08/31/2025 | News release | Distributed by Public on 08/31/2025 06:33
Posted on August 31, 2025 in White Collar Crimes
White-collar prosecutions in Wisconsin can move quickly from investigation to indictment, and once charges are filed, the consequences can be very serious. Defendants often face not only prison time but also financial ruin and irreparable reputational damage; even the news of a criminal investigation can fuel major speculation and cause professional contacts to distance themselves.
While trials are an option, most local and federal white-collar cases end in negotiated resolutions. The difference between a devastating outcome and a carefully managed one often comes down to how well your criminal defense team handles the plea bargaining process.
At Gimbel, Reilly, Guerin & Brown, LLP, our Wisconsin white-collar criminal defense attorneys are seasoned in federal and state defense, bringing decades of combined experience to the negotiation table. The goal is not simply to accept what prosecutors offer. It is to seize opportunities, pressure the prosecution, and negotiate outcomes that are focused on preserving freedom, finances, and reputation.
As of August 2025, both the U.S. Department of Justice and Wisconsin prosecutors are serious about pursuing fraud, embezzlement, tax violations, and public corruption. Sentencing guidelines in federal cases can be particularly unforgiving, with enhancements for "loss amounts," leadership roles, sophisticated means, or multiple alleged victims. These enhancements can drive potential prison terms far higher than what most defendants, and sometimes even judges and juries, consider reasonable.
Trials in white-collar cases also tend to be long, expensive, and resource-intensive for the prosecution, often requiring months of preparation and weeks in court. Prosecutors know that juries can be overwhelmed by evidence, and defendants know that the risk of a conviction on even one major count can carry devastating penalties. This mutual recognition fuels the push toward negotiation.
Plea deals matter because they allow the defense to cut through the rigid framework of sentencing guidelines and secure outcomes that reflect the true facts of the case, not the government's inflated version. By challenging how "loss" is calculated, disputing whether every alleged act truly constitutes fraud, or narrowing which charges move forward, defense attorneys can often negotiate plea agreements that dramatically reduce penalties and exposure.
In some instances, a plea can mean probation or a short sentence instead of years in federal prison. In others, it looks like restitution structured in a way that allows a defendant to rebuild financially. For individuals and businesses alike, a plea deal is not simply a concession; it is often the most strategic way to protect both liberty and reputation.
Plea bargaining in white-collar cases is not about passively accepting an offer in the hope that the stigma will go away if the case is cleared up fast enough. Instead, defense attorneys must negotiate from a position of strength. That means:
Challenging the government's calculation of financial loss, which often drives sentencing ranges.
Undermining the credibility of cooperators or whistleblowers whose testimony may be weak.
Demonstrating compliance steps or internal controls that reduce the perception of criminal intent.
Prosecutors understand that going to trial in complex white-collar cases is expensive and time-consuming. By showing readiness to litigate, and finding early flaws in the government's case, an experienced defense team can pressure prosecutors to negotiate more favorable plea terms.
In some cases, the best resolution is avoiding a conviction altogether. Deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs) and non-prosecution agreements (NPAs) are outcomes sometimes used in white-collar matters. These arrangements allow defendants like corporate officers or entire companies to admit to certain facts, pay restitution or fines, and agree to compliance measures without entering a criminal conviction.
For defendants in Wisconsin facing long-term reputational harm, a DPA can mean the difference between a career-ending felony and a manageable resolution that allows for rehabilitation. Getting one requires sophisticated negotiation and often cooperation with regulators, but it can protect a defendant's interests far more than courtroom litigation.
Another key strategy is charge selection. White-collar indictments are often sprawling, with multiple counts ranging from wire fraud to money laundering to conspiracy. Not all charges carry the same weight.
An effective defense team can sometimes negotiate to drop or reduce serious fraud charges in exchange for guilty pleas to lesser regulatory violations or tax offenses. For example, pleading to a recordkeeping violation or a misdemeanor regulatory infraction may carry minimal penalties compared to felony fraud. The difference is enormous, not only in sentencing but also in long-term consequences for professional licensing, immigration status, or business opportunities.
Even when a felony plea is unavoidable, defense attorneys can give strong arguments for minimizing sentencing exposure. This includes:
Arguing for downward departures from sentencing guidelines.
Emphasizing mitigating factors such as charitable work, community standing, or lack of prior record.
Challenging enhancements that prosecutors try to stack onto the case.
Judges in Wisconsin and federal courts have discretion in sentencing, within certain guidelines. A well-prepared defense can often make a persuasive argument that the government's recommendation overstates the seriousness of the offense or its impact.
White-collar defendants often worry as much about their reputation as their freedom. A conviction can destroy careers, businesses, and family legacies. While criminal records cannot always be erased, there are sometimes strategies available to reduce public exposure.
Defense teams may pursue motions to seal certain filings, particularly those containing sensitive financial or personal information. In addition, managing the public narrative is crucial. By proactively addressing reputational concerns, whether through controlled media statements, highlighting compliance reforms, or stressing the non-violent nature of the offense, attorneys can limit the collateral damage of a plea.
At Gimbel, Reilly, Guerin & Brown, LLP, our attorneys are discreet professionals who understand that one mistake should not define a person's entire career or legacy.
The government may hold many cards in a criminal investigation, but with the experienced counsel of our team of Milwaukee criminal defense attorneys, you can still fight for a favorable outcome. We combine fearless negotiation with creative strategies to pursue results that protect both liberty and future opportunities. Call Gimbel, Reilly, Guerin & Brown, LLP today at 414-271-1440.