04/14/2026 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 04/14/2026 15:07
WASHINGTON, DC - US Senators James Lankford (R-OK), John Fetterman (D-PA), Chair and Ranking Member of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Subcommittee on Border Management, Federal Workforce and Regulatory Affairs reintroduced the Retirement Annuity Supplement Clarity Act, which addresses the way the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) calculates retirement annuity settlements for federal employees, primarily for federal law enforcement personnel, who have a settlement agreements dividing their annuity.
"Law enforcement officers are protecting us at the southern border and around the country and should be able to focus on their mission, not on bureaucratic decisions complicating their retirement calculations," said Lankford. "Our commonsense proposal solves a long-standing discrepancy with how annuities are calculated for some of our law enforcement personnel and gives OPM maximum clarity for how Congress wants them to handle these payments. This ensures courts' explicit orders are followed when dividing annuity supplement payments, so retirees and the courts decide how settlements are carried out, not OPM."
"I've always been proud to support those who put their life on the line every day-they represent the very best of us," said Fetterman. "This bill is about playing it fair and making sure our federal law enforcement officers get the retirement benefits they worked hard for. I'm proud to join Senator Lankford in doing right by those who served our communities to keep us all safe."
Background
The Retirement Annuity Supplement Clarity Act clarifies that OPM has the flexibility to comply with a court order that divides the annuity supplement. The bill repays annuitants who were retired on or before June 30, 2016, and entitled to an annuity supplement subject to a court order that was silent on division of the supplement or expressly excluded the supplement from division, and whose annuity supplement was recomputed retroactively. Additionally, the bill clarifies that any collection of overpayments to former spouses due to this recalculation is waived.
###