01/28/2026 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 01/28/2026 04:27
Results and analysis of the Council's 2025 annual survey of American views on foreign policy.
The world seems to be falling apart. Conflicts rage in Ukraine, Sudan, Nigeria, the Congo, Yemen, and many other countries. The Israel-Hamas ceasefire is holding but tenuous, protesters are risking their lives on the streets of Iran, and Venezuela faces an uncertain future. It may seem like the world has hit new levels of strife, but a review of the 50 years of Chicago Council Survey data on American public opinion reminds us that Americans have lived through upheaval before, with varying impacts on the US public's outlook for the country's place and responsibility on the global stage.
In the aftermath of the Vietnam War in 1974, the Chicago Council on Global Affairs conducted its first survey of American public opinion on US foreign policy. In the five decades since, the Chicago Council illuminated public sentiment during and after the Iran hostage crisis, the collapse of the Soviet Union, the September 11 attacks, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the rise of China, Russia's decade-long war in Ukraine, and the ascent of Donald Trump to the presidency.
Since the first Chicago Council Survey, results have shown consistency in public support for the broad principles of US foreign policy despite global volatility. Majorities across the political spectrum support an active role for the United States in the world, support US alliances, and support the US overseas military presence, Americans generally align on the use of force when an ally or the United States is directly threatened. Republicans, Democrats, and Independents also view international trade as good for the country and say free trade agreements are an effective way to realize US foreign policy goals.
Yet these results show a widening partisan divide when it comes to the application of these broad principles, especially since 2015 and the advent of America First agenda. While Americans across the political spectrum once viewed immigration, globalization, engagement with China, and support for Israel and Ukraine similarly, this is no longer the case. Now Republicans and Democrats-and Independents, whose opinions resemble those of Democrats more than Republicans in the most recent survey-see the world and America's role in it differently. They disagree on what priorities and threats are most critical to the vital interests of the United States, an important focal point for any administration. Partisans also disagree on whether multilateralism or unilateralism is the better approach to US involvement in the world, whether increasing diversity in the United States has more positive or negative impacts for the country, and on specific US foreign policies toward contentious international problems.