01/08/2026 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 01/08/2026 18:40
Washington, D.C. - Today, the Senate advanced U.S. Senators Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Rand Paul (R-Ky.), Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), and Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer's (D-N.Y.) resolution to prevent the President from using military force against Venezuela without authorization by Congress. The vote follows the Trump administration's military actions in Venezuela to arrest and detain Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro and months of military buildup in the region. The resolution advanced 52-47, receiving the support of five Republican Senators. The Senate will debate the measure next week.
"Today, the U.S. Senate took an important and bipartisan step in exercising its constitutional war powers and putting constraints on further military action in Venezuela. Now, we can advance a critical and full debate on the Senate floor. The progress of this War Powers resolution to the full Senate reflects the Senate's deep concern over the administration's plans to 'run' Venezuela and profit off its oil industry. If the administration believes it is in the country's interest to deploy servicemembers to secure the oil resources of another country, it should seek Congressional authorization to do so. We have all too much experience in getting mired down in foreign exercises in regime change and nation building, and the American people want us to focus on problems at home," said Senator Schiff.
"Maduro's arrest is good for the U.S. and Venezuela. If President Trump had left this at his arrest, I wouldn't have called up this vote. But the President's claims that the U.S. will run Venezuela for years makes it clear that his plans go way beyond Maduro," said Senator Kaine, a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee and Ranking Member of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere. "This war is clearly illegal because it was launched without the debate and vote by Congress the Constitution requires. With today's vote-after months of congressional leadership refusing to hold a single public hearing about this war-the Senate sends a clear message: we will not accept that. Now, the Senate moves closer to actually debating the merits of military action in Venezuela in full view of the American public. Every senator needs to go on the record."
"For months, the Trump administration has dodged accountability and obfuscated their intention and plans in the Caribbean and Venezuela. Now Congress has taken a concrete step to stop Trump's folly and reassert their constitutional authority in foreign conflicts," said Leader Schumer. "Donald Trump seems content to drag our country and American families into an endless war with no plan, no transparency, and nothing but wishful thinking. But today, Democrats and Republicans came together to begin to stop this madness and advance the War Powers Resolution."
Background: In December, Senators Kaine, Paul, Schiff, and Schumer filed this War Powers resolution to block military action against Venezuela after President Trump said that military operations targeting Venezuelan land targets would begin "very soon." Schiff, Kaine, and Paul previously introduced a bipartisan resolution to prevent the use of military force within or against Venezuela, but it fell short of passage by just two votes. Schiff and Kaine also introduced, in September, a similar measure focused on repeated military strikes in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean that the Trump administration has carried out without congressional authorization, killing dozens of unknown individuals. A majority of Senate Republicans blocked the resolution in October.
In December, Senate Republicans blocked the Senator's attempt to pass legislation that would require the Trump administration to publicly release the video of the strikes on shipwrecked survivors following boat strikes in the Caribbean conducted September 2nd.
Watch his full speech HERE. Download remarks HERE.
Read the full transcript of his remarks as delivered below:
Mr. President,
For months, the Trump administration claimed that its campaign of blowing up boats in the Caribbean was about stopping drugs like deadly fentanyl from coming to the United States.
Never mind that fentanyl doesn't really come from Venezuela. It comes from precursors made in China and is predominately smuggled in through Mexico.
Never mind that there are well established, well-practiced operations for interdicting drugs and apprehending alleged drug traffickers, not killing them.
Never mind that we don't even have clarity about what was on the boats, who was on these boats, and where they were headed.
No, even as the United States military amassed unprecedented military firepower off the coast of Caracas that included multiple warships, thousands of troops, and the largest aircraft carrier ever put to sea, the administration still claimed this was about drug boats.
You heard the administration say that time and time again: to the public and to Congress.
Until last weekend - when the objective became clear - this was about Venezuela's oil. And if we could have that, we would leave that drug-running regime in place, albeit with its number two corrupt leader, instead of its number one, Nicolás Maduro.
The rightful leadership of Venezuela, Maria Corina Machado and her election surrogate, Edmundo Gonzales, the ones who won the last election there, would have no place, no role in the new government. Because this was no more about democracy than it was about drugs - it was about oil.
Just yesterday, the Secretary of Energy said that the United States intended to maintain significant control over Venezuela's oil industry, including by overseeing the sale of the country's production "indefinitely." Indefinitely.
And Donald Trump has promised to use the revenue from these oil sales to create a fund that he would control.
He is literally meeting with U.S. oil executives on Friday to try to divide up the spoils of this military campaign.
Now, some of colleagues may believe that using the U.S. military to depose Nicolás Maduro and seize Venezuela's oil is well worth the risk to our troops and the danger of our becoming mired down in that country. I disagree - but if that was the case, let them seek an authorization from Congress to do so.
We have so many urgent problems that need addressing at home. With life barely affordable, and the costs of living rising. With people struggling to cover the rent. With families barely able to afford the cost of groceries. To say nothing of skyrocketing health care costs.
But now, instead of putting Americans first, we are stepping into a foreign nation and promising to run it for the foreseeable future. An administration that had promised to end foreign wars has begun a new one. A president who had decried the use of force for regime change or to engage in nation building has just committed our country to both.
No doubt Russia and China see opportunity in this about-face. Russia to indict Ukrainian leaders and to seize them, and China to do the same in Taiwan. We are not only at risk of re-establishing the idea that might makes right and military conquest is acceptable in your sphere of influence, but the very real prospect of destabilizing a post-World War II order that has made us safer and more prosperous.
Now, when it comes to Congress' role in checking this president, in asserting its War Powers given to us by the Founders and Framers of our nation: if we do not assert this power, we will lose it - and not just to constrain this president, but any president, and for all time.
The American people have said, clearly and repeatedly, that they do not want us dragged into new foreign wars, especially wars of our own making. And we have the power to make good on that instruction. We are a co-equal branch of government, and the only branch endowed with the power of the purse and the power to declare war or to refuse to do so.
But if we do not assert those powers, if we do not stand up - not just for our branch of government, but for the American people, there is no telling - and no stopping - what comes next.
Because the administration has made it clear that Venezuela is the opening salvo. Will it be: Cuba next? Colombia? Mexico? Greenland, for crying out loud?
This is the moment where we need to stand up and exercise our powers as part of the government closest to the people.
To make it clear that no president can commit our military forces - absent an attack on our country or imminent threat of invasion - without the approval of Congress, and certainly not to help industry chase new profits or revenue in oil or minerals around the globe.
We have a duty to our constituents, to our Constitution, and to posterity. Let us uphold it. Vote yes.
###