04/30/2026 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 04/30/2026 10:10
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENT COMPANIES
| Investment Company Act file number | 811-22784 | |||||
| BNY Mellon Municipal Bond Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | ||||||
| (Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter) | ||||||
|
c/o BNY Mellon Investment Adviser, Inc. 240 Greenwich Street New York, New York 10286 |
||||||
| (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) | ||||||
|
Deirdre Cunnane, Esq. 240 Greenwich Street New York, New York 10286 |
||||||
| (Name and address of agent for service) | ||||||
| Registrant's telephone number, including area code: | (212) 922-6400 | |||||
|
Date of fiscal year end: |
2/28 | |||||
| Date of reporting period: |
2/28/2026 |
|||||
FORM N-CSR
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.
|
BNY Mellon Municipal Bond Infrastructure Fund, Inc.
|
|
Protecting Your Privacy
Our Pledge to You
|
|
THE FUND IS COMMITTED TO YOUR PRIVACY. On this page, you
will find the fund's policies and practices for collecting, disclosing, and
safeguarding "nonpublic personal information," which may include
financial, biometric or other customer information. These policies apply to
individuals who purchase fund shares for personal, family, or household
purposes, or have done so in the past. This notification replaces all previous
statements of the fund's consumer privacy policy, and may be amended at
any time. We'll keep you informed of changes as required by law.
|
|
YOUR ACCOUNT IS PROVIDED IN A SECURE ENVIRONMENT.
The fund maintains physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that
comply with federal regulations to guard nonpublic personal information.
The fund's agents and service providers have limited access to customer
information based on their role in servicing your account.
|
|
THE FUND COLLECTS INFORMATION IN ORDER TO SERVICE
AND ADMINISTER YOUR ACCOUNT. The fund collects a variety of
nonpublic personal information, which may include:
|
|
●Information we receive from you, such as your name, address, and
social security number.
|
|
●Information about your transactions with us, such as the purchase or
sale of fund shares.
|
|
●Information we receive from agents and service providers, such as proxy
voting information.
|
|
THE FUND DOES NOT SHARE NONPUBLIC PERSONAL
INFORMATION WITH ANYONE, EXCEPT AS PERMITTED BY
LAW.
|
|
Thank you for this opportunity to serve you.
|
|
Fund Performance and Distribution Information
|
2
|
|
Selected Information
|
6
|
|
Portfolio Summary
|
7
|
|
Schedule of Investments
|
8
|
|
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
|
33
|
|
Statement of Operations
|
34
|
|
Statement of Cash Flows
|
35
|
|
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
|
36
|
|
Financial Highlights
|
37
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements
|
38
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
48
|
|
Additional Information
|
49
|
|
Important Tax Information
|
61
|
|
Board Members Information
|
62
|
|
Officers of the Fund
|
66
|
|
Officers and Directors
|
69
|
|
FOR MORE INFORMATION
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns as of 2/28/2026
|
|||
|
1 Year
|
5 Years
|
10 Years
|
|
|
BNY Mellon Municipal Bond Infrastructure Fund, Inc.-
Market Price
|
6.92%
|
(0.29%)
|
3.18%
|
|
BNY Mellon Municipal Bond Infrastructure Fund, Inc.-
Net Asset Value
|
3.01%
|
0.54%
|
3.03%
|
|
Bloomberg U.S. Municipal Bond Index
|
4.96%
|
1.44%
|
2.43%
|
|
Distributions
|
|||||||
|
Current Month
Percentage of Distributions
|
Fiscal Year Ended
Per Share Amounts
|
||||||
|
Net
Investment
Income
|
Realized
Gains
|
Return
of
Capital
|
Total
Distributions
|
Net
Investment
Income
|
Realized
Gains
|
Return
of
Capital
|
|
|
BNY Mellon
Municipal
Bond
Infrastructure
Fund, Inc.
|
100.00%
|
.00%
|
.00%
|
$.46
|
$.46
|
$.00
|
$.00
|
|
Market Price per share February 28, 2026
|
$11.11
|
|
Shares Outstanding February 28, 2026
|
18,405,973
|
|
New York Stock Exchange Ticker Symbol
|
DMB
|
|
MARKET PRICE ($) (NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE)
|
||||
|
Fiscal Year Ended February 28, 2026
|
||||
|
Quarter Ended
May 31, 2025
|
Quarter Ended
August 31, 2025
|
Quarter Ended
November 30, 2025
|
Quarter Ended
February 28,
2026
|
|
|
High
|
10.84
|
10.27
|
10.98
|
11.27
|
|
Low
|
9.65
|
9.87
|
10.00
|
10.47
|
|
Close
|
10.04
|
10.02
|
10.56
|
11.11
|
|
PERCENTAGE GAIN (LOSS) based on change in Market Price†
|
|
|
April 26, 2013 (commencement of operations) through February 28,
2026
|
38.97
%
|
|
March 1, 2016 through February 28, 2026
|
36.71
|
|
March 1, 2021 through February 28, 2026
|
(1.42
)
|
|
March 1, 2025 through February 28, 2026
|
6.92
|
|
June 1, 2025 through February 28, 2026
|
14.45
|
|
September 1, 2025 through February 28, 2026
|
13.40
|
|
December 1, 2025 through February 28, 2026
|
6.41
|
|
NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE
|
|
|
April 26, 2013 (commencement of operations)
|
$14.295
|
|
February 28, 2025
|
12.11
|
|
May 31, 2025
|
11.15
|
|
August 31, 2025
|
11.02
|
|
November 30, 2025
|
11.78
|
|
February 28, 2026
|
11.96
|
|
PERCENTAGE GAIN (LOSS) based on change in Net Asset Value†
|
|
|
April 26, 2013 (commencement of operations) through February 28,
2026
|
56.95
%
|
|
March 1, 2016 through February 28, 2026
|
34.77
|
|
March 1, 2021 through February 28, 2026
|
2.71
|
|
March 1, 2025 through February 28, 2026
|
3.01
|
|
June 1, 2025 through February 28, 2026
|
10.92
|
|
September 1, 2025 through February 28, 2026
|
10.97
|
|
December 1, 2025 through February 28, 2026
|
2.66
|
|
†
|
With dividends reinvested.
|
|
Description
|
Coupon
Rate (%)
|
Maturity
Date
|
Principal
Amount ($)
|
Value ($)
|
|
|
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 152.8%
|
|||||
|
Alabama - 5.2%
|
|||||
|
Alabama Special Care Facilities
Financing Authority,
Revenue Bonds (Methodist
Home for the Aging
Obligated Group)
|
6.00
|
6/1/2050
|
3,820,000
|
3,755,083
|
|
|
Baldwin County Industrial
Development Authority,
Revenue Bonds (Novelis
Corporation Project) Ser.
A(a),(b)
|
5.00
|
6/1/2032
|
1,750,000
|
1,833,057
|
|
|
Jefferson County, Revenue
Bonds, Refunding
|
5.50
|
10/1/2053
|
2,750,000
|
2,917,712
|
|
|
Mobile County Industrial
Development Authority,
Revenue Bonds (Calvert LLC
Project) Ser. B
|
4.75
|
12/1/2054
|
725,000
|
694,794
|
|
|
Selma Industrial Development
Board, Revenue Bonds,
Refunding (International
Paper Co.) Ser. A
|
4.20
|
5/1/2034
|
1,000,000
|
1,076,422
|
|
|
Southeast Energy Authority A
Cooperative District,
Revenue Bonds, Ser. C(a)
|
5.00
|
2/1/2031
|
1,000,000
|
1,083,687
|
|
|
11,360,755
|
|||||
|
Arizona - 6.8%
|
|||||
|
Arizona Industrial
Development Authority,
Revenue Bonds (Legacy
Cares Project)(b),(c)
|
7.75
|
7/1/2050
|
3,200,000
|
75,200
|
|
|
Arizona Industrial
Development Authority,
Revenue Bonds (Sustainable
Bond) (Equitable School
Revolving Fund Obligated
Group) Ser. A
|
4.00
|
11/1/2050
|
3,425,000
|
3,065,094
|
|
|
Maricopa County Industrial
Development Authority,
Revenue Bonds (Benjamin
Franklin Charter School
Obligated Group)(b)
|
6.00
|
7/1/2052
|
2,000,000
|
2,014,744
|
|
|
Description
|
Coupon
Rate (%)
|
Maturity
Date
|
Principal
Amount ($)
|
Value ($)
|
|
|
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 152.8% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Arizona - 6.8% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Maricopa County Industrial
Development Authority,
Revenue Bonds, Refunding
(Legacy Traditional Schools
Project)(b)
|
5.00
|
7/1/2049
|
1,025,000
|
990,840
|
|
|
Phoenix Civic Improvement
Corp., Revenue Bonds
|
4.00
|
7/1/2044
|
1,405,000
|
1,411,931
|
|
|
Salt Verde Financial Corp.,
Revenue Bonds
|
5.00
|
12/1/2037
|
5,000,000
|
5,574,369
|
|
|
Sierra Vista Industrial
Development Authority,
Revenue Bonds (American
Leadership Academy
Project)(b)
|
5.00
|
6/15/2054
|
1,000,000
|
880,690
|
|
|
The Phoenix Arizona Industrial
Development Authority,
Revenue Bonds, Refunding
(BASIS Schools Projects) Ser.
A(b)
|
5.00
|
7/1/2046
|
1,000,000
|
967,198
|
|
|
14,980,066
|
|||||
|
Arkansas - 1.6%
|
|||||
|
Arkansas Development
Finance Authority, Revenue
Bonds (Sustainable Bond)
(U.S. Steel Corp.)
|
5.70
|
5/1/2053
|
3,500,000
|
3,579,044
|
|
|
California - 8.0%
|
|||||
|
California Community Choice
Financing Authority,
Revenue Bonds (Sustainable
Bond) (Clean Energy
Project) Ser. B(a)
|
5.00
|
11/1/2035
|
2,250,000
|
2,501,557
|
|
|
California Community Choice
Financing Authority,
Revenue Bonds (Sustainable
Bond) (Clean Energy
Project) Ser. C(a)
|
5.00
|
10/1/2032
|
1,690,000
|
1,829,575
|
|
|
California County Tobacco
Securitization Agency,
Revenue Bonds, Refunding
(Los Angeles County
Securitization Corp.) Ser. A
|
4.00
|
6/1/2049
|
1,000,000
|
891,825
|
|
|
Description
|
Coupon
Rate (%)
|
Maturity
Date
|
Principal
Amount ($)
|
Value ($)
|
|
|
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 152.8% (continued)
|
|||||
|
California - 8.0% (continued)
|
|||||
|
California Health Facilities
Financing Authority,
Revenue Bonds, Refunding
(Providence St. Joseph
Health Obligated Group) Ser.
C(a)
|
5.25
|
10/1/2035
|
1,000,000
|
1,173,762
|
|
|
California Municipal Finance
Authority, Revenue Bonds
(Cabrillo College Project)
Ser. A(b)
|
5.38
|
7/1/2050
|
1,750,000
|
1,764,868
|
|
|
Long Beach Bond Finance
Authority, Revenue Bonds,
Ser. A
|
5.50
|
11/15/2037
|
5,000,000
|
6,101,390
|
|
|
San Diego County Regional
Airport Authority, Revenue
Bonds, Ser. B
|
5.50
|
7/1/2055
|
1,000,000
|
1,076,375
|
|
|
Southern California Public
Power Authority, Revenue
Bonds (Southern
Transmission System
Renewal Project) (Insured;
Build America Mutual) Ser. 1
|
5.25
|
7/1/2050
|
2,000,000
|
2,158,104
|
|
|
17,497,456
|
|||||
|
Colorado - 5.5%
|
|||||
|
Colorado Health Facilities
Authority, Revenue Bonds
(CommonSpirit Health
Obligated Group)
|
5.25
|
11/1/2052
|
1,000,000
|
1,041,089
|
|
|
Colorado Health Facilities
Authority, Revenue Bonds,
Refunding (Covenant Living
Communities & Services
Obligated Group) Ser. A
|
4.00
|
12/1/2050
|
3,000,000
|
2,563,028
|
|
|
Colorado Health Facilities
Authority, Revenue Bonds,
Refunding (Intermountain
Healthcare Obligated Group)
Ser. A
|
4.00
|
5/15/2052
|
1,255,000
|
1,154,937
|
|
|
Colorado University Research
Foundation, Revenue Bonds
(The Prospect Project) Ser.
