noodls browser compatibility check

The security settings of your browser are blocking the execution of scripts.

To use noodls, javascript support must be enabled. Please change your browser's security settings to enable javascript.

If you have changed your browser's security settings, you can click here.

related announcements

Company News

Rush Street Interactive Inc.

Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (Form 4)
Southern Copper Corporation

Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (Form 4)
Dell Technologies Inc.

Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (Form 4)

Financial Services

BBR ALO Fund LLC

06/05/2026 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 06/05/2026 15:20

Annual Report by Investment Company (Form N-CSR)

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549

FORM N-CSR

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT

OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT

INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Investment Company Act File Number 811-23567

BBR ALO FUND, LLC

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

Matthew Shapiro
c/o BBR Partners, LLC
55 East 52nd Street, 18th Floor
New York, New York 10055

(Name and address of agent for service)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (212) 313-9870

With a copy to:

Nicole M. Runyan, P.C.
Brad A. Green, P.C.
Kirkland & Ellis LLP
601 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10022
(212) 446-4800

Date of fiscal year end: March 31

Date of reporting period: March 31, 2026

Item 1. Report to Shareholders

(a)

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Annual Report

March 31, 2026

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Table of Contents
For the Year Ended March 31, 2026


Investor Letter (Unaudited)	2-3
Fund Performance	4-5
Schedule of Investments	6-11
Summary of Investments	12
Statement of Assets and Liabilities	13
Statement of Operations	14
Statements of Changes in Net Assets	15
Statement of Cash Flows	16
Financial Highlights	17
Notes to Financial Statements	18-27
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	28
Investment Program and Principal Risk Factors (Unaudited)	29-40
Approval of the Renewal of the Advisory Agreements (Unaudited)	41-42
Information Regarding the Fund's Directors and Officers (Unaudited)	43-44
Other Information (Unaudited)	45

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Investor Letter (Unaudited)
As of March 31, 2026

Dear Investors:

We are pleased to present this Annual Report for BBR ALO Fund, LLC (the "Fund") covering the period from April 1, 2025 to March 31, 2026. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2026, the Fund's total return was 9.71%. The Fund underperformed the blend of reference indexes¹ for the one-year period by 13.78%.

The reference indexes performed as follows during this period:

Russell 2000:	25.59%
Russell 2500:	23.45%
Russell 2500 Value:	25.43%
MSCI ACWI ex-US:	25.57%
MSCI World Quality:	15.45%

At a headline level, markets delivered strong absolute returns over the past year despite continued macro and geopolitical-driven volatility. In April 2025, uncertainty around tariffs and trade policy drove a market sell off and raised concerns around inflation and global growth. These risks proved less disruptive given realized tariff outcomes were less severe than expected. This, combined with resilient economic data and the Federal Reserve's shift toward easing policy, helped to improve financial conditions and investor sentiment. Equity markets rebounded quickly, with particularly strong performance in small- and mid-cap equities and non-US markets. In this environment, more cyclical, lower-quality companies drove the rally, while higher-quality businesses with stronger balance sheets and more durable earnings profiles lagged. As a result, our quality-biased active long only managers faced headwinds trying to keep up with broader equity market performance.

Several factors drove the Fund's underperformance throughout the period:

Upgrade of Non-US Exposure: By design, the Fund has always maintained exposure to non-US equity markets based on the belief that the market backdrop presents a broad opportunity set optimal for active management. At the start of 2025, a portion of the Fund's assets was subadvised by a concentrated, non-US growth manager that had underperformed its benchmark and peer group on a 1-, 3-, and 5-year basis. After an extensive re-underwriting process, we elected to terminate the subadviser's subadvisory agreement due to both security selection missteps and portfolio management execution issues. The Fund engaged a new subadviser focused on the non-US markets in July 2025 that takes a more diversified, balanced approach to portfolio construction. We believe structural tailwinds-including deglobalization trends and the multi-year underperformance of non-US equities relative to the US-are creating greater opportunity for alpha generation across a wider range of securities. As a result, a more diversified approach is best aligned with the current market backdrop. We believe this transition has improved the positioning of the Fund and been additive to performance to date.

Underperformance of Quality: Most of the Fund's subadvisers maintain a quality bias. While definitions vary, quality typically includes businesses that grow market share, have a stable balance sheet, and compound earnings-companies the subadvisers are comfortable owning over the long term. During the fiscal year, this bias weighed on relative performance as market leadership shifted toward more cyclical, lower-quality businesses where the Fund had more limited exposure. While this created a headwind to performance, the underlying fundamentals of our subadvisers' holdings remain strong. We believe the Fund's quality-oriented portfolio is well positioned today, offering a compelling combination of attractive valuations and durable business models.

The Fund's value-biased subadviser provided a meaningful offset to these headwinds, with a return of approximately 40% for the fiscal year versus 25% for the Russell 2500 Value Index. This strength followed an extended period in which the subadviser's value bias was out of favor, weighing on relative returns. The subadviser stuck to its playbook and used the dislocation as an opportunity to buy stocks that had gone through material valuation resets. Over the last 12 months,

¹	During the one-year period ended March 31, 2026, the blended indexes were weighted as follows, taking into account the allocation of the Fund's assets to the Fund's subadvisers and investment funds:

From April 2025 to June 2025: 25% to Russell 2500, 20% to MSCI ACWI Ex US, 20% to Russell 2000, 20% to Russell 2500 Value and 15% Russell MidCap.

From July 2025 to March 2026: 23% to Russell 2500, 25% to MSCI ACWI-ex US, 18.5% to Russell 2000, 18.5% to Russell 2500 Value and 15% to Russell MidCap.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Investor Letter (Unaudited) (continued)

the subadviser experienced a meaningful rebound in its portfolio as a result of buying well and sticking to its investment philosophy. In our view, this recovery reinforces the importance of remaining patient through periods of underperformance and maintaining diversification across complementary styles.

We maintain conviction in our actively managed equity strategy that is constructed to take long-term perspectives and compound capital. The Fund's subadvisers and their investment personnel have repeatable playbooks and strong track records of navigating a variety of different environments across multiple market cycles. Looking ahead, we see a robust opportunity set and believe the Fund is well-positioned for the current and foreseeable investment environment.

Thank you for your continued confidence and support.

Sincerely,

William C. Page
Portfolio Manager of the Fund
May 2026

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Fund Performance
As of March 31, 2026 (Unaudited)

Performance of a $100,000 Investment

This graph compares a hypothetical $100,000 investment in the Fund with a similar investment in the Blended Index and the four indices that comprise the Blended Index. Results include the reinvestment of all dividends and capital gains. The indices do not reflect the fees charged and expenses of the Fund, which would lower performance. Investments in the Fund are not subject to a sales load.

Past performance does not predict future performance, and the performance information set forth herein does not reflect the deduction of taxes that an investor would pay on Fund distributions or the repurchase of Fund shares.

*	From Inception (May 1, 2020) to July 2022: 25% weighting to Russell 2000, 25% to MSCI World Quality , 25% to MSCI ACWI ex-US, and 25% to Russell 1000 Value.

From August 2022 to December 2022: 32.5% weighting to Russell 2000, 27.5% to MSCI World Quality , 25% to MSCI ACWI ex-US, and 15% to Russell 1000 Value.

For January 2023: 25% weighting to Russell 2000, 25% to MSCI World Quality , 20% to MSCI ACWI ex-US, 15% to Russell 2500, and 15% to Russell 2500 Value.

For February 2023: 25% weighting to Russell 2500, 25% to MSCI World Quality , 20% to MSCI ACWI ex-US, 15% to Russell 2000, and 15% to Russell 2500 Value.

From March 2023 to December 2023: 25% weighting to Russell 2500, 25% to MSCI World Quality , 20% to MSCI ACWI ex-US, 15% to Russell 2000, and 15% to Russell 2500 Value.

From January 2024 to April 2024: 30% weighting to Russell 2500, 25% to MSCI ACWI ex-US, 25% to Russell 2000, and 20% to Russell 2500 Value.

From May 2024 to June 2025: 25% weighting to Russell 2500, 20% to MSCI ACWI ex-US, 20% to Russell 2000, 20% to Russell 2500 Value, and 15% to Russell MidCap.

From July 2025 to March 31, 2026: 23% weighting to Russell 2500, 25% to MSCI ACWI ex-US, 18.5% to Russell 2000, 18.5% to Russell 2500 Value, and 15% to Russell MidCap.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Fund Performance
As of March 31, 2026 (Unaudited) (Continued)

Average Annual Total Returns as of March 31, 2026	1 Year	5 years	Since Inception**
BBR ALO Fund, LLC	9.71%	3.85%	9.02%
Blended Index*	23.49%	7.62%	13.38%

**	The Fund commenced operations on May 1, 2020.

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Schedule of Investments
As of March 31, 2026

Number of Shares			Value
		COMMON STOCKS - 81.6%
		COMMUNICATIONS - 3.1%
	375,043	Auto Trader Group PLC¹	$	2,328,828
	3,054	Booking Holdings, Inc.*		12,858,317
	166,849	Fox Corp.		9,743,982
	3,777,000	HIK Trust and HKT, Ltd.¹		5,887,410
	470,005	Informa PLC¹		4,645,969
	897,344	Koninklijke KPN NV¹		4,979,140
	401,652	Pearson PLC¹		5,256,908
	173,494	Tele2 AB		3,565,560
	300,550	Warner Bros Discovery, Inc.*		8,253,103
				57,519,217
		CONSUMER DISCRETIONARY - 6.2%
	55,613	Amadeus IT Group SA¹		3,127,589
	138,896	Aristrocrat Leisure, Ltd.¹		4,344,573
	147,246	Buckle, Inc.		7,415,308
	104,953	Bunzl PLC-ADR¹		3,131,516
	664,218	Copart, Inc.*		22,052,038
	16,711	Dillard's, Inc.		9,560,530
	309,300	Honda Motor Co., Ltd.¹		2,450,509
	117,741	Industria de Diseno Textil SA¹		6,697,744
	206,804	Lottomatica Group SPA¹		5,915,512
	4,400	NVR, Inc.*		28,995,252
	122,500	Open House Group Co., Ltd.¹		7,721,853
	140,873	Signet Jewelers, Ltd.		11,923,491
				113,335,915
		CONSUMER STAPLES - 2.8%
	124,215	British American Tobacco PLC¹		7,180,846
	36,710	Canadian Tire Corporation, Ltd.¹		4,935,116
	62,584	Danone¹		4,991,681
	190,386	Glanbia PLC¹		3,728,099
	320,312	Haleon PLC¹		1,583,555
	41,687	Kerry Group PLC¹		3,294,121
	58,528	Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize NV¹		2,724,230
	16,497	Philip Morris International, Inc.		2,727,614
	60,614	Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC¹		4,078,879
	28,234	Salmar ASA¹		1,645,813
	1,442,990	Tesco PLC¹		9,028,945
	72,600	Toyo Suisan Kaisha, Ltd.¹		5,031,502
				50,950,401
		ENERGY - 4.8%
	9,733	Gaztransport ET Technigaz SA		2,284,826
	150,803	HF Sinclair Corp.		9,408,599
	121,328	Landbridge Company LLC		8,377,698

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Schedule of Investments
As of March 31, 2026 (continued)

Number of Shares			Value
		COMMON STOCKS (Continued)
		ENERGY (Continued)
	54,051	Marathon Petroleum Corp.	$	13,198,173
	161,652	Shell PLC¹		7,660,351
	18,894	Texas Pacific Land Corp.		8,966,337
	61,257	TotalEnergies SE¹		5,725,859
	65,268	Valero Energy Corp.		16,126,418
	181,266	Weatherford International PLC		17,144,138
				88,892,399
		FINANCIALS - 15.3%
	523,400	AIA Group, Ltd.¹		5,664,892
	711,554	AIB Group PLC¹		7,410,651
	190,000	Arch Capital Group, Ltd.*		18,238,100
	165,147	AXA SA¹		7,486,562
	165,347	Bank Leumi Le-Israel¹		3,669,295
	43,842	BAWAG Group AG¹		6,559,079
	612,400	BOC Aviation, Ltd.¹		6,034,479
	311,463	Brown & Brown, Inc.		20,310,502
	40,816	Hingham Institution for Savings		11,666,845
	331,072	IG Group Holdings PLC¹		6,270,270
	57,101	KBC Group NV¹		6,893,547
	46,148	Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.		15,766,926
	23,850	London Stock Exchange Group PLC¹		2,796,011
	966,620	Medibank Private, Ltd.¹		2,908,131
	421,900	Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.¹		6,911,164
	823,134	NatWest Group PLC¹		6,022,454
	96,497	NN Group N.V.¹		7,475,842
	379,660	Nordea Bank Abp¹		6,457,376
	512,500	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation, Ltd.¹		8,750,097
	73,642	Phoenix Financial, Ltd.		3,887,110
	110,258	Primerica, Inc.		27,617,424
	335,500	RLI Corp.		19,136,920
	20,606	Royal Bank of Canada¹		3,329,892
	212,916	Scorpio Tankers, Inc.		15,896,309
	294,000	Singapore Exchange, Ltd.¹		4,459,807
	212,900	Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.¹		6,714,827
	243,690	Teekay Tankers, Ltd.		17,867,351
	63,789	Toronto Dominion Bank¹		5,955,351
	320,933	Tryg A/S¹		7,647,761
	78,643	UniCredit SPA¹		5,529,359
	100,859	WR Berkley Corp.		6,684,935
				282,019,269

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Schedule of Investments
As of March 31, 2026 (continued)

Number of Shares			Value
		COMMON STOCKS (Continued)
		HEALTH CARE - 6.5%
	50,173	AstraZeneca PLC¹	$	9,747,935
	94,200	Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.¹		5,110,611
	37,388	Elevance Health, Inc.		10,945,337
	48,306	Fresenius SE & Co KGaA¹		2,473,339
	18,594	Galenica AG1		2,112,902
	34,903	Humana, Inc.		6,051,831
	27,112	IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.*		15,233,962
	209,692	Lantheus Holdings, Inc.*		15,905,138
	97,326	Molina Healthcare, Inc.*		12,973,556
	57,528	Novartis AG¹		8,696,478
	21,016	Roche Holding AG¹		8,272,339
	136,200	Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.¹		4,860,363
	29,190	United Therapeutics Corp.*		17,309,086
				119,692,877
		INDUSTRIALS - 19.3%
	83,985	ABB, Ltd.¹		6,643,166
	162,900	Ametek, Inc.		34,919,244
	273,326	Amphenol Corp., Class A		34,534,740
	375,650	BAE Systems PLC¹		10,930,168
	216,197	Canadian Pacific Kansas City		17,006,056
	202,598	Compass Group PLC¹		5,586,785
	195,200	ENEOS Holdings, Inc.¹		1,734,688
	394,585	Fastenal Company		18,308,744
	111,154	Gentex Corp.		2,428,715
	374,734	Graco, Inc.		31,721,233
	245,302	HEICO Corp., Class A		51,780,808
	141,800	Hitachi, Ltd.		3,988,125
	163,678	Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.		31,982,681
	1,443,400	Persol Holdings Co., Ltd.¹		2,100,714
	64,527	Prysmian SPA¹		7,363,652
	90,369	RBC Bearings, Inc.*		49,081,211
	192,194	RELX PLC¹		6,293,775
	155,286	Ryanair Holdings PLC¹		4,282,205
	20,066	Safran SA¹		6,476,941
	33,900	Schneider Electric SE¹		8,972,378
	67,503	Stantec, Inc.¹		5,833,509
	33,108	Vinci SA¹		4,909,210
	158,701	Weir Group PLC¹		5,872,840
	26,836	Wolters Kluwer NV¹		2,003,399
				354,754,987

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Schedule of Investments
As of March 31, 2026 (continued)

Number of Shares			Value
		COMMON STOCKS (Continued)
		MATERIALS - 8.0%
	67,768	Anglo American PLC	$	2,849,285
	135,468	CF Industries Holdings, Inc.		17,589,165
	156,285	Core Natural Resources, Inc.		16,367,728
	64,564	Linde PLC¹		32,008,249
	211,995	LyondellBasell Industries - Class A		17,078,317
	40,189	Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.		23,658,461
	28,795	Rio Tinto, Ltd.¹		3,207,547
	85,000	Simpson Manufacturing Co, Inc.		14,587,700
	12,886	Vulcan Materials Co.		3,508,858
	184,040	Warrior Met Coal, Inc.		17,143,326
				147,998,636
		REAL ESTATE - 0.4%
	630,300	Mitsui Fudosan Co, Ltd.¹		6,574,229

		TECHNOLOGY - 14.3%
	16,454	AppFolio, Inc.*		2,596,770
	29,870	Applied Materials, Inc.		10,209,267
	6,676	ASML Holding NV¹		8,631,908
	97,600	BIPROGY, Inc.¹		2,840,927
	104,076	Cisco Systems, Inc.		8,075,257
	55,677	Euronext NV¹		8,908,577
	47,783	Gartner, Inc.*		7,565,960
	333,119	HP, Inc.		6,399,216
	180,044	Intel Corp.		7,945,342
	32,385	Interdigital, Inc.		9,780,270
	7,609	KLA Corp.		11,203,568
	51,200	Lam Research Corp.		10,939,392
	27,086	Micron Technology, Inc.		9,150,734
	43,053	Moody's Corp.		18,781,871
	51,425	MSCI, Inc.		27,718,589
	23,780	NICE, Ltd.-ADR*		2,621,983
	175,900	OBIC Co., Ltd.¹		4,268,944
	30,395	SAP SE- SP ADR¹		5,158,301
	304,300	Sony Group Corp.¹		6,152,336
	32,400	Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. SP ADR		10,949,580
	63,651	Teledyne Technologies, Inc.*		38,509,492
	58,539	Tyler Technologies, Inc.*		20,042,583
	139,093	Veeva Systems, Inc. - Class A*		24,433,076
				262,883,943

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Schedule of Investments
As of March 31, 2026 (continued)

Number of Shares			Value
		COMMON STOCKS (Continued)
		UTILITIES - 0.9%
	757,115	Enel SPA¹	$	8,200,038
	455,823	National Grid PLC¹		7,653,317
				15,853,355
		TOTAL COMMON STOCKS
		(Cost $1,149,005,669)		1,500,475,228

		INVESTMENT FUNDS - 13.2%
		HWC Long Onshore Fund, LP^2,*		242,756,486
		TOTAL INVESTMENT FUNDS
		(Cost $236,500,000)		242,756,486

		TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 94.8%		1,743,231,714

		CASH EQUIVALENTS - 7.0%
		Fidelity Investments Money Market Treasury Portfolio - Class I, 3.55%³		129,417,544
		TOTAL CASH EQUIVALENTS		129,417,544


		TOTAL INVESTMENTS AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - 101.8%
		(Cost $1,385,505,669)		1,872,649,258
		Liabilities Less Other Assets - (1.8%)		(33,512,958	)
		TOTAL NET ASSETS - 100.0%	$	1,839,136,300

LLC	- Limited Liability Company

PLC	- Public Limited Company

SP ADR

- Sponsored American Depository Receipt

SE - Societas Europea

SA - Société Anonyme

ADR - American Depository Receipt

¹	Foreign security denominated in U.S. Dollars.

²	Partnership is not designated in units. The Fund owns approximately 29.07% of HWC Long Master Fund, LP through its investment in HWC Long Onshore Fund, LP, which invests substantially all of its assets in HWC Long Master Fund, LP, and has contractually waived its right to vote its interests.

³	The rate is the annualized seven-day yield at period end.

*	Non-income producing security.

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Schedule of Investments
As of March 31, 2026 (continued)

Additional information on Investment Funds is as follows:

Security	Redemption Permitted	Acquisition Date	Investment Strategy	Redemption Notice Period
HWC Long Onshore Fund, LP	Quarterly	5/1/2024	Long-Only Equities^a	45 Days

^a	This investment category includes investment funds that make long-only investments in equity securities that are deemed by investment managers to be undervalued and to present certain sustainable advantages.

