Federal Court Dismisses Another Attempt to Stymie Sable Offshore Corporation’s Oil and Gas Operations

Note, a press release posted earlier today, Sept. 3, was mistakenly a reprint of an Aug. 21 press release about a related decision. Below is the correct press release regarding a decision issued on Monday, Aug. 31, in this matter.

On Monday, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California dismissed with prejudice the complaint in Center for Biological Diversity v. Burgum - one of several cases challenging Sable Offshore Corp.'s oil and gas operations at the Santa Ynez Unit in the Santa Barbara Channel. This ruling follows another, related ruling issued last month.

"States cannot stop the Executive Branch from acting pursuant to Congress's authorization, especially when it comes to ensuring American energy dominance," said Associate Attorney General Stanley E. Woodward Jr. "The Department is pleased with the court's decision. This Department of Justice will never allow California or ideological groups to undermine our Nation's national security and economic prosperity interests in ensuring availability of this critical resource for Americans."

"This is another victory for American energy independence," said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Adam Gustafson of the Justice Department's Energy and Natural Resources Division (ENRD). "Two weeks ago, this same court affirmed the federal government's authority to protect energy security from state overreach through a Defense Production Act order restarting this critical domestic source of oil. This week's decision protects this critical resource against special interest groups who sought to stymie that same oil production through a lawsuit alleging violations of federal law. We are committed to unleashing American energy, as President Donald J. Trump has directed the Department of Justice and all federal agencies to do."

Following a decade of inactivity, Sable last year sought to restart offshore oil and gas production on Platform Harmony in the Santa Ynez Unit. Plaintiff environmental groups sued, challenging the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM)'s April 2025 decision not to require revision of the development and production plan for Platform Harmony related to Sable's restart plans. In its decision dismissing the case for lack of standing, the court held that the plaintiffs have not alleged a procedural injury and their theory of causation is "far too hypothetical and attenuated" and "not fairly traceable to BOEM and Sable."

The court instead explained that plaintiffs' asserted injuries stem from offshore oil and gas operations generally, not from BOEM's decision. The court further held that the plaintiffs' injuries are not redressable because BOEM has substantial discretion in deciding whether to require revision of the plan.

Attorneys with ENRD's Natural Resources Section handled this matter.