A(b)
|
5.25
|
3/1/2045
|
650,000
|
668,917
|
|
|
Description
|
Coupon
Rate (%)
|
Maturity
Date
|
Principal
Amount ($)
|
Value ($)
|
|
|
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 152.8% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Colorado - 5.5% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Denver City & County Airport
System, Revenue Bonds,
Refunding, Ser. A
|
5.50
|
11/15/2053
|
1,000,000
|
1,051,238
|
|
|
Dominion Water & Sanitation
District, Revenue Bonds,
Refunding
|
5.88
|
12/1/2052
|
2,000,000
|
2,053,291
|
|
|
Rampart Range Metropolitan
District No. 5, Revenue
Bonds
|
4.00
|
12/1/2051
|
1,000,000
|
816,935
|
|
|
Tender Option Bond Trust
Receipts (Series 2020-
XM0829), (Colorado Health
Facilities Authority, Revenue
Bonds, Refunding
(CommonSpirit Health
Obligated Group) Ser. A1)
Recourse, Underlying
Coupon Rate 4.00%(b),(d),(e)
|
12.90
|
8/1/2044
|
2,455,000
|
2,771,272
|
|
|
12,120,707
|
|||||
|
Connecticut - .6%
|
|||||
|
Connecticut Health &
Educational Facilities
Authority, Revenue Bonds,
Refunding (Fairfield
University) Ser. T
|
4.00
|
7/1/2055
|
875,000
|
777,360
|
|
|
Stamford Housing Authority,
Revenue Bonds, Refunding
(Mozaic Concierge Living),
Ser. A
|
6.25
|
10/1/2060
|
500,000
|
504,905
|
|
|
1,282,265
|
|||||
|
Delaware - .5%
|
|||||
|
Delaware Economic
Development Authority,
Revenue Bonds (ACTS
Retirement-Life
Communities Obligated
Group) Ser. B
|
5.25
|
11/15/2053
|
1,000,000
|
1,014,419
|
|
|
District of Columbia - 1.0%
|
|||||
|
District of Columbia, Revenue
Bonds, Refunding (The
Catholic University of
America) Ser. A
|
5.75
|
10/1/2055
|
2,000,000
|
2,137,250
|
|
|
Description
|
Coupon
Rate (%)
|
Maturity
Date
|
Principal
Amount ($)
|
Value ($)
|
|
|
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 152.8% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Florida - 9.0%
|
|||||
|
Collier County Industrial
Development Authority,
Revenue Bonds (NCH
Healthcare System Project)
(Insured; Assured Guaranty
Corp.) Ser. A
|
5.00
|
10/1/2049
|
3,425,000
|
3,556,547
|
|
|
Florida Development Finance
Corp., Revenue Bonds,
Refunding (Brightline
Florida Passenger Rail
Project) (Insured; Assured
Guaranty Corp.)
|
5.25
|
7/1/2053
|
1,570,000
|
1,564,996
|
|
|
Florida Housing Finance Corp.,
Revenue Bonds (Insured;
GNMA, FNMA, FHLMC) Ser. 1
|
4.40
|
7/1/2044
|
1,415,000
|
1,426,537
|
|
|
Florida Local Government
Finance Commission,
Revenue Bonds (Bridgeprep
Academy Projects) Ser. A(b)
|
6.25
|
6/15/2055
|
1,500,000
|
1,549,533
|
|
|
Florida Local Government
Finance Commission,
Revenue Bonds (Fleet
Landing at Nocatee Project)
Ser. A(b)
|
6.63
|
11/15/2045
|
1,000,000
|
1,076,510
|
|
|
Greater Orlando Aviation
Authority, Revenue Bonds
(United Airlines, Inc. Project)
|
5.25
|
11/1/2035
|
1,000,000
|
1,090,020
|
|
|
Greater Orlando Aviation
Authority, Revenue Bonds,
Ser. A
|
4.00
|
10/1/2049
|
2,480,000
|
2,250,902
|
|
|
Lee County Industrial
Development Authority,
Revenue Bonds, Refunding,
Ser. 1
|
4.00
|
4/1/2049
|
1,750,000
|
1,571,359
|
|
|
Miami-Dade County Water &
Sewer System, Revenue
Bonds (Insured; Build
America Mutual)
|
4.00
|
10/1/2051
|
1,000,000
|
921,985
|
|
|
Description
|
Coupon
Rate (%)
|
Maturity
Date
|
Principal
Amount ($)
|
Value ($)
|
|
|
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 152.8% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Florida - 9.0% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Palm Beach County Health
Facilities Authority, Revenue
Bonds, Refunding (ACTS
Retirement-Life
Communities Obligated
Group) Ser. B
|
5.00
|
11/15/2055
|
1,300,000
|
1,301,990
|
|
|
Palm Beach County Health
Facilities Authority, Revenue
Bonds, Refunding (Lifespace
Communities Obligated
Group) Ser. C
|
7.63
|
5/15/2058
|
1,000,000
|
1,113,734
|
|
|
Pinellas County Industrial
Development Authority,
Revenue Bonds (Foundation
for Global Understanding)
|
5.00
|
7/1/2039
|
1,000,000
|
1,017,901
|
|
|
Seminole County Industrial
Development Authority,
Revenue Bonds, Refunding
(Legacy Pointe at UCF
Project)
|
5.75
|
11/15/2054
|
500,000
|
483,965
|
|
|
Village Community
Development District No. 15,
Special Assessment Bonds(b)
|
5.25
|
5/1/2054
|
900,000
|
906,921
|
|
|
19,832,900
|
|||||
|
Georgia - 4.6%
|
|||||
|
Savannah Georgia Convention
Center Authority, Revenue
Bonds (Insured; Assured
Guaranty Corp.) (Convention
Center Hotel) Ser. C
|
5.50
|
6/1/2045
|
350,000
|
387,805
|
|
|
Tender Option Bond Trust
Receipts (Series 2020-
XM0825), (Brookhaven
Development Authority,
Revenue Bonds (Children's
Healthcare of Atlanta) Ser.
A) Recourse, Underlying
Coupon Rate 4.00%(b),(d),(e)
|
11.30
|
7/1/2044
|
3,600,000
|
3,869,949
|
|
|
Description
|
Coupon
Rate (%)
|
Maturity
Date
|
Principal
Amount ($)
|
Value ($)
|
|
|
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 152.8% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Georgia - 4.6% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Tender Option Bond Trust
Receipts (Series 2023-
XF3183), (Municipal Electric
Authority of Georgia,
Revenue Bonds (Plant Vogtle
Units 3&4 Project) Ser. A)
Recourse, Underlying
Coupon Rate 5.00%(b),(d),(e)
|
13.64
|
1/1/2059
|
2,060,000
|
2,051,306
|
|
|
Tender Option Bond Trust
Receipts (Series 2025-
XF80660), (Atlanta
Department of Aviation,
Revenue Bonds, Ser. B1),
Non-Recourse, Underlying
Coupon Rate 5.25%(b),(d),(e)
|
14.86
|
7/1/2050
|
3,520,000
|
3,709,253
|
|
|
10,018,313
|
|||||
|
Illinois - 10.3%
|
|||||
|
Chicago, GO (Housing and
Economic Development
Projects) Ser. F
|
6.00
|
1/1/2055
|
1,000,000
|
1,046,895
|
|
|
Chicago, GO, Ser. A
|
5.00
|
1/1/2044
|
900,000
|
903,163
|
|
|
Chicago, GO, Refunding, Ser. A
|
6.00
|
1/1/2038
|
2,500,000
|
2,537,064
|
|
|
Chicago Board of Education,
GO, Ser. A
|
6.25
|
12/1/2050
|
850,000
|
902,660
|
|
|
Chicago Board of Education,
GO, Refunding, Ser. A
|
5.00
|
12/1/2035
|
1,500,000
|
1,519,065
|
|
|
Chicago Board of Education,
GO, Refunding, Ser. B
|
5.50
|
12/1/2035
|
1,500,000
|
1,655,785
|
|
|
Illinois, GO, Ser. D
|
5.00
|
11/1/2027
|
3,500,000
|
3,651,768
|
|
|
Illinois, GO, Ser. D
|
5.00
|
11/1/2028
|
2,600,000
|
2,709,830
|
|
|
Illinois, Revenue Bonds, Ser. C
|
5.00
|
6/15/2045
|
2,000,000
|
2,123,306
|
|
|
Illinois Finance Authority,
Revenue Bonds (Plymouth
Place Obligated Group) Ser.
A
|
6.63
|
5/15/2052
|
1,000,000
|
1,056,975
|
|
|
Metropolitan Pier & Exposition
Authority, Revenue Bonds
(McCormick Place Project)
(Insured; National Public
Finance Guarantee Corp.)
Ser. A(f)
|
0.00
|
12/15/2036
|
1,400,000
|
968,999
|
|
|
Description
|
Coupon
Rate (%)
|
Maturity
Date
|
Principal
Amount ($)
|
Value ($)
|
|
|
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 152.8% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Illinois - 10.3% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Tender Option Bond Trust
Receipts (Series 2023-
XF1623), (Regional
Transportation Authority
Illinois, Revenue Bonds, Ser.
B) Non-Recourse,
Underlying Coupon Rate
4.00%(b),(d),(e)
|
6.85
|
6/1/2048
|
1,625,000
|
1,482,769
|
|
|
Tender Option Bond Trust
Receipts (Series 2025-
XF3349), (Chicago O'Hare
International Airport,
Revenue Bonds, Refunding,
Ser. A) Recourse, Underlying
Coupon Rate 5.50%(b),(d),(e)
|
15.78
|
1/1/2053
|
2,100,000
|
2,207,078
|
|
|
22,765,357
|
|||||
|
Indiana - .9%
|
|||||
|
Indiana Finance Authority,
Revenue Bonds (Sustainable
Bond)(b),(c)
|
7.00
|
3/1/2039
|
1,925,000
|
96,250
|
|
|
Indianapolis Local Public
Improvement Bond Bank,
Revenue Bonds (City Moral
Obligation) (Insured; Build
America Mutual) Ser. F1
|
5.25
|
3/1/2067
|
1,000,000
|
1,045,784
|
|
|
Valparaiso, Revenue Bonds,
Refunding (Pratt Paper
(IN) LLC Project)(b)
|
5.00
|
1/1/2054
|
750,000
|
745,175
|
|
|
1,887,209
|
|||||
|
Iowa - .6%
|
|||||
|
Iowa Finance Authority,
Revenue Bonds, Refunding
(Iowa Fertilizer Co.