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Summary of Investments
As of March 31, 2026

Security Type/Sector	Percent of Total Net Assets
Common Stocks
Industrials	19.3%
Financials	15.3%
Technology	14.3%
Materials	8.0%
Health Care	6.5%
Consumer Discretionary	6.2%
Energy	4.8%
Communications	3.1%
Consumer Staples	2.8%
Utilities	0.9%
Real Estate	0.4%
Total Common Stocks	81.6%
Investment Funds	13.2%
Total Investments	94.8%
Cash Equivalents	7%
Total Investments and Cash Equivalents	101.8%
Liabilities Less Other Assets	(1.8)%
Total Net Assets	100.0%

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Statement of Assets and Liabilities
March 31, 2026

Assets
Investments, at fair value (cost $1,385,505,669)	$	1,743,231,714
Cash and cash equivalents		129,417,544
Receivables:
Receivables for investments sold		12,807,333
Dividends receivable		2,537,653
Interest receivable		353,916
Total Assets		1,888,348,160

Liabilities
Payables:
Payable for shares repurchased (see Note 8)		30,181,879
Payable for investments purchased		9,476,737
Investor subscriptions received in advance		7,300,000
Investment advisory fees (see Note 5)		1,246,767
Subadvisory fees (see Note 5)		694,361
Other fees payable		312,116
Total Liabilities		49,211,860

Net Assets	$	1,839,136,300

Components of Net Assets:
Paid-in capital	$	1,470,487,984
Total distributable earnings		368,648,316
Net Assets	$	1,839,136,300

Number of Shares Outstanding (unlimited number of shares authorized)		135,529,485

Net asset value per Share	$	13.57

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended March 31, 2026

Income
Dividends (net of foreign withholding taxes of $1,472,804)	$	20,455,133
Interest		4,513,115
Total Income		24,968,248

Expenses
Investment advisory fees (see Note 5)		14,753,023
Subadvisory fees (see Note 5)		8,215,178
Legal expense		26,242
Custody fees		10,618
Miscellaneous fees		5,760
Total Expenses		23,010,821

Net Expenses		23,010,821
Net Investment Income		1,957,427

Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss):
Net realized gain (loss) on:
Investments		115,049,939
Foreign currency transactions		(199,722	)
Net realized gain		114,850,217
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on:
Investments		47,347,239
Foreign currency transactions		(46,558	)
Net unrealized appreciation		47,300,681
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain		162,150,898

Net Increase in Net Assets from Operations	$	164,108,325

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Statements of Changes in Net Assets

	For the Year Ended March 31, 2026			For the Year Ended March 31, 2025
Operations
Net investment income	$	1,957,427		$	166,908
Net realized gain on investments		114,850,217			58,082,507
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments		47,300,681			(51,370,809	)
Net Increase in Net Assets from Operations		164,108,325			6,878,606

Distributions to Investors
Distributions		(135,679,065	)		(91,136,341	)
Net Change in Net Assets from Distributions to Investors		(135,679,065	)		(91,136,341	)

Capital Share Transactions (see Note 8)
Shares issued		183,289,600			268,030,069
Reinvested distributions		135,679,065			91,136,341
Shares repurchased		(156,261,095	)		(148,626,320	)
Net Change in Net Assets from Capital Transactions		162,707,570			210,540,090

Total Increase (Decrease)		191,136,830			126,282,355

Net Assets
Beginning of year		1,647,999,470			1,521,717,115
End of year	$	1,839,136,300		$	1,647,999,470

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Statement of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended March 31, 2026

Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities:
Net Increase in Net Assets from Operations	$	164,108,325
Adjustments to reconcile Net Increase in Net Assets from Operations to net cash used in operating activities:
Net realized gain from investments		(115,049,939	)
Net change in unrealized (appreciation) on investments		(47,347,239	)
Purchases of investments		(971,577,845	)
Sales of investments		951,286,565
(Increase)/Decrease in assets:
Receivable for investments sold		(7,694,226	)
Dividends receivable		(1,909,063	)
Interest receivable		47,800
Increase/(Decrease) in liabilities:
Payable for investments purchased		5,795,260
Investment advisory fees		130,644
Subadvisory fees		148,604
Other payable		268,809
Net Cash provided by (used in) Operating Activities		(21,792,305	)

Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities:
Proceeds from subscriptions		173,936,400
Payments for Shares repurchased		(153,182,464	)
Net Cash provided by (used in) Financing Activities		20,753,936

Net change in cash	$	(1,038,369	)

Cash
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		130,455,913
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	129,417,544

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Financial Highlights

The following represents certain ratios to average net assets and other supplemental information for the period indicated. An individual investor's ratios and returns may vary from the below based on the timing of capital transactions.

	For the Year Ended March 31, 2026			For the Year Ended March 31, 2025			For the Year Ended March 31, 2024			For the Year Ended March 31, 2023			For the Year Ended March 31, 2022
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Year	$	13.32		$	14.04		$	11.45		$	13.05		$	13.73
Income from investment operations:
Net investment gain (loss) ⁽¹⁾		0.02			0.00			0.00			(0.04	)		(0.11	)
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments		1.28			0.04			2.59			(1.22	)		0.04
Total from investment operations:		1.30			0.04			2.59			(1.26	)		(0.07	)

Less Distributions to Investors:
From net investment income		(0.02	)		-			-			-			-
From net realized gains		(1.03	)		(0.76	)		-			(0.34	)		(0.61	)
Net change in Net Asset Value due to distributions to Investors		(1.05	)		(0.76	)		-			(0.34	)		(0.61	)

Net Asset Value, End of Year	$	13.57		$	13.32		$	14.04		$	11.45		$	13.05

Total Return ⁽²⁾		9.71	%		0.32	%		22.62	%		(9.42	)%		(1.16	)%

Net assets, end of year (in thousands)	$	1,839,136		$	1,647,999		$	1,521,717		$	1,252,251		$	1,400,171

Net investment income (loss) to average net assets		0.11	%⁽³⁾		0.01	%⁽³⁾		0.02	%⁽³⁾		(0.33	)%⁽³⁾		(0.74	)%⁽³⁾

Ratio of net expenses to average net assets		1.27	%⁽³⁾		1.30	%⁽³⁾		1.26	%⁽³⁾		1.23	%⁽³⁾		1.22	%⁽³⁾

Portfolio turnover rate		55.21	%		24.84	%		36.11	%		46.17	%		20.84	%

⁽¹⁾	Based on average Shares outstanding for the period.

⁽²⁾	Total return reflects the changes in net asset value during the period based on the performance of the Fund and investor subscriptions and redemptions, and assumes all dividends and distributions, if any, were reinvested in accordance with the Fund's dividend reinvestment plan.

⁽³⁾	These ratios do not include earned income or expenses incurred by the Fund through its investment in the Investment Fund.

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements
March 31, 2026

1. Organization

BBR ALO Fund, LLC (the "Fund") is a closed-end, non-diversified management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). The Fund was organized as a Delaware limited liability company on January 10, 2020, and commenced operations on May 1, 2020. BBR Partners, LLC serves as the investment adviser to the Fund (the "Adviser"), and each of Maren Capital LLC ("Maren"), AllianceBernstein L.P. ("AllianceBernstein"), Quantum Capital Management, LLC ("Quantum") and Summit Street Capital Management, LLC ("Summit Street" and, collectively with Maren, AllianceBernstein and Quantum, the "Subadvisers") has been engaged to directly manage specified portions of the Fund's assets. The Adviser and each Subadviser is registered as an investment adviser with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended.

AllianceBernstein commenced providing subadvisory services to the Fund on June 30, 2025. On April 28, 2025, the Adviser provided notice to Polen Capital Management, LLC ("Polen") , a then-current subadviser of the Fund, of the termination of the subadvisory agreement among the Adviser, the Fund and Polen, pursuant to its terms, to be effective after the close of business on June 27, 2025. At a special meeting of Fund investors held on June 27, 2025, upon the recommendation of the Board and further to the Board's respective approvals at a meeting held on May 22, 2025, Fund investors approved a new subadvisory agreement with AllianceBernstein.

The investment objective of the Fund is to seek long-term capital appreciation. The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by deploying its assets among a select group of long-biased equity investment managers (the "Investment Managers"), and the unregistered investment vehicles (the "Investment Funds") and/or accounts they operate. In addition to allocating Fund assets to Investment Funds, the Adviser may allocate Fund assets to accounts operated by Investment Managers pursuant to subadvisory agreements with such Investment Managers.

Long-biased investing generally involves buying securities with the expectation that their price will increase. Investment Managers that employ long-biased equity strategies typically seek to capitalize on discrepancies between an evaluation of the intrinsic value of an equity security and assessment of the forward-looking prospects of the issuer of the security, and the consensus view reflected in the market price of such security. Investment Managers generally will invest primarily in equity securities and equity-linked instruments in U.S. and global markets, including emerging markets, to create long-biased holdings in various positions, sectors and/or countries. Investment Managers may focus on a particular capitalization range (e.g., small cap vs. large cap) or industry sector (e.g., healthcare, technology or consumer products), may employ a specific investment style (e.g., value vs. growth) or may pursue a broad mandate without specific regard for capitalization, sector or geography. Certain Investment Managers also may seek to extract value by being more trading-oriented or catalyst-driven.

Subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act, the business and affairs of the Fund are managed under the direction of its Board of Directors (the "Board"). The Board has the right, power and authority, on behalf of the Fund and in its name, to do all things necessary and proper to carry out its duties under the Fund's Limited Liability Company Agreement, as amended and restated from time to time. Each Director is vested with the same powers, authority and responsibilities on behalf of the Fund as are customarily vested in each director of a closed-end management investment company registered under the 1940 Act that is organized under Delaware law. The Board may delegate the management of the Fund's day-to-day operations to one or more officers or other persons (including, without limitation, the Adviser), subject to the investment objective and policies of the Fund and to the oversight of the Board. The Board has engaged the Adviser to manage the day-to-day operations of the Fund, and the Subadvisers to manage allocated portions of the Fund's assets.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The Fund is an investment company and follows the accounting and reporting guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 946.

Valuation of Investments

The 1940 Act provides that securities for which market quotations are "readily available" must be valued at market value, and all other securities and other assets must be valued at "fair value" in accordance with requirements under the 1940 Act. The Board has approved procedures pursuant to which the Fund values its investments (the "Valuation Procedures"), and

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements
March 31, 2026 (continued)

2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

has designated the Adviser as its "valuation designee" (as defined in Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act) to determine fair value in good faith for all Fund investments for which market quotations are not readily available. The Fund's assets managed by the Subadvisers are valued in accordance with the Valuation Procedures. The value of the Fund's assets will be based on information reasonably available on each date on which the Fund calculates its net asset value (each, a "Determination Date") and that the Adviser believes to be reliable.

Publicly-traded equity securities are valued, except as indicated below, at the last sale price on the Determination Date on the securities exchange or national securities market on which such securities primarily are traded (a "primary market"). If there has been no sale on such day, the securities are valued at the average of the most recent bid and asked quotations or, if no asked quotations for such security are available, at the most recent bid quotation on such exchange or market on the Determination Date.

Equity-linked instruments are valued based on the value of the underlying reference asset(s) and the terms of the instrument (e.g., an interest rate) to approximate what the Fund would receive on a current termination of the instrument. Such reference asset(s) are valued in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Valuation Procedures.

Debt securities and instruments, if any, generally are valued, to the extent possible, by an independent pricing service approved by the Adviser. Each pricing service provides an evaluated price based on its proprietary methodologies, which may use a variety of inputs, models and assumptions based on its methodology for a particular type of security. Debt securities and instruments for which valuation is not provided by a pricing service are valued using an evaluated price provided by Bloomberg, and if Bloomberg does not provide a price, then the security generally will be valued by obtaining prices from broker/dealers on the Determination Date. Overnight and certain other short-term debt securities and instruments with maturities of less than 60 days (excluding U.S. Treasury bills) are valued by the amortized cost method, unless a pricing service provides a valuation for such security, or, in the opinion of the Adviser, the amortized cost method would not represent fair value on the Determination Date.

Derivative instruments, if any, which may be used for hedging and non-hedging purposes, are valued in accordance with the Valuation Procedures. Certain derivatives may be valued (i) by pricing services approved by the Adviser, (ii) based on the value of the underlying reference asset(s), (iii) at their last sale price on the primary market, (iv) using evaluated pricing available from Bloomberg, (v) using a quotation obtained from an independent broker/dealer, (vi) at their intrinsic value, (vii) at the most recent settlement price, (viii) at their acquisition cost until such time as market prices become available or (ix) at their fair value determined by the Valuation Committee (as defined below), as applicable.

Securities for which market prices are not readily available and securities for which quotations are deemed by the Adviser to be unreliable are fair valued or otherwise valued in accordance with the Valuation Procedures. The Board has approved the formation of a committee established by the Adviser to oversee the valuation of the Fund's investments pursuant to the Valuation Procedures (the "Valuation Committee"), and assist in the valuation of such securities. Circumstances in which market prices may not be readily available include, but are not limited to, when an exchange or market is not open for trading for an entire trading day or closes early, or trading in a particular security is halted, and no other market prices are available. In these circumstances, portfolio management personnel of the Fund, the Adviser or the Subadvisers will seek to determine whether to recommend an adjustment to the last sale price on the primary market, and the Valuation Committee will meet as necessary, in accordance with the Valuation Procedures.

The Adviser generally will value the Fund's investment in any Investment Funds using the "practical expedient," in accordance with ASC Topic 820, based on the valuation provided to the Adviser by the Investment Fund in accordance with the Investment Fund's own valuation policies, provided that the Investment Fund falls within the scope of ASC 946. The fair value of investments in Investment Funds ordinarily will be the carrying amount (book value) of the Fund's interest in such investments, as provided to the Fund by the Investment Managers as of or prior to the relevant Determination Date. The Valuation Procedures, however, require the consideration of all relevant information reasonably available at the time the Fund values its portfolio. As a result, the Adviser may conclude in certain circumstances that the information provided by an Investment Manager does not represent the fair value of the Fund's interests in an Investment Fund. In accordance with the Valuation Procedures, in the absence of specific transaction activity in interests in a particular Investment Fund, the Adviser will consider whether it is appropriate, in light of all relevant circumstances, to value the Fund's interest in an Investment Fund based on the net asset value reported by the Investment Manager, or whether to adjust such value to reflect a premium or discount to net asset value. Any such decision will be made in good faith, and subject to the review and supervision of the Board.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements
March 31, 2026 (continued)

2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

The valuations reported by the Investment Managers, upon which the Fund will calculate its month-end net asset value, may be subject to later adjustment based on information reasonably available at that time. In the event that an Investment Fund does not report a month-end value to the Fund on a timely basis, the Fund will determine the fair value of such Investment Fund based on the most recent final or estimated value reported by the Investment Fund, as well as any other relevant information available at the time the Fund values its portfolio.

In general, fair value represents a good faith approximation of the current value of an asset and will be used when there is no public market or possibly no market at all for the asset. The fair values of one or more assets may not be the prices at which those assets ultimately are sold, and the differences may be significant.

Investment Transactions, Investment Income and Expenses

Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Realized gains and losses on investments are determined on the identified cost basis. Dividend income and expense is recorded net of applicable withholding taxes on the ex-dividend date and interest income and expense is recorded on an accrual basis. Withholding taxes on foreign dividends, if applicable, are paid (a portion of which may be reclaimable) or provided for in accordance with the applicable country's tax rules and rates and are disclosed in the Statement of Operations. The Fund accounts for distributions received from investments as dividend income, realized gain, or return of capital based on information provided by the company. Withholding tax reclaims are filed in certain countries to recover a portion of the amounts previously withheld. The Fund records a reclaim receivable based on a number of factors, including a jurisdiction's legal obligation to pay reclaims as well as payment history and market convention.

Spot Contracts

The Fund may be exposed to foreign currency risks through its investments. The Fund may enter into currency exchange contracts on a spot basis (i.e., for cash at the spot rate prevailing in the currency exchange market for buying or selling currencies). Gains or losses arising from foreign currency transactions, including those resulting from the settlement of spot contracts related to portfolio securities, are included in realized gains or losses on foreign currency transactions in the Statement of Operations. The Fund may use spot currency transactions to manage foreign currency exposure related to the purchase and sale of portfolio securities denominated in foreign currencies.

Currency Translation

Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies and commitments under forward currency exchange contracts are translated into U.S. dollars at the mean of the quoted bid and ask prices of such currencies against the U.S. dollar. Purchases and sales of portfolio securities are translated into U.S. dollars at the rates of exchange prevailing when such securities were acquired or sold. Income and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars at rates of exchange prevailing when accrued.

Net realized gain or loss on foreign currency transactions represents foreign exchange gains and losses from sales and maturities of foreign fixed income investments, holding of foreign currencies, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on foreign investment transactions, and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the Fund's books and the U.S. dollar equivalent amounts actually received or paid. Net unrealized currency gains and losses from valuing foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities at year-end exchange rates are reflected as a component of net unrealized appreciation or depreciation of foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires Fund management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements
March 31, 2026 (continued)

2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash includes cash equivalents consisting of highly liquid money market funds that are readily convertible into cash. Such securities with maturities of three months or less, when purchased, are considered to be cash equivalents and a Level 1 investment in the Fair value hierarchy. The carrying amount of these securities approximates fair value. Cash is held in financial institutions and, at times, may exceed federal insured limits. At March 31, 2026, cash on the statement of financial condition includes $129,417,544 invested in the Fidelity Treasury Fund (FISXX).

Segment Reporting

Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 280, Segment Reporting, established disclosure requirements relating to operating segments in financial statements. The Fund has adopted FASB Accounting Standards Update 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures ("ASU 2023-07"), which is intended to enhance reportable operating segment disclosure requirements. Operating segments are defined as components of a reporting entity about which separate financial information, including disclosures about income and expenses, is available that is regularly evaluated by the chief operating decision maker ("CODM") in deciding how to allocate resources and assess the Fund's performance. The Fund is structured as an investment company and represents a single operating segment. Subject to the oversight and, when applicable, approval of the Board, the Adviser acts as the Fund's CODM. The CODM monitors the Fund's operating results as a whole, and the Fund's long-term strategic asset allocation is determined in accordance with the terms of its Confidential Memorandum based on its defined investment objective. The financial information provided to and reviewed by the CODM is consistent with that presented in the Fund's financial statements. Adoption of the new standard impacted the Fund's financial statement note disclosures only and did not affect the Fund's financial position or the results of its operations.

3. Select Risk Factors

The Fund's investments may expose the Fund to various risk factors including, but not limited to the following:

Investment Risk. All investments risk the loss of capital. The value of the Fund's total net assets is expected to fluctuate. To the extent that the Fund's portfolio is concentrated in issuers in a single sector, the risk of any investment decision is increased. While the Adviser believes that the Fund's investment program will moderate this risk to some degree through multiple Investment Managers, no guarantee or representation is made that the Fund's investment program will be diversified or successful.

An investment in the Fund involves a high degree of risk, including the risk that the investor's entire investment may be lost. No assurance can be given that the Fund's investment objective will be achieved. The Fund's performance depends upon the Adviser's selection of Investment Managers, the allocation of offering proceeds thereto and the performance of the Investment Managers, including the Subadvisers, and the Investment Funds. The Investment Managers' investment activities involve the use of strategies and investment techniques with significant risk characteristics, including risks arising from national or international economic conditions, volatility in the global equity, currency, real estate and fixed-income markets, shifts in macro-economic fundamentals, the risks of short sales, the risks of leverage, the potential illiquidity of securities and derivative instruments, the risk of loss from counterparty defaults and the risk of borrowing to meet withdrawal requests, as well as acts of God, uninsurable losses, war, terrorism, earthquakes, hurricanes or floods and other factors which are beyond the control of the Fund or the Investment Managers. No assurance can be given that: (i) the Investment Managers' investment programs, strategies, decisions and activities will be successful; (ii) the Investment Managers will achieve their return expectations; (iii) the Investment Managers will achieve any return of capital invested; or (iv) investors will not suffer losses from an investment in the Fund. All investments made by the Investment Managers risk the loss of capital. The Investment Managers' results may vary substantially over time.

Market Disruption and Geopolitical Risk. Market risks, including political, regulatory, market, economic and social developments, and developments that impact specific economic sectors, industries or segments of the market, can affect the value and liquidity of the Fund's and the Investment Funds' investments. In addition, turbulence and reduced market liquidity in financial markets may negatively affect Investment Managers, Investment Funds and issuers, which could adversely affect the Fund. Stock prices may experience greater volatility during periods of challenging market conditions. As a result, during these periods, the Fund's net asset value will fluctuate, you may experience a significant decline in the value of your investment and you could lose money.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements
March 31, 2026 (continued)

3. Select Risk Factors (continued)

As global systems, economies and financial markets are increasingly interconnected, events that once had only local impact are now more likely to have regional or even global effects. These risks may be magnified if certain events or developments were to adversely interrupt the global supply chain, which could affect companies worldwide. The Adviser's business activities, as well as the activities of the Fund, the Investment Funds and their operations and investments, could be materially adversely affected by social, political, economic and other conditions and events, such as natural disasters, epidemics and pandemics, terrorism, conflicts and social unrest, which create uncertainty and have significant impacts on issuers, industries, governments and other systems, including the financial markets, to which companies and their investments are exposed, and can trigger prolonged periods of global economic slowdown. Recent examples include pandemic risks related to COVID-19 (notably, its significant negative impact on economic and market conditions and global supply chains, and the aggressive measures taken worldwide in response by governments and businesses) and geopolitical risks related to the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine and conflict(s) in the Middle East and other geopolitical tensions, hostilities and instability. To the extent the Fund or the Investment Funds have significant investments in certain countries, regions, companies, industries or market sectors, such positions will increase the risk of loss from adverse developments affecting those countries, regions, companies, industries or sectors.

As of the date hereof, there is uncertainty with respect to legislation, regulation and government policy at the federal, state and local levels, notably as respects U.S. fiscal, tax, trade, healthcare, energy, immigration, foreign and government regulatory policy. Recent events have created a climate of heightened uncertainty and introduced new and difficult-to-quantify macroeconomic and geopolitical risks with potentially far-reaching implications. There has been a corresponding meaningful increase in the uncertainty surrounding interest rates, tax rates, inflation, energy costs, foreign exchange rates, trade volumes and fiscal and monetary policy. To the extent the U.S. Congress or the White House implements additional changes to U.S. policy, those changes may impact, among other things, the U.S. and global economy, international trade and relations, the U.S. regulatory environment, corporate taxes, inflation, healthcare, unemployment and immigration, among other areas. Until any additional policy changes are finalized, it cannot be known whether the Fund and its investments or future investments may be positively or negatively affected, or the impact of continuing uncertainty.

Equity Securities. An Investment Fund's and the Fund's portfolio may include positions in common stocks, preferred stocks and convertible securities of U.S. and non-U.S. issuers. Investment Managers may focus on investments within specific sectors, countries and/or regions. Investment Managers also may invest in depositary receipts or shares relating to non-U.S. securities. Equity securities fluctuate in value in response to many factors, including the activities and financial condition of individual companies, the business market in which individual companies compete and general market and economic conditions. Investment Managers may invest in equity securities without restriction as to market capitalization, such as those issued by smaller capitalization companies, including micro-cap companies. Investment Managers may purchase securities in all available securities trading markets, including initial public offerings and the aftermarket.

