08/19/2026 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 08/19/2026 08:48
Aug 19, 2026
Receive email updates on topics that matter to you.
Learn MoreThe Indiana General Assembly has enacted several laws affecting tax increment financing (TIF) districts in recent sessions. House Enrolled Act 1177 (2026) updates how TIF districts share revenue with fire protection territories and expands permitted uses of TIF funds. House Enrolled Acts 1001 and 1210 (2026) make the residential housing TIF framework permanent and extend the maximum terms of certain TIF districts from 20 to 25 years, rather than adding new eligibility tests or approval requirements, with key provisions taking effect in 2026.
This article summarizes the TIF-related changes from all three bills and identifies practical considerations for local governments, redevelopment commissions, developers, bondholders, and school corporations.
A TIF district allows a redevelopment commission to capture growth in property tax revenue within a defined area and use it for public improvements and other eligible redevelopment costs. The existing tax base is frozen at its current assessed value. As property values rise within the TIF district, the added tax revenue above that frozen base - the "increment" - can be used to pay for development-related costs, including bond payments for public improvements or other eligible projects.
The primary statutes governing Indiana's TIF framework include Indiana Code 36-7-14-39 (general TIF allocation rules), Indiana Code 36-7-15.1-26 (consolidated city TIF), and Indiana Code 36-7-14-53 (residential housing TIF programs).
HEA 1177 changes parts of Indiana's general TIF laws (Indiana Code 36-7-14-39 and Indiana Code 36-7-15.1-26). These changes affect how captured TIF revenue is shared with fire protection territories and expand what a TIF allocation fund revenue may be used for. The amendments to Indiana Code 36-7-14-39 and the first amendment to Indiana Code 36-7-15.1-26 took effect July 1, 2026; a second amendment to Indiana Code 36-7-15.1-26 takes effect July 1, 2027.
HEA 1177 also expands the ways TIF allocation fund revenue may be used, specifically as it applies to the categories below.
This change to child care financial assistance also appears in the Marion County consolidated city TIF statute, amended twice by HEA 1177, with effective dates of July 1, 2026, and July 1, 2027. The change to police and fire spending was not added in the Marion County consolidated city TIF statute because that statute already allows such spending through an existing cross-reference.
HEA 1001 (2026) makes Indiana's current residential housing TIF framework permanent and extends the maximum program term from 20 to 25 years. It does so through two key changes: Section 26 amends Indiana Code 36-7-14-53 to extend the term and remove the sunset, and Section 27 repeals Indiana Code 36-7-14-53.1, eliminating the provision that would have reinstated the 1% housing-supply test and school corporation approval requirement on July 1, 2027.
HEA 1210 (2026) includes related technical and administrative TIF provisions, but it does not change residential housing TIF eligibility, approval requirements, or timing.
The amended Indiana Code 36-7-14-53 allows a redevelopment commission to establish a residential housing TIF program by resolution without meeting a housing-supply threshold. The program must be approved by the municipal legislative body or county executive. Before formal submission, the department of redevelopment must (i) consult with affected parties, including school corporation superintendents and governing body presidents; (ii) provide neighborhood associations, residents, and township assessors an advisory role; and (iii) hold at least one public meeting with 30 days' notice. The maximum program term increases from 20 to 25 years, measured from the date the first bond or lease obligation is incurred, or ending earlier if those obligations are satisfied.
Before HEA 1001, Indiana Code 36-7-14-53.1 would have expired the current framework on June 30, 2027, and reinstated the pre-2023 version of Section 53. That reinstated version would have required two things. First, it would have imposed a 1% housing-supply test, limiting residential housing TIF programs to areas where average new single-family construction over the preceding three years was less than 1% of existing single-family housing stock. For county programs, the test would have been measured at the township level, and for municipal programs, at the municipal level. The test would not have applied in designated economic development target areas.
Second, the reinstated version would have required the governing body of each affected school corporation to pass a resolution approving the program before it could take effect. HEA 1001 repeals Indiana Code 36-7-14-53.1 effective July 1, 2026. Neither the 1% housing-supply test nor the school corporation approval requirement will take effect.
Although school corporations do not gain approval authority, they retain meaningful participation rights under the permanent framework. The department of redevelopment must consult with school corporation superintendents and governing body presidents before formally submitting a residential housing TIF program. School officials must also receive 30 days' notice before the required public meeting. These consultation and notice requirements remain part of the statutory process, and local governments should continue to engage school corporations early in the planning process.
Indiana's distressed-area housing TIF program under Indiana Code 36-7-14-45 through -48 is not changed in substance by either HEA 1001 or HEA 1210. This program requires a municipality to make 10 specific findings addressing housing vacancy rates, the age of existing housing, and signs of blight.
The legacy program operates under its own framework, with different findings and procedural requirements. Municipalities should evaluate with counsel which housing TIF framework best fits the specific facts of a proposed project.
For more information about these TIF changes, please contact the author or any attorney with FBT Gibbons' Government Services Practice Group.
*Christian Scott, a second-year law student at Indiana University Maurer School of Law, contributed to this article while working as a summer associate at FBT Gibbons.