06/16/2026 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 06/16/2026 15:49
Montpelier, Vt. - Governor Phil Scott announced action on the following bills, passed by the General Assembly.
On June 16, Governor Scott signed bills of the following titles:
On June 16, Governor Scott returned without his signature and vetoed S.190, An act relating to reference-based pricing and the Green Mountain Care Board and sent the following letter to the General Assembly :
Dear Mr. Bloomer:
Pursuant to Chapter II, Section 11 of the Vermont Constitution, I'm returning unsigned and without my approval, in the time permitted by the Constitution, S.190, An act relating to reference-based pricing and the Green Mountain Care Board.
All Vermonters are impacted by Vermont's health insurance costs - individuals, small and large businesses, public employee plans, and non-profits - and the Legislature must focus on system-wide savings for all, consistent with the GMCB's statutory purpose. By vetoing S.190, the savings generated by the Board's 2027 hospital revenue reductions will apply to all Vermonters paying for insurance, including those few who benefit from the passage of this bill.
This basic concern for fairness is the primary reason for this veto. Title 18 VSA 9372 clearly expresses the purpose of the Green Mountain Care Board (GMCB) in five succinct points. This bill is at odds with two of them. First, the law plainly states that reductions should apply "across all payers." Second, it calls for "achieving administrative simplification in healthcare financing and delivery." Yet this bill would exclude most payers from the affordability gains achieved in FY2027 and, in doing so, add unnecessary complexity, inequity, and cost.
Advocates for this bill have claimed it would generate significant healthcare savings. According to analysis by the Department of Financial Regulation, those claims do not hold up. The GMCB has authority to control or reduce hospital prices and revenue, so this bill is unnecessary to achieve both and Act 68 of 2025, the bipartisan bill I signed last year, already codified Reference Based Pricing.
Last year, for example, the Board reduced hospital revenues by nearly $100 million and expressed those savings in lower insurance rate increases. This year, its guidance calls for an additional $40 million in revenue reduction. I urge the GMCB to follow-through with that policy and generate the same level of savings it otherwise would have achieved while ensuring those savings benefit all payers. They should also be cognizant of the concerns our rural, critical access hospitals have raised, several of which are opposed to S.190.
It's important for Vermonters to know that broader and meaningful healthcare affordability reforms were offered to the Legislature this session. My administration proposed a comprehensive package through H.585 and supported multiple efforts by the minority to advance these reforms through other legislation. These proposals included proven approaches that expanded affordable choices in other states. Organizations representing many of Vermont's small and independent businesses described H.585 as "…a sweeping package (H.585) to improve affordable health coverage options …" and recognized it as a "serious attempt at health insurance reform." Yet these proposals - and the concerns of Vermont's small businesses - were largely ignored by the legislative majority. We also supported the proposal from the Vermont School Boards Association, which they advocated would have lowered VEHI healthcare costs and thus property tax pressure. Unfortunately, this proposal was also rejected by the majority in Legislature.
While reasonable people may disagree on the best path forward, Vermont will not solve its affordability crisis by directing savings to some payers while excluding others. Lasting progress will require structural reforms that expand affordability, increase choices, and ensure savings are shared broadly across the system. For these reasons, I intend to advance several key provisions of H.585 through executive action. The remaining changes will require a more moderate Legislature willing to move beyond the policies and politics of the past (see failed single payer and some of what was left behind).
Vermonters need quality healthcare and affordable insurance options. Rising costs are putting pressure on patients, providers, hospitals, employers, and taxpayers alike. Our focus must remain on delivering improvements to everyone paying into the system. By vetoing S.190, the savings generated by the GMCB's revenue reductions can be applied fairly and consistently across all Vermonters paying for health insurance, including those the bill sought to unfairly favor.
Sincerely,
/s/
Philip B. Scott
Governor
To view a complete list of action on bills passed during the 2026 legislative session, click here.