Investment Approach. Investment Funds are not registered as investment companies under the 1940 Act. The Fund, as an investor in an Investment Fund, does not have the benefit of the protections afforded by the 1940 Act to investors in registered investment companies. Although the Adviser periodically receives information from the Investment Fund regarding its investment performance and investment strategies, the Adviser may have little or no means of independently verifying this information. An Investment Manager may use proprietary investment strategies that are not fully disclosed to the Adviser, and such strategies may involve risks that are not anticipated by the Adviser. Investment Managers may change their investment strategies (i.e., may experience style drift) at any time. In addition, the Fund and the Adviser have no control over an Investment Fund's investment management, brokerage, custodial arrangements or operations, and must rely on the experience and competency of the Investment Manager in these areas. The performance of the Fund depends on the success of the Adviser in selecting Investment Managers for investment by the Fund and the allocation and reallocation of Fund assets among Investment Managers.

Investment Managers make investment decisions independently of each other so that, at any particular time, Investment Managers may buy, sell or hold similar positions at the same time. Alternatively, an Investment Manager may purchase shares in an issuer that at the same time are being sold by another Investment Manager; transactions of this sort could result in the Fund's directly or indirectly incurring certain transaction costs without accomplishing any net investment result. Because the Fund may make additional investments in or withdraw from Investment Managers only at certain times due to restrictions imposed by the Investment Managers or Investment Funds, the Fund may, from time to time, temporarily invest some of its assets in money market securities, money market funds, or other similar types of investments.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements
March 31, 2026 (continued)

3. Select Risk Factors (continued)

assets investors, including the Fund, may withdraw on any single withdrawal date. The Fund may otherwise not be able to withdraw from an Investment Fund except at specified times, thereby limiting the Adviser's ability to withdraw assets from an Investment Fund that may have poor performance or for other reasons.

4. Fair Value Disclosures

The Fund discloses the fair value of its investments in accordance with FASB ASC 820-10, "Fair Value Measurements", which establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to valuations based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to valuations based upon unobservable inputs that are significant to the valuation (Level 3 measurement). FASB ASC 820-10-35-40 to 54 provides three levels of fair value as listed below.

●

Level 1 - Inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that the Fund has the ability to access at the measurement date.

●

Level 2 - Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates, and similar data.

●

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability to the extent that relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund's own assumptions about the assumptions that a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and that would be based on the best information available.

The notion of unobservable inputs is intended to allow for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date. Under Level 3, the owner of an asset must determine fair value based on its own assumptions about what market participants would take into account in determining the fair value of the asset, using the best information available.

The inputs or methodology for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.

A financial instrument's level within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement; however, the determination of what constitutes "observable" requires significant judgment by the Valuation Committee. The Valuation Committee considers observable data to be market data that is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, not proprietary, and provided by independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market.

The following table presents the investments carried on the Schedule of Investments by level within the valuation hierarchy as of March 31, 2026:

	Level 1		Level 2*		Level 3*		Investments Valued at Net Asset Value		Total
Investments in Securities
Common Stocks¹	$	1,500,475,228	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	1,500,475,228
Investment Fund	$	-		-		-	$	242,756,486	$	242,756,486
Total Investments	$	1,500,475,328	$	-	$	-	$	242,756,486	$	1,743,231,714

Cash and cash equivalents	$	129,417,544		-		-		-	$	129,417,544

¹	All common stocks held in the Fund are Level 1 securities. For a detailed break-out of common stocks by major industry classification, please refer to the Schedule of Investments.

*	The Fund did not hold any Level 2 or Level 3 securities at year-end.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements
March 31, 2026 (continued)

5. Investment Advisory and Other Agreements

The Fund has entered into an investment advisory agreement with the Adviser. In consideration of services provided, the Fund pays the Adviser a unitary management fee, computed and payable monthly in arrears, at an annual rate of 0.80% of the Fund's net asset value (the "Investment Advisory Fee"). In turn, the Adviser pays substantially all operating expenses of the Fund, except fees and expenses of the Investment Funds, the fees payable to the Subadvisers, interest expenses, taxes, portfolio transaction-related fees and expenses, costs of borrowing, litigation and indemnification expenses, and any other extraordinary expenses not incurred in the ordinary course of the Fund's business. For the year ended March 31, 2026, the Fund accrued fees to the Adviser of $14,753,023, of which $13,506,256 was paid during the period.

Each of Maren, AllianceBernstein, Quantum and Summit Street has been engaged to directly manage specified portions of the Fund's assets pursuant to subadvisory agreements with each Subadviser. In consideration of the subadvisory services provided to the Fund by the Subadvisers, the Fund pays a fee, calculated based on the net asset value of the respective allocated portion of the Fund's assets, to each Subadviser (the "Subadvisory Fees"). For the year ended March 31, 2026, the weighted average aggregate fee payable by the Fund to the Subadvisers and Polen, as applicable, was 0.45% of the allocable portion of the Fund's assets managed by the Subadvisers. For the year ended March 31, 2026, the Fund accrued fees to the Subadvisers of $8,215,178, of which $7,520,817 was paid during the period.

For purposes of determining the Investment Advisory Fee payable to the Adviser for any month, "net asset value" means the total value of all assets of the Fund as of the end of such month, less an amount equal to all accrued debts, liabilities and obligations of the Fund as of such date, and calculated before giving effect to any repurchase of Shares on such date and before any reduction for any fees and expenses of the Fund. For purposes of determining the Subadvisory Fees payable to each Subadviser, "net asset value" means the total value of the assets of the Fund allocated to the Subadviser as of the end of a month or quarter, as the case may be, less a pro rata portion of all accrued debts, liabilities and obligations of the Fund as of such date, and calculated before giving effect to any repurchase of shares on such date and before any reduction for any fees and expenses of the Fund. The Investment Advisory Fee and the Subadvisory Fees are prorated for any partial period based on the number of days in such period. The Investment Advisory Fee and the Subadvisory Fees are paid to the Adviser and the Subadvisers, respectively, out of the Fund's assets and, therefore, will decrease the net profits or increase the net losses of the Fund. The Investment Advisory Fee and the Subadvisory Fees are in addition to the asset-based fees, incentive fees or allocations, if applicable, and other expenses charged by the Investment Funds and indirectly borne by investors.

UMB Fund Services, Inc. serves as administrator (the "Administrator") to the Fund and provides certain accounting, administrative, record keeping and investor related services. In consideration of these services, the Adviser pays the Administrator, out of the Investment Advisory Fee, certain annual fees subject to a minimum fee of $215,000, in addition to certain other fixed and transactional fees, and reimburses certain of the Administrator's expenses. During the year ended March 31, 2026, the Adviser paid the Administrator $926,368.

UMB Bank, n.a., an affiliate of the Administrator, serves as the primary custodian of the assets of the Fund, and may maintain custody of such assets with U.S. and non-U.S. sub-custodians, securities depositories and clearing agencies.

6. Federal Income Taxes

The Fund has elected to be treated, and intends to operate in a manner so as to qualify continuously, as a regulated investment company ("RIC") under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). Assuming that the Fund continues to so qualify, the Fund generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on its taxable income and gains that it distributes to investors.

In accounting for income taxes, the Fund follows the guidance in FASB ASC 740, as amended by Accounting Standards Update 2009-06, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" ("ASC 740"). ASC 740 prescribes the minimum recognition threshold a tax position must meet in connection with accounting for uncertainties in income tax positions taken or expected to be taken by an entity before being measured and recognized in the financial statements. Fund management has concluded there were no uncertain tax positions as of the year ended March 31, 2026 for federal income tax purposes or in the Fund's major state and local tax jurisdiction of Delaware.

Because U.S. federal income tax regulations differ from U.S. GAAP, distributions in accordance with tax regulations may differ from net investment income and realized gains recognized for financial reporting purposes. Differences may be permanent or temporary. Permanent differences are reclassified among capital accounts in the financial statements to reflect the applicable tax characterization. Temporary differences arise when certain items of income, expense, gain or loss are recognized at some

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements
March 31, 2026 (continued)

6. Federal Income Taxes (continued)

time in the future. The tax basis components of distributable earnings may differ from the amounts reflected in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities due to temporary book/tax differences arising primarily from partnership investments. These amounts will be finalized before filing the Fund's federal tax return.

At March 31, 2026, gross unrealized appreciation and depreciation on investments, based on cost for federal income tax purposes were as follows:

Cost of investments	$	1,402,433,787
Gross unrealized appreciation	$	420,476,070
Gross unrealized depreciation		(79,678,143	)
Net unrealized appreciation on investments	$	340,797,927

The difference between cost amounts for financial statement and federal income tax purposes is due primarily to timing differences in recognizing certain gains and losses in security transactions.

GAAP requires that certain components of net assets be reclassified between financial and tax reporting. These reclassifications have no effect on net assets or asset value per share. For the year ended March 31, 2026, permanent differences in book and tax accounting have been reclassified to paid-in capital and distributable earnings as follows:

Increase (Decrease)
Paid in Capital	Total Distributable Earnings
(-)	-

As of March 31, 2026, the Fund's most recent tax year end, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:

Undistributed ordinary income ......................................................................................................	$	678,583
Undistributed long-term capital gains ............................................................................................		27,233,430
Accumulated earnings .................................................................................................................		27,912,013
Accumulated capital and other losses ............................................................................................		(-	)
Amortization of Organizational Costs .............................................................................................		(15,137	)
Unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments .......................................................................		340,797,927
Foreign currency transactions .......................................................................................................		(46,487	)
Total distributable earnings ..........................................................................................................	$	368,648,316

The tax character of distributions paid during the tax year ended March 31, 2026 and March 31, 2025 were as follows:

	2026		2025
Distribution paid from:
Ordinary Income	$	4,528,882	$	21,911,249
Net long-term capital gains		131,150,183		69,225,092
Total distributions paid	$	135,679,065	$	91,136,341

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements
March 31, 2026 (continued)

6. Federal Income Taxes (continued)

As of March 31 2026, the Fund had accumulated capital loss carry forwards as follows:

Not Subject to Expiration
Short-Term	$	-
Long-Term		-
	$	-

To the extent that the Fund may realize future net capital gains, those gains will be offset by any of its unused capital loss carryforward.

Future capital loss carryover utilization in any given year may be subject to Code limitations.

For the year ended March 31, 2026, the Fund utilized capital loss carryovers totaling $0.

For the year ended March 31, 2026, the Fund did not pay any significant foreign, federal or state and local income taxes.

7. Investment Transactions

For the year ended March 31, 2026, the purchase and sale of investments in securities, excluding short-term investments and U.S. Government securities, were $971,601,780 and $951,286,565, respectively.

8. Capital Share Transactions

The Fund offers Shares on a continuous basis. Shares may be purchased as of the first business day of each month at the Fund's then current net asset value per Share.

The Fund, from time to time, may provide liquidity to investors by offering to repurchase Shares pursuant to written tenders by investors. Repurchases will be made at such times and on such terms as may be determined by the Board in its complete and exclusive discretion. In determining whether the Fund should repurchase Shares from investors pursuant to written tenders, the Fund's Board will consider the recommendation of the Adviser. The Adviser expects that each repurchase offer will apply to a predetermined percentage of the net assets of the Fund, and that it will recommend to the Board that the Fund offer to repurchase Shares from investors on a quarterly basis, with such repurchases to occur as of each March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 (or, if any such date is not a business day, on the immediately preceding business day).

The Fund expects that dividends will be paid annually on the Shares in amounts representing substantially all of the net investment income, if any, earned each year. Payments on the Shares may vary in amount depending on investment income received and expenses of operation; however, in order to continue to qualify as a RIC, substantially all of any taxable net capital gain realized on investments will be paid to investors at least annually.

For the year ended March 31, 2026, transactions in Shares were as follows:

Shares outstanding, April 1, 2025	123,741,744
Shares issued	13,000,212
Shares reinvested	9,882,878
Shares repurchased	(11,095,349	)
Shares outstanding, March 31, 2026	135,529,485

9. Indemnification

In the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The Fund's maximum exposure under these agreements is dependent on future claims that may be made against the Fund, and therefore cannot be established; however, the Fund expects the risk of loss from such claims to be remote.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements
March 31, 2026 (continued)

10. Subsequent Events

Management has evaluated the impact of all subsequent events on the Fund through the date the financial statements were issued and has determined that there were no subsequent events to report.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the schedule of investments, of BBR ALO Fund, LLC (the "Fund") as of March 31, 2026, the related statements of operations and cash flows for the year ended March 31, 2026, the statement of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period ended March 31, 2026, including the related notes, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period ended March 31, 2026 (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of March 31, 2026, the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period ended March 31, 2026 and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period ended March 31, 2026 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Fund's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Fund in accordance with the relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit, which include standards of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Code of Professional Conduct, as well as U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the auditing standards of the PCAOB and in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of March 31, 2026 by correspondence with the custodian, transfer agent, and broker; when replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

New York, New York
May 28, 2026

We have served as the auditor of one or more investment companies in BBR Partners Funds since 2017.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Investment Program and Principal Risk Factors (Unaudited)
March 31, 2026

INVESTMENT PROGRAM

Investment Objective and Policies

The investment objective of BBR ALO Fund, LLC (the "Fund") is to seek long-term capital appreciation. The Fund's investment objective is not a fundamental policy, and may be changed without the approval of investors. Except as otherwise indicated, the Fund's investment policies, strategies and restrictions are not fundamental and may be changed without a vote of the investors. No assurance can be given that the Fund will achieve its investment objective.

Principal Investment Strategies

The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by deploying its assets among a select group of long-biased equity investment managers (the "Investment Managers") and the unregistered investment vehicles (i.e., hedge funds) (the "Investment Funds") and/or accounts they operate. In addition to allocating Fund assets to Investment Funds, BBR Partners, LLC, the Fund's investment adviser (the "Adviser"), may allocate Fund assets to accounts operated by Investment Managers pursuant to subadvisory agreements with such Investment Managers.

The Fund may invest in investment strategies other than those described in its Confidential Memorandum. In addition, the Adviser may, in its sole discretion, allocate and reallocate the Fund's assets among (i) Investment Funds (subject to any withdrawal or redemption limitations imposed by the Investment Fund) and (ii) Maren Capital LLC, Polen Capital Management, LLC, Quantum Capital Management, LLC and Summit Street Capital Management, LLC (collectively, the "Subadvisers"), and terminate the subadvisory agreements pursuant to which each Subadviser has been engaged to directly manage specified portions of the Fund's assets. The Adviser also may select additional Investment Managers to subadvise a specified portion of the Fund's assets, subject to approval by the Fund's Board of Directors (the "Board") and investors. To the extent the Adviser manages a portion of the Fund's assets directly, it may sell those holdings in its sole discretion.

The Fund and Investment Managers may invest in high quality fixed-income securities, money market instruments and money market funds, or may hold cash or cash equivalents in such amounts as the Adviser and Investment Managers deem appropriate under the circumstances, including in response to adverse market, economic or political conditions or for temporary defensive purposes. In addition, the Fund may make these types of investments pending the investment of assets by the Investment Managers, or to maintain the liquidity necessary to effect repurchases of the Fund's shares of limited liability company interests ("Shares") or meet expenses.

Selection of Investment Managers

The Fund seeks to identify, select and monitor Investment Managers that the Adviser believes will produce attractive returns over time. The Adviser selects Investment Managers based on a number of factors including, but not limited to, portfolio management experience, strategy style and historical performance. The Adviser follows certain general guidelines when reviewing and selecting Investment Managers, but is not bound by any fixed criteria. While the Adviser attempts to apply the guidelines consistently, the guidelines involve the application of subjective and qualitative criteria and, therefore, the selection of Investment Managers is a fundamentally subjective process. The guidelines may be modified or eliminated at the discretion of the Adviser.

It is the responsibility of the Adviser to research and select the Investment Managers, to monitor and conduct ongoing diligence regarding the suitability of the Investment Managers and to allocate and reallocate the Fund's assets among Investment Managers directly or indirectly through the Fund's investment in Investment Funds. The Adviser makes its allocation decisions based on its view of the optimal mix of investment styles.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Investment Program and Principal Risk Factors (Unaudited) (continued)
March 31, 2026

Investment Managers are chosen on the basis of selection criteria established by the Adviser, including an analysis of the Investment Managers' performance during various time periods and market cycles and the Investment Managers' reputations, experience, training and investment philosophy and policies. In addition, the Adviser considers the ability of Investment Managers to provide timely and accurate reporting, and their internal controls. The Adviser reviews the Investment Funds' offering documents, due diligence materials and other available information regarding the Investment Managers, and may conduct interviews and substantial other due diligence with senior personnel of Investment Managers. The identity and number of Investment Managers is likely to change over time.

The Adviser monitors the Investment Managers and their performance on an ongoing basis, and communicates regularly with the Investment Managers about their investment strategies, policies, philosophies and risk management practices, as well as general market trends. In addition, the Adviser participates on periodic conference calls with, and conducts onsite visits of, Investment Managers where appropriate. These interactions facilitate ongoing portfolio analyses and may help to identify potential issues, such as loss of key team members or proposed changes in constituent documents. It also provides ongoing due diligence feedback, as additional investments are considered.

In an effort to optimize the Fund's investment program, the Adviser may allocate a portion of the Fund's assets to Investment Funds and Investment Managers that are newly organized-and, therefore, that lack historical track records or have limited operating histories-but, in the Adviser's judgment, offer exceptional potential.

The Fund's investment program is speculative and entails substantial risks. There can be no assurance that the Fund's or the Investment Managers' investment objectives will be achieved or that their investment programs will be successful. Prospective investors should consider the Fund as a supplement to an overall investment program and should invest only if they are willing to undertake the risks involved.

PRINCIPAL RISK FACTORS

General Risks

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Investment Program and Principal Risk Factors (Unaudited) (continued)
March 31, 2026

The impact of the departure of the United Kingdom (the "UK") from the European Union (the "EU"), an event widely referred to as "Brexit" and the potential departure of one or more other countries from the EU has had and may have profound and uncertain economic and political consequences for the UK and the EU, as well as the Eurozone and global markets. There remains uncertainty regarding many aspects of the UK's legal and economic relationship with the EU, including financial services and the provision of cross-border services. It is not possible to ascertain the precise impact these events may have on the Fund or the Investment Funds from an economic, financial, tax or regulatory perspective, but since such events could result in periods of instability and market volatility, any such impact could have material consequences for the Fund and the Investment Funds.

Investment Approach. The Investment Funds are not registered as investment companies under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). The Fund, as an investor in an Investment Fund, does not have the benefit of the protections afforded by the 1940 Act to investors in registered investment companies. Although the Adviser periodically receives information from the Investment Fund regarding its investment performance and investment strategies, the Adviser may have little or no means of independently verifying this information. An Investment Manager may use proprietary investment strategies that are not fully disclosed to the Adviser, and such strategies may involve risks that are not anticipated by the Adviser. Investment Managers may change their investment strategies (i.e., may experience style drift) at any time. In addition, the Fund and the Adviser have no control over an Investment Fund's investment management, brokerage, custodial arrangements or operations, and must rely on the experience and competency of the Investment Manager in these areas. The performance of the Fund depends on the success of the Adviser in selecting Investment Managers for investment by the Fund and the allocation and reallocation of Fund assets among Investment Managers.

In contrast to most registered investment companies, the Investment Funds typically do not maintain their securities and other assets in the custody of a bank. It is anticipated that the Investment Funds generally will maintain custody of their assets with brokerage firms that do not separately segregate such customer assets as required in the case of registered investment companies. If such brokerage firm became bankrupt, the Fund could be more adversely affected than would be the case if custody of assets were maintained in accordance with the requirements applicable to registered investment companies. In addition, an Investment Manager could convert assets committed to it by the Fund for its own use, or a custodian could convert assets committed to it by an Investment Manager for the custodian's own use.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Investment Program and Principal Risk Factors (Unaudited) (continued)
March 31, 2026

could result in the Fund's directly or indirectly incurring certain transaction costs without accomplishing any net investment result. Because the Fund may make additional investments in or withdraw from Investment Managers only at certain times due to restrictions imposed by the Investment Managers or Investment Funds, the Fund may, from time to time, temporarily invest some of its assets in money market securities, money market funds, or other similar types of investments.

Investment Funds may permit or require that withdrawals or redemptions of interests be made in-kind, or in part in cash and in part in-kind. The Fund may receive securities that are illiquid or difficult to value upon its withdrawal of all or a portion of its interest in an Investment Fund. In such a case, the Adviser would seek to have the Fund dispose of these securities in a manner that is in the interest of the Fund. In addition, some Investment Funds may impose so-called "gates," limiting the proportion of assets investors, including the Fund, may withdraw on any single withdrawal date. The purpose of "gate" provisions is to prevent a run on the Investment Fund, which could impair or cripple its operations, as a large number of withdrawals from the Investment Fund would force the Investment Manager to sell off a large number of positions. The Fund may otherwise not be able to withdraw from an Investment Fund except at specified times, thereby limiting the Adviser's ability to withdraw assets from an Investment Fund that may have poor performance or for other reasons.

Dependence on Key Personnel. William C. Page currently serves as the Fund's portfolio manager. There can be no assurance that Mr. Page will remain affiliated with the Adviser, or otherwise will continue to carry on his current duties, throughout the life of the Fund. In addition, the ability of the Investment Managers to meet their investment objectives may depend on their respective key personnel. There can be no assurance that such individuals will remain employed by their respective Investment Manager or otherwise continue to carry on their expected duties throughout the duration of the Fund's investment in the Investment Manager.

Limited or No Operating History. Certain Investment Funds and Investment Managers may be newly organized and have limited or no operating histories upon which to evaluate their performance; the information the Fund will obtain about such investments may be limited. As such, the ability of the Adviser to evaluate past performance or to validate the investment strategies of such Investment Funds and Investment Managers will be limited. Moreover, even to the extent an Investment Fund or Investment Manager has a longer operating history, the past investment performance of any of the Fund's investments should not be construed as an indication of the future results of such investments or the Fund, particularly as the investment professionals responsible for the performance of such Investment Funds or Investment Managers may change over time. This risk is related to, and enhanced by, the risks created by the fact that the Adviser relies upon information provided to it by the Investment Fund that is not, and cannot be, independently verified.

