12/20/2025 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 12/20/2025 06:04
BPI and The Hill collaborated to host an event on Tuesday, Dec. 16, "Modern Money: The Next Chapter in Banking, Regulation and Financial Trust," featuring discussions with lawmakers, experts and financial industry leaders on the future of financial services, policy and regulation as innovation advances. The event examined themes such as how innovation and oversight can advance to reinforce trust in the financial system, and how responsible modernization can evolve as digital and traditional financial ecosystems converge.
Fraud and Scam Mitigation
Fraud is a modern heist: It moves rapidly and often originates and spreads on social media.
The first panel focused on fraud and scam prevention, a matter of increasing urgency for policymakers and industry. Banks are investing heavily in preventing fraud and addressing it after it occurs, but cannot do so alone - a comprehensive solution requires buy-in from the telecom and tech sectors and the entire U.S. government. Reps. Bill Foster (D-IL) and Dan Meuser (R-PA) discussed the problems and the solutions in fraud and scams during the panel. A key theme was the role of social media as a breeding ground for scams and what should be done to stop scams at their source, as well as the benefits of digital ID in fraud prevention.
Open Banking and Section 1033
Consumer data privacy is a key element of the open banking debate.
The second panel focused on the future of open banking as the CFPB prepares a new rule on financial data sharing under Section 1033 of the Dodd-Frank Act. The panel featured experts from banks, the fintech industry and a consumer advocacy group. Panelists discussed the high volume of data requests that banks receive - likely much more than necessary for providing services - and the need to protect consumers' sensitive data in that environment. Panelists also discussed differing views on what federal law says about financial institutions charging fees to access this data.
Bank Charters
The final panel examined the changing state of bank charters. The boundaries of what it means to be a bank are up for debate as crypto, fintech and other nonbank firms seek banking charters. Panelists discussed the limits and obligations of each different type of charter, the current landscape of novel companies applying for national trust charters and concerns about transparency and risks to the banking system. The discussion followed OCC conditional approvals on Friday of several trust charter applications.
To watch a recording of the event, click here.
The Federal Reserve on Friday issued a request for information on payment accounts for eligible financial institutions. BPI responded on Friday with a statement: "Today's proposal attempts to establish minimum protections for expanded Federal Reserve account access but warrants further scrutiny to ensure that credit, settlement, illicit finance and other risks would be fully mitigated. Master account applications are carefully reviewed because insufficient protections can harm the structure, stability and resilience of the U.S. payments system. BPI will continue to advocate for responsible innovation backed by appropriate risk mitigants codified in law."
BPI also published a factsheet describing the risks and safeguards of these accounts. Access it here.
An analysis published this week by Jessie Jiaxu Wang of the Federal Reserve Board provides insights on how stablecoins could affect the U.S. banking system. The paper explores three dimensions of stablecoin impacts: displacement of deposits and changes to banks' funding mix, liquidity risk profile and cost of capital; implications for bank credit provision; and broader structural consequences in the banking system. Here are some notable highlights.
Erebor, a crypto- and tech-focused firm conditionally approved for a national bank charter by the OCC, this week obtained FDIC approval for deposit insurance. The FDIC found that Erebor satisfied the statutory factors for deposit insurance application approval, subject to certain conditions. Such factors include the institution's financial condition and history, its capital adequacy, its future earnings prospects and the quality of its management. Erebor received OCC conditional approval for its bank charter in October.
Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller, who interviewed this week for chair of the central bank, said he would emphasize to the President the importance of central bank independence. "I spent 20 years of my life working on central bank independence and why it was important. There's no doubt," Waller said in a CNBC interview this week. "I've got a long paper trail of this. The one thing everybody always forgets in central bank independence is there's another side of it, which is accountability. There's no institution in this country that is unaccountable to the electorate … and that's what people often forget is that we want central bank independence to be free of political interference, but we still have to be accountable to the American public, and we try to do that with the chair testimony to Congress twice a year" and with post-FOMC meeting press conferences. Other candidates for the chairmanship include Kevin Hassett, Kevin Warsh, Michelle Bowman and Rick Rieder, according to media reports.
The FDIC this week proposed licensing rules to govern banks' applications to issue of stablecoins through a subsidiary and to engage in stablecoin-related activities. The proposal would implement provisions of the GENIUS Act, a stablecoin law enacted earlier this year that allows insured depository institutions to issue payment stablecoins through a subsidiary and to engage in certain related activities.
A recent ECB working paper found that banks reach peak profit efficiency - a bank's ability to generate revenue given its costs - when their capital ratios are 18 percent. The paper, "Capital requirements: a pillar or a burden for bank competitiveness?" by Markus Behn and Alessio Reghezza, concludes that it is therefore untrue that high capital requirements hurt banks' competitiveness.