Project)(g)
|
5.00
|
12/1/2032
|
1,150,000
|
1,342,708
|
|
|
Kentucky - 2.4%
|
|||||
|
Christian County, Revenue
Bonds, Refunding (Jennie
Stuart Medical Center
Obligated Group)
|
5.50
|
2/1/2044
|
1,000,000
|
1,000,544
|
|
|
Kentucky Public Energy
Authority, Revenue Bonds,
Ser. A(a)
|
5.00
|
7/1/2030
|
1,000,000
|
1,071,899
|
|
|
Description
|
Coupon
Rate (%)
|
Maturity
Date
|
Principal
Amount ($)
|
Value ($)
|
|
|
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 152.8% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Kentucky - 2.4% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Kentucky Public Energy
Authority, Revenue Bonds,
Ser. B
|
5.00
|
12/1/2033
|
2,000,000
|
2,132,628
|
|
|
Kentucky Public Energy
Authority, Revenue Bonds,
Refunding, Ser. C
|
5.00
|
5/1/2036
|
1,000,000
|
1,100,112
|
|
|
5,305,183
|
|||||
|
Louisiana - 3.8%
|
|||||
|
Ernest N. Morial New Orleans
Exhibition Hall Authority,
Special Tax Bonds
|
5.50
|
7/15/2054
|
1,500,000
|
1,589,447
|
|
|
Louisiana Public Facilities
Authority, Revenue Bonds
(I-10 Calcasieu River Bridge
Public-Private Partnership
Project)
|
5.75
|
9/1/2064
|
1,825,000
|
1,900,801
|
|
|
Louisiana Public Facilities
Authority, Revenue Bonds,
Refunding (Ochsner Clinic
Foundation Obligated
Group) Ser. A
|
5.50
|
5/15/2050
|
1,325,000
|
1,433,897
|
|
|
Louisiana Public Facilities
Authority, Revenue Bonds,
Refunding (Ochsner Clinic
Foundation Obligated
Group) Ser. A
|
5.50
|
5/15/2055
|
3,300,000
|
3,525,437
|
|
|
8,449,582
|
|||||
|
Maine - .6%
|
|||||
|
Finance Authority of Maine,
Revenue Bonds (University
of New England)
|
5.50
|
7/1/2055
|
1,250,000
|
1,332,291
|
|
|
Maryland - 3.6%
|
|||||
|
Maryland Economic
Development Corp., Revenue
Bonds (College Park
Leonardtown Project)
(Insured; Assured Guaranty
Corp.)
|
5.25
|
7/1/2064
|
650,000
|
673,277
|
|
|
Description
|
Coupon
Rate (%)
|
Maturity
Date
|
Principal
Amount ($)
|
Value ($)
|
|
|
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 152.8% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Maryland - 3.6% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Maryland Economic
Development Corp., Revenue
Bonds (Sustainable Bond)
(Purple Line Transit
Partners) Ser. B
|
5.25
|
6/30/2055
|
4,200,000
|
4,209,040
|
|
|
Tender Option Bond Trust
Receipts (Series 2024-
XF1758), (Maryland Stadium
Authority, Revenue Bonds)
Non-Recourse, Underlying
Coupon Rate 5.00%(b),(d),(e)
|
13.89
|
6/1/2054
|
3,000,000
|
3,126,366
|
|
|
8,008,683
|
|||||
|
Massachusetts - 2.7%
|
|||||
|
Massachusetts Development
Finance Agency, Revenue
Bonds (Brown University)
Ser. A
|
5.50
|
8/15/2050
|
1,000,000
|
1,054,560
|
|
|
Massachusetts Development
Finance Agency, Revenue
Bonds, Refunding (Beth
Israel Lahey Health
Obligated Group) Ser. N
|
5.50
|
7/1/2055
|
2,080,000
|
2,218,557
|
|
|
Massachusetts Development
Finance Agency, Revenue
Bonds, Refunding
(NewBridge
Charles Obligated Group)(b)
|
5.00
|
10/1/2057
|
1,000,000
|
979,657
|
|
|
Massachusetts Educational
Financing Authority,
Revenue Bonds, Ser. B
|
5.00
|
7/1/2030
|
1,000,000
|
1,067,955
|
|
|
Massachusetts Housing
Finance Agency, Revenue
Bonds, Ser. B
|
4.50
|
6/1/2056
|
650,000
|
638,303
|
|
|
5,959,032
|
|||||
|
Michigan - 4.2%
|
|||||
|
Michigan Building Authority,
Revenue Bonds, Refunding
|
4.00
|
10/15/2049
|
2,500,000
|
2,373,012
|
|
|
Michigan Finance Authority,
Revenue Bonds (Sustainable
Bond) (Henry Ford)
|
5.50
|
2/28/2049
|
1,275,000
|
1,351,051
|
|
|
Description
|
Coupon
Rate (%)
|
Maturity
Date
|
Principal
Amount ($)
|
Value ($)
|
|
|
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 152.8% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Michigan - 4.2% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Michigan Finance Authority,
Revenue Bonds, Refunding,
Ser. A
|
4.00
|
12/1/2049
|
1,000,000
|
903,178
|
|
|
Michigan Housing
Development Authority,
Revenue Bonds, Ser. A
|
3.35
|
12/1/2034
|
2,500,000
|
2,517,849
|
|
|
Michigan Housing
Development Authority,
Revenue Bonds, Ser. C
|
5.05
|
6/1/2051
|
1,500,000
|
1,522,184
|
|
|
Michigan Tobacco Settlement
Finance Authority, Revenue
Bonds, Refunding, Ser. C(f)
|
0.00
|
6/1/2058
|
20,000,000
|
467,172
|
|
|
9,134,446
|
|||||
|
Minnesota - .4%
|
|||||
|
Woodbury, Revenue Bonds,
Refunding (Math &
Science Academy)(b)
|
5.50
|
6/1/2063
|
855,000
|
808,437
|
|
|
Missouri - 2.7%
|
|||||
|
Missouri Housing Development
Commission, Revenue Bonds
(Insured; GNMA, FNMA,
FHLMC) Ser. A
|
4.70
|
11/1/2054
|
960,000
|
958,872
|
|
|
St. Louis County Industrial
Development Authority,
Revenue Bonds (Friendship
Village St. Louis Obligated
Group) Ser. A
|
5.13
|
9/1/2049
|
1,000,000
|
1,001,905
|
|
|
St. Louis County Industrial
Development Authority,
Revenue Bonds, Refunding
(Friendship Village Sunset
Hills)
|
5.00
|
9/1/2042
|
1,000,000
|
1,000,511
|
|
|
Tender Option Bond Trust
Receipts (Series 2023-
XM1116), (Jackson County
Missouri Special Obligation,
Revenue Bonds, Refunding,
Ser. A) Non-Recourse,
Underlying Coupon Rate
4.25%(b),(d),(e)
|
8.74
|
12/1/2053
|
3,000,000
|
2,901,236
|
|
|
5,862,524
|
|||||
|
Description
|
Coupon
Rate (%)
|
Maturity
Date
|
Principal
Amount ($)
|
Value ($)
|
|
|
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 152.8% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Montana - 1.8%
|
|||||
|
Montana Facility Finance
Authority, Revenue Bonds
(Benefis Health System
Obligated Group) Ser. A
|
5.50
|
2/15/2055
|
3,850,000
|
4,067,628
|
|
|
Nebraska - .4%
|
|||||
|
Omaha Public Power District,
Revenue Bonds, Ser. A
|
4.00
|
2/1/2051
|
1,000,000
|
945,717
|
|
|
Nevada - 1.4%
|
|||||
|
Clark County School District,
GO (Insured; Assured
Guaranty Corp.) Ser. A
|
4.25
|
6/15/2041
|
2,155,000
|
2,229,157
|
|
|
Reno, Revenue Bonds,
Refunding (Insured; Assured
Guaranty Corp.)
|
4.00
|
6/1/2058
|
1,000,000
|
924,811
|
|
|
3,153,968
|
|||||
|
New Hampshire - 2.0%
|
|||||
|
New Hampshire Business
Finance Authority, Revenue
Bonds (The Wildflower
Project)(b),(f)
|
0.00
|
12/15/2033
|
800,000
|
493,282
|
|
|
New Hampshire Business
Finance Authority, Revenue
Bonds (Winston-Salem
Sustainable Energy
Partners) Ser. A
|
5.50
|
6/1/2050
|
1,000,000
|
1,057,466
|
|
|
New Hampshire Business
Finance Authority, Revenue
Bonds, Refunding
(Springpoint Senior Living
Obligated Group)
|
4.00
|
1/1/2041
|
2,925,000
|
2,828,000
|
|
|
4,378,748
|
|||||
|
New Jersey - 4.9%
|
|||||
|
New Jersey Economic
Development Authority,
Revenue Bonds (Repauno
Port & Rail Terminal
Project)(b)
|
6.38
|
1/1/2035
|
1,045,000
|
1,101,973
|
|
|
New Jersey Economic
Development Authority,
Revenue Bonds (The
Goethals)
|
5.38
|
1/1/2043
|
2,500,000
|
2,503,244
|
|
|
Description
|
Coupon
Rate (%)
|
Maturity
Date
|
Principal
Amount ($)
|
Value ($)
|
|
|
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 152.8% (continued)
|
|||||
|
New Jersey - 4.9% (continued)
|
|||||
|
New Jersey Transportation
Trust Fund Authority,
Revenue Bonds
|
5.00
|
6/15/2044
|
1,250,000
|
1,340,636
|
|
|
New Jersey Transportation
Trust Fund Authority,
Revenue Bonds(g)
|
5.50
|
12/15/2032
|
1,600,000
|
1,934,059
|
|
|
New Jersey Transportation
Trust Fund Authority,
Revenue Bonds, Ser. BB
|
5.25
|
6/15/2050
|
1,000,000
|
1,061,359
|
|
|
Tender Option Bond Trust
Receipts (Series 2025-
XF3423), (New Jersey
Turnpike Authority,
Revenue Bonds, Ser. A)
Recourse, Underlying
Coupon Rate 5.25%(b),(d),(e)
|
15.09
|
1/1/2055
|
2,600,000
|
2,791,224
|
|
|
10,732,495
|
|||||
|
New Mexico - .6%
|
|||||
|
New Mexico Mortgage Finance
Authority, Revenue Bonds
(Insured; GNMA, FNMA,
FHLMC) Ser. E
|
4.70
|
9/1/2054
|
1,385,000
|
1,383,558
|
|
|
New York - 11.5%
|
|||||
|
Build New York City Resource
Corp., Revenue Bonds
(Riverspring Health Senior
Living, Inc. Project) Ser. A(b)
|
7.00
|
12/15/2065
|
2,400,000
|
2,410,367
|
|
|
Build New York City Resource
Corp., Revenue Bonds (The
Renaissance Charter School
2 Project) Ser. B(b)
|
5.00
|
6/1/2036
|
1,500,000
|
1,597,267
|
|
|
New York Energy Finance
Development Corp., Revenue
Bonds(a)
|
5.00
|
12/1/2033
|
1,000,000
|
1,073,764
|
|
|
New York Transportation
Development Corp., Revenue
Bonds (John F. Kennedy
International Airport New
Terminal One Project)
(Insured; Assured Guaranty
Corp.)
|
6.00
|
6/30/2060
|
2,100,000
|
2,272,576
|
|
|
Description
|
Coupon
Rate (%)
|
Maturity
Date
|
Principal
Amount ($)
|
Value ($)
|
|
|
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 152.8% (continued)
|
|||||
|
New York - 11.5% (continued)
|
|||||
|
New York Transportation
Development Corp., Revenue
Bonds (John F. Kennedy
International Airport
Terminal)
|
5.00
|
12/1/2036
|
2,000,000
|
2,185,625
|
|
|
New York Transportation
Development Corp., Revenue
Bonds (John F. Kennedy
International Airport
Terminal)
|
5.00
|
12/1/2040
|
1,200,000
|
1,280,769
|
|
|
New York Transportation
Development Corp., Revenue
Bonds (LaGuardia Airport
Terminal B Redevelopment
Project)
|
5.63
|
4/1/2040
|
1,000,000
|
1,070,776
|
|
|
Tender Option Bond Trust
Receipts (Series 2022-
XM1004), (Metropolitan
Transportation Authority,
Revenue Bonds, Refunding
(Sustainable Bond) (Insured;
Assured Guaranty Corp.) Ser.