Available Information. The Adviser monitors the performance of Investment Managers, as well as other pertinent developments regarding the Investment Managers. The availability of certain information, however, may be limited due to the lack of transparency associated with certain Investment Managers, Investment Funds or strategies.

Unspecified Investments; Dependence on the Adviser. The Fund and, accordingly, investors must rely upon the ability of the Adviser to identify and implement investments consistent with the Fund's investment objective. Investors will not receive or otherwise be privy to due diligence or risk information prepared by or for the Adviser. The Adviser has the authority and responsibility for asset allocation, the selection of the Fund's investments and all other investment decisions of the Fund. The success of the Fund depends upon the ability of the Adviser to develop and implement investment strategies that achieve the investment objective of the Fund. Investors have no right or power to participate in the management or control of the Fund, or the terms of any such investments. There can be no assurance that the Adviser will be able to select or implement successful strategies or that the Fund will be able to achieve its investment objective. The Fund is organized to provide investors with an investment program across Investment Managers that employ long-biased equity-strategies, and not an indirect way for investors to gain access to any particular Investment Manager or Investment Fund.

Limitations on Transferability; Shares Not Listed; No Market for Shares. The transferability of Shares is subject to certain restrictions contained in the Fund's Limited Liability Company Agreement, as amended and restated from time to time (the "LLC Agreement"), and is affected by restrictions imposed under applicable securities laws. Shares are not traded on any securities exchange or any public or other market. No market currently exists for Shares, and it is not anticipated that a market will develop. Although the Adviser and the Fund expect to recommend to the Board that the Fund offer to repurchase Shares from investors on a quarterly basis, and that each repurchase offer will apply to a predetermined percentage of the net assets of the Fund, no assurances can be given that the Fund will do so. Consequently, Shares should only be acquired by investors able to commit their funds for an indefinite period of time.

Closed-End Fund; Liquidity Risks. The Fund is a non-diversified, closed-end management investment company designed for long-term investors. An investor should not invest in the Fund if the investor needs a liquid investment. Closed-end funds differ from open-end management investment companies (commonly known as mutual funds) in that investors in a closed-

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Investment Program and Principal Risk Factors (Unaudited) (continued)
March 31, 2026

end fund do not have the right to redeem their shares on a daily basis at a price based on net asset value. Shares are not traded on any securities exchange or other market and are subject to substantial restrictions on transferability. Although the Fund may offer to repurchase Shares from time to time, an investor may not be able to redeem its Shares for a substantial period of time.

Legal and Regulatory Risks. Legal and regulatory changes that could occur during the life of the Fund may substantially affect private funds and such changes may adversely impact the performance of the Fund. The regulation of the U.S. and non-U.S. securities and futures markets and investment funds has undergone substantial change in recent years and such change may continue. Greater regulatory scrutiny may increase the Fund's and the Adviser's exposure to potential liabilities. Increased regulatory oversight also can impose administrative burdens and costs on the Fund and the Adviser, including, without limitation, responding to examinations or investigations and implementing new policies and procedures.

Substantial Fees and Expenses. An investor in the Fund meeting the eligibility conditions imposed by the Investment Funds, including minimum initial investment requirements that are substantially higher than those imposed by the Fund, could invest directly in the Investment Funds. An investor in the Fund pays a pro rata portion of (i) the unitary management fee paid in consideration of the advisory services provided to the Fund by the Adviser, computed and payable monthly in arrears, at an annual rate of 0.80% of the Fund's net asset value, (ii) the fee paid in consideration of the subadvisory services provided to the Fund by the Subadvisers, calculated based on the net asset value of the respective allocated portion of the Fund's assets, to each Subadviser and (iii) other expenses of the Fund. In addition, by investing in the Investment Funds through the Fund, an investor in the Fund also indirectly bears a portion of the asset-based fees, incentive fees or allocations, if applicable, and other expenses borne by the Fund as an investor in the Investment Funds. Each Investment Manager receives any incentive-based allocations to which it is entitled irrespective of the performance of the other Investment Funds and the Fund generally. As a result, an Investment Fund with positive performance may receive compensation from the Fund, even if the Fund's overall returns are negative. As of the date hereof, none of the Investment Funds that the Fund invests in charge incentive fees or allocations based on the Investment Funds' performance.

Certain Investment Managers may pass through certain operating expenses and costs to its Investment Funds, which may be significant. The operating expenses of an Investment Fund may include, but are not limited to: organizational and offering expenses; the cost of investments (such as broker-dealer expenses, exchange and clearing fees, interest expense and other charges for transactions); the cost of leverage and other borrowing charges; margin payments and fees; administrative, legal and internal and external accounting fees; other limited third-party diligence-related expenses, such as background checks; and extraordinary or non-recurring expenses (such as litigation or indemnification expenses). It is difficult to predict the future expenses of the Fund.

Investments in Non-Voting Stock; Inability to Vote. The Fund intends to hold its interests in the Investment Funds in non-voting form in order to avoid becoming (i) an "affiliated person" of any Investment Fund within the meaning of the 1940 Act and (ii) subject to the 1940 Act limitations and prohibitions on transactions with affiliated persons. Where only voting securities are available for purchase, the Fund generally will seek to create by contract the same result as owning a non-voting security by agreeing to relinquish the right to vote in respect of its investment. The Fund may irrevocably waive its rights (if any) to vote its interest in an Investment Fund. The Fund will not receive any consideration in return for entering into a voting waiver arrangement. To the extent that the Fund contractually foregoes the right to vote Investment Fund securities, the Fund will not be able to vote on matters that may be adverse to the Fund's interests. As a result, the Fund's influence on an Investment Fund could be diminished, which may consequently adversely affect the Fund and its investors. The waiver arrangement should benefit the Fund, as it will enable the Fund to acquire more interests of an Investment Fund that the Adviser believes is desirable than the Fund would be able to if it were deemed to be an "affiliate" of the Investment Fund within the meaning of the 1940 Act.

Non-Diversified Status. The Fund is a "non-diversified" management investment company for purposes of the 1940 Act, which means it is not subject to percentage limitations under the 1940 Act on assets that may be invested in the securities of any one issuer. As a result, the Fund's net asset value may be subject to greater volatility than that of an investment company that is subject to diversification limitations.

Dilution from Subsequent Offering of Shares. The Fund may accept additional purchases of Shares as of the first business day of each calendar month. Additional purchases will dilute the indirect interests of existing investors in the Investment Funds.

Small- and Medium-Capitalization Companies. Some Investment Managers may invest a portion of their assets in the securities of companies with small- to medium-sized market capitalizations. While such securities may provide significant potential for appreciation, the securities of certain companies, particularly smaller-capitalization companies, may involve higher

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Investment Program and Principal Risk Factors (Unaudited) (continued)
March 31, 2026

risks than do investments in securities of larger companies. For example, prices of small-capitalization and even medium-capitalization securities are often more volatile than prices of large-capitalization securities, as they typically are traded in lower volume and the issuers typically are more subject to changes in earnings and prospects, and the risk of bankruptcy or insolvency is higher than for larger, "blue-chip" companies. In addition, an investment in some small-capitalization companies may be relatively illiquid due to thin trading in their securities.

Geographic Concentration Risks. An Investment Manager may concentrate its investments in specific geographic regions. This focus may constrain the liquidity and the number of issues available for investment by an Investment Manager. In addition, the investments of such an Investment Manager will be disproportionately exposed to the risks associated with the region of concentration.

Currency Risk. Investment Managers may make direct and indirect investments in a number of different currencies. Any returns on, and the value of such investments, therefore, may be materially affected by exchange rate fluctuations, local exchange control, limited liquidity of the relevant foreign exchange markets, the convertibility of the currencies in question and/or other factors. A decline in the value of the currencies in which the Fund investments are denominated against the U.S. dollar will result in a decrease in the Fund's net asset value. The Adviser generally will not hedge the value of investments made by the Fund against currency fluctuations. Accordingly, the performance of the Fund could be adversely affected by such currency fluctuations.

Investment Managers May Concentrate or Invest Significantly in Volatile Sectors and Markets. One or more Investment Managers, from time to time, may invest a substantial portion of assets in an industry sector, or in only a limited number of issuers. As a result, the Fund's portfolio may be subject to greater risk and volatility than if investments had been made in a broader range of issuers. In addition, an Investment Manager's emphasis in a particular sector or issuer may be especially volatile. To the extent that an Investment Manager concentrates its investments in a single industry, in a limited number of issuers or in securities of only a single issuer, the risk of any investment decision is increased.

Valuation of the Fund's Investments in Investment Funds. The 1940 Act provides that securities for which market quotations are "readily available" must be valued at market value, and all other securities and other assets must be valued at "fair value" in accordance with requirements under the 1940 Act. Pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act, the Board has designated the Adviser as its "valuation designee" (as defined in Rule 2a-5) to determine fair value in good faith for all Fund investments for which market quotations are not readily available and to carry out all of the functions required by Rule 2a-5, subject to oversight by the Board and the other requirements of Rule 2a-5, in accordance with the procedures pursuant to which the Fund values its investments (the "Valuation Procedures").

The valuation of the Fund's investments in Investment Funds ordinarily is determined based upon valuations determined by the Investment Managers. The Investment Funds may invest in certain securities and other financial instruments that do not have readily ascertainable market prices, and will be valued by the respective Investment Manager. In this regard, an Investment Manager may face a conflict of interest in valuing the securities, as their value may affect the Investment Manager's compensation or its ability to raise additional funds. No assurances can be given regarding the valuation methodology or the sufficiency of systems utilized by any Investment Fund, the accuracy of the valuations provided by the Investment Funds, that the Investment Funds will comply with their own internal policies or procedures for keeping records or making valuations, or that the Investment Funds' policies and procedures and systems will not change without notice to the Fund. As a result, valuations of the securities may be subjective and could prove in hindsight to have been wrong, potentially by significant amounts.

An Investment Manager's information could be inaccurate due to fraudulent activity, misvaluation or inadvertent error. In any case, the Fund may not uncover errors for a significant period of time, if ever. Even if the Adviser elects to cause the Fund to sell, withdraw or redeem its interests in such an Investment Fund, the Fund may be unable to sell, withdraw or redeem such interests quickly, if at all, and could therefore be obligated to continue to hold such interests for an extended period of time. In such a case, the Investment Fund's valuations of such interests could remain subject to such fraud or error, and the committee established by the Adviser to oversee the valuation of the Fund's investments pursuant to the Valuation Procedures may, in its sole discretion, determine to discount the value of the interests or value them at zero.

Investors should be aware that situations involving uncertainties as to the valuations by Investment Funds could have a material adverse effect on the Fund if the Investment Manager's, the Adviser's or the Fund's judgments regarding valuations should prove incorrect. Persons who are unwilling to assume such risks should not make an investment in the Fund.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Investment Program and Principal Risk Factors (Unaudited) (continued)
March 31, 2026

Valuations Subject to Adjustment. The valuations reported by the Investment Funds based upon which the Fund determines its month-end net asset value and the net asset value of the Shares may be subject to later adjustment or revision. For example, fiscal year-end net asset value calculations of the Investment Funds may be revised as a result of audits by their independent auditors. Other adjustments may occur from time to time. Because such adjustments or revisions, whether increasing or decreasing the net asset value of the Fund at the time they occur, relate to information available only at the time of the adjustment or revision, the adjustment or revision may not affect the amount of the repurchase proceeds of the Fund received by investors who had their Shares repurchased prior to such adjustments and received their repurchase proceeds, subject to the ability of the Fund to adjust or recoup the repurchase proceeds received by investors under certain circumstances. As a result, to the extent that such subsequently adjusted valuations from the Investment Funds or revisions to the net asset value of an Investment Fund adversely affect the Fund's net asset value, the value of the outstanding Shares may be adversely affected by prior repurchases to the benefit of investors who had their Shares repurchased at a net asset value higher than the adjusted amount. Conversely, any increases in the net asset value resulting from such subsequently adjusted valuations may be entirely for the benefit of the outstanding Shares and to the detriment of investors who previously had their Shares repurchased at a net asset value lower than the adjusted amount. The same principles apply to the purchase of Shares. New investors may be affected in a similar way.

Indemnification of Investment Funds, Investment Managers and Others. The Fund may agree to indemnify certain of the Investment Managers, Investment Funds and their respective managers, officers, directors, and affiliates from any liability, damage, cost or expense arising out of, among other things, acts or omissions undertaken in connection with the management of Investment Funds and Fund assets. If the Fund were required to make payments (or return distributions) in respect of any such indemnity, the Fund could be materially adversely affected.

Investment Strategy-Related Risks

The principal risks of the Fund's identified investment strategy (which will be employed directly or indirectly through the Investment Managers) are set forth below. Depending on economic and market conditions, or allocations to other Investment Managers or Investment Funds, however, other risks may be present.

Investment Managers' investments in equity securities may include securities that are listed on securities exchanges, as well as unlisted securities that are traded over-the-counter ("OTC"). Equity securities of companies traded OTC may not be traded in the volumes typically found on a national securities exchange. Consequently, an Investment Manager may be required to dispose of such securities over a longer (and potentially less favorable) period of time than is required to dispose of the securities of listed companies.

Cash, Cash Equivalents, Investment Grade Bonds, Money Market Instruments. The Fund and Investment Managers may invest some or all of their respective assets in high quality fixed-income securities, money market instruments and money market mutual funds, or hold cash or cash equivalents in such amounts as the Adviser and Investment Managers deem appropriate under the circumstances, including in response to adverse market, economic or political conditions or for temporary defensive purposes. In addition, the Fund may invest in these instruments pending the investment of assets with Investment Managers or in Investment Funds, or to maintain the liquidity necessary to effect repurchases of Shares or meet expenses. Money market instruments are high quality, short-term fixed-income obligations, which generally have remaining maturities of one year or less and may include U.S. Government securities, commercial paper, certificates of deposit and bankers' acceptances issued by domestic branches of U.S. banks that are members of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and repurchase agreements.

These investments may be adversely affected by tax, legislative, regulatory, credit, political or government changes, interest rate increases and the financial conditions of issuers, which may pose credit risks that result in issuer default.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Investment Program and Principal Risk Factors (Unaudited) (continued)
March 31, 2026

Non-U.S. Investments. Investment Managers may invest a portion of their capital outside the U.S. in non-dollar-denominated securities, including in securities issued by foreign (non-U.S.) companies, including other funds, or governments of foreign countries. Investment Managers also may invest in depositary receipts, such as American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). Non-U.S. securities in which an Investment Manager invests may be listed on non-U.S. securities exchanges, traded in non-U.S. over-the-counter markets, or purchased in private placements and not be publicly traded. These investments involve special risks not usually associated with investing in securities of U.S. companies or U.S. federal, state or local governments.

The securities markets of foreign countries generally are less regulated than U.S. securities markets. Some foreign securities markets have a higher potential for price volatility and relative illiquidity compared to the U.S. securities markets. In addition, because there is less publicly available information about foreign companies, and because many non-U.S. entities are not subject to uniform accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards, practices and requirements comparable to those of U.S. companies, it may be difficult to analyze and compare such foreign company's performance.

Although certain Investment Managers may invest portions of their assets in non-U.S. equity or fixed-income instruments or in instruments denominated in non-U.S. currencies, the Investment Managers may value their securities and other assets in U.S. dollars. The Investment Managers may or may not seek to hedge all or any portion of their foreign currency exposure.

Following is a discussion of some of the more significant risks generally associated with investing in non-U.S. securities:

Non-U.S. Currencies. Certain Investment Managers may invest their capital outside the U.S. These investments involve special risks not usually associated with investing in securities of U.S. companies. Because some Investment Managers may temporarily hold funds in bank deposits in foreign currencies during the completion of its investment program, such Investment Managers may be affected favorably or unfavorably by changes in currency rates and in exchange control regulations and may incur transaction costs in connection with conversions between various currencies. Investment Managers may, but are not required to, hedge their exposure to fluctuations in the non-U.S. currency exchange rates. The Investment Managers may seek to hedge currency risks by investing in currencies, currency futures contracts and options on currency futures contracts, forward currency exchange contracts, swaps, swaptions or any combination thereof (whether or not exchange traded), but there can be no assurance that these strategies will be effective, and such techniques entail costs and additional risks. If an Investment Manager enters into hedging transactions, it may not participate fully in any currency gains that would otherwise be attributable to any appreciation of the foreign currencies. To the extent unhedged, the value of an Investment Manager's assets will fluctuate with U.S. dollar exchange rates, as well as the price changes of the Investment Manager's investments in the various local markets and currencies. Among the factors that may affect currency values are trade balances, the level of short-term interest rates, differences in relative values of similar assets in different currencies, long-term opportunities for investment and capital appreciation and political developments. An increase in the value of the U.S. dollar compared to the other currencies in which an Investment Manager makes its investments will reduce the effect of increases, and magnify the effect of decreases, in the prices of the Investment Manager's securities in their local markets. The Investment Managers could realize a net loss on an investment, even if there were a gain on the underlying investment before currency losses were taken into account.

Characteristics of Non-U.S. Securities Markets. Some Investment Managers may buy and sell securities on the principal stock exchange or over-the-counter market of foreign countries. Many foreign stock markets are not as developed or efficient as those in the U.S., and they may be more volatile. Generally, there is less government supervision and regulation of non-U.S. exchanges, brokers and listed companies than in the U.S. Furthermore, trading volumes in non-U.S. markets are usually lower than in U.S. markets, resulting in reduced liquidity and potentially rapid and erratic price fluctuations. Commissions for trades on foreign stock exchanges and custody expenses generally are higher than those in the U.S. Settlement practices for transactions in foreign markets may involve delays beyond periods customary in the United States, possibly requiring an Investment Manager to borrow funds or securities to satisfy its obligations arising out of other transactions. In addition, there could be more "failed settlements," which can result in losses.

Less Company Information and Regulation. Generally, there is less publicly available information about foreign companies than about U.S. companies. This may make it more difficult for an Investment Manager to stay informed of corporate action that may affect the price of a particular security. Further, many foreign countries lack uniform accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards, practices and requirements. These factors can make it difficult to analyze and compare the performance of non-U.S. companies.

Political and Economic Instability. Because of volatile internal political environments, less stable monetary systems and/or external political risks, among other factors, many non-U.S. economies are less stable than the U.S. economy. Some foreign governments participate in their economies through ownership or regulation in ways that can have a significant

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Investment Program and Principal Risk Factors (Unaudited) (continued)
March 31, 2026

effect on the prices of securities. Some economies depend heavily on international trade and can be adversely affected by trade barriers or changes in the economic conditions of their trading partners. In addition, some countries face the risk of expropriation or confiscatory taxation, political, economic or social instability, limitation on the removal of funds or other assets or the repatriation of profits, restrictions on investment opportunities, the imposition of trading controls, withholding or other taxes on interest, capital gain or other income, import duties or other protectionist measures, various laws enacted for the protection of creditors, greater risks of nationalization or diplomatic developments which could adversely affect an Investment Manager's investments in those countries. It also may be difficult for the Fund to obtain or enforce a judgment in a non-U.S. jurisdiction.

Withholding Taxes. Realized income and gains may be subject to withholding and other taxes, which would reduce net proceeds.

Foreign Exchange. Investment Managers may engage in foreign-exchange transactions in the spot and, to a limited degree, forward markets. A forward currency exchange contract involves an obligation to purchase or sell a specific currency at a future date, which may be any fixed number of days from the date of the contract as agreed by the parties, at a price that is fixed at the time the contract is entered into. In addition, an Investment Manager may maintain short positions in forward currency exchange transactions, in which the Investment Manager agrees to exchange a specified amount of a currency it does not currently own for another currency at a future date in anticipation of a decline in the value of the currency sold relative to the value of the currency the Investment Manager agreed to purchase. A forward currency exchange contract offers less protection against defaults by the counterparty than exchange-traded currency futures contracts. Forward currency exchange contracts also are highly leveraged. An Investment Manager also may purchase and sell put and call options on currencies and currency futures contracts and options on currency futures contracts.

Purchasing Initial Public Offerings. Investment Managers may purchase securities of companies in initial public offerings or shortly after those offerings are complete. Special risks are associated with these securities, including lack of a trading history, lack of knowledge about the issuer and limited operating history. These factors may contribute to substantial price volatility for the shares of these companies, and this volatility can affect the value of the Fund's assets allocated to the Investment Managers that invest in these shares. The limited number of shares available for trading in some initial public offerings may make it more difficult for an Investment Manager to buy or sell significant amounts of shares without an unfavorable effect on prevailing market prices. In addition, some companies in initial public offerings may be involved in relatively new industries or businesses, which may not be widely understood by investors. Some of these companies may be undercapitalized or regarded as developmental stage companies, without revenues or operating income, or close to achieving revenues or operating income. In addition, an investment in an initial public offering may have a disproportionate impact on the performance of an Investment Manager that does not yet have a substantial amount of assets. This impact on an Investment Manager's performance may decrease as its assets increase.

