Office of the Vermont Attorney General

04/24/2026 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 04/24/2026 12:36

Attorney General Clark Sues Trump Administration Over Failure to Implement Life-Saving Soot Standard

Attorney General Charity Clark today joined a coalition of 14 states and local governments in suing the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) over its failure to implement a lifesaving 2024 Clean Air Act rule strengthening national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for fine particulate matter (PM2.5), commonly known as soot. In a lawsuit filed earlier today, the coalition called for a court order to ensure EPA takes the key steps required by Congress to initiate the rule's protections and kick off implementation planning.

Soot is a deadly air pollutant emitted from a variety of sources including combustion-engine vehicles, factories, and construction sites. Because of the particles' small size, once inhaled, they can penetrate the lower parts of lungs, move out of the respiratory system, and affect other organs. As a result, soot exposure can lead to myriad health problems, including shortened lifespans, heart attacks, asthma attacks, and cancer. These health effects fall disproportionately on lower-income communities and communities of color.

"Vermonters value both human and environmental health, but the Trump Administration is neglecting both in its failure to implement the soot standard," said Attorney General Charity Clark. "With today's lawsuit, I'm once again protecting the rule of law, the environment, and the health of our communities."

Under the Clean Air Act, the EPA is required to set NAAQS for several pollutants, including fine particulate matter, at a level that protects public health and welfare. When NAAQS are updated, the Clean Air Act gives EPA a specific deadline to designate areas of the country that are in violation of the updated standard as "nonattainment." This designation provides key support for State programs to reduce dangerous pollution levels to safer levels.

Reductions in soot are associated with decreases in the risk of mortality and increases in life expectancy. In 2024, in response to advocacy from Vermont and others, EPA strengthened the soot NAAQS based on overwhelming scientific evidence. According to its own estimates, the EPA has reported that the first year alone of full attainment of the 2024 NAAQS will result in significant public health benefits, including avoiding 4,500 premature deaths, 2,000 emergency room visits, 5,700 new cases of asthma, 800,000 cases of asthma symptoms, 290,000 lost workdays, and 1,000 hospital admissions for Alzheimer's/Parkinson's diseases. The value of these and other health benefits would outweigh the estimated costs of implementation by $46 billion.

Shortly after EPA adopted the 2024 standard, a coalition of Republican states and chambers of commerce asked a federal court to strike down the updated soot standard. Vermont joined a lawsuit to defend the standard. Currently, the case is pending, and the 2024 standard remains in effect. In February 2025, the EPA missed its deadline for designating areas with soot levels that exceed the 2024 standard, denying states important tools to reduce air pollution.

The coalition's lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, alleges that the EPA violated the Clean Air Act by failing to designate areas in the United States as in or out of attainment with the 2024 standard. EPA's failure undermines the ability of states and local governments to reduce levels of fine particulate pollution in the air-especially in low-income communities and communities of color, who are disproportionately impacted-and to achieve significant public health benefits including reduced premature deaths, mortality, and healthcare and administrative costs. The coalition states are seeking both declaratory and injunctive relief, asking the Court to declare EPA's failure to implement the 2024 standard as unlawful and order it to carry out its responsibility to make attainment designations within 150 days of the court order.

Joining Attorney General Clark in filing this lawsuit are the attorneys general of California, Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin, as well as Harris County, Texas, and the City of New York, New York.

A copy of the complaint is available by request.

This lawsuit is the 49th case Attorney General Clark has brought against the Trump Administration since President Trump took office in January 2025. For more information on actions taken by the Attorney General on behalf of Vermonters, visit our website .

CONTACT: Amelia Vath, Senior Advisor to the Attorney General, 802-828-3171

Office of the Vermont Attorney General published this content on April 24, 2026, and is solely responsible for the information contained herein. Distributed via Public Technologies (PUBT), unedited and unaltered, on April 24, 2026 at 18:36 UTC. If you believe the information included in the content is inaccurate or outdated and requires editing or removal, please contact us at [email protected]