C) Non-Recourse,
Underlying Coupon Rate
4.00%(b),(d),(e)
|
5.90
|
11/15/2047
|
3,300,000
|
3,057,725
|
|
|
Tender Option Bond Trust
Receipts (Series 2024-
XM1174), (New York State
Transportation
Development Corp., Revenue
Bonds (Sustainable Bond)
(John F. Kennedy
International Airport
Terminal One Project)
(Insured; Assured Guaranty
Corp.)) Recourse, Underlying
Coupon Rate 5.25%(b),(d),(e)
|
14.62
|
6/30/2060
|
2,150,000
|
2,201,195
|
|
|
Description
|
Coupon
Rate (%)
|
Maturity
Date
|
Principal
Amount ($)
|
Value ($)
|
|
|
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 152.8% (continued)
|
|||||
|
New York - 11.5% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Tender Option Bond Trust
Receipts (Series 2024-
XM1181), (Triborough New
York Bridge & Tunnel
Authority, Revenue Bonds,
Ser. A1) Non-Recourse,
Underlying Coupon Rate
4.13%(b),(d),(e)
|
7.38
|
5/15/2064
|
3,000,000
|
2,749,337
|
|
|
Tender Option Bond Trust
Receipts (Series 2024-
XM1194), (New York
Transportation
Development Corp., Revenue
Bonds, Refunding
(Sustainable Bond) (JFK
International Airport
Terminal Six Redevelopment
Project) (Insured; Assured
Guaranty Corp.)) Recourse,
Underlying Coupon Rate
5.25%(b),(d),(e)
|
14.62
|
12/31/2054
|
2,100,000
|
2,157,340
|
|
|
Tender Option Bond Trust
Receipts (Series 2025-
XF8040), (Long Island
Power Authority, Revenue
Bonds, Ser. A) Non-
Recourse, Underlying
Coupon Rate 5.25%(b),(d),(e)
|
14.81
|
9/1/2050
|
2,100,000
|
2,284,943
|
|
|
Westchester County Local
Development Corp., Revenue
Bonds, Refunding (Senior
Learning Community)(b)
|
5.00
|
7/1/2041
|
1,000,000
|
1,026,379
|
|
|
25,368,063
|
|||||
|
North Carolina - 2.1%
|
|||||
|
North Carolina Medical Care
Commission, Revenue Bonds
(Carolina Meadows
Obligated Group)
|
5.25
|
12/1/2054
|
2,885,000
|
2,954,875
|
|
|
Description
|
Coupon
Rate (%)
|
Maturity
Date
|
Principal
Amount ($)
|
Value ($)
|
|
|
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 152.8% (continued)
|
|||||
|
North Carolina - 2.1% (continued)
|
|||||
|
North Carolina Medical Care
Commission, Revenue Bonds
(Deerfield Episcopal
Retirement Community
Project) Ser. A
|
5.00
|
11/1/2040
|
600,000
|
658,107
|
|
|
North Carolina Medical Care
Commission, Revenue
Bonds, Refunding (Lutheran
Services for the Aging
Obligated Group)
|
4.00
|
3/1/2051
|
1,300,000
|
1,102,402
|
|
|
4,715,384
|
|||||
|
Ohio - 9.2%
|
|||||
|
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement
Financing Authority,
Revenue Bonds, Refunding,
Ser. B2
|
5.00
|
6/1/2055
|
6,665,000
|
5,512,108
|
|
|
Cuyahoga County, Revenue
Bonds, Refunding (The
MetroHealth System)
|
5.00
|
2/15/2052
|
1,980,000
|
1,833,834
|
|
|
Cuyahoga County, Revenue
Bonds, Refunding (The
MetroHealth System)
|
5.25
|
2/15/2047
|
2,500,000
|
2,491,798
|
|
|
Hamilton County, Revenue
Bonds, Refunding (Life
Enriching Communities
Project)
|
5.50
|
1/1/2055
|
500,000
|
513,820
|
|
|
Muskingum County, Revenue
Bonds (Genesis Healthcare
System Project)
|
5.00
|
2/15/2048
|
6,495,000
|
6,337,383
|
|
|
Port of Greater Cincinnati
Development Authority,
Revenue Bonds, Refunding
(Duke Energy Co.) (Insured;
Assured Guaranty Corp.) Ser.
B
|
4.38
|
12/1/2058
|
275,000
|
265,898
|
|
|
Tender Option Bond Trust
Receipts (Series 2024-
XF1711), (University of
Cincinnati Ohio Receipt,
Revenue Bonds, Ser. A) Non-
Recourse, Underlying
Coupon Rate 5.00%(b),(d),(e)
|
14.09
|
6/1/2049
|
3,200,000
|
3,343,753
|
|
|
20,298,594
|
|||||
|
Description
|
Coupon
Rate (%)
|
Maturity
Date
|
Principal
Amount ($)
|
Value ($)
|
|
|
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 152.8% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Oklahoma - 2.2%
|
|||||
|
Tender Option Bond Trust
Receipts (Series 2024-
XM1163), (Oklahoma City
Water Utilities Trust,
Revenue Bonds, Refunding)
Non-Recourse, Underlying
Coupon Rate 5.25%(b),(d),(e)
|
14.96
|
7/1/2064
|
3,200,000
|
3,392,259
|
|
|
Tulsa County Industrial
Authority, Revenue Bonds,
Refunding (Montereau
Project)
|
5.25
|
11/15/2045
|
1,500,000
|
1,507,362
|
|
|
4,899,621
|
|||||
|
Pennsylvania - 6.9%
|
|||||
|
Allentown School District, GO,
Refunding (Insured; Build
America Mutual) Ser. B
|
5.00
|
2/1/2033
|
1,455,000
|
1,557,192
|
|
|
Clairton Municipal Authority,
Revenue Bonds, Refunding,
Ser. B
|
4.00
|
12/1/2038
|
3,750,000
|
3,817,854
|
|
|
Pennsylvania Economic
Development Financing
Authority, Revenue Bonds
(The Penndot Major
Bridges)
|
6.00
|
6/30/2061
|
2,000,000
|
2,127,336
|
|
|
Pennsylvania Turnpike
Commission, Revenue
Bonds, Ser. A
|
4.00
|
12/1/2050
|
1,000,000
|
922,353
|
|
|
Philadelphia Housing
Authority, Revenue Bonds
(PHADC Acquisition
Program) Ser. A
|
5.25
|
3/1/2043
|
2,000,000
|
2,162,270
|
|
|
Description
|
Coupon
Rate (%)
|
Maturity
Date
|
Principal
Amount ($)
|
Value ($)
|
|
|
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 152.8% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Pennsylvania - 6.9% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Tender Option Bond Trust
Receipts (Series 2023-
XF1525), (Pennsylvania
Economic Development
Financing Authority,
Revenue Bonds (University
of Pittsburgh Medical
Center) Ser. A) Recourse,
Underlying Coupon Rate
4.00%(b),(d),(e)
|
5.82
|
5/15/2053
|
2,300,000
|
2,043,993
|
|
|
Tender Option Bond Trust
Receipts (Series 2023-
XM1133), (Philadelphia
Water & Wastewater,
Revenue Bonds, Refunding
(Insured; Assured Guaranty
Corp.) Ser. B) Non-Recourse,
Underlying Coupon Rate
5.50%(b),(d),(e)
|
15.70
|
9/1/2053
|
2,400,000
|
2,588,180
|
|
|
15,219,178
|
|||||
|
Rhode Island - 2.4%
|
|||||
|
Rhode Island Health and
Educational Building Corp.,
Revenue Bonds (Insured;
Assured Guaranty Corp.)
(PRG - RI Properties LLC)
Ser. A
|
5.00
|
7/1/2065
|
1,500,000
|
1,494,641
|
|
|
Tender Option Bond Trust
Receipts (Series 2023-
XM1117), (Rhode Island
Infrastructure Bank State
Revolving Fund, Revenue
Bonds, Ser. A) Non-
Recourse, Underlying
Coupon Rate 4.13%(b),(d),(e)
|
6.69
|
10/1/2048
|
4,000,000
|
3,890,216
|
|
|
5,384,857
|
|||||
|
South Carolina - 2.4%
|
|||||
|
South Carolina Jobs-Economic
Development Authority,
Revenue Bonds (Bishop
Gadsden Episcopal
Retirement Community)
|
5.00
|
4/1/2041
|
1,095,000
|
1,168,357
|
|
|
Description
|
Coupon
Rate (%)
|
Maturity
Date
|
Principal
Amount ($)
|
Value ($)
|
|
|
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 152.8% (continued)
|
|||||
|
South Carolina - 2.4% (continued)
|
|||||
|
South Carolina Jobs-Economic
Development Authority,
Revenue Bonds, Refunding
(Bon Secours Mercy Health)
|
4.00
|
12/1/2044
|
1,500,000
|
1,413,067
|
|
|
South Carolina Jobs-Economic
Development Authority,
Revenue Bonds, Refunding
(Lutheran Homes of South
Carolina Obligated Group)
|
5.13
|
5/1/2048
|
1,750,000
|
1,524,100
|
|
|
South Carolina Public Service
Authority, Revenue Bonds,
Refunding (Santee Cooper)
Ser. A
|
4.00
|
12/1/2055
|
1,300,000
|
1,160,999
|
|
|
5,266,523
|
|||||
|
South Dakota - 1.2%
|
|||||
|
Tender Option Bond Trust
Receipts (Series 2022-
XF1409), (South Dakota
Health & Educational
Facilities Authority, Revenue
Bonds, Refunding (Avera
Health Obligated Group))
Non-Recourse, Underlying
Coupon Rate 5.00%(b),(d),(e)
|
14.09
|
7/1/2046
|
2,680,000
|
2,701,358
|
|
|
Tennessee - .6%
|
|||||
|
Metropolitan Government
Nashville & Davidson County
Health & Educational
Facilities Board, Revenue
Bonds (Belmont University)
|
5.25
|
5/1/2048
|
1,250,000
|
1,304,160
|
|
|
Texas - 13.4%
|
|||||
|
Aldine Independent School
District, GO (Insured;
Permanent School Fund
Guarantee Program)
|
4.00
|
2/15/2054
|
1,000,000
|
927,680
|
|
|
Arlington Higher Education
Finance Corp., Revenue
Bonds (BASIS Texas Charter
Schools)(b)
|
4.88
|
6/15/2059
|
1,000,000
|
913,387
|
|
|
Arlington Higher Education
Finance Corp., Revenue
Bonds (BASIS Texas Charter
Schools)(b)
|
5.00
|
6/15/2064
|
1,000,000
|
917,351
|
|
|
Description
|
Coupon
Rate (%)
|
Maturity
Date
|
Principal
Amount ($)
|
Value ($)
|
|
|
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 152.8% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Texas - 13.4% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Clifton Higher Education
Finance Corp., Revenue
Bonds, Refunding (IDEA
Public Schools) (Insured;
Permanent School Fund
Guarantee Program)
|
4.00
|
8/15/2054
|
1,000,000
|
908,094
|
|
|
Clifton Higher Education
Finance Corp., Revenue
Bonds, Refunding
(International Leadership of
Texas, Inc.) (Insured;
Permanent School Fund
Guarantee Program) Ser. A
|
4.25
|
8/15/2053
|
1,000,000
|
934,909
|
|
|
Clifton Higher Education
Finance Corp., Revenue
Bonds, Refunding
(International Leadership of
Texas, Inc.) (Insured;
Permanent School Fund
Guarantee Program) Ser. A
|
5.25
|
2/15/2049
|
1,475,000
|
1,550,482
|
|
|
Dallas Independent School
District, GO, Refunding
(Insured; Permanent School
Fund Guarantee Program)
|
4.00
|
2/15/2054
|
2,000,000
|
1,846,356
|
|
|
El Paso County Hospital
District, GO (El Paso County)
(Insured; Assured Guaranty
Corp.)