Investing in the Fund involves risks other than those associated with investments made by the Investment Managers. Some of these risks are described below:

Availability of Investment Opportunities. The business of identifying and structuring investments of the types contemplated by the Fund is competitive, and involves a high degree of uncertainty. The availability of investment opportunities is subject to market conditions, and also may be affected by the prevailing regulatory or political climate and Investment Manager capacity. Investment Funds may close to new investors or investment from time to time, and certain Investment Managers may experience capacity constraints. If an Investment Fund, a class of an Investment Fund or an Investment Manager closes, the Fund may allocate its capital to a different Investment Fund or Investment Manager, or invest in a different class of the Investment Fund; however, certain terms (e.g., liquidity or fees) may be less advantageous. No assurance can be made that the Fund will be able to identify and complete attractive investments in the future or that it will be able to invest fully its subscriptions. Other investment vehicles sponsored, managed or advised by the Adviser and its affiliates may seek investment opportunities similar to those the Fund may be seeking. The Adviser will allocate fairly between the Fund and such other investment vehicles any investment opportunities that may be appropriate for the Fund and such other investment vehicles. Similarly, identifying attractive investment opportunities is difficult and involves a high degree of uncertainty. Even if an Investment Manager identifies an attractive investment opportunity, the Investment Manager may not be permitted to take advantage of the opportunity to the fullest extent desired.

Changes in Investment Strategies. The investment strategies of one or more Investment Managers may be modified and any such Investment Managers may begin utilizing additional investment strategies without prior approval or notice if the Investment Managers determine that any such modification or addition is in the best interests of its clients. Any such modification or addition could result in exposure of the Fund's assets to additional risks, which could be substantial.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Investment Program and Principal Risk Factors (Unaudited) (continued)
March 31, 2026

Potential Significant Effect of the Performance of a Limited Number of Investments or Strategies. The Fund may make investments in a limited number of Investment Managers and Investment Funds, which in turn may make a limited number of underlying investments. In either instance, these limited numbers of investments may have a significant effect on the performance of the Fund. In addition, the Fund may invest a substantial portion of its assets in Investment Managers and Investment Funds that follow a particular investment strategy. In such event, the Fund would be exposed to the risks associated with that strategy to a greater extent than it would if the Fund's assets were invested more broadly among Investment Managers and Investment Funds pursuing various investment strategies.

Inadequate Return. No assurance can be given that the returns on the Fund's investments will be proportionate to the risk of investment in the Fund. Prospective investors should not commit money to the Fund unless they have the resources to sustain the loss of their entire investment.

Inside Information. From time to time, the Fund or an Investment Manager or their respective affiliates may come into possession of material, non-public information concerning an entity or issuer in which the Fund or an Investment Manager has invested or may invest. The possession of such information may limit the Fund's or the Investment Manager's ability to buy or sell securities of the issuer.

Recourse to the Fund's Assets. The Fund's assets, including any investments made by the Fund and any interest in the Investment Funds held by the Fund, are available to satisfy all liabilities and other obligations of the Fund. If the Fund becomes subject to a liability, parties seeking to have the liability satisfied may have recourse to the Fund's assets generally and not be limited to any particular asset, such as the asset representing the investment giving rise to the liability.

Possible Exclusion of Investors Based on Certain Detrimental Effects. The Fund may, at any time, involuntarily repurchase Shares held by an investor or other person acquiring Shares from or through an investor, in accordance with the LLC Agreement and Section 23 of the 1940 Act and any applicable rules thereunder, if: (i) the Shares have been transferred or have vested in any person other than by operation of law as the result of the death, bankruptcy, insolvency, adjudicated incompetence or dissolution of the investor; (ii) the investor or other person does not meet the necessary qualifications to invest in the Fund; (iii) ownership of the Shares by the investor or other person is likely to cause the Fund to be in violation of, require registration of any Shares under, or subject the Fund to additional registration or regulation under, the securities, commodities or other laws of the United States or any other relevant jurisdiction; (iv) continued ownership of the Shares by the investor or other person may be harmful or injurious to the business or reputation of the Fund, or may subject the Fund or any investor to an undue risk of adverse tax or other consequences or restrictions; (v) any of the representations and warranties made by the investor or other person in connection with the acquisition of the Shares was not true when made or has ceased to be true; (vi) the investor is likely to be subject to additional regulatory or compliance requirements under special laws or regulations by virtue of continuing to hold the Shares; (vii) the investment balance of the investor, if not a Fund officer, employee of the Adviser or Director who is not an "interested person" (as defined in the 1940 Act) of the Fund, falls below $25,000; or (viii) the Board determines that it would be in the best interests of the Fund. These provisions may, in effect, deprive an investor in the Fund of an opportunity for a return that might be received by other investors.

Tax Risks. Special tax risks are associated with an investment in the Fund. The Fund has elected to be treated, and intends to operate in a manner so as to continuously qualify as a regulated investment company (a "RIC") under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). As such, the Fund must satisfy, among other requirements, certain ongoing asset diversification, source-of-income and annual distribution requirements. If the Fund fails to qualify as a RIC it will become subject to corporate-level income tax, and the resulting corporate taxes could substantially reduce the Fund's net assets, the amount of income available for distributions to investors, the amount of distributions and the amount of funds available for new investments. Such a failure would have a material adverse effect on the Fund and the investors.

Each of the aforementioned ongoing requirements for qualification of the Fund as a RIC requires that the Adviser obtain information from or about the Investment Managers and Investment Funds. However, Investment Funds generally are not obligated to disclose the contents of their portfolios. This lack of transparency may make it difficult for the Adviser to monitor the sources of the Fund's income and the diversification of its assets, and otherwise comply with Subchapter M of the Code, and ultimately may limit the universe of Investment Funds in which the Fund can invest or the amount that may be invested in certain Investment Funds. Furthermore, although the Fund expects to receive information from each Investment Manager regarding its investment performance on a regular basis, in most cases there is little or no means of independently verifying this information.

If, before the end of any quarter of its taxable year, the Fund believes that it may fail the RIC asset diversification tests, the Fund may seek to take certain actions to avert such a failure. However, the action frequently taken by RICs to avert such a failure, the disposition of non-diversified assets, may be difficult to pursue. While relevant tax provisions afford a RIC a 30-day

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Investment Program and Principal Risk Factors (Unaudited) (continued)
March 31, 2026

period after the end of the relevant quarter in which to cure a diversification failure by disposing of non-diversified assets, the constraints on the Fund's ability to effect a sale of an Investment Fund may limit the Fund's use of this cure period. In certain cases, the Fund may be afforded a longer cure period under applicable savings provisions, but the Fund may be subject to a penalty tax in connection with its use of those savings provisions. If the Fund fails to satisfy the RIC diversification tests or other RIC requirements, the Fund may fail to qualify as a RIC under the Code. If the Fund fails to qualify as a RIC, it would become subject to a corporate-level U.S. federal income tax (and any applicable U.S. state and local taxes) and distributions to the investors generally would be treated as corporate dividends. In addition, the Fund is required each December to make certain "excise tax" calculations based on income and gain information that must be obtained from the Investment Managers and Investment Funds. If the Fund does not receive sufficient information from an Investment Manager or Investment Fund, it risks failing to satisfy the Subchapter M qualification tests and/or incurring an excise tax on undistributed income. The Fund may, however, attempt to avoid such outcomes by paying a distribution that is or is considered to be in excess of its current and accumulated earnings and profits for the relevant period (i.e., a return of capital).

In addition, the Fund may directly or indirectly invest in Investment Funds located outside the United States. Such Investment Funds may be subject to withholding taxes and other taxes in such jurisdictions with respect to their investments. In general, a U.S. person will not be able to claim a foreign tax credit or deduction for foreign taxes paid by the Fund. Further, adverse United States tax consequences can be associated with certain foreign investments, including potential United States withholding taxes on foreign investment entities with respect to their United States investments and potential adverse tax consequences associated with investments in certain foreign corporations.

Under the Fund's dividend reinvestment plan ("DRIP"), an investor's dividends and capital gain distributions paid by the Fund are automatically reinvested in additional Shares of the Fund unless the investor "opts out." If an investor participates in the DRIP, that investor will be deemed to have received, and for U.S. federal income tax purposes will be taxed on, the amount reinvested in Shares of the Fund to the extent the amount reinvested was not a tax-free return of capital. As a result, an investor may have to use funds from other sources to pay U.S. federal income tax liability on the value of the Shares received. Even if an investor does not participate in the DRIP, the Fund will have the ability to declare a large portion of a dividend in Shares instead of in cash, for example, to satisfy the annual RIC distribution requirement. As long as a portion of this dividend is paid in cash and certain requirements are met, the entire distribution will be treated as a dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, an investor generally would be subject to tax on 100% of the fair market value of the dividend on the date the dividend is received by the investor in the same manner as a cash dividend, even though most of the dividend was paid in Shares.

The Fund may retain some income and capital gains in the future, including for purposes of providing the Fund with additional liquidity, which amounts would be subject to the 4% U.S. federal excise tax. In that event, the Fund will be liable for the tax on the amount by which the Fund does not meet the foregoing distribution requirement.

Cybersecurity Risk. The Fund and its service providers, as well as the Investment Managers, Investment Funds and their service providers, are susceptible to operational and information security and related risks of cybersecurity incidents. In general, cyber-incidents can result from deliberate attacks or unintentional events. Cybersecurity attacks include, but are not limited to, gaining unauthorized access to digital systems (e.g., through "hacking" or malicious software coding) for purposes of misappropriating assets or sensitive information, corrupting data or causing operational disruption. Cyber-attacks also may be carried out in a manner that does not require gaining unauthorized access, such as causing denial-of- service attacks on websites (i.e., efforts to make services unavailable to intended users). Cybersecurity incidents affecting the Adviser, the Fund's administrator, the Fund's custodian or other service providers have the ability to cause: (i) disruptions and impact business operations, potentially resulting in financial losses; (ii) interference with the Fund's ability to calculate its net asset value; (iii) the inability of investors to transact business with the Fund; (iv) violations of applicable privacy, data security or other laws; (v) regulatory fines and penalties; (vi) reputational damage; (vii) reimbursement or other compensation or remediation costs; (viii) legal fees; or (ix) additional compliance costs. Similar adverse consequences could result from cybersecurity incidents affecting Investment Funds, Investment Managers, governmental and other regulatory authorities, exchange and other financial market operators, banks, brokers, dealers, insurance companies and other financial institutions and other parties. While information risk management systems and business continuity plans have been developed that are designed to reduce the risks associated with cybersecurity, there are inherent limitations in any cybersecurity risk management system or business continuity plan, including the possibility that certain risks have not been identified.

RECENT CHANGES

The following information in this annual report is a summary of certain changes since March 31, 2025. This information may not reflect all of the changes that have occurred since you subscribed to the Fund.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Investment Program and Principal Risk Factors (Unaudited) (continued)
March 31, 2026

During the most recent fiscal year, there were (i) no material changes to the Fund's investment objective and policies that constitute its principal portfolio emphasis that have not been approved by investors, (ii) no material changes to the principal risk factors associated with investment in the Fund, (iii) no changes to the persons who are primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund's portfolio and (iv) no changes to the Fund's organizational agreements that would delay or prevent a change of control of the Fund that have not been approved by investors, except that the Fund has updated disclosures under the caption "Market Disruption and Geopolitical Risk".

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Approval of the Renewal of the Advisory Agreements (Unaudited)

The Board, including the members of the Board who are not "interested persons" (as defined in the 1940 Act) of the Fund (the "Independent Directors"), considered the approval of the renewal of the (i) investment advisory agreement (the "Investment Advisory Agreement") between the Fund and the Adviser and (ii) the subadvisory agreements (each, a "Subadvisory Agreement" and collectively with the Investment Advisory Agreement, the "Advisory Agreements") among the Fund, the Adviser and each of Maren Capital LLC, Quantum Capital Management, LLC and Summit Street Capital Management, LLC (collectively, the "Subadvisers") at a meeting held on March 26, 2026.

In determining whether to renew the Advisory Agreements, the Board, including the Independent Directors, reviewed and discussed with management materials furnished by the Adviser and each Subadviser in response to formal requests for information relevant to the Board's deliberations, including: information regarding the Adviser and Subadvisers, their personnel, operations and financial conditions and the services they provide to the Fund; the Fund's operations; comparative fee and performance information; and a summary financial analysis. The Independent Directors also met in an executive session, during which they had the opportunity to discuss with counsel the approval of the Advisory Agreements and the duties and responsibilities of board members in connection with considering the approval of advisory and subadvisory agreements.

In considering the renewal of the Advisory Agreements, the Board considered all factors that it believed to be relevant, including those discussed below. The Board did not identify any one factor as dispositive, and each Board member may have attributed different weights to the factors considered.

(i) The nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser and Subadvisers: The Board reviewed the services that Adviser and Subadvisers provide to the Fund, including generally managing the Fund's investments in accordance with the stated policies of the Fund. The Board also discussed the amount of time the Adviser and Subadvisers dedicate to the Fund and the type of transactions that are effected on behalf of the Fund. The Board also considered the Adviser and Subadvisers' investment philosophies and investment processes with respect to, and the investment outlook for, the Fund. In addition, the Board considered the education, background and experience of the Adviser and Subadvisers' advisory and other personnel providing services to the Fund. The Board then considered the administrative services provided by the Adviser and Subadvisers to the Fund, including administrative and compliance services, oversight of Fund accounting, marketing services, assistance in meeting legal and regulatory requirements and other services necessary for the operation of the Fund. The Board acknowledged the Adviser and Subadvisers' engagement of skilled investment professionals, research analysts and administrative, legal and compliance staff members to seek to ensure that a high level of quality in compliance and administrative services is provided to the Fund. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the quality and scope of services offered by the Adviser and Subadvisers to the Fund was appropriate and supported renewal of the Advisory Agreements.

(ii) Investment performance of the Fund and the Adviser and Subadvisers: The Board considered the investment performance of the Fund as compared to other investment companies that have investment objectives and strategies similar to those of the Fund and that are managed by third-party investment advisers (the "Third-Party Comparable Funds"). The Board noted that the Fund's performance was above the median performance of the Third-Party Comparable Funds since inception, and that the Fund's annualized performance was above the median annualized performance of the Third-Party Comparable Funds for the respective three-year period ended as of the most recent applicable annual or semi-annual period. The Board noted the impact of market conditions and volatility on the Fund and the Third-Party Comparable Funds over the past three years. The Board also noted the recent changes to the Fund's subadvisers and discussed the positive impact of those changes with representatives from the Adviser.

(iii) Cost of the services provided and profits realized by the Adviser and from the relationship with the Fund: The Board considered an analysis of the Adviser's costs in providing services to the Fund, as well as the profitability of the Adviser. The Board discussed the allocation of costs and expenses by the Adviser, and the methodology used to determine the Adviser's profit. The Board concluded that the profits realized by the Adviser under the Investment Advisory Agreement were within a range the Board considered reasonable and appropriate.

The Board also considered the profitability of each Subadviser. The Board considered the fees paid to the Subadvisers, the competitiveness of the fees and the level of services provided by the Subadvisers. The Board concluded that the profits realized by each Subadviser under the respective Subadvisory Agreement were within a range the Board considered reasonable and appropriate.

(iv) The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Fund grows and whether fee levels would reflect such economies of scale: The Board considered the material benefits from economies of scale that the Adviser might realize with respect to the Fund as the Fund increases in assets. The Board noted that the Adviser has negotiated reduced fees or breakpoints with the Subadvisers, and that the breakpoints are reached as the net asset value of the portion of the Fund's assets allocated to a Subadviser, together with all assets of the Adviser's other clients for which the Subadviser provides

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Approval of the Renewal of the Advisory Agreements (Unaudited) (continued)

investment management services, increases, thereby reducing the fee rate payable by the Fund to the Subadviser and benefitting shareholders. The Board concluded that the fees and breakpoints were appropriate at this time and that any economies of scale were appropriately reflected in the advisory and subadvisory fees paid by the Fund.

(v) Comparison of fees paid to those under other investment advisory contracts, such as contracts of the same and other investment advisers or other clients: The Board reviewed the fees paid by the Fund, and compared the fees to those being charged to the Third-Party Comparable Funds and to those being charged by the Adviser and the Subadvisers to other clients. The Board noted the Fund's unitary fee was slightly above the median advisory fee of the Third-Party Comparable Funds, but that the Fund's total expense ratio was below the median expense ratio of the Third-Party Comparable Funds. The Board also noted that the fee rates paid by the Fund to each Subadviser were less than or equal to the standard fee rates charged by each Subadviser to similar clients. The Board determined that the fees paid under the Advisory Agreements did not constitute fees that are so disproportionately large as to bear no reasonable relationship to the services rendered and that could not have been the product of arm's-length bargaining.

After considering all factors that it considered relevant, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Directors, approved the renewal of the Advisory Agreements.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Information Regarding the Fund's Directors and Officers (Unaudited)
March 31, 2026

Information regarding the Directors and officers of the Fund, including their positions with the Fund, length of time served and principal occupations during the past five years, as well as the Directors' other board memberships and affiliations during the past five years, is set forth below.

NAME, POSITION(S) WITH FUND, YEAR OF BIRTH AND ADDRESS¹	TERM OF OFFICE AND LENGTH OF TIME SERVED²	PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION(S) DURING PAST 5 YEARS	NUMBER OF PORTFOLIOS IN FUND COMPLEX OVERSEEN BY DIRECTOR	OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS/ TRUSTEESHIPS HELD BY DIRECTOR OUTSIDE FUND COMPLEX
INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
Aaron F. Hood, Director (1972)	Term Indefinite- Since Inception	Finance Senior Fellow, United States Military Academy, West Point (since 2019); Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Summit Carbon Solutions (2021 to 2023); Interim Chief Financial Officer, Superior Silica Sands LLC (2021); Head/Co-Head of Asset Management (2016 to 2019), Perella Weinberg Partners	1	Superior Silica Sands LLC (since 2001)
Steven M. Kass, Director (1960)	Term Indefinite- Since Inception	Managing Director and Management Consultant, Alignment Partners (since 2012); Steven M. Kass, EA (since 2018)	1	N/A
Michael Wingertzahn, Director	Term Indefinite- Since June 15, 2023	Managing Director, Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. (2025 to present); Director, TD Securities LLC (since 2020 to 2024); Managing Director, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC (2007 to 2018)	1	N/A
INTERESTED DIRECTOR
Michael W. Anson, Director, Chairman of the Board and Chief Compliance Officer³ (1968)	Term Indefinite- Since Inception	Partner, Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Compliance Officer of BBR Partners, LLC ("BBR") (since 2000); Member of BBR's Operating, Investment and Compliance Committees	1	N/A

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Information Regarding the Fund's Directors and Officers (Unaudited) (continued)
March 31, 2026

NAME, POSITION(S) WITH FUND, YEAR OF BIRTH AND ADDRESS¹	TERM OF OFFICE AND LENGTH OF TIME SERVED²	PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION(S) DURING PAST 5 YEARS	NUMBER OF PORTFOLIOS IN FUND COMPLEX OVERSEEN BY DIRECTOR	OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS/ TRUSTEESHIPS HELD BY DIRECTOR OUTSIDE FUND COMPLEX
OFFICER(S) WHO ARE NOT DIRECTORS
Matthew Shapiro, Principal Executive Officer and Secretary (1974)	Term Indefinite- Secretary Since Inception; Principal Executive Officer since March 26, 2026	Director and General Counsel of BBR (since 2014); Member of BBR's Compliance and Cybersecurity Committees	N/A	N/A
Mark Muffler, Principal Accounting Officer (1967)	Term Indefinite- Since Inception	Lead Fund Administrator and Officer of UMB Fund Services, Inc. (since 2008)	N/A	N/A

¹	The Address for each Director and officer is c/o BBR Partners, LLC, 55 East 52nd Street, 18th Floor New York, New York 10055, except for Mr. Muffler, whose address is c/o UMB Fund Services, Inc., 235 West Galena Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53212.

²	The Fund commenced operations on May 1, 2020.

³	Mr. Anson is an "interested person" (as defined in the 1940 Act) of the Fund because he is affiliated with the Adviser and serves as the Fund's Chief Compliance Officer.

BBR ALO Fund, LLC

Other Information
March 31, 2026 (Unaudited)

Proxy Voting

A description of the policies and procedures used by the Fund to determine how to vote proxies is available: (i) without charge, upon request, by calling the Fund at (212) 313-9870; and (ii) on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

The Fund is required to file, on Form N-PX, its complete proxy voting record for the 12-month period ended June 30, no later than August 31. The Fund's Form N-PX filing is available: (i) without charge, upon request, by calling the Fund at (212) 313-9870; and (ii) on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

Availability of Quarterly Portfolio Schedules

The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year as an exhibit to its report on Form N-PORT. The Fund's Form N-PORT reports are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov or by calling the Fund at (212) 313-9870.

Dividend Reinvestment Program

The Fund has adopted a dividend reinvestment plan (the "Plan") pursuant to which distributions of dividends and capital gains ("Dividends") paid by the Fund will be automatically reinvested in additional Shares of the Fund by UMB Fund Services, Inc., as agent of the Plan (the "Plan Agent"), unless an investor "opts out" (elects not to reinvest in Shares). An investor that elects not to participate in the Plan will receive Dividends in cash, paid by the Plan Agent, as Dividend disbursing agent, directly to the investor's account, which will be the same account from which investments and any other payments required as a condition to the investor's investment in the Fund will be made by the investor. Even if an investor does not participate in the Plan, however, the Fund will have the ability to declare a large portion of Dividends in Shares instead of in cash. The tax treatment of dividends and capital gain distributions will be the same whether the investor takes them in cash or reinvests them to purchase additional Shares.

The Plan Agent serves as agent for the Fund's investors in administering the Plan. After the Fund declares a Dividend, the Plan Agent will, as agent for the investors, distribute newly-issued Shares on behalf of the participants. The number of Shares to be issued will be computed at a per share rate equal to the net asset value per Share on the Dividend payment date. There is no sales charge or other charge for reinvestment. The Fund reserves the right to suspend or limit at any time the ability of investors to reinvest distributions. Additional information regarding the reinvestment of distributions may be obtained by contacting the Adviser at the number noted herein. The Plan Agent's fees for the handling of reinvestment of Dividends are paid by the Adviser. The automatic reinvestment of Dividends will not relieve participants of any income tax that may be payable or required to be withheld on such Dividends.

