06/26/2026 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 06/26/2026 12:10
The State Board of Education is expected to give final approval to a list of required literary works for each grade level and changes to the state's K-8 social studies curriculum during its June 26 meeting.
Click here to watch the meeting. TCTA will update this article after the meeting adjourns.
Both topics generated an outpouring of public interest at each of the board's meetings in the past year, and this week's meeting was no different. On June 22, over 400 people registered to testify and the sun had set before each of them had an opportunity to speak.
Many of the opinions expressed mirrored those from previous meetings: for the reading lists, people are concerned about the length of the list for each grade level and the inclusion of Bible passages. For the social studies curriculum, history teachers and professors testified that the standards painted a murky picture of history and would not serve to enhance students' understanding of Texas' place in the world.
A handful of state representatives and a state senator were present at Monday's meeting to testify in support of the social studies changes: Reps. Alan Schoolcraft (R-McQueeney), Carrie Isaac (R-Wimberley), and Hillary Hickland (R-Belton); and Sen. Bob Hall (R-Edgewood). Each of them encouraged board members to "hold the line" against attempts to change the social studies standards into anything other than a Texas- and United States-focused curriculum.
After public testimony concluded, board members began their deliberations on changes to the reading lists and the social studies standards.
Compared to the initial draft proposed by TEA, the reading lists have been reduced by around 60%. While Bible passages have remained, members shaved a few more titles at this week's meeting due to concerns about print access and TEKS alignment.
The Texas Council of Teachers of English Language Arts (TCTELA) conducted a study with teachers in each grade level to get a clearer idea of how long it would take to effectively teach the works on the reading list, and these findings seemed to take hold with some of the board members and convinced them to recommend removing more titles.
After debating the contents of the list, Board members debated the rules surrounding their implementation. Member Tom Maynard (R-Florence) proposed rules that would require teachers to include locally selected required literary works to be posted online for parent access, including materials self-selected by students. Another member said this would add to the "bureaucratic morass" teachers already face and the amendment was narrowly defeated.
Edits to the social studies curriculum consumed a vast majority of the board's time during the week. Meetings went past 2 a.m. on multiple occasions as they debated the details of individual social studies student expectations. At times, the debate on a single expectation took more than an hour.
Due to the board's changes this week, the final literary lists and curriculum changes have not yet been made public. TCTA will update this article to share them as they are released by TEA.
New rules surrounding how and when teacher misconduct is reported and the temporary suspension of teachers reported for certain things also came before the board for final approval this week. These rules were debated in detail at the State Board for Educator Certification, but they must receive final approval at SBOE to go into effect. The rules are expected to be approved by the State Board of Education on June 26.
With final approval expected on June 26, the literary lists and social studies TEKS changes both take effect with the 2030-31 school year. As with any change to the standards, teachers must make sense of what changed and develop a new curriculum around it. Dozens of required literary works may require veteran teachers to discard their favorite lessons with their chosen works to make room for new state requirements.
In social studies, there may not be sufficient time for teachers to share their passion for certain corners of history because so much else has been included in the new curriculum.
After this week's meeting, the SBOE agenda business should slow down for a while. However, six board members are either not seeking reelection or were defeated in their primaries, so the makeup of the Board will be significantly different after the November election. You can see who's running here.