|
5.50
|
2/15/2050
|
2,000,000
|
2,146,869
|
|
|
Grand Parkway Transportation
Corp., Revenue Bonds,
Refunding
|
4.00
|
10/1/2049
|
1,165,000
|
1,086,470
|
|
|
Houston Airport System,
Revenue Bonds (United
Airlines) Ser. B
|
5.50
|
7/15/2037
|
2,000,000
|
2,213,304
|
|
|
Houston Airport System,
Revenue Bonds, Refunding
(Insured; Assured Guaranty
Corp.) Ser. A
|
4.50
|
7/1/2053
|
1,085,000
|
1,043,401
|
|
|
Houston Airport System,
Revenue Bonds, Refunding,
Ser. A
|
4.00
|
7/1/2039
|
2,480,000
|
2,502,348
|
|
|
Description
|
Coupon
Rate (%)
|
Maturity
Date
|
Principal
Amount ($)
|
Value ($)
|
|
|
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 152.8% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Texas - 13.4% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Lamar Consolidated
Independent School District,
GO
|
4.00
|
2/15/2053
|
1,000,000
|
923,645
|
|
|
Medina Valley Independent
School District, GO (Insured;
Permanent School Fund
Guarantee Program)
|
4.00
|
2/15/2053
|
4,500,000
|
4,090,707
|
|
|
Mission Economic
Development Corp., Revenue
Bonds, Refunding
(Natgasoline Project)(b)
|
4.63
|
10/1/2031
|
1,900,000
|
1,907,842
|
|
|
Tender Option Bond Trust
Receipts (Series 2024-
XM1164), (Texas University
System, Revenue Bonds,
Refunding) Non-Recourse,
Underlying Coupon Rate
5.25%(b),(d),(e)
|
15.17
|
3/15/2054
|
3,200,000
|
3,407,899
|
|
|
Texas Municipal Power
Agency, Revenue Bonds,
Refunding (Insured; Build
America Mutual)
|
5.50
|
9/1/2055
|
1,540,000
|
1,646,764
|
|
|
Waxahachie Independent
School District, GO (Insured;
Permanent School Fund
Guarantee Program)
|
4.25
|
2/15/2053
|
480,000
|
457,643
|
|
|
29,425,151
|
|||||
|
U.S. Related - 1.7%
|
|||||
|
Puerto Rico, GO, Ser. A(f)
|
0.00
|
7/1/2033
|
211,359
|
156,499
|
|
|
Puerto Rico, GO, Ser. A1
|
4.00
|
7/1/2033
|
164,238
|
168,209
|
|
|
Puerto Rico, GO, Ser. A1
|
4.00
|
7/1/2035
|
147,628
|
150,162
|
|
|
Puerto Rico, GO, Ser. A1
|
4.00
|
7/1/2037
|
126,704
|
126,966
|
|
|
Puerto Rico, GO, Ser. A1
|
4.00
|
7/1/2041
|
172,269
|
167,200
|
|
|
Puerto Rico, GO, Ser. A1
|
4.00
|
7/1/2046
|
179,157
|
161,752
|
|
|
Puerto Rico, GO, Ser. A1
|
5.63
|
7/1/2027
|
181,259
|
185,507
|
|
|
Puerto Rico, GO, Ser. A1
|
5.63
|
7/1/2029
|
2,178,318
|
2,327,612
|
|
|
Puerto Rico, GO, Ser. A1
|
5.75
|
7/1/2031
|
173,199
|
192,463
|
|
|
3,636,370
|
|||||
|
Description
|
Coupon
Rate (%)
|
Maturity
Date
|
Principal
Amount ($)
|
Value ($)
|
|
|
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 152.8% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Utah - 2.7%
|
|||||
|
High Star Ranch Infrastructure
Financing District, Special
Assessment Bonds (High
Star Ranch Assessment
Area)(b)
|
6.25
|
12/1/2055
|
2,950,000
|
2,962,847
|
|
|
Mida Cormont Public
Infrastructure District, GO,
Ser. A2(b),(h)
|
6.75
|
6/1/2055
|
1,460,000
|
1,262,396
|
|
|
Pine View Public Infrastructure
District No. 2, Special
Assessment Bonds (Firelight
Assessment Area No. 1)(b)
|
6.25
|
12/1/2055
|
1,000,000
|
1,008,904
|
|
|
Point Phase 1 Public
Infrastructure District No. 1,
Revenue Bonds, Ser. A1
|
6.13
|
3/1/2055
|
700,000
|
731,283
|
|
|
5,965,430
|
|||||
|
Virginia - 1.7%
|
|||||
|
Tender Option Bond Trust
Receipts (Series 2024-
XM1176), (Virginia State
Housing Development
Authority, Revenue Bonds,
Ser. A) Recourse, Underlying
Coupon Rate 4.80%(b),(d),(e)
|
13.29
|
9/1/2059
|
3,000,000
|
3,007,402
|
|
|
Williamsburg Economic
Development Authority,
Revenue Bonds (William &
Mary Project) (Insured;
Assured Guaranty Corp.) Ser.
A
|
4.13
|
7/1/2058
|
710,000
|
679,938
|
|
|
3,687,340
|
|||||
|
Washington - 1.1%
|
|||||
|
Washington Convention Center
Public Facilities District,
Revenue Bonds (Sustainable
Bond) Ser. B
|
4.00
|
7/1/2058
|
1,000,000
|
854,600
|
|
|
Description
|
Coupon
Rate (%)
|
Maturity
Date
|
Principal
Amount ($)
|
Value ($)
|
|
|
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 152.8% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Washington - 1.1% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Washington Housing Finance
Commission, Revenue
Bonds, Refunding (Horizon
House Project) Ser. B3
|
4.38
|
1/1/2033
|
1,000,000
|
1,004,073
|
|
|
Washington Housing Finance
Commission, Revenue
Bonds, Refunding (Seattle
Academy of Arts &
Sciences)(b)
|
6.38
|
7/1/2063
|
600,000
|
643,799
|
|
|
2,502,472
|
|||||
|
West Virginia - 1.2%
|
|||||
|
West Virginia Hospital Finance
Authority, Revenue Bonds
(West Virginia University
Health System Obligated
Group) Ser. A
|
5.50
|
6/1/2050
|
2,500,000
|
2,688,270
|
|
|
Wisconsin - 6.4%
|
|||||
|
Public Finance Authority,
Revenue Bonds(b)
|
5.00
|
7/1/2055
|
1,000,000
|
929,935
|
|
|
Public Finance Authority,
Revenue Bonds (EMU
Campus Living) (Insured;
Build America Mutual) Ser.
A1
|
5.50
|
7/1/2052
|
1,200,000
|
1,272,889
|
|
|
Public Finance Authority,
Revenue Bonds (EMU
Campus Living) (Insured;
Build America Mutual) Ser.
A1
|
5.63
|
7/1/2055
|
1,315,000
|
1,395,753
|
|
|
Public Finance Authority,
Revenue Bonds (Georgia SR
400 Express Lanes Project)
|
6.50
|
12/31/2065
|
2,625,000
|
2,921,558
|
|
|
Public Finance Authority,
Revenue Bonds (Heritage
Bend Project)(b),(f)
|
0.00
|
12/15/2042
|
3,500,000
|
1,104,187
|
|
|
Public Finance Authority,
Revenue Bonds, Ser. 2023-1,
Cl. A
|
5.75
|
7/1/2062
|
2,614,660
|
2,722,550
|
|
|
Public Finance Authority,
Revenue Bonds, Refunding
(Legacy Hills Project)(b)
|
6.00
|
11/15/2045
|
1,500,000
|
1,495,853
|
|
|
Description
|
Coupon
Rate (%)
|
Maturity
Date
|
Principal
Amount ($)
|
Value ($)
|
|
|
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 152.8% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Wisconsin - 6.4% (continued)
|
|||||
|
Public Finance Authority,
Revenue Bonds, Refunding
(Lindenwood Education
System) Ser. A(b)
|
5.50
|
6/1/2040
|
1,000,000
|
1,072,065
|
|
|
Wisconsin Health &
Educational Facilities
Authority, Revenue Bonds
(Bellin Memorial Hospital
Obligated Group)
|
5.50
|
12/1/2052
|
1,000,000
|
1,075,704
|
|
|
13,990,494
|
|||||
|
Total Investments (cost $335,093,749)
|
152.8%
|
336,394,006
|
|||
|
Liabilities, Less Cash and Receivables
|
(52.8%)
|
(116,296,838)
|
|||
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders
|
100.0%
|
220,097,168
|
|||
|
FHLMC-Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
|
|
FNMA-Federal National Mortgage Association
|
|
GNMA-Government National Mortgage Association
|
|
GO-Government Obligation
|
|
(a)
|
These securities have a put feature; the date shown represents the put date and the bond holder can take a
specific action to retain the bond after the put date.
|
|
(b)
|
Security exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933. These securities
may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At
February 28, 2026, these securities amounted to $97,941,884 or 44.5% of net assets applicable to
Common Stockholders.
|
|
(c)
|
Defaulted security. Currently, the issuer is in default with respect to principal and/or interest payments. The
aggregate value of these securities at February 28, 2026 was $171,450, which represented .1% of net
assets.
|
|
(d)
|
The Variable Rate is determined by the Remarketing Agent in its sole discretion based on prevailing market
conditions and may, but need not, be established by reference to one or more financial indices.
|
|
(e)
|
These bonds serve as collateral in a secured borrowings. The coupon rate given represents the current interest
rate for the inverse floating rate security. See Note 3 of the Notes to Financial Statements for details.
|
|
(f)
|
Security issued with a zero coupon. Income is recognized through the accretion of discount.
|
|
(g)
|
These securities are prerefunded; the date shown represents the prerefunded date. Bonds which are
prerefunded are collateralized by U.S. Government securities which are held in escrow and are used to pay
principal and interest on the municipal issue and to retire the bonds in full at the earliest refunding date.
|
|
(h)
|
Multi-coupon. Zero coupon until a specified date at which time the stated coupon rate becomes effective
until maturity.
