Alabama Plans to Execute Michael Taylor

The State of Alabama plans to execute Michael Taylor by lethal injection on Thursday, November 5, despite serious questions about the reliability of the death sentence in his case.

Michael Taylor was just 19 years old and had absolutely no history of violence when he was charged with capital murder for the 1991 killings of Ivan and Lucille Moore in Etowah County, Alabama.

He could not afford to hire a lawyer and was appointed counsel who had never represented a capital defendant before, according to court filings.

The crime was completely out of character for Mr. Taylor-family, teachers, and friends, who described Mr. Taylor as polite and respectful, hard working, and active in church and school, were shocked when they heard about it.

The circumstances raised serious questions about his mental state at the time-the Moores lived across the street from Mr. Taylor's relatives, Mr. Taylor had a friend drop him off at their house, he made little effort to avoid arrest and immediately confessed when he was arrested, pleadings show.

But defense counsel failed to investigate Mr. Taylor's mental state, even though they had psychological reports and accounts from family members and friends about Mr. Taylor's relative immaturity, apparently harsh upbringing, and psychological deterioration.

Counsel later admitted they did not know what they had was important mitigating evidence and so they did not pursue any of it.

Instead, they helped the prosecution's case by telling the jury that Mr. Taylor was "1000 percent" guilty of capital murder and that he had a perfectly normal upbringing and "no mental problems." During opening and closing arguments to the jury, trial counsel stated that "[t]here's nothing that mitigates the crime."

The Sixth Amendment guarantees effective assistance of counsel. In this case, effective counsel would have proven that Mr. Taylor was part of a family significantly predisposed to alcoholism and mental illness, was immature for his age, was physically and emotionally abused by his father, and was likely mentally disturbed at the time of the offense.

They should have presented expert evidence to show that, at the time of the offense, Mr. Taylor was "suffering from a serious psychological disorder and/or was overwhelmed with psychological and emotional stress" and was severely emotionally disturbed, undergoing a predictable form of psychological collapse, and in desperate need of intervention by a mental health professional.

New counsel for Mr. Taylor later argued this evidence would have made a difference at trial.

"These facts were absolutely indispensable to an accurate assessment of Mr. Taylor's culpability, both legal and moral, and neither the jury nor the sentencing court heard any of it before convicting Mr. Taylor of intentional capital murder and imposing the death penalty," they argued in federal court.

Supporters have called on Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey to commute Mr. Taylor's death sentence, emphasizing his young age at the time of the crime.

In 2005, the Supreme Court barred the death penalty for people under 18 at the time of the crime, relying on scientific evidence to find that they exhibit characteristics-a lack of maturity and an underdeveloped sense of responsibility, a tendency towards risk taking, vulnerability to negative influences and outside pressures (including pressure to give false confessions)-that make them less culpable.

Since the decision in Roper v. Simmons, experts have reached a broad consensus that emerging adults age 18, 19, and 20 display the same cognitive immaturity as people under 18, the Death Penalty Information Center reports.

Over the last 20 years, new death sentences for 18-, 19-, and 20-year-olds have diminished both in absolute terms and as a percentage of all new death sentences, DPIC reported in 2025, and have become vanishingly rare in recent years.

The Court in Roper and its progeny also has observed that young people are more likely to change for the better, undercutting retribution and deterrence as justifications for the death penalty.

"The man the State of Alabama seeks to execute is not the chaotic, unformed young man who committed those atrocious acts," Project Hope to Abolish the Death Penalty in Alabama said in a post. "Michael has grown into someone fundamentally different-and the evidence of that transformation is not abstract. Over decades of incarceration, he has developed a deep and abiding faith. Michael's faith took root and grew through the people who showed up anyway: volunteer ministers and laypeople from Alabama churches who gave their time to sit with him, and fellow men on the row who walked alongside him."

"His relationship with Jesus Christ-cultivated through that community-has reshaped how he understands himself, how he treats others, and how he carries the weight of what that 19-year-old did," the post continued. "Michael is profoundly and genuinely remorseful. He does not minimize what happened. He grieves it."

• Tags:

• Alabama

• Executions