commercial premises in terms of usage patterns and maintenance cost structures. On this basis, Dentons Lee demonstrated the arbitrariness and unreasonableness of the plaintiff's allocation method. In addition, the firm argued that the statutory cost-sharing framework applicable to co-owners of aggregate buildings could not be directly applied to a landlord-tenant relationship. The court accepted all of these arguments and dismissed the plaintiff's claims in full.

This decision reaffirms the principle that maintenance fee obligations are governed by the parties' contract, and stands as a significant precedent limiting landlords' attempts to impose unagreed costs on tenants under the guise of common area maintenance fees. Given the court's comprehensive consideration of contractual intent and the reasonableness of cost-allocation methods, the ruling is expected to serve as an important benchmark in future disputes of a similar nature.

Dentons Lee will continue to provide sophisticated contractual analysis and strategic litigation services to effectively manage legal risks and protect clients' interests in complex commercial disputes.

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com