|
|
Futures
|
|||||
|
Description
|
Number of
Contracts
|
Expiration
|
Notional
Value ($)
|
Market
Value ($)
|
Unrealized
(Depreciation) ($)
|
|
Futures Short
|
|||||
|
Ultra U.S. Treasury
Bond
|
22
|
6/18/2026
|
2,650,958
|
2,675,063
|
(24,105)
|
|
Gross Unrealized Depreciation
|
(24,105)
|
||||
|
Cost
|
Value
|
|
|
Assets ($):
|
||
|
Investments in securities-See Schedule of Investments
|
335,093,749
|
336,394,006
|
|
Cash
|
1,568,217
|
|
|
Cash collateral held by broker-Note 3
|
118,154
|
|
|
Interest receivable
|
3,847,158
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
12,731
|
|
|
341,940,266
|
||
|
Liabilities ($):
|
||
|
Due to BNY Mellon Investment Adviser, Inc. and
affiliates-Note 2(b)
|
187,238
|
|
|
RVMTP Shares at liquidation value-Note 1
|
75,000,000
|
|
|
Payable for inverse floater notes issued-Note 3
|
42,495,000
|
|
|
Payable for investment securities purchased
|
2,950,000
|
|
|
Dividends payable to Common Stockholders
|
773,052
|
|
|
Interest and expense payable related to inverse floater notes
issued-Note 3
|
313,159
|
|
|
Directors' fees and expenses payable
|
20,696
|
|
|
Payable for futures variation margin-Note 3
|
15,813
|
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
88,140
|
|
|
121,843,098
|
||
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders ($)
|
220,097,168
|
|
|
Composition of Net Assets ($):
|
||
|
Common Stock, par value, $.001 per share
(18,405,973 shares issued and outstanding)
|
18,406
|
|
|
Paid-in capital
|
262,501,288
|
|
|
Total distributable earnings (loss)
|
(42,422,526)
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders ($)
|
220,097,168
|
|
|
Shares Outstanding
|
||
|
(250 million shares authorized)
|
18,405,973
|
|
|
Net Asset Value Per Share of Common Stock ($)
|
11.96
|
|
Investment Income ($):
|
|
|
Interest Income
|
15,812,654
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
Management fee-Note 2(a)
|
2,137,834
|
|
RVMTP Shares interest expense-Note 1(g)
|
2,907,493
|
|
Interest and expense related to inverse floater
notes issued-Note 3
|
1,293,466
|
|
Professional fees
|
133,321
|
|
Directors' fees and expenses-Note 2(c)
|
68,247
|
|
Shareholders' reports
|
39,244
|
|
Registration fees
|
23,750
|
|
Chief Compliance Officer fees-Note 2(b)
|
15,305
|
|
Shareholder and regulatory reports service fees-Note 2(b)
|
14,583
|
|
Shareholder servicing costs
|
14,167
|
|
Tender and Paying Agent fees-Note 2(b)
|
9,034
|
|
Custodian fees-Note 2(b)
|
3,812
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
89,849
|
|
Total Expenses
|
6,750,105
|
|
Less-reduction in fees due to earnings credits-Note 2(b)
|
(3,812)
|
|
Net Expenses
|
6,746,293
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
9,066,361
|
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments-Note 3 ($):
|
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) on investments
|
(2,639,706)
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) on futures
|
(439,459)
|
|
Net Realized Gain (Loss)
|
(3,079,165)
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments
|
(420,436)
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures
|
(24,105)
|
|
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)
|
(444,541)
|
|
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments
|
(3,523,706)
|
|
Net Increase in Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders
Resulting from Operations
|
5,542,655
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities ($):
|
||
|
Purchases of long term portfolio securities
|
(119,066,726)
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of long term portfolio securities
|
119,467,575
|
|
|
Interest income received
|
15,909,317
|
|
|
Interest and expense related to inverse floater notes issued
|
(1,401,670)
|
|
|
RVMTP Shares interest expense
|
(2,907,493)
|
|
|
Expenses paid to BNY Mellon Investment Adviser, Inc. and
affiliates
|
(2,168,549)
|
|
|
Operating expenses paid
|
(357,213)
|
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) from futures†
|
(447,751)
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided (or Used) in Operating Activities
|
9,027,490
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities ($):
|
||
|
Dividends paid to Common Stockholders
|
(8,172,252)
|
|
|
Decrease in payable for inverse floater notes issued
|
(960,000)
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided (or Used) in Financing Activities
|
(9,132,252)
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash
|
(104,762)
|
|
|
Cash at beginning of period
|
1,791,133
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Collateral Held by Broker at End of
Period
|
1,686,371
|
|
|
Reconciliation of Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Applicable to Common Stockholders Resulting from
Operations to Net Cash Provided by (or Used) in
Operating Activities ($):
|
||
|
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting From Operations
|
5,542,655
|
|
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Increase (Decrease) in
Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders
Resulting from Operations to Net Cash Provided (or
Used) in Operating Activities ($):
|
||
|
Decrease in investments in securities at cost
|
90,555
|
|
|
Decrease in interest receivable
|
96,663
|
|
|
Increase futures variation margin paid
|
(8,292)
|
|
|
Decrease in prepaid expenses
|
31,057
|
|
|
Increase in Due to BNY Mellon Investment Adviser, Inc. and
affiliates
|
8,207
|
|
|
Increase in payable for investment securities purchased
|
2,950,000
|
|
|
Decrease in interest and expense payable related to inverse
floater notes issued
|
(108,204)
|
|
|
Increase in Directors' fees and expenses payable
|
2,255
|
|
|
Decrease in other accrued expenses
|
(21,947)
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on
investments
|
444,541
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided (or Used) in Operating Activities
|
9,027,490
|
|
†
|
Includes change in variation margin from beginning of period.
|
|
Year Ended February 28,
|
||
|
2026
|
2025
|
|
|
Operations ($):
|
||
|
Net investment income
|
9,066,361
|
8,211,074
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) on investments
|
(3,079,165)
|
(1,525,421)
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on
investments
|
(444,541)
|
942,800
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Applicable to
Common Stockholders Resulting from Operations
|
5,542,655
|
7,628,453
|
|
Distributions ($):
|
||
|
Distributions to stockholders
|
(8,393,124)
|
(6,626,150)
|
|
Distributions to Common Stockholders
|
(8,393,124)
|
(6,626,150)
|
|
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Applicable to
Common Stockholders
|
(2,850,469)
|
1,002,303
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders ($):
|
||
|
Beginning of Period
|
222,947,637
|
221,945,334
|
|
End of Period
|
220,097,168
|
222,947,637
|
|
Year Ended February 28/29,
|
|||||
|
2026
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
|
2022
|
|
|
Per Share Data ($):
|
|||||
|
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
12.11
|
12.06
|
11.70
|
13.86
|
14.41
|
|
Investment Operations:
|
|||||
|
Net investment income(a)
|
.49
|
.45
|
.42
|
.53
|
.63
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on
investments
|
(.18)
|
(.04)
|
.38
|
(2.11)
|
(.54)
|
|
Total from Investment Operations
|
.31
|
.41
|
.80
|
(1.58)
|
.09
|
|
Distributions to Common Stockholders:
|
|||||
|
Dividends from net investment income
|
(.46)
|
(.36)
|
(.44)
|
(.58)
|
(.64)
|
|
Net asset value, end of period
|
11.96
|
12.11
|
12.06
|
11.70
|
13.86
|
|
Market value, end of period
|
11.11
|
10.85
|
10.33
|
10.97
|
13.17
|
|
Market Price Total Return (%)
|
6.92
|
8.65
|
(1.82)
|
(12.41)
|
(1.33)
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%):
|
|||||
|
Ratio of total expenses to average net
assets
|
3.19
|
3.26
|
3.53
|
2.60
|
1.68
|
|
Ratio of net expenses to average net
assets
|
3.19
(b)
|
3.26
(b)
|
3.52
(b)
|
2.60
(b)
|
1.68
|
|
Ratio of interest and expense related to
inverse floater notes issued, RVMTP
Shares interest expense to
average net assets
|
1.99
|
2.14
|
2.36
|
1.45
|
.55
|
|
Ratio of net investment income to average
net assets
|
4.29
(b)
|
3.69
(b)
|
3.58
(b)
|
4.29
(b)
|
4.32
|
|
Portfolio Turnover Rate
|
38.95
|
24.35
|
34.36
|
24.75
|
11.33
|
|
Asset Coverage of RVMTP Shares, end of
period
|
393
|
397
|
396
|
387
|
440
|
|
Net Assets, applicable to Common
Stockholders, end of period
($ x 1,000)
|
220,097
|
222,948
|
221,945
|
215,286
|
255,086
|
|
RVMTP Shares Outstanding, end of
period ($ x 1,000)
|
75,000
|
75,000
|
75,000
|
75,000
|
75,000
|
|
Floating Rate Notes Outstanding, end
of period ($ x 1,000)
|
42,495
|
43,455
|
24,895
|
38,130
|
48,640
|
|
(a)
|
Based on average common shares outstanding.
|
|
(b)
|
Amount inclusive of reduction in fees due to earnings credits.
|
|
Level 1 -
Unadjusted
Quoted Prices
|
Level 2- Other
Significant
Observable Inputs
|
Level 3-
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
|
Total
|
|
|
Assets ($)
|
||||
|
Investments in
Securities:†
|
||||
|
Municipal
Securities
|
-
|
336,394,006
|
-
|
336,394,006
|
|
-
|
336,394,006
|
-
|
336,394,006
|
|
|
Liabilities ($)
|
||||
|
Other Financial
Instruments:
|
||||
|
Futures††
|
(24,105)
|
-
|
-
|
(24,105)
|
|
Inverse Floater
Notes†††
|
-
|
(42,495,000)
|
-
|
(42,495,000)
|
|
RVMTP Shares†††
|
-
|
(75,000,000)
|
-
|
(75,000,000)
|
|
(24,105)
|
(117,495,000)
|
-
|
(117,519,105)
|
|
†
|
See Schedule of Investments for additional detailed categorizations, if any.
|
|
††
|
Amount shown represents unrealized appreciation (depreciation) at period end, but only variation margin
on exchange-traded and centrally cleared derivatives, if any, are reported in the Statement of Assets and
Liabilities.
|
|
†††
|
Certain of the fund's liabilities are held at carrying amount, which approximates fair value for financial
reporting purposes.
|
|
Derivative
Assets ($)
|
Derivative
Liabilities ($)
|
||
|
Interest Rate Risk
|
-
|
Interest Rate Risk
|
(24,105)
(1)
|
|
Gross fair value of derivative
contracts
|
-
|
(24,105)
|
|
Statement of Assets and Liabilities location:
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes cumulative appreciation (depreciation) on futures as reported in the Schedule of Investments, but
only the unpaid variation margin is reported in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
|
|
Amount of realized gain (loss) on derivatives recognized in income ($)
|
||
|
Underlying risk
|
Futures(1)
|
Total
|
|
Interest Rate
|
(439,459)
|
(439,459)
|
|
Total
|
(439,459)
|
(439,459)
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on derivatives recognized in income ($)
|
||
|
Underlying risk
|
Futures(2)
|
Total
|
|
Interest Rate
|
(24,105)
|
(24,105)
|
|
Total
|
(24,105)
|
(24,105)
|
|
Statement of Operations location:
|
|
|
(1)
|
Net realized gain (loss) on futures.
|
|
(2)
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures.
|
|
Average Market Value ($)
|
|
|
Futures:
|
|
|
Interest Rate Futures Short
|
3,110,514
|
| Item 2. | Code of Ethics. |
The Registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the Registrant's principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. There have been no amendments to, or waivers in connection with, the Code of Ethics during the period covered by this Report.
| Item 3. | Audit Committee Financial Expert. |
The Registrant's Board has determined that J. Charles Cardona, a member of the Audit Committee of the Board, is an audit committee financial expert as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). J. Charles Cardona is "independent" as defined by the SEC for purposes of audit committee financial expert determinations.
| Item 4. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services. |
(a) Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years (the "Reporting Periods") for professional services rendered by the Registrant's principal accountant (the "Auditor") for the audit of the Registrant's annual financial statements or services that are normally provided by the Auditor in connection with the statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for the Reporting Periods, were $39,710 in 2025 and $39,710 in 2026.