Investors may elect initially not to reinvest by indicating that choice in their subscription agreement. Thereafter, investors are free to change their election at any time by contacting the Adviser at (212) 313-9870. Such withdrawal will be effective immediately if received not less than ten days prior to a Dividend record date; otherwise, it will be effective for all subsequent Dividends.

The Fund reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan at any time. All correspondence concerning the Plan should be directed to the Adviser at (212) 313-9870.

Corporate Offices

BBR ALO FUND, LLC
55 East 52nd Street, 18th Floor
New York, New York 10055

Fund Administrator, Transfer Agent and Fund Accountant

UMB Fund Services
235 W. Galena Street
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53212
Phone: (414) 299-2200

Custodian Bank

UMB Bank, N.A.
928 Grand Boulevard, 5th Floor
Kansas City, Missouri 64106

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
300 Madison Avenue,
New York, New York 10017

(b) Not applicable.

Item 2. Code of Ethics.

(a) The registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the registrant's principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, regardless of whether these individuals are employed by the registrant or a third party.

(b) No information is required to be disclosed pursuant to this paragraph.

(c) There have been no amendments, during the period covered by this report, to a provision of the code of ethics that applies to the registrant's principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, regardless of whether these individuals are employed by the registrant or a third party, and that relates to any element of the code of ethics.

(d) The registrant has not, during the period covered by this report, granted any waivers, including an implicit waiver, from a provision of the code of ethics that applies to the registrant's principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, regardless of whether these individuals are employed by the registrant or a third party, that relates to one or more of the items set forth in paragraph (b) of this Item's instructions.

Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.

The registrant's Board of Directors (the "Board") has determined that Steven M. Kass, Aaron F. Hood, and Michael Wingertzahn , each a member of the Audit Committee of the Board, are audit committee financial experts as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Each of Messrs. Kass, Hood, and Wingertzahn is "independent" as defined by the SEC for purposes of audit committee financial expert determinations.

Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

Audit Fees

(a) The aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of the registrant's annual financial statements or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years were $58,905 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2026 and $58,705 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025.

Audit-Related Fees

(b) There were no fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services by the principal accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the registrant's financial statements and are not reported under paragraph (a) of this Item.

Tax Fees

(c) The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning were $21,700 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2026 and $21,700 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025.

All Other Fees

(d) There were no fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for products and services provided by the principal accountant, other than the services reported in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this Item.

(e)(1) The registrant's audit committee has adopted pre-approval policies and procedures that require the audit committee to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services proposed to be provided by the registrant's principal accountant to the registrant and BBR Partners, LLC, the registrant's investment adviser ("BBR Partners"), and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with BBR Partners that provides ongoing services to the registrant ("Service Affiliates"). Pre-approval considerations include whether the proposed services are compatible with maintaining the principal accountant's independence.

(e)(2) None of the services described in paragraphs (b) through (d) above were approved by the registrant's audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.

(f) Not applicable.

(g) The aggregate non-audit fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years by the principal accountant for services rendered to the registrant were $0 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2026, and $21,700 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025. There were no fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for non-audit services rendered by the principal accountant to any Service Affiliates.

(h) No non-audit services were rendered to any Service Affiliates during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2026.

Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.

Not applicable.

Item 6. Investments.

(a)

The Schedule of Investments as of the close of the reporting period is included as part of the report to shareholders filed under Item 1(a) of this form.

(b)

Not applicable.

Item 7. Financial Statements and Financial Highlights for Open-End Management Investment Companies.

Not applicable.

Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies.

Not applicable.

Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies.

Not applicable.

Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies.

Not applicable.

Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Advisory Contract.

Included as part of the Report to Shareholders filed under Item 1(a) of this Form N-CSR.

Item 12. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

The Board has approved and adopted the following policies and procedures with respect to proxy voting by the Fund.

BBR PARTNERS, LLC PROXY VOTING POLICY

BBR Partners, LLC ("BBR") has adopted the following proxy voting policy with respect to those assets for which a client has vested BBR with discretionary investment management authority (the "assets").

BBR's Policy

Unless a client directs otherwise, in writing, BBR shall be responsible for: (1) directing the manner in which proxies solicited by issuers of securities beneficially owned by the client shall be voted, and (2) making all elections relative to any mergers, acquisitions, and tender offers. However, clients maintain exclusive responsibility for all legal proceedings or other types of events pertaining to the assets, including, but not limited to, class action lawsuits.

It is BBR's general policy to vote proxies consistent with the recommendation of the senior management of the issuer (the "Proxy Voting Guideline"). For issues not addressed by the Proxy Voting Guideline, or for those issues where a determination is made by that a vote according to the established Proxy Voting Guideline would not be consistent with BBR's fiduciary duties or in the economic interest of a client account, the Chief Compliance Officer will seek to resolve the issue.

BBR shall maintain records pertaining to proxy voting as required pursuant to Rule 204-2 (c)(2) under the Advisers Act.

Copies of Rules 206(4)-6 and 204-2(c)(2) are available upon written request. In addition, information pertaining to how BBR voted on any specific proxy issue is also available upon written request. Any questions regarding BBR's proxy voting policy shall be directed to Michael Anson, Chief Compliance Officer of BBR.

Mitigating Circumstances/Conflicts of Interest

The following are examples of mitigating circumstances and/or conflicts of interest: (1) an adviser or its affiliate may manage a pension plan, administer employee benefit plans, or provide brokerage, underwriting, insurance, or banking services to a company whose management is soliciting proxies; (2) an adviser may have business or personal relationships with participants in proxy contests, corporate directors, or candidates for directorships, etc.; (3) an adviser has a business relationship not with the company but with a proponent of a proxy proposal that may affect how it casts votes on client securities; and (4) senior management's recommendation, in the opinion of BBR, is not in the best interests of the client.

Use of Proxy Edge

BBR uses the services of ProxyEdge, a Broadridge Financial Solutions product ("Broadridge"), to vote proxies according to its policy above and to prepare the information required in order for to make the required filings for the BBR ALO Fund, LLC, and then store them in ProxyEdge for the required period of time. ProxyEdge also follows our Proxy Voting Guidelines, a copy of which are also enclosed as an Exhibit to our Compliance Manual.

Implementation/Adoption

The Chief Compliance Officer or his/her designee shall be primarily responsible for the ongoing review and evaluation of BBR's proxy voting policy and corresponding compliance with the requirements of Rules 206(4)-6 and 204-2(c)(2). Copies of the Rules are attached and made a part hereof.

The above Proxy Voting Policy has been adopted by BBR Partners, LLC.

Table of Contents

Introduction	3
Research Underpins Decision Making	3
Research Services	3
Engagement	4
Escalation Strategies	4
Proxy Voting Guidelines	4
Shareholder Proposal Assessment Framework	4
Director Elections	5
Majority Vote Standard	5
Board Leadership	6
Classified Board	6
Board Capacity	6
Board Composition	6
Compensation	7
Executive Compensation	7
Equity Compensation Plans	8
Director Compensation	8
Auditors	8
Transactions and Special Situations	8
Transactions, Restructurings, Mergers and Acquisitions	8
Shareholder Rights Plans	8
Shareholder Rights	9
Capital Structure	9
Proxy Access	9
Majority Vote Standard for Charter & Bylaw Amendments	9
Special Meetings	9
Written Consent	10
Material Environmental and Social Issues	10
Climate	10
Biodiversity	11
Political Spending	11
Human Capital Management	11
Conflicts of Interest	12
Introduction	12
Adherence to Stated Proxy Voting Policies	12
Disclosure of Conflicts	12

Potential Conflicts	12
Handling Potential Conflicts of Interest	13
Review of Third-Party Proxy Service Vendors	13
Confidential Voting	14
A Note Regarding AB's Structure	14
Voting Transparency	14
Record Keeping	15
Proxy Voting and Governance Policy	15
Proxy Statements Received Regarding Clients' Securities	15
Records of Votes Cast on Behalf of Clients	15
Pre-Disclosure of Vote Intentions on Select Proposals	15
Documents Prepared by AB that Are Material to Voting Decisions	15
Proxy Voting Procedures	15
Voting Administration	16
Share Blocking and Abstaining from Voting Client Securities	16
Loaned Securities	16

Introduction

AllianceBernstein L.P.'s ("AB," "we," "us," "our" and similar terms) mission is to work in our clients' best financial interests to deliver better investment outcomes through differentiated research insights and innovative portfolio solutions. As a fiduciary and investment adviser, we place the interests of our clients first and treat all our clients fairly and equitably, and we have an obligation to responsibly allocate, manage and oversee their investments to seek sustainable, long-term shareholder value.

AB has authority to vote proxies relating to securities in certain client portfolios and, accordingly, AB's fiduciary obligations extend to AB's exercise of such proxy voting authority for each client AB has agreed to exercise that duty. AB's general policy is to vote proxy proposals, amendments, consents or resolutions relating to client securities, including interests in private investment funds, if any (collectively, "proxies"), in a manner that serves the best financial interests of each respective client as determined by AB in its discretion, after consideration of the relevant clients' investment strategies, and in accordance with this Proxy Voting and Governance Policy ("Proxy Voting and Governance Policy" or "Policy") and the operative agreements governing the relationship with each respective client ("Governing Agreements"). This Policy outlines our principles for proxy voting, includes a wide range of issues that often appear on voting ballots, and applies to all of AB's internally managed assets, globally. It is intended for use by those involved in the proxy voting decision-making process and those responsible for the administration of proxy voting ("Investment Stewardship Team"), to ensure that this Policy and its procedures are implemented consistently.¹

This Policy forms part of a suite of policies and frameworks including AB's Stewardship Statement that outline our approach to investment stewardship. Proxy voting is an integral part of this process, enabling us to support sound corporate governance practices, strong shareholder rights, transparent disclosures, and encourage effective oversight of material issues.

This Policy is overseen by the Proxy Voting and Governance Committee ("Proxy Voting and Governance Committee" or "Committee"), which provides oversight and includes senior representatives from Investments, Legal and Operations. It is the responsibility of the Committee to evaluate and maintain proxy voting procedures and guidelines, to evaluate proposals and issues not covered by these guidelines, to consider changes in the Policy, and to review the Policy no less frequently than annually. In addition, the Committee meets at least three times a year and as necessary to address special situations.

Research Underpins Decision Making

As a research-driven firm, we approach proxy voting with the same commitment to rigorous research and engagement that we apply to all our investment activities. The different investment philosophies applied by our investment teams may occasionally result in different conclusions being drawn for certain proposals. In turn, our votes for some proposals may vary from issuer to issuer, while still aligning with our goal of maximizing the long-term value of securities in our clients' portfolios.

For accounts where proxy voting is directed by clients or newly acquired subsidiary companies, voting decisions may deviate from this Policy. To the extent there are any inconsistencies between this Policy and a client's Governing Agreements, the Governing Agreements shall supersede this Policy. We do not offer different versions of our Proxy Voting and Governance Policy.

Research Services

To facilitate the efficient and accurate voting of our client's securities, we subscribe to research services from vendors such as Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. ("ISS") and Glass Lewis. These research materials are used for informational purposes alongside company filings, and AB's voting decisions are always guided by AB's Proxy Voting and Governance Policy. Our investment professionals can access these research and informational materials at any time.

Please note that while this Policy is intended to be applied globally, in certain jurisdictions in which we operate, a limited number of votes may vary due to local rules and regulations.

Engagement

In evaluating proxy issues and determining our votes, we seek the perspective and expertise of various relevant parties. Internally, the Investment Stewardship Team may consult the Committee, Chief Investment Officers, Portfolio Managers, and/or Research Analysts across our equities platform. By partnering with investment professionals, we are empowered to incorporate company-specific fundamental insights into our vote decisions.

Externally, we may engage with companies in advance of their Annual General Meeting, and throughout the year. We believe engagement provides the opportunity to share our philosophy, and more importantly, affect positive changes which we believe will drive shareholder value. In addition, we may engage with shareholder proposal proponents and other stakeholders to understand different viewpoints and objectives.

Escalation Strategies

Proxy voting and engagements work in conjunction to raise and escalate investor concerns to companies. In cases where we determine that the issuer's behavior isn't aligned with our clients' best financial interests, we may escalate our voting and engagement by taking actions such as voting against the relevant directors. The materiality of the issue and the responsiveness of management will guide our approach which is outlined in the AB Stewardship Statement.

Proxy Voting Guidelines

Our proxy voting guidelines are both principles-based and rules-based. Subject to client guidelines, we adhere to a core set of principles described in this Policy. We assess each proxy proposal within the framework of these principles, with our ultimate "litmus test" being what we view as most likely to maximize long-term shareholder value. We believe that authority and accountability for setting and executing corporate policies, goals and compensation should generally rest with a company's board of directors and senior management. In return, we support strong investor rights that allow shareholders to hold directors and management accountable should they fail to act in the best interests of shareholders.

We generally vote proposals in accordance with these guidelines; however, we may deviate from these guidelines if we believe that deviating from our stated Policy is necessary to maximize long-term shareholder value or as otherwise warranted by the specific facts and circumstances of an investment. While our Policy is broadly applicable, we may make exceptions to these guidelines for non-operating companies such as closed-end funds. We will evaluate on a case-by-case basis any proposal not specifically addressed by these guidelines, whether submitted by management or shareholders, always keeping in mind our fiduciary duty to make voting decisions that are in our clients' best interests.

Shareholder Proposal Assessment Framework

AB's commitment to maximizing the long-term value of clients' portfolios drives how we analyze shareholder proposals. Shareholder proposals often address environmental, social and governance ("ESG") disclosures, which we believe can in some cases help improve the accuracy of our valuation of companies. We think it is in our clients' best interests to incorporate a comprehensive set of risks and opportunities, including but not limited to material ESG issues, from a long-term shareholder value perspective. The evaluation of a proposal that addresses an ESG issue will consider (among other things) the following core factors, as necessary:

●

The materiality of the mentioned ESG issue for the company's business

●

The company's current practice, policy, and framework

●

The prescriptiveness of the proposal-does the shareholder make a request that unreasonably burdens management?

●

The context of the shareholder proposal-is the proponent tied to any particular interest group(s)? Does the proposal aim to promote the interest of the shareholders or group that they are associated with?

●

How does the proposal add value for the shareholders?

We do not vote in favor of all ESG-related proposals. This shareholder proposal assessment framework applies to all proposals slated by shareholders, globally.

Director Elections

AB's approach to voting on director elections is grounded in the belief that directors should represent shareholder interests and ensure management is maximizing long-term shareholder value. We generally vote in favor of the management-proposed slate of directors, but we consider a number of factors, including local market best practice, when making our decision. Each company's board of directors has a duty to act in the best interest of the company's shareholders at all times. These interests are best served by having directors who bring objectivity to the company and are free from potential conflicts of interests. Accordingly, we believe that companies should have a majority of independent directors and independent key committees. We will incorporate local market regulation and corporate governance codes into our decision making, though we may support requirements that surpass market regulation and corporate governance codes if we believe they will improve corporate governance practices.

We consider a director to be independent if they meet the criteria for independence set forth by the primary exchange or the best practice code in the country where the company is domiciled. We also take into account affiliations, related party transactions, and prior service to the company.

We believe that directors have a duty to respond to shareholder actions that have received significant shareholder support. We may vote against directors who fail to act on key issues. We oppose directors who fail to attend at least 75% of board meetings within a given year without a reasonable excuse. We prioritize transparency and disclosure in our analysis of director elections. If there is insufficient information about nominees disclosed in the proxy statement, we may abstain or vote against.

We also take into account compensation, audit, and governance practices when evaluating directors. If a company lacks a formal key committee or has demonstrated poor practices in these areas, we may vote against relevant directors, which may include committee chairs, committees as a whole, or the full board in cases of multi-year concerns.

Finally, we are committed to engaging with company management to resolve issues that arise. We may do so through phone, written, virtual or in-person communication until a satisfactory resolution is reached.

Majority Vote Standard

Sound corporate governance requires that shareholders have a meaningful say in the company's affairs. We believe that electing directors by a majority of votes cast at an annual meeting is a better method than plurality voting. Under plurality voting standards, a director could be elected by a single affirmative vote even if a majority of shareholders withheld support.

AB also views majority voting provisions as beneficial to director accountability. Therefore, we generally support companies amending their by-laws to require director nominees be elected by an affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast. However, we recognize that in contested elections where the number of nominees exceeds the number of board seats, a carve-out should be provided to allow for plurality voting. While we generally prefer a majority vote standard, we may take a case-by-case approach if the issuer is a non-operating company such as closed-end funds.

Board Leadership

We believe there can be benefits to an executive chairman and to having the positions of chairman and CEO combined as well as split. When the chair is non-independent, the company must have sufficient counter-balancing governance in place, generally through a strong lead independent director. AB therefore generally supports the establishment of a lead independent director if the chairman is non-independent. We believe that having a robust lead independent director role with clearly defined duties and responsibilities, such as the authority to call meetings and approve agendas, is an effective way to balance governance.

If a company already has a lead independent director in place with robust responsibilities, we will generally oppose proposals that require an independent board chairman, unless there are additional concerns regarding board leadership or broader corporate governance.

Classified Board

Typically, a classified board is divided into three classes, each holding office for a term of three years, with only a portion of the board being elected or replaced each year. We generally favor declassified boards, but we may take a case-by-case approach if certain conditions are met, such as an adequate sunset provision, a justifiable financial reason, or if the issuer is a non-operating company such as closed-end funds.

Board Capacity

We believe that assessing each nominee's capacity for a board seat is essential for ensuring meaningful board oversight of management. Nominees who are "over-boarded", or have too many outside board commitments, may be unable to dedicate sufficient time toward their board oversight responsibilities.

●

Non-Executive Directors: AB generally votes against the appointment of non-executive directors who serve on more than four public company boards.

●

Active CEOs: AB generally votes against the appointment of active CEOs who serve on more than two public company boards.

●

Active CEO of the Company Under Voting Consideration: For CEOs of the company under consideration, AB generally votes against their appointment if they serve on more than three public company boards.

Board Composition

Diversity is an important element of assessing a board's composition, as it promotes a wider range of perspectives to be considered for companies to both strategize and mitigate risks. We believe diversity is multi-faceted and should incorporate a broad range of factors in order to promote diversity of thought, which may include professional experience, tenure, age, gender, ethnicity, and/or nationality. We comply with the requirements of local market regulation and note that several European countries legally require board-level gender diversity at publicly listed companies.

Taking into account a board's size as well as regional considerations, AB may vote against the nominating committee chair, or a relevant incumbent board member such as a nominating committee member if the chair is not up for election, when the board lacks sufficient diversity, unless there are mitigating factors (e.g. the board has articulated plans to diversify board membership, or has made recent improvements).

Compensation

Compensation policies play a critical role in attracting, retaining, and motivating executives, directors, and employees. Incentives should be aligned with shareholder interests to facilitate long-term value creation and sustainable performance.

Executive Compensation

It is crucial to establish a direct correlation between variable pay and the company's operational and financial performance, through metrics that are challenging and align with the company's strategy. Compensation plans are often complex and are a major corporate expense, so we evaluate them carefully and on a case-by-case basis. In all cases, however, we assess each proposed executive compensation plan within the framework of four guiding principles, each of which ensures a company's compensation plan helps to align the long-term interests of management with shareholders:

●

Valid measures of business performance tied to the firm's strategy and shareholder value creation, which are clearly articulated and incorporate appropriate time periods, should be utilized;

●

Compensation costs should be managed in the same way as any other expense;

●

Compensation should reflect management's handling, or failure to handle, any recent social, environmental, governance, ethical or legal issue that had a material adverse financial or reputational effect on the company and;

●

In granting awards, management should clearly exhibit integrity and a rigorous decision-making process.

Further, we believe that compensation plans should be sufficiently long-term oriented. Long-term incentive plans should adhere to a minimum of three-year vesting periods and clearly target long-term financial goals. We are generally unsupportive of special bonuses that are not explicitly tied to a company's financial performance or lack multi-year vesting periods. If a retention grant is awarded, we expect companies to provide a rationale detailing how the award aligns with business needs and overall strategy. In cases where the compensation committee has exercised discretion to adjust pay outcomes, we expect a detailed justification and explanation of the method used to determine the adjustment. Additionally, we expect disclosure on how the revised outcome is consistent with the shareholders' interests.

We believe that compensation plans should include clawback provisions that require executives to relinquish their awards if their compensation was based on erroneous financial statements or deceitful business practices.

We may oppose plans which include, and directors who establish, compensation plan provisions deemed to be poor practice such as automatic acceleration of equity, or single-triggered, in the event of a change in control. Although votes on compensation plans are by nature only broad indications of shareholder views, they do lead to more compensation-related dialogue between management and shareholders and help ensure that management and shareholders meet their common objective: maximizing shareholder value.

Equity Compensation Plans

Equity compensation plans (or "omnibus stock plans") are intended to align the interests of employees and executives with those of shareholders by providing stock-based incentives. While we generally support the use of equity in compensation plans, we assess each plan on a case-by-case basis. Our evaluation criteria include the overall cost of the plan, potential dilution to shareholders, historical burn rates, and the specific design features of the plan. We may vote against equity compensation plans that contain provisions that are misaligned with shareholder interests, such as the ability to reprice options without shareholder approval or the inclusion of evergreen provisions.

Director Compensation

For non-executive directors, we believe that compensation should be structured in such a way that it does not compromise their independence. We will generally oppose performance-based variable remuneration for non-executive directors.

