08/08/2026 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 08/08/2026 04:03
Late on Thursday evening it was reported that Senate Leadership had decided to delay any votes on the Clarity Act until the chamber returns from August recess.
As recess approached, Senate leadership faced limited time on the calendar and a number of competing priorities, including a nominations package, a continuing resolution to fund the government, a Russia sanctions bill, an Attorney General confirmation and a reconciliation package.
The push to also include the Clarity Act in that list of pre-recess votes was reportedly hampered by a number of issues in the legislation that do not yet have bipartisan solutions.
A number of Republicans have reportedly raised concerns about how the current stablecoin yield provision could drive deposit flight from banks across the country, including Senators John Cornyn (R-TX), John Curtis (R-UT), Mike Rounds (R-SD), James Lankford (R-OK), Josh Hawley (R-MO), Susan Collins (R-ME) and Jerry Moran (R-KA).
Law enforcement concerns about how the bill would hamper their ability to stop and prosecute illicit finance have reportedly not been resolved and Democrats have reportedly raised concern that the law enforcement funding promised in the bill may not actually get appropriated.
A bipartisan ethics solution from Senators Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) and Thom Tillis (R-NC) that was shared with the administration last week, is reportedly still under discussion, but has not been agreed to by the White House.
The Wall Street Journal editorial board also weighed in on the bill, with editorials on August 4 and August 6 raising concerns with how the current bill addresses stablecoin yield, illicit finance and ethics, among other issues.
On Tuesday, Bank Policy Institute and The Clearing House filed a comment letter with the FDIC, the most recent in a series of comment letters to regulators regarding the importance of effective anti-money laundering, countering the financing of terrorism and sanctions programs for payment stablecoin issuers and the crypto ecosystem more broadly.
In a one-pager, BPI outlined where regulators are getting it right and where there are opportunities to strengthen the regime.
What's Right:
What Should Change:
Banks challenging FDIC supervisory findings will now have access to a new, more independent appeals process. This week, the FDIC formally launched its Office of Supervisory Appeals, creating a standalone structure to act as a final level of review for disputes over supervisory determinations. According to the FDIC, the new office will operate independently from supervisory staff, with reviewing officials subject to confidentiality and conflict-of-interest requirements.
Background. The framework stems from a multi-year effort to expand the due process rights of banks that choose to appeal supervisory determinations like examination ratings and Matters Requiring Attention. For the first time, reviewing officials include individuals recruited from outside the FDIC with relevant experience, including in banking.
Why It Matters. The change is part of a broader effort by banking regulators to increase transparency and accountability in supervision.
The CFPB has submitted its proposed open banking rule to the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs for review, moving the agency closer to releasing a new framework implementing Section 1033 of the Dodd-Frank Act. The Biden-era open banking rule, issued in 2024, was challenged by BPI and the Kentucky Bankers Association, and has been subject to a court injunction while the CFPB has been working to revise the rule. According to reports, key issues under consideration include whether banks may charge fintechs and data aggregators for providing secure, reliable data access.
Background. The proposal comes amid ongoing debate over the future of consumer financial data sharing. Banks have advocated for greater flexibility to charge for data access and for shared data security obligations, while fintech companies have argued against permitting access fees. The CFPB has reportedly considered a framework that would allow a baseline level of data sharing at no cost while permitting fees above certain thresholds.
Following the expiration of Russell Vought's tenure as acting director on Aug. 1, Mark Paoletta, the CFPB's chief legal officer and deputy director, has assumed the role of acting director of the CFPB while the Senate considers President Trump's nomination of Brian Johnson to lead the agency on a permanent basis.
Background. Vought served two 210-day terms as acting CFPB director, the maximum duration permitted under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act. Johnson, a banking executive and former CFPB deputy director during the first Trump administration, testified before the Senate Banking Committee last month. The committee has not yet voted on Johnson's nomination. Until a permanent director is confirmed, Paoletta is expected to oversee the agency's operations.
Other Transition News. Victoria Dorfman, currently the CFPB's chief legal adviser, has been selected to succeed Paoletta as general counsel while continuing in her existing advisory role.
Here's the latest in crypto.
Here's the latest in international banking policy.
Wells Fargo announced that it will launch tokenized deposits for select corporate and commercial clients this fall, enabling clients to move, program and settle funds on a 24/7 basis using blockchain technology. The initial rollout will support U.S. dollar and British pound transactions, with plans to expand to additional clients, countries and currencies throughout 2027. According to the bank, the capability will be integrated into its existing payments offering and will automatically route eligible payments through tokenized deposits when doing so can improve speed, timing and flexibility.