(b) Audit-Related Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for assurance and related services by the Auditor that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the Registrant's financial statements and are not reported under paragraph (a) of this Item 4 were $7,479 in 2025 and $10,232 in 2026. These services consisted of one or more of the following: (i) agreed upon procedures related to compliance with Internal Revenue Code section 817(h), (ii) security counts required by Rule 17f-2 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, (iii) advisory services as to the accounting or disclosure treatment of Registrant transactions or events and (iv) advisory services to the accounting or disclosure treatment of the actual or potential impact to the Registrant of final or proposed rules, standards or interpretations by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Financial Accounting Standards Boards or other regulatory or standard-setting bodies.
The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for non-audit assurance and related services by the Auditor to the Registrant's investment adviser (not including any sub-investment adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the Registrant ("Service Affiliates"), that were reasonably related to the performance of the annual audit of the Service Affiliate, which required pre-approval by the Audit Committee were $0 in 2025 and $0 in 2026.
(c) Tax Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for professional services rendered by the Auditor for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning ("Tax Services") were $3,342 in 2025 and $3,342 in 2026. These services consisted of: (i) review or preparation of U.S. federal, state, local and excise tax returns; (ii) U.S. federal, state and local tax planning, advice and assistance regarding statutory, regulatory or administrative developments; (iii) tax advice regarding tax qualification matters and/or treatment of various financial instruments held or proposed to be acquired or held, and (iv) determination of Passive Foreign Investment Companies. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting
Periods for Tax Services by the Auditor to Service Affiliates, which required pre-approval by the Audit Committee were $8,860 in 2025 and $9,224 in 2026.
(d) All Other Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for products and services provided by the Auditor, other than the services reported in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this Item, were $0 in 2025 and $0 in 2026. These services consisted of a review of the Registrant's anti-money laundering program.
The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for Non-Audit Services by the Auditor to Service Affiliates, other than the services reported in paragraphs (b) through (c) of this Item, which required pre-approval by the Audit Committee, were $0 in 2025 and $0 in 2026.
(e)(1) Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures. The Registrant's Audit Committee has established policies and procedures (the "Policy") for pre-approval (within specified fee limits) of the Auditor's engagements for non-audit services to the Registrant and Service Affiliates without specific case-by-case consideration. The pre-approved services in the Policy can include pre-approved audit services, pre-approved audit-related services, pre-approved tax services and pre-approved all other services. Pre-approval considerations include whether the proposed services are compatible with maintaining the Auditor's independence. Pre-approvals pursuant to the Policy are considered annually.
(e)(2) Note. None of the services described in paragraphs (b) through (d) of this Item 4 were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
(f) None of the hours expended on the principal accountant's engagement to audit the registrant's financial statements for the most recent fiscal year were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant's full-time, permanent employees.
Non-Audit Fees. The aggregate non-audit fees billed by the Auditor for services rendered to the Registrant, and rendered to Service Affiliates, for the Reporting Periods were $1,402,909 in 2025 and $2,584,588 in 2026.
Auditor Independence. The Registrant's Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to Service Affiliates, which were not pre-approved (not requiring pre-approval), is compatible with maintaining the Auditor's independence.
| (i) | Not applicable. |
| (j) | Not applicable. |
| Item 5. | Audit Committee of Listed Registrants. |
Not applicable.
| Item 6. | Investments. |
Not applicable.
| Item 7. | Financial Statements and Financial Highlights for Open-End Management Investment Companies. |
Not applicable.
| Item 8. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies. |
Not applicable.
| Item 9. | Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies. |
Not applicable.
| Item 10. | Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others for Open-End Management Investment Companies. |
Not applicable.
| Item 11. | Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Advisory Contract. |
Not applicable.
| Item 12. | Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies. |
SUMMARY OF THE PROXY VOTING POLICY AND PROCEDURES
The board of the Fund has adopted the following procedures with respect to proxy voting by the Fund.
Delegation of Proxy Voting Responsibility and Adoption of Proxy Voting Procedures
The board has delegated the authority to vote proxies of companies held in the fund's portfolio to Insight North America, LLC ("INA" or the "Sub-Adviser"), the fund's sub-adviser. In addition, the board has adopted proxy voting procedures pursuant to which proxies of companies held in the fund's portfolio will be voted. The proxy voting policies and procedures adopted for the fund are those of the Sub-Adviser, as described below.
Proxy Voting Operations
The funds have engaged ISS as their proxy voting agent to administer the ministerial, non-discretionary elements of proxy voting and reporting. Each fund for which ISS provides proxy voting and related services bears an equal share of ISS's fees in connection with the provision of such services.
Voting Shares of Certain Registered Investment Companies
Under certain circumstances, when a fund owns shares of another registered investment company (an "Acquired Fund"), the fund may be required by the 1940 Act or the rules thereunder, or exemptive relief from the 1940 Act and/or the rules thereunder, to vote such Acquired Fund shares in a certain manner, such as voting the Acquired Fund shares in the same proportion as the vote of all other shareholders of such Acquired Fund.
Securities on Loan
Certain funds may participate in a securities lending program to generate income for their portfolio. Generally, the voting rights pass with the securities on loan and any securities on loan as of a record date cannot be voted by the fund. In certain circumstances, BNYIA may seek to recall a security on loan before a record date in order to cast a vote (for example, if a fund's Sub-Adviser determines, based on the information available at the time, that there is a material proxy event that could effect the value of the loaned security and recalling the security for voting purposes would be in the best interest of the fund). However, BNYIA anticipates that, in most cases, the potential income a fund may derive from a loaned security would outweigh the benefit the fund could receive from voting the security. In addition, the ability to timely recall securities on loan is not entirely within the control of BNYIA or a fund's Sub-Adviser. Under certain circumstances, the recall of securities in time for such securities to be voted may not be possible due to applicable proxy voting record dates occurring before the proxy statements are released or other administrative considerations.
Policies and Procedures; Oversight
The CCO is responsible for confirming that the Firms have adopted and implemented written policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to ensure that the funds' proxies are voted in the best interests of the funds. In addition, the adequacy of such policies and procedures are reviewed at least annually, and proxy voting for the funds is monitored to ensure compliance with the Firms' procedures, as applicable, such as by sampling votes cast for the funds, including routine proposals as well as those that require more analysis, to determine whether they complied with the applicable Firm's Proxy Voting Procedures.
Oversight of ISS for Voting Proxies for of Designated BHC Securities. For ISS's voting activities in respect of proxies for securities of the Designated BHCs, BNYIA, through its legal, operational and administrative support groups, as well as certain BNY vendor review groups and engaged external consulting firms, shall provide ongoing oversight of ISS in order to ensure that ISS continues to vote proxies in the best interests of the funds and shall establish and implement measures reasonably designed to identify and address any conflicts involving ISS that can arise on an ongoing basis by requiring ISS to provide updates regarding any changes to its business, including with respect to capacity and competency to provide proxy voting advice, or its conflict policies and procedures.
Review of Proxy Voting
BNYIA reports annually to the boards on the funds' proxy voting, including information regarding: (1) proxy voting proposals that were voted; (2) proxy voting proposals that were voted against the management company's recommended vote, but in accordance with the applicable proxy voting guidelines; and (3) proxy voting proposals that were not voted, including the reasons the proxy voting proposals were not voted.
Availability of Fund Proxy Voting Records
Pursuant to Rule 30b1-4 under the 1940 Act, the funds are required to file their complete proxy voting record with the SEC on Form N-PX not later than August 31st of each year for the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30th. In addition, this information is available, by August 31st of each year, at www.bny.com/investments, on the SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov, and without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-373-9387 (inside the U.S. only). The funds have delegated the responsibility for gathering this information, filing Form N-PX and posting voting information to the website to BNYIA, with the assistance of ISS.
SUMMARY OF INSIGHT'S PROXY VOTING POLICY AND PROCEDURES
1. Introduction
Insight seeks to actively exercise its rights and responsibilities in regard to proxy voting on behalf of Clients and is an essential part of maximizing shareholder value, ensuring good governance and delivering investment performance aligned with our Clients' long-term economic interests.
The Insight Proxy Voting Policy ("Policy") sets out the arrangements employed by Insight Investment Management (Global) Limited, Insight Investment Management (Europe) Limited, Insight North America LLC and Insight Investment International Limited (collectively "Insight").
2. Policy Statement
Insight is committed to supporting good governance practices and also voting all our proxies where it is deemed appropriate and responsible to do so for the relevant asset class. In such cases, Insight's objective is to vote proxies in the best interests of its Clients.
3. Scope
This Policy applies to financial instruments with voting rights where Insight has discretionary voting authority. Alternatively where a Client retains control over the voting decision, Insight will only lodge votes in instances where the client agreement hands responsibility to Insight to cast the votes on their behalf.
4. Proxy Voting Process
Insight's proxy voting activity adheres to best-practice standards and is a component of Insight's Stewardship and Responsible Investment Policies. In implementing its Proxy Voting Policy, Insight will take into account a number of factors used to provide a framework for voting each proxy. These include:
Leadership: Every company should be led by an effective board whose approach is consistent with creating sustainable long-term growth.
| · | Strategy: Company leadership should define a clear purpose and set long term objectives for delivering value to shareholders. |
| · | Culture: The board should promote a diverse and inclusive culture which strongly aligns to the values of the company. It should seek to monitor culture and ensure that it is regularly engaging with its workforce. |
| · | Engagement with Shareholders: The board and senior management should be transparent and engaged with existing shareholders. The board should have a clear understanding of the views of shareholders. The board should seek to minimize unnecessary dilution of equity and preserve the rights of existing shareholders. |
| · | Sustainability: The board should aim to take account of environmental, social and governance risks and opportunities when setting strategy and in their company monitoring role. |
Structure: The board should have clear division of responsibilities.
| · | The Chair: The Independent Chair, or Lead Independent Director, of the board should demonstrate objective judgment and promote transparency and facilitate constructive debate to promote overall effectiveness. |
| · | The Board: There should be an appropriate balance of executive and non-executive directors. Non-executive directors should be evaluated for independence. No one individual should have unfettered decision-making powers. There should be a clear division of responsibilities, between the independent board members and the executive leadership of the company. |
| · | Resources: The board should ensure it has sufficient governance policies, influence and resources to function effectively. Non-executive directors should have sufficient time to fulfil their obligations to the company as directors. |
Effectiveness: The board should seek to build strong institutional knowledge to ensure long term efficient and sustainable operations.
| · | Appointment: There should be a formal appointment process, which ensures that the most qualified individuals are selected for the board. This process should be irrespective of bias to ensure appropriate diversity of the board. |
| · | Knowledge: The board should be comprised of those with the knowledge, skills and experience to effectively discharge their duties. The board should have sufficient independence to serve as an effective check on company management and ensure the best outcomes for shareholders. |
| · | Evaluation: The board should be evaluated for effectiveness on a regular basis. Board member's contributions should be considered individually. |
Independence: The board should present a fair and balanced view of the company's position and prospects.
| · | Integrity: The board should ensure that all reports produced accurately reflect the financial position, prospects and risks relevant to the company. The board should ensure the independence and effectiveness of internal and external audit functions. |
| · | Audit: The board should ensure that clear, uncontentious accounts are produced. These should conform to the relevant best accountancy practices and accurately represent the financial position of the company. Deviations from standard accounting practices should be clearly documented with a corresponding rationale. |
| · | Risk: The board should ensure the company has sound risk management and internal control systems. There should be a regular assessment and communication of the company's emerging and principal risks. |
Remuneration: Levels of remuneration should be sufficient to attract, retain and motivate talent of the quality required to run the company successfully.
| · | Goal Based: The board should base remuneration on goal-based, qualitative, discretionary cash incentives. Remuneration should consider underlying industry and macroeconomic conditions and not be structured in a tax oriented manner. |
| · | Transparent: Remuneration arrangements should be transparent and should avoid complexity. |
| · | Sustainable: Remuneration should not be excessively share based and should be accurately represented and controlled as an operational cost. The remuneration of executives should promote long term focus and respect the interests of existing shareholders. |
The relevant factors are used by Insight to develop Voting Guidelines enabling a consistent approach to proxy voting, which are reviewed annually by the Proxy Voting Group ("PVG") - (see section 6).