Auditors

We believe that the company is in the best position to choose its accounting firm, and we generally support management's recommendation. We recognize that there may be potential conflicts when a company's independent auditors perform substantial non-audit related services for the company. Therefore, we consider the proportion of non-audit fees to total fees and other factors like auditor tenure to assess independence. Excessive non-audit fees may lead us to vote against the auditor and/or audit committee members. In determining what is excessive we exclude non-audit fees related to extraordinary events such as IPOs, bankruptcy emergence, and spin-offs. Additionally, we may vote against or abstain if the audit firm is not disclosed, considering local market practices.

In some markets, companies are required to submit their financial statements for shareholder approval. We generally approve financial statements unless there are reasons to vote otherwise, such as if the information is not made available prior to the meeting. In markets requiring the election of internal statutory auditors (e.g., Japan), we generally support management's nominees if they meet regulatory requirements. However, we may vote against nominees who are designated independent statutory auditors but serve as executives of a subsidiary or affiliate of the issuer, or if there are other reasons to question their independence. We review proposals to limit auditor liability on a case-by-case basis, considering whether such a provision is necessary to secure appointment and whether it helps to maximize long-term shareholder value.

Transactions and Special Situations

Transactions, Restructurings, Mergers and Acquisitions

Proposals requesting shareholder approval for corporate restructurings, merger and acquisitions, and spin-offs are evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Our primary objective in assessing and voting on these proposals is to maximize long-term shareholder value. We consider a multitude of factors that could impact the company's future performance and shareholder returns, including the board's rationale behind the transaction, the potential financial benefits and risks, the alignment with the company's long-term strategic goals, and the overall integrity of the transaction process. We may abstain from voting on transactions in instances where there is insufficient information.

Shareholder Rights Plans

Our approach to voting on shareholder rights plans, or poison pills, is grounded in our commitment to protecting shareholder rights and maximizing long-term value. Accordingly, we assess these proposals on a case-by-case basis. We will oppose poison pills that unreasonably seek to impede takeovers or entrench management. We may support proposals which protect shareholders' right to consider and potentially accept a compelling offer. Additionally, we may support net operating loss rights plans when the protection of a company's tax assets is material to its financial health and future value. We generally support shareholder proposals that require the company to submit a shareholder rights plan to a shareholder vote, though may take a case-by-case approach if the issuer is a non-operating company such as closed-end funds.

Shareholder Rights

Capital Structure

The one share, one vote principle-that voting power is proportional to an one's economic interest- is preferred to ensure the board is accountable to shareholders. AB's general expectation of companies with multi-class equity structures carrying unequal voting rights (or "supervoting shares") is to attach safeguards for minority shareholders when appropriate and in a cost-effective manner, which may include a sunset provision or periodic shareholder reauthorizations. We expect boards to routinely review existing multi-class share structures and articulate why the structure is beneficial for long-term shareholders. If a multi-class share structure is in place without adequate safeguards, AB will generally vote against relevant directors.

With that backdrop, we acknowledge that multi-class structures may be beneficial for a period of time for certain companies, allowing management to focus on longer-term value creation which benefits all shareholders. Accordingly, AB may refrain from voting against relevant directors if the multi-class capital structure is subject to a formal sunset provision, or if company-specific conditions warrant it.

Proxy Access

Proxy access allows "qualified shareholders" to nominate directors. Our voting stance typically favors proposals for proxy access that adhere to the 2010 SEC proposal (since vacated) which allowed a single shareholder, or group of shareholders, who hold at least 3% of the voting power for at least three years continuously to nominate up to 25% of the current board seats, or two directors, for inclusion in the subject company's annual proxy statement alongside management nominees. We may vote against proposals that include requirements that are stricter than the SEC's framework including implementation restrictions and against individual board members, or entire boards, who exclude from their ballot properly submitted shareholder proxy access proposals or compete against shareholder proxy access proposals with stricter management proposals on the same ballot. We will generally vote in favor of proposals that seek to amend an existing right to more closely align with the SEC framework. We will evaluate on a case-by-case basis proposals with less stringent requirements than the vacated SEC framework.

Majority Vote Standard for Charter & Bylaw Amendments

We generally favor the implementation of simple majority vote requirements for charter and bylaw amendments. This means that a proposal would only need to receive a majority of votes cast in order to be approved. We believe that this approach promotes greater shareholder accountability and ensures that the will of the majority is reflected in important decisions affecting the company. As such, we will generally vote for proposals to reduce supermajority voting requirements, though may take a case-by-case approach if the issuer is a non-operating company such as closed-end funds.

Special Meetings

We are generally supportive of the right for shareholders to call special meetings, which allows shareholders to take action on certain matters that arise between regularly scheduled annual meetings. This right may apply only if a shareholder, or a group of shareholders, owns a specified percentage as defined by the relevant company bylaws.

We recognize the importance of the right of shareholders to remove poorly performing directors, respond to takeover offers and take other actions without having to wait for the next annual meeting. However, we also believe it is important to protect companies and shareholders from nuisance proposals. We further believe that striking a balance between these competing interests will maximize shareholder value. We believe that encouraging active share ownership among shareholders generally is beneficial to shareholders and helps maximize shareholder value. Accordingly, we will generally support proposals to establish shareholders' right to call a special meeting if one is not already in place. When evaluating proposals to reduce the existing special meeting right threshold, we will assess the potential abuse of the right based on the company's current share ownership structure, and whether the request goes beyond market practice.

Written Consent

Action by written consent enables a large shareholder or group of shareholders to initiate votes on corporate matters prior to the annual meeting. We believe this is a fundamental shareholder right and, accordingly, will generally support shareholder proposals seeking to restore this right. However, in cases where a company has a majority shareholder or group of related majority shareholders with majority economic interest, we may oppose proposals seeking to restore this right as there is a potential risk of abuse by the majority shareholder or group of majority shareholders. We may also vote against the proposal if the company provides shareholders a right to call special meetings with an ownership threshold of 15% or below in absence of material restrictions, as we believe that shareholder access rights should be considered from a holistic view rather than promoting all possible access rights that may impede one another in contrast to long-term shareholder value.

Material Environmental and Social Issues

Climate

Proposals addressing climate change concerns are plentiful and their scope varies. Climate change increasingly receives investor attention as a potential material risk to the sustainability of a wide range of business activities. These proposals may include emissions standards or reduction targets, quantitative goals, and impact assessments. We evaluate these proposals on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the materiality of the issue to the business and whether the proposal is of added benefit to shareholders. We will additionally consider company specific context as well as our ongoing research and engagements for evaluating the company's existing policies and practices.

For proposals related to climate change, we will carefully assess the company's current policies/disclosures and its incorporation of national standards and best practices. In addition, we will evaluate the potential enactment of new regulations, as well as any investment risk related to the specific issue.

For issuers with material exposure to climate risk, AB assess the climate risk management strategy by considering factors such as, but not limited to:

Emissions Metrics and Targets

●

Does the company have emissions metrics and targets in place for Scopes 1 and 2 emissions?

Climate Risk Management

●

Does the company perform scenario analysis that includes the use of a widely recognized, scientifically based 1.5 degree scenario?

Governance

●

Does the board provide oversight on the issuer's climate change strategy?

●

Has the company incurred any recent material failures, or been involved in any controversies, related to managing climate-related risk?

Disclosure

●

Does the company disclose its exposure to climate risk via the framework developed by the Taskforce on Climate related Financial Disclosure?

Biodiversity

Companies are increasingly recognizing the importance of managing biodiversity and nature-related factors to generate long-term financial returns for shareholders. This can be achieved by implementing appropriate risk oversight and establishing relevant metrics and targets to manage their reliance on, impact on, and use of natural capital. Companies-particularly those that have significant impacts on local environments or have supply chains exposed to locations with biodiversity-related risk-should disclose how they integrate these factors into their strategy and how they manage material risks and opportunities relating to biodiversity. Additionally, companies should consider engaging with stakeholders, including local communities and conservation organizations, to ensure that their activities do not have a negative impact on biodiversity, which could potentially cause negative reputational or financial risks. Accordingly, we will vote on proposals related to biodiversity on a case-by-case basis.

Political Spending

We believe that increased transparency in political contributions and lobbying expenses is essential for ensuring accountability and promoting responsible corporate citizenship. As such, we generally vote in favor of proposals that request increased disclosure of these expenses, including those paid to trade organizations and political action committees at the federal, state, or local level. By doing so, we can better understand how a company is using its resources to influence political decisions and ensure that these activities align with its stated values and principles and are in the best interests of shareholders. Increased transparency can also help to mitigate reputational risks and promote public trust in the company. We believe that companies have a responsibility to disclose their political contributions and lobbying expenses to their shareholders and the public.

Human Capital Management

Human capital management is a critical component of a company's long-term success. Companies should provide fair compensation and benefits, as well as opportunities for career growth and advancement. Additionally, companies should prioritize employee health and safety, both physical and mental, and provide a supportive work environment that fosters collaboration and innovation. Effective communication and engagement with employees is also essential for building a strong corporate culture and ensuring that employees feel valued and heard. By prioritizing human capital management, companies can attract and retain top talent, foster innovation and creativity, and ultimately drive long-term value for shareholders. We will vote case-by-case on proposals related to human capital management considering a company's current practices, policies and disclosures.

Conflicts of Interest

Introduction

As a fiduciary, we must always act in our clients' best financial interests. We strive to avoid even the appearance of a conflict that may compromise the trust our clients have placed in us, and we insist on strict adherence to fiduciary standards and compliance with all applicable federal and state securities laws. We have adopted a comprehensive Code of Business Conduct and Ethics ("Code") to help us meet these obligations. As part of this responsibility and as expressed throughout the Code, we place the interests of our clients first and attempt to mitigate any perceived or actual conflicts of interest.

AB recognizes that potentially material conflicts of interest arise when we engage with a company or vote a proxy solicited by an issuer that sponsors a retirement plan we manage (or administer), that distributes AB-sponsored mutual funds, or with which AB or one or more of our employees have another business or personal relationship, and that such conflicts could affect how we vote on the issuer's proxy. Similarly, potentially material conflicts of interest arise when engaging with and deciding how to vote on a proposal sponsored or supported by a shareholder group that is a client. In order to address any perceived or actual conflict of interest, the procedures set forth below (see Handling Potential Conflicts of Interest section below) have been established for use when we encounter a potential conflict to ensure that our engagement activities and voting decisions are in our clients' best interest consistent with our fiduciary duties and seek to maximize shareholder value.

Adherence to Stated Proxy Voting Policies

Subject to client guidelines, votes generally are cast in accordance with this Policy. In situations where our Policy involves a case-by-case assessment, the following sections provide criteria that will guide our decision. In situations where our Policy on a particular issue involves a case-by-case assessment and the vote cannot be clearly decided by an application of our stated Policy, a member of the Committee or his/her designee will make the voting decision in accordance with the basic principle of our Policy to vote proxies with the intention of maximizing the value of the securities in our client accounts. In these situations, the voting rationale must be documented either on the voting platform of our proxy services vendor, by retaining relevant emails or another appropriate method. Where appropriate, the views of investment professionals are considered. All votes cast contrary to our stated voting Policy on specific issues must be documented. If a proxy vote involves a potential conflict of interest, the voting decision will be determined in accordance with the processes outlined in the Handing Potential Conflicts of Interest section of the Policy below. On an annual basis, the Committee will receive and review a report of all such votes so as to confirm adherence with the Policy.

Disclosure of Conflicts

When considering a proxy proposal, members of the Committee or investment professionals involved in the decision-making process must disclose to the Committee any potential conflict (including personal relationships) of which they are aware and any substantive contact that they have had with any interested outside party (including the issuer or shareholder group sponsoring a proposal) regarding the proposal. Any previously unknown conflict will be recorded on the Potential Conflicts List (discussed below). If a member of the Committee has a material conflict of interest, he or she generally must recuse himself or herself from the decision-making process.

Potential Conflicts

Potential conflicts related to proxy voting may include, but are not limited to, the following:

●

Votes involving publicly traded clients of AB;

●

Votes involving publicly traded companies that distribute AB mutual funds;

●

Votes where investment teams have different views;

●

Votes involving any clients that try to advocate for proxy voting support;

●

Voting contrary to the Policy; and

●

Any other company subject to a material conflict of which a Committee member becomes aware.

We determine our votes for all meetings of companies that may present a conflict by applying the processes described in the Handling Potential Conflicts of Interest section below. We document all instances when the Conflicts Officer determines our vote.

Handling Potential Conflicts of Interest

When we encounter a potential conflict of interest, we review our proposed vote using the following analysis to ensure our voting decision is in the best interest of our clients:

●

If our proposed vote is consistent with the Policy, no further review is necessary.

●

If our proposed vote is contrary to the Policy, the vote will be presented to AB's Conflicts Officer. The Conflicts Officer's review and determination will be documented and presented to the Proxy Voting and Governance Committee. The Conflicts Officer will determine whether the proposed vote is reasonable and in line with our fiduciary duties to clients. If the Conflicts Officer cannot determine that the proposed vote is reasonable, the Conflicts Officer may instruct AB to refer the votes back to the client(s) or take other actions as the Conflicts Officer deems appropriate in light of the facts and circumstances of the particular potential conflict. The Conflicts Officer may take or recommend that AB take the following steps:

○

Recuse or "wall-off" certain personnel from the proxy voting process;

○

Confirm whether AB's proposed vote is consistent with the voting recommendations of our proxy research services vendor; or

○

Take other actions as the Conflicts Officer deems appropriate.

Review of Third-Party Proxy Service Vendors

AB engages one or more Proxy Service Vendors to provide voting research and voting execution services. From time to time, AB will evaluate each Proxy Service Vendor's services to assess that they are consistent with this Policy and the best interest of our clients. This evaluation may include: (i) a review of pre-populated votes on the Proxy Service Vendor's electronic voting platform before such votes are cast, and (ii) a review of policies that address the consideration of additional information that becomes available regarding a proposal before the vote is cast. AB will also periodically review whether Proxy Service Vendors have the capacity and competency to adequately analyze proxy issues and provide the necessary services to AB. AB will consider, among other things, the adequacy and quality of the Proxy Service Vendor's staffing, personnel and/or technology, as well as whether the Proxy Service Vendor has adequate disclosures regarding its methodologies in formulating voting recommendations. If applicable, we will also review whether any potential factual errors, incompleteness or methodological weaknesses materially affected the Proxy Service Vendor's services and the effectiveness of the Proxy Service Vendor's procedures for obtaining current and accurate information relevant to matters included in its research.

The Committee also takes reasonable steps to review the Proxy Service Vendor's policies and procedures addressing conflicts of interest and verify that AB's primary Proxy Service Vendor(s) is, in fact, independent based on all of the relevant facts and circumstances. This includes reviewing each Proxy Service Vendor's conflict management procedures on an annual basis. When reviewing these conflict management procedures, we will consider, among other things, (i) whether the Proxy Service Vendor has adequate policies and procedures to identify, disclose, and address actual and potential conflicts of interest; and (ii) whether the Proxy Service Vendor provides adequate disclosure of actual and potential conflicts of interest with respect to the services provided to AB by the Proxy Service Vendor and (iii) whether the Proxy Service Vendor's policies and procedures utilize technology in delivering conflicts disclosure; and (iv) can offer research in an impartial manner and in the best interests of our clients.

Confidential Voting

It is AB's policy to support confidentiality before the actual vote has been cast. Employees are prohibited from revealing how we intend to vote except to (i) members of the Committee; (ii) Portfolio Managers who hold the security in their managed accounts; (iii) the Research Analyst(s) who cover(s) the security; (iv) clients, upon request, for the securities held in their portfolios; (v) clients who do not hold the security or for whom AB does not have proxy voting authority, but who provide AB with a signed a Non-Disclosure Agreement; or (vi) declare our stance on a shareholder proposal(s) that is (are) deemed material for the issuer's business for generating long-term value in our clients' best interests. Once the votes have been cast for our mutual fund clients, they are made public in accordance with mutual fund proxy vote disclosures required by the SEC, and we generally post all votes to our public website one business day after the meeting date.

We may participate in proxy surveys conducted by shareholder groups or consultants so long as such participation does not compromise our confidential voting policy. Specifically, prior to our required SEC disclosures each year, we may respond to surveys asking about our proxy voting policies, but not any specific votes. After our mutual fund proxy vote disclosures required by the SEC each year have been made public and/or votes have been posted to our public website, we may respond to surveys that cover specific votes in addition to our voting policies.

On occasion, clients for whom we do not have proxy voting authority may ask us how AB's Policy would be implemented. A member of the Committee or one or more Investment Stewardship Team may provide the results of a potential implementation of the AB policy to the client's account subject to an understanding with the client that the implementation shall remain confidential.

Any substantive contact regarding proxy issues from the issuer, the issuer's agent or a shareholder group sponsoring a proposal must be reported to the Committee if such contact was material to a decision to vote contrary to this Policy. Routine administrative inquiries from proxy solicitors need not be reported.

A Note Regarding AB's Structure

AB and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. ("AB Holding") are Delaware limited partnerships. As limited partnerships, neither company is required to produce an annual proxy statement or hold an annual shareholder meeting. In addition, the general partner of AB and AB Holding, AllianceBernstein Corporation is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Equitable Holdings, Inc.

As a result, most of the positions we express in this Proxy Voting Policy are inapplicable to our business. For example, although units in AB Holding are publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE"), the NYSE Listed Company Manual exempts limited partnerships and controlled companies from compliance with various listing requirements, including the requirement that our board have a majority of independent directors.

Voting Transparency

We publish our voting records on our website one business day after the shareholder meeting date for each issuer company.

Many clients have requested that we provide them with periodic reports on how we voted their proxies. Clients may obtain information about how we voted proxies on their behalf by contacting their Advisor.

Record Keeping

All of the records referenced below will be kept in an easily accessible place for at least the length of time required by local regulation and custom, and, if such local regulation requires that records are kept for less than six (6) years from the end of the fiscal year during which the last entry was made on such record, we will follow the US rule of six (6) or more years. If the local regulation requires that records are kept for more than six or more years, we will comply with the local regulation. We maintain the vast majority of these records electronically.

Proxy Voting and Governance Policy

The Policy shall be maintained in the Legal and Compliance Department and posted on our company intranet and on the AB website.

Proxy Statements Received Regarding Clients' Securities

For US Securities, AB relies on the SEC to maintain copies of each proxy statement we receive regarding client securities. For Non-US Securities, we rely on ISS, our proxy voting agent, to retain such proxy statements.

Records of Votes Cast on Behalf of Clients

Records of votes cast by AB are retained electronically by our proxy research service vendor.

Pre-Disclosure of Vote Intentions on Select Proposals

As part of our engagement and stewardship efforts, AB may publish our vote intentions on certain proposals in advance of select shareholder meetings, with an emphasis on issuers where our discretionary managed accounts have significant economic exposure. The selected proposals are chosen because they impact a range of key topics where AB may have expressed our viewpoints publicly, through prior engagement or proxy voting. We do not pre-disclose our vote intentions on mergers and acquisition activity. The published vote intentions are available on our website.

Disclosure of Holdings

It is AB's policy to not disclose holdings information of its discretionary managed accounts outside what is required to be disclosed in a regulatory filing. However, AB will disclose this holdings information to the issuers of the securities subject to an upcoming vote as required by local law or regulation.

Documents Prepared by AB that Are Material to Voting Decisions

The Investment Stewardship Team is responsible for maintaining documents prepared by the Committee or any AB employee that were material to a voting decision. Therefore, where an investment professional's opinion is essential to the voting decision, the recommendation from investment professionals must be made in writing to a member of Investment Stewardship Team.

Proxy Voting Procedures

Voting Administration

To efficiency execute proxy voting for clients' holdings, AB uses ISS to submit votes electronically.

Issuers initially send proxy information to the custodians of our client accounts. We instruct these custodian banks to direct proxy related materials to ISS's offices. ISS provides us with research related to each resolution and pre-populates certain ballots based on the guidelines contained in this Policy. AB's Investment Stewardship Team assesses the proposals via ISS's web platform, Proxy Exchange, and submits all votes electronically. ISS then returns the proxy ballot forms to the designated returnee for tabulation. In addition, AB's proxy votes are double-checked in a two-tiered approach. All votes are reviewed real-time by an offshore proxy review team to verify that the executed votes are aligned with our Policy. Votes for significant holdings, as defined by our stake, are additionally reviewed on a monthly basis by the Investment Stewardship Team to ensure their compliance with our Policy.

If necessary, any paper ballots we receive will be voted electronically or via mail or fax.

Share Blocking and Abstaining from Voting Client Securities

Proxy voting in certain countries requires "share blocking." Shareholders wishing to vote their proxies must deposit their shares shortly before the date of the meeting (usually one week) with a designated depositary. During this blocking period, shares that will be voted at the meeting cannot be sold until the meeting has taken place and the shares are returned to the clients' custodian banks. We may determine that the value of exercising the vote is outweighed by the detriment of not being able to sell the shares during this period. In cases where we want to retain the ability to trade shares, we may determine to not vote those shares.

We seek to vote all proxies for securities held in client accounts for which we have proxy voting authority. However, in some markets administrative issues beyond our control may sometimes prevent us from voting such proxies. For example, we may receive meeting notices after the cut-off date for voting or without enough time to fully consider the proxy. Similarly, proxy materials for some issuers may not contain disclosure sufficient to arrive at a voting decision, in which cases we may abstain from voting. Some markets outside the US require periodic renewals of powers of attorney that local agents must have from our clients prior to implementing our voting instructions.

AB will abstain from voting (which generally requires submission of a proxy voting card) or affirmatively decide not to vote if AB determines that abstaining or not voting would be in the applicable client's best interest. In making such a determination, AB will consider various factors, including, but not limited to: (i) the costs associated with exercising the proxy (e.g., translation or travel costs); (ii) any legal restrictions on trading resulting from the exercise of a proxy (e.g., share-blocking jurisdictions); (iii) whether AB's clients have sold the underlying securities since the record date for the proxy; and (iv) whether casting a vote would not reasonably be expected to have a material effect on the value of the client's investment.