The result appears to be in conflict with the premise of international capital standards (the need to ensure a level playing field on capital requirements to avoid regulatory arbitrage between jurisdictions) and with consensus economic research that higher capital results in higher costs for banks.
A new BPI note examines the ECB paper, suggesting that:
The Senate Banking Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Protection held a hearing on Tuesday examining access to banking, including looking at whether a fair access standard was necessary and what that could potentially look like. The hearing came shortly after the OCC issued a report on "debanking" last week. Witnesses at the hearing included University of Wyoming law professor Julie Hill, Kathleen Sgamma, principal of Multiple-Use Advocacy, and Tyler Klimas, principal of Leaf Street Strategies.
The Federal Reserve on Wednesday issued a new policy statement aimed at facilitating responsible bank innovation. The policy statement creates an avenue for both insured and uninsured state Fed member banks to engage in certain innovative activities. For insured state member banks, the policy statement maintains that these banks generally may not engage as principal in any type of activity that is not permissible for a national bank, or that has not been approved by rule for insured state-chartered banks by the FDIC. For uninsured state member banks, the policy statement acknowledges that these banks may be permitted by the Board to engage in activities as principal that are impermissible for insured state member banks, provided that such activities are conducted in a manner consistent with bank safety and soundness and preserving the stability of the U.S. financial system.
"New technologies offer efficiencies to banks and improved products and services to bank customers," said Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman in a statement. "By creating a pathway for responsible, innovative products and services, the Board is helping ensure that the banking sector remains safe and sound while also modern, efficient, and effective."
The Board simultaneously withdrew a 2023 policy statement that limited Fed-supervised state member banks, both insured and uninsured, to the same activities permissible for banks supervised by the other federal banking agencies. The financial system and the Fed's understanding of innovative products and services have "evolved" since that statement was published, so it "is no longer appropriate and has been withdrawn," the Fed said in a statement.
The OCC this week filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit case National Association of Industrial Bankers v. Weiser. The amicus brief called for the Tenth Circuit to consider the case before the full court. The case centers on Colorado's decision to opt out of a federal law authorizing state banks to charge interest at the rate permitted by the laws of the state in which they are located (or the alternative reference rate) and to export this rate to borrowers in any state. The Colorado opt-out could jeopardize access to bank lending for Colorado residents. A Tenth Circuit panel decision in the case undermines the benefits of the federal interest rate framework that Congress granted to state banks and places them at a significant competitive disadvantage compared to national banks, the OCC said. "[T]he panel decision threatens to diminish the vibrancy of the dual banking system and to harm consumers by reducing their access to credit across the country," the agency said in its brief. Comptroller Jonathan Gould recently said the panel decision is inconsistent with Congressional efforts to create competitive equality between state- and federally chartered banks.
Here's the latest in crypto.
Walmart late last week filed an objection to the recently proposed interchange-fee settlement agreed between retailers and card issuers. The settlement, principally related to credit cards, would give greater flexibility to merchants on which cards they accept and reduce interchange fees. In a court filing, Walmart dismissed the proposed deal as "a mere mirage of relief" and said it favors small merchants over large national retailers. The company argued that the court should either reject the settlement and decertify the class, permit class members to opt out or carve out large national merchants from the agreement. The Walmart objection followed others by the National Association of College Stores, Energy Markets of America and other groups.
Here's the latest in international banking policy.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ruled this week that the Corporate Transparency Act is constitutional, reversing a lower-court decision to block enforcement of the anti-money laundering measure for plaintiffs who had challenged it. The Eleventh Circuit ruled that the CTA, which requires businesses to report information on their beneficial owners, regulates economic activities with a substantial impact on interstate commerce and does not violate protections against unreasonable searches. The decision reverses a ruling by an Alabama federal court last year that the CTA exceeds the Constitution's limits on Congress' power.
The U.S. Department of Justice this week asked the Federal Reserve if it has returned to making profits, which could provide an opening for the administration to replenish the CFPB's funding. The letter requested the Fed's "opinion" on whether its revenues currently exceed its interest expenses and whether the Fed anticipates such a surplus continuing into the coming weeks.
The biggest financial stability risk in Europe is no longer banks, but low growth itself, Santander Executive Chair Ana Botin wrote in a Financial Times op-ed this week. The op-ed referred to recent efforts by EU authorities seeking to simplify and streamline the bloc's financial regulatory framework. Botin observed that the U.S. and UK are taking actions to support growth, such as revising capital requirements to promote more lending capacity. "The message from Washington and London is unmistakable: if you want growth, you cannot keep tightening the screws on those institutions that finance the real economy," she wrote. "Strong growth and strong stability are not opposing goals - they reinforce each other."
Signup for BPInsights.