11/13/2025 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 11/13/2025 14:10
Photo: OLYMPIA DE MAISMONT/AFP/Getty Images
Commentary by Caitlin Welsh, Rose Parker, and Joely Virzi
Published November 13, 2025
Among the U.S. government global development programs paused or terminated in 2025 are those that aimed to improve global agriculture and nutrition. These programs reflect longstanding, bipartisan support for U.S. global food security efforts. These programs also reflect a complex array of U.S. legislative, bureaucratic, and funding priorities regarding food security. While the cessation of these programs represents losses-lost U.S. influence globally and lost support for food security by recipient countries-it also represents an important opportunity. Going forward, U.S. lawmakers may consider ways to streamline U.S. foreign assistance for global food security to reduce duplication of efforts, ensure complementarity of investments, and further U.S. national security interests.
Interact with the infographic below, which looks at eight of these U.S. global food security assistance programs over the last four presidential terms and illustrates their reach around the world.
To explore more, the tables below detail each program's funding (in USD millions) to each recipient country. The data is derived from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC), and the Congressional Research Service (CRS). Where data is not listed, data was not available.
Caitlin Welsh is the director of the Global Food and Water Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington, D.C. Rose Parker is a program manager with the Global Food and Water Security Program at CSIS. Joely Virzi is a program coordinator and research assistant with the Global Food and Water Security Program at CSIS.
Commentary is produced by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a private, tax-exempt institution focusing on international public policy issues. Its research is nonpartisan and nonproprietary. CSIS does not take specific policy positions. Accordingly, all views, positions, and conclusions expressed in this publication should be understood to be solely those of the author(s).
© 2025 by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. All rights reserved.
Commentary by Caitlin Welsh - May 21, 2025