Loaned Securities

Many of our clients have entered into securities lending arrangements with agent lenders to generate additional revenue. We will not be able to vote securities that are on loan under these types of arrangements. However, for AB managed funds, the agent lenders have standing instructions to recall all securities on loan systematically in a timely manner on a best effort basis in order for AB to vote the proxies on those previously loaned shares.

If you have questions or desire additional information about this Policy, please contact [email protected]

Maren Capital LLC

Proxy Voting Policy

Introduction

As a fiduciary, Maren Capital LLC exercises its responsibility, if any, to vote its clients' securities in a manner that, in the judgment of Maren Capital, is in the clients' economic best interests. In accordance with that fiduciary obligation and Rule 206(4)-6 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, Maren Capital has established the following proxy voting policy.

Responsibility for Voting

Maren Capital shall vote proxies solicited by or with respect to the issuers of securities in which assets of a client portfolio are invested, unless (i) the client otherwise instructs Maren Capital; or

(ii) Maren Capital has responsibility for proxy voting and, in Maren Capital's judgment, the cost or disadvantages of voting the proxy would exceed the anticipated benefit to the client.

Primary Consideration in Voting

Maren Capital considers the reputation, experience and competence of a company's management when we evaluate the merits of investing in a particular company, and we invest in companies in which we believe management goals and shareholder goals are aligned. Therefore, on most issues, Maren Capital will vote in accordance with management's recommendations. This does not mean we do not care about corporate governance. Rather, it is a confirmation that our process of investing with shareholder aligned management is working. However, when we believe management's position on a particular issue is not in the best interests of our clients, we will vote contrary to management's recommendation.

Except as otherwise specifically instructed by a client, Maren Capital generally doesn't take into account interests of other stakeholders of the issuer or interests the client may have in other capacities.

Conflicts of Interest

In certain circumstances, Maren Capital may have a relationship with an issuer that could pose a conflict of interest when voting the shares of that issuer on behalf of clients. Any material conflict between our interests and those of a client will be resolved in the best interests of our client. In the event we become aware of such a conflict, we will (i) disclose the conflict and obtain the client's consent before voting its shares, or (ii) make other voting arrangements consistent with our fiduciary obligations.

Administration

Designation of Proxy Administrator - A member of the Operations department shall serve as Proxy Administrator.

Notification of Custodian - For each client account for which Maren Capital has discretion to vote shareholder proxies, a member of the Operations department shall notify the client's custodian that all proxy materials and ballots shall be forwarded to Maren Capital.

Proxy Voting Authority - When Maren Capital enters into an advisory agreement with a new client, the Proxy Administrator will be advised whether the client has vested MC with proxy voting authority or has reserved or delegated that responsibility to another designated person. The Proxy Administrator will be notified any time a client amends its voting instructions or voting policy.

Records

The following documents shall be maintained by Maren Capital:

a copy of each proxy statement received, provided that no copy need be retained of a proxy statement found on the SEC's EDGAR website;

a record of each proxy vote cast, including the issuer, the number of shares voted, a description of the proposal, how the shares were voted and the date on which the proxy was returned;

a copy of each written client request for Maren Capital's proxy voting record with respect to such client and a copy of any written response from Maren Capital to such client for that record; and

a copy of Maren Capital's Proxy Voting Policy

All records kept under this section shall be retained no less than seven years, the first two years in an appropriate office of Maren Capital, or, if instructed by a client, for such longer period as may be mutually agreed by Maren Capital and such client.

QUANTUM CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.

PROXY VOTING POLICY RULE 206(4)-6

In accordance with the requirements of United States SEC Rule 206(4)-6 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act"), Quantum Capital Management, LLC (the "Firm") has adopted the following proxy voting policy with respect to those assets for which a client has vested the Firm with discretionary investment management authority (the "assets").

The Firm's Policy

The Firm shall be responsible for: (1) directing the manner in which proxies solicited by issuers of securities beneficially owned by the client shall be voted, and (2) making all elections relative to any mergers, acquisitions, and tender offers. The Firm and/or the client shall correspondingly instruct each custodian of the assets to forward to the Firm, or its third-party service provider/agent, copies of all proxies and shareholder communications relating to the assets. Absent mitigating circumstances and/or conflicts of interest (to the extent any such circumstance or conflict is presented, if ever, information pertaining to how the Firm or its third party service provider/agent addressed any such circumstance or conflict shall be maintained by the Firm - see examples below), it is the Firm's general policy to vote proxies consistent with the recommendation of the senior management of the issuer. The Firm shall monitor corporate actions of individual issuers and investment companies consistent with the Firm's fiduciary duty to vote proxies in the best interests of its clients. With respect to individual issuers, the Firm may be solicited to vote on matters including corporate governance, adoption or amendments to compensation plans (including stock options), and matters involving social issues and corporate responsibility. With respect to investment companies (e.g., mutual funds), the Firm may be solicited to vote on matters including the approval of advisory contracts, distribution plans, and mergers. The Firm or its third party service provider/agent shall maintain records pertaining to proxy voting as required pursuant to United States SEC Rule 204-2 (c)(2) under the Advisers Act.

Mitigating Circumstances/Conflicts of Interest

In the event that subsequent to submission of the Firm's votes, the proxy issuer publishes new material information prior to the voting submission deadline, the Firm shall use reasonable efforts to review such information and determine whether such additional information requires a vote change. Policy: If, subsequent to completion of the Firm's voting process, the Firm learns that the proxy issuer has published new material information, such information will be reviewed by the Firm, and a determination will be made if a change in the Firm's prior vote is necessary. If a vote change is determined necessary, the Firm shall use reasonable efforts to make the revised vote prior to the submission deadline.

QUESTIONS: Any questions regarding the Firm's proxy voting policy shall be directed to the Chief Compliance Officer.

The above Proxy Voting Policy has been adopted by Quantum Capital Management, LLC on this 18th day of March, 2025.

Summit Street Capital Management, LLC

Proxy Voting Policy

Summit Street's proxy voting policy has been adopted to facilitate the voting of proxies in what we perceive to be the best interests of our Clients based on our fiduciary obligation and our intention to comply with our obligations under Rule 206(4)-6 under the Advisers Act.

Summit Street has proxy voting authority with respect to all Investment Portfolios unless otherwise agreed upon with a Client. In giving discretionary management authority to Summit Street, Clients have granted Summit Street voting authorization and will not participate in proxy voting decisions. Summit Street exercises its proxy voting authority in accordance with its proxy voting policies and procedures that are aimed at achieving the goal of voting proxies in the best interest of Clients.

The objective of voting a security in each case under this Policy is to seek to enhance the value of the security. This Policy does not prescribe specific voting requirements or specific voting considerations. Instead, this Policy provides procedures for applying the informed expertise and judgment of our investment professionals on a timely basis in pursuit of the above stated voting objectives. Summit Street does not consider it feasible or desirable to prescribe in advance comprehensive guidelines as to how it will exercise proxy voting authority in all circumstances. The primary aim of our approach to corporate governance issues is to encourage a culture of performance among the companies in which we manage investments in order to add value to our portfolios.

Summit Street's general policy is to vote proxies in accordance with the recommendation of a company's management. However, Summit Street may vote to oppose such a recommendation in certain circumstances, particularly in matters deemed "non-routine," such as matters that (i) may measurably change the structure, management control, or operation of the company; (ii) may measurably change the terms of, or fees and expenses associated with, an investment in the company; and (iii) are inconsistent with customary industry standards and practices in a manner that may measurably impact the value of an investment in the company. In certain circumstances, Summit Street also may refrain from voting proxies when it believes that that is in the best interest of Clients.

Summit Street believes that its policies and procedures for proxy voting combined with its independent, private ownership structure significantly limit the potential for conflicts of interest in the proxy voting process. If a conflict of interest were to arise, the policies and procedures set forth potential measures to address the conflict, which may include referral to a third party or other extraordinary steps.

Responsibility

The Managing Members are responsible for facilitating the overall voting process, including making decisions and casting the votes for proxies. The Compliance Officer is responsible for ensuring accurate and adequate disclosure in Form ADV Part 2 and periodically reviewing proxy voting documentation.

Procedures

Receipt of Proxies / Process for Voting

Summit Street uses the services of ProxyEdge, a Broadridge Financial Solutions product ("Broadridge"), to receive and process proxy votes according to its policies above. Summit Street retains proxy records in ProxyEdge for the required retention period.

Note: Certain proxies received may be voted manually via mail.

Major Corporate Proposals

Summit Street will always vote on the following issues arising in company General Meetings where it has the authority to do so on behalf of Clients:

Contentious issues (e.g. issues of perceived national interest, or where there has been extensive press coverage or public comment);

Approval of changes of substantial shareholdings;

Mergers; and

Approval of major asset sales or purchases.

Our approach to significant proxy voting issues which fall outside these areas will be addressed on their merit.

Conflicts of Interest

Summit Street will use reasonable efforts to determine whether a potential conflict may exist, and a potential conflict shall be deemed to exist only if management actually knew or should have known of the conflict. We are sensitive to conflicts of interest that may arise in the proxy decision-making process and have identified the following potential conflicts of interest:

A principal of Summit Street or any person involved in the proxy decision-making process currently serves on the Board of the portfolio company.

An immediate family member of a principal of Summit Street or any person involved in the proxy decision-making process currently serves as a director or executive officer of the portfolio company.

•

Summit Street, any fund managed by Summit Street, or any affiliate holds a significant ownership interest in the portfolio company.

•

Any matter involving a Client/Investor that generates substantial revenue for Summit Street.

•

Any other issue that the Compliance Officer determines is an actual or potential conflict.

This list is not intended to be complete. All employees are obligated to disclose any potential conflict to the Compliance Officer. Materiality determinations will be based on an assessment of the particular facts and circumstances and consultation with Legal Counsel. One or more of the following methods may be used to resolve the conflict:

Voting in accordance with the recommendation of another independent third party/fiduciary;

Disclosing the conflict to the Client and obtaining consent before voting;

Suggesting to the Client that it engage another party to vote the proxy on its behalf;

In the case of a conflict of interest resulting from a particular employee's personal relationships, removing such employee from the decision-making process with respect to such proxy vote; or

Any other method as is deemed appropriate under the particular facts and circumstances, given the nature of the conflict.

The Compliance Officer shall document the method used to resolve conflicts of interest and maintain supporting documentation in accordance with regulatory requirements.

Securities Litigation

Summit Street relies upon the Broker and Custodian to provide notification of any securities held that are subject to litigation/class action lawsuits. Summit Street will review the details of the lawsuit

and, in determining how to file any claims, will consider the potential impact on the Client/shareholder, without considering any benefit to ourselves, our employees or our affiliates.

Recordkeeping

The Firm shall maintain the following records in accordance with regulatory requirements:

Copies of this Policy as from time to time revised or supplemented;

A copy of each proxy statement received. The Firm may rely on obtaining a copy of a proxy statement from the Commission's Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) system;

A record of each vote cast by the adviser on behalf of a Client;

A copy of any document that was material to making a decision how to vote proxies or that memorializes the basis for the decision;

A copy of each written request for information on how Summit Street voted proxies on behalf of the Client/investor and a copy of any written response by Summit Street to any Client request for information on how proxies were voted;

Communications/documentation surrounding Conflicts of Interest.

Written reports arising from review of the proxy function

Item 13. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

(a) The Adviser. William C. Page has served as the Fund's portfolio manager (the "Portfolio Manager") since its inception. As Portfolio Manager, Mr. Page primarily is responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund's portfolio.

Mr. Page is Director of Investment Research of BBR Partners, LLC, the Fund's investment adviser (the "Adviser"), and a member of the Adviser's Investment Committee. His responsibilities include, among other things, sourcing new investments across all asset classes, performing ongoing due diligence of clients' existing investments and working with the Adviser's portfolio and wealth advisory team to analyze the risk and return characteristics of client portfolios. In addition, Mr. Page has considerable experience in hedge fund manager due diligence, selection, risk management and asset allocation. Prior to joining the Adviser in 2008, Mr. Page worked in the fund of hedge funds group at Deutsche Bank AG. Mr. Page received his bachelor's degree from Trinity College, and attended the Tuck Business Bridge Program at Dartmouth College.

The Portfolio Manager is affiliated with other accounts in addition to the Fund, including other pooled investment vehicles. Because the Portfolio Manager may manage assets for other investment companies, pooled investment vehicles, and/or other accounts (collectively "Client Accounts"), or may be affiliated with such Client Accounts, there may be an incentive to favor one Client Account over another, resulting in conflicts of interest. The Adviser has adopted trade allocation and other policies and procedures that it believes are reasonably designed to address conflicts of interest.

The Portfolio Manager's compensation is comprised of a fixed annual salary, a discretionary bonus and potentially an annual supplemental distribution paid by the Adviser, or its parent company, and not by the Fund. Because the Portfolio Manager is an equity owner of the Adviser's parent company, the supplemental distribution that the Portfolio Manager receives generally is based on the annual net profits earned by the Adviser from advisory and other fees derived from Client Accounts, including the Fund, as applicable.

As of March 31, 2026, the Fund's Portfolio Manager beneficially owned shares of limited liability company interests ("Shares") of the Fund with a value of $50,001-$100,000.

The Subadvisers.

AllianceBernstein L.P. ("AllianceBernstein"). Kent Hargis and Brian Holland have served as the portfolio managers of the portion of the Fund's assets that are allocated to Alliance Bernstein since June 2025.

Mr. Hargis, who joined AllianceBernstein in 2003, is the Chief Investment Officer of Strategic Core Equities at AllianceBernstein. He created the Strategic Core platform and has been managing the Global, International and US Strategic Core portfolios since their inception in 2011. Mr. Hargis also has been portfolio manager for the Global Low Carbon Strategy Portfolio since 2022, and managed the Emerging Portfolio from 2015 through 2023.

Mr. Holland, who joined AllianceBernstein in 2004, is a Portfolio Manager and Senior Research Analyst for International Strategic Core Equities at AllianceBernstein. He joined the Strategic Core Equities team as a Senior Research Analyst in 2022 and was appointed Portfolio Manager of International Strategic Core Equities effective January 2023. From 2014 to 2022, Mr. Holland was a senior research analyst on the US Small and Mid Cap Value team, responsible for coverage of technology and materials companies.

The portfolio managers receive base compensation as well as incentive-based compensation determined by the level and performance of client assets under management.

The following table lists the number and types of accounts, other than the Fund, managed by Messrs. Hargis and Holland and assets under management in those accounts, as of March 31, 2026. None of the accounts charge performance-based advisory fees. Neither Mr. Hargis nor Mr. Holland beneficially owns any shares of the Fund.

Portfolio Manager	Registered Investment Companies		Pooled Investment Vehicles		Other Accounts
Portfolio Manager	Number of Accounts	Assets Managed	Number of Accounts	Assets Managed	Number of Accounts	Assets Managed
Kent Hargis	4	$2,007,000,000	12	$8,150,000,000	2,686	$6,434,000,000
Brian Holland	2	$1,654,000,000	8	$7,996,000,000	16	$2,128,000,000

Maren Capital LLC ("Maren"). Brad Schatz serves as the portfolio manager of the portion of the Fund's assets that are allocated to Maren. Mr. Schatz is the Founder and Chief Investment Officer of Maren, and has more than 27 years of investment experience, primarily with concentrated, boutique investment management firms. Prior to founding Maren, Mr. Schatz was the President of Port Capital, where he served as the sole portfolio manager of the small-cap and multi-cap strategies from Port Capital's inception in 2015 through 2021. Mr. Schatz was responsible for creating the firm's fundamental, intrinsic value-based and concentrated investment philosophy, developing and implementing the research and due diligence process and managing and directing the research team and trading operations. Previously, he spent over nine years with San Francisco-based Snyder Capital Management, where he served as a portfolio manager. Mr. Schatz received his B.S. in Finance and B.A. in Psychology from the University of Colorado, Boulder, and earned his MBA from the University of Chicago Booth School of Business.

The following table lists the number and types of accounts, other than the Fund, managed by Mr. Schatz and assets under management in those accounts, as of March 31, 2026. None of the accounts charge performance-based advisory fees. Mr. Schatz does not beneficially own any Shares of the Fund.

Portfolio Manager	Registered Investment Companies		Pooled Investment Vehicles		Other Accounts
Portfolio Manager	Number of Accounts	Assets Managed	Number of Accounts	Assets Managed	Number of Accounts	Assets Managed
Brad Schatz	1	$168,615,382	2	$428,275,750	114	$1,149,412,572

Quantum Capital Management, LLC ("Quantum"). John J. Hughes has served as the lead portfolio manager, and Giridhar Reddy has served as co-portfolio manager, of the portion of the Fund's assets allocated to Quantum since the Fund's inception. Messrs. Hughes and Reddy jointly are responsible for the day-to-day management of the allocated portion of the Fund's assets.

Mr. Hughes, Founder, President and Chief Investment Officer of Quantum, is responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund's assets allocated to Quantum. He also serves as Managing Partner of Quantum Capital Advisors, LLC, an affiliated registered investment adviser ("QCA"). Mr. Hughes received a B.S. in Accounting from The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey, an M.S. in Taxation from Widener University and an MBA with an emphasis in Finance and Economics from Columbia Business School. Mr. Hughes is a member of the CFA Institute and American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA).

Mr. Reddy serves as Vice President of Investment Research of Quantum, and is a minority owner and member of QCA. Mr. Reddy graduated from the Indian Institute of Technology, obtained a Masters in Mechanical Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University and an MBA from Columbia Business School. Mr. Reddy is a CFA charterholder, and is a member of the CFA Institute and the New York Society of Security Analysts (NYSSA).

All Quantum personnel, including the portfolio managers, receive base compensation as well as incentive-based compensation determined by the level and performance of client assets under management.

The following table lists the number and types of accounts, other than the Fund, managed by Messrs. Hughes and Reddy and assets under management in those accounts, as of March 31, 2026. None of the accounts charge performance-based advisory fees. Neither Mr. Hughes nor Mr. Reddy beneficially owns any Shares of the Fund.

Portfolio Manager	Registered Investment Companies		Pooled Investment Vehicles		Other Accounts
Portfolio Manager	Number of Accounts	Assets Managed	Number of Accounts	Assets Managed	Number of Accounts	Assets Managed
John J. Hughes	0	N/A	0	N/A	208	$603,669,960
Giridhar Reddy	0	N/A	0	N/A	0	N/A

Summit Street Capital Management, LLC ("Summit Street"). Jennifer Wallace has more than 30 years of investment experience. Prior to co-founding Summit Street, she worked with the Robert M. Bass investment groups where she was manager of Emerald Value Partners and co-manager of Alpine Capital. Before joining the Bass organization, Jenny was a consultant with McKinsey & Company and an investment banker. She earned a BA from Columbia College and an MBA from the Columbia University Graduate School of Business where she received Beta Gamma Sigma honors and other awards. Jenny is the 2025 recipient of the Gabelli Prize for Contribution to the Field of Value Investing and serves on the Advisory Board of The Heilbrunn Center for Graham & Dodd Investing at the Columbia Business School.

The following table lists the number and types of accounts, other than the Fund, managed by Ms. Wallace and assets under management in those accounts, as of March 31, 2026. Ms. Wallace does not beneficially own any Shares of the Fund.

Portfolio Manager	Registered Investment Companies		Pooled Investment Vehicles		Other Accounts
Portfolio Manager	Number of Accounts	Assets Managed	Number of Accounts	Assets Managed	Number of Accounts	Assets Managed
Jennifer Wallace	1	$407,923,047	1⁽¹⁾	$399,539,494	0	$N/A

⁽¹⁾

The vehicle charges a performance-based advisory fee.

Subadviser Conflicts of Interest. Each of AllianceBernstein, Maren, Quantum, and Summit Street (each, a "Subadviser") provides advisory services to other clients that invest in securities of the same type in which the Fund invests. As a result, there may be an incentive to favor one vehicle or account over another, resulting in conflicts of interest. The Subadvisers are aware of their obligation to ensure that, when orders for the same securities are entered on behalf of the Fund and other accounts, the Fund receives a fair and equitable allocation of the orders, particularly where affiliated accounts may participate. Each Subadviser has adopted various compliance policies and procedures that it believes are reasonably designed to address various conflicts of interest that may arise in connection with its management of other accounts and investment vehicles, and that provide a methodology for seeking to ensure fair treatment of all clients.

(b) Not applicable.

Item 14. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.

Not applicable.

Item 15. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Board.

Item 16. Controls and Procedures.

(a)

The registrant's Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, or persons performing similar functions, have concluded that the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act")) were effective as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that includes the disclosure required by this paragraph, based on their evaluation of the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures, as required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act.

(b)

There were no changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act) that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Item 17. Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

(a)

Not applicable.

(b)

Not applicable.

Item 18. Recovery of Erroneously Awarded Compensation.

Not applicable.

Item 19. Exhibits.

(a)(3) Not applicable.

(a)(4) Not applicable.

(b) Not applicable.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

(registrant)	BBR ALO FUND, LLC

By (Signature and Title)	/s/ Matthew Shapiro
	Matthew Shapiro
	Principal Executive Officer and Secretary

Date	June 5, 2026

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.

By (Signature and Title)	/s/ Matthew Shapiro
	Matthew Shapiro
	Principal Executive Officer and Secretary

Date	June 5, 2026

By (Signature and Title)	/s/ Mark Muffler
	Mark Muffler
	Principal Accounting Officer
	(Principal Financial Officer)

Date	June 5, 2026

BBR ALO Fund LLC published this content on June 05, 2026, and is solely responsible for the information contained herein. Distributed via EDGAR on June 05, 2026 at 21:21 UTC. If you believe the information included in the content is inaccurate or outdated and requires editing or removal, please contact us at [email protected]

Back

View original format