Voting activity is most usually performed by the Chair of the PVG, a senior portfolio manager with no day to day investment discretion. This creates an independent governance structure for voting, helping to mitigate actual and potential conflicts of interest (see section 5).
The Chair of the PVG can seek support from portfolio managers, who have active discretion over the securities, to provide additional input into the voting decision such as company background. However the vote will be cast by the Chair of the PVG or their delegate. Insight seeks to vote on all holdings with associated voting rights in one of three ways: in support of, against, or in abstention. If the chair is unable to cast a vote, the decision will be cast by the deputy chair. Insight uses a Voting Agent to assist in the analysis and administration of the vote (see section 4.1). The rationale for voting for, against, or abstaining is retained on a case-by-case basis as appropriate and reviewed by the PVG on a regular basis.
4.1 Voting Agent
To assist Insight professionals with implementing its proxy voting strategy, Insight retains the services of an independent proxy voting service, namely Minerva ("Voting Agent"). The Voting Agent's responsibilities include, but are not limited to, monitoring company meeting agendas and items to be voted on, reviewing each vote against Insight's Voting Guidelines and providing a voting analysis based upon the Voting Guidelines. The Voting Agent also identifies resolutions that require specific shareholder judgement - often relating to corporate transactions or shareholder resolutions. This enables Insight to review situations where the Voting Guidelines require additional consideration or assist in the identification of potential conflicts of interest impacting the proxy vote decision. The Chair of the PVG will review for contentious resolutions, and in the event of one will determine if an actual or potential conflict exists in which case the resolution will be escalated to the PVG voting committee (see section 5.1).
Voting decisions are communicated by Insight to the Voting Agent and submitted to shareholder meetings through a specific proxy.
On a monthly basis the Voting Agent provides reports on voting activity to Insight. Voting data is available to Clients upon request and is posted on its website (see section 7). Insight conducts an annual due diligence to review the Voting Guidelines and the Voting Agent's related services.
5. Conflicts of Interest
Effective stewardship requires protecting our Clients against any potential conflicts of interest and managing them with appropriate governance. To comply with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, Insight believes managing perceived conflicts is as important as managing actual conflicts.
In the course of normal business, Insight and its personnel may encounter situations where it faces a conflict of interest or a conflict of interest could be perceived. A conflict of interest occurs whenever the interests of Insight or its personnel could diverge from those of a Client or when Insight or its personnel could have obligations to more than one party whose interests are different to each other or those of Insight's Clients.
In identifying a potential conflict situation, as a minimum, consideration will be made as to whether Insight, or a member of staff, is likely to:
| · | make a financial gain or avoid a financial loss at the expense of the Client |
| · | present material differences in the thoughts of two PM's who own the same security |
| · | benefit if it puts the interest of one Client over the interests of another Client |
| · | gain an interest from a service provided to, or transaction carried out on behalf of a Client which may not be in, or which may be different from, the Client's interest |
| · | obtain a higher than usual benefit from a third party in relation to a service provided to the Client |
| · | receive an inducement in relation to a service provided to the Client, in the form of monies, goods or services other than standard commission or fee for that service or have a personal interest that could be seen to conflict with their duties at Insight |
| · | create a conflict where Insight invests in firms which are Clients or potential Clients of Insight. Insight might give preferential treatment in its research (including external communication of the same) and/or investment management to issuers of publicly traded debt or equities which are also clients or closely related to clients (e.g., sponsors of pension schemes). This includes financial and ESG considerations. |
| · | create a conflict between investment teams with fixed income holdings in publicly listed firms or material differences in the thoughts of two PM's who own the same security |
5.1 Escalation of Contentious Voting Issue
When a contentious voting issue is identified, the PVG Chairman or delegate will review, evaluate and determine whether an actual material conflict of interest exists, and if so, will escalate the matter to the PVG voting committee. Depending upon the nature of the material conflict of interest, Insight may elect to take one or more of the following measures:
| · | removing certain Insight personnel from the proxy voting process |
| · | walling off personnel with knowledge of the material conflict to ensure that such personnel do not influence the relevant proxy vote and |
| · | voting in accordance with the applicable Voting Guidelines, if any, if the application of the Voting Guidelines would objectively result in the casting of a proxy vote in a predetermined manner |
An unconflicted contentious resolution will be voted by the Chair or their delegate. Where a conflict is deemed to exist the vote, widened to the PVG voting committee, will be determined by majority vote.
The resolution of all contentious voting issues, will be documented in order to demonstrate that Insight acted in the best interests of its Clients. Any voting decision not resolved by the PVG will be escalated to the Insight Chief Investment Officer ("CIO") or their delegate for additional input.
6. Proxy Voting Group
The PVG is responsible for overseeing the implementation of voting decisions where Insight has voting authority on behalf of Clients. The PVG meets at least quarterly, or more frequently as required. In ensuring that votes casted are in the best interest of Clients, the PVG will oversee the following proxy voting activities:
| · | Casting votes on behalf of Clients |
| · | Voting Policy: Oversee and set the Proxy Voting Policy |
| · | Voting Guidelines: Oversee and set the Voting Guidelines which are reviewed and approved on an annual basis |
| · | Stewardship Code & Engagement Policy: Review for consistency with Proxy Voting Policy and Voting Guidelines |
| · | Conflicts of Interest: Manage conflicts when making voting instructions in line with Insight's Conflict of Interest Policy |
| · | Resolution Assessment: Review upcoming votes that cannot be made using Voting Guidelines and make voting decisions |
| · | Voting Agent: Appoint and monitor third-party proxy agencies, including the services they perform for Insight in implementing its voting strategy and |
Reporting: Ensure voting activity aligns with local regulations and standards
The PVG is chaired by a Senior Portfolio Manager (who has no direct day to day investment discretion) and attended by portfolio management personal, the Senior Stewardship Analyst (Deputy Chair), Corporate Risk, Compliance, and Operations personal. The PVG is accountable to and provides quarterly updates to the Investment Management Group ("IMG").
7. Disclosure and Recording Keeping
In certain foreign jurisdictions, the voting of proxies can result in additional restrictions that have an economic impact to the security, such as "share-blocking." If Insight votes on the proxy share- blocking may prevent Insight from selling the shares of the security for a period of time. In determining whether to vote proxies subject to such restrictions Insight, in consultation with the PVG, considers whether the vote, either in itself or together with the votes of other shareholders, is expected to affect the value of the security that outweighs the cost of voting. If Insight votes on a proxy and during the "share-blocking period" Insight would like to sell the affected security Insight, in consultation with the PVG, will attempt to recall the shares (as allowable within the market time-frame and practices).
US Proxy Reporting: Form N-PX
Rule 14Ad-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") requires institutional investment managers (i.e., those managers subject to reporting requirements under Section 13(f) of the Exchange Act), such as Insight North America LLC (INA), to report annually on Form N-PX each "say-on-pay" and "say-on-frequency" vote over which they exercised voting power. Managers must file the form annually by August 31 of each year, covering the previous 12-month period ending on June 30. INA will leverage BNY's Global Holdings Reporting Group to effectuate required filings under Rule 14Ad-1. The PVG will ensure data required to satisfy INA's Rule 14Ad-1 reporting requirements is collected and reviewed for completeness and accuracy, in alignment with the reporting deadlines noted above.
Insight publishes its voting activity in full on its website. This can be found at https://www.insightinvestment.com/ri.
8. Proxy Voting Policy Review
Insight will review its Proxy Voting arrangements regularly through the PVG. Insight reviews this Policy at least annually or whenever a material change occurs and will notify Clients of any material change that affects our ability to vote in line with the best interests of its Clients.
A material change shall be a significant event that could impact Insight's ability to vote proxies such as a change in voting agent.
| Item 13. | Portfolio Managers for Closed-End Management Investment Companies. |
(a)(1) The following information is as of February 28, 2026:
Jeffrey Burger and Thomas Casey of INA and, an affiliate of BNYIA Adviser, are primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the registrant's portfolio.
Mr. Burger is a senior portfolio manager for tax-sensitive strategies at INA and has served as a primary portfolio manager of the fund since April 2013. He has been employed by INA or a predecessor company of INA since July 2009.
Mr. Casey is a senior portfolio manager for tax-sensitive strategies at INA and has served as a primary portfolio manager of the fund since April 2013. He has been employed by INA or a predecessor company of INA since 1993.
(a)(2) Information about the other accounts managed by the fund's primary portfolio managers is provided below.
|
Primary Portfolio Manager |
Registered Investment Companies | Total Assets Managed | Other Pooled Investment Vehicles | Total Assets Managed | Other Accounts | Total Assets Managed |
| Jeffrey Burger | 12 | $4.7B | None | N/A | 468 | $779.8M |
| Thomas Casey | 8 | $6.2B | None | N/A | 591 | $4.4B |
None of the funds or accounts are subject to a performance-based advisory fee.
Portfolio managers may manage multiple accounts for a diverse client base, including mutual funds, separate accounts (assets managed on behalf of private clients or institutions such as pension funds, insurance companies and foundations), private funds, bank collective trust funds or common trust accounts and wrap fee programs that invest in securities in which a fund may invest or that may pursue a strategy similar to a fund's component strategies ("Other Accounts").
Potential conflicts of interest may arise because of an Adviser's or portfolio manager's management of a fund and Other Accounts. For example, conflicts of interest may arise with both the aggregation and allocation of securities transactions and allocation of limited investment opportunities, as an Adviser may be perceived as causing accounts it manages to participate in an offering to increase the Adviser's overall allocation of securities in that offering, or to increase the Adviser's ability to participate in future offerings by the same underwriter or issuer. Allocations of bunched trades, particularly trade orders that were only partially filled due to limited availability, and allocation of investment opportunities generally, could raise a potential conflict of interest, as an Adviser may have an incentive to allocate securities that are expected to increase in value to preferred accounts. IPOs, in particular, are frequently of very limited availability. A potential conflict of interest may be perceived to arise if transactions in one account closely follow related transactions in a different account, such as when a fund purchase increases the value of securities previously purchased by the Other Account or when a sale in one account lowers the sale price received in a sale by a second account. Conflicts of interest may also exist with respect to portfolio managers who also manage performance-based fee accounts, which could give the portfolio managers an incentive to favor such Other Accounts over the corresponding funds such as deciding which securities to allocate to a fund versus the performance-based fee account. Additionally, portfolio managers may be perceived to have a conflict of interest if there are a large number of Other Accounts, in addition to a fund, that they are managing on behalf of an Adviser. The Advisers periodically review each portfolio manager's overall responsibilities to ensure that he or she is able to allocate the necessary time and resources to effectively manage the fund. In addition, an Adviser could be viewed as having a conflict of interest to the extent that the Adviser or its affiliates and/or portfolio managers have a materially larger investment in Other Accounts than their investment in the fund.
Other Accounts may have investment objectives, strategies and risks that differ from those of the relevant fund. In addition, the funds, as registered investment companies, are subject to different regulations than certain of the Other Accounts and, consequently, may not be permitted to engage in all the investment techniques or transactions, or to engage in such techniques or transactions to the same degree, as the Other Accounts. For these or other reasons, the portfolio managers may purchase different securities for the fund and the Other Accounts, and the performance of securities purchased for the fund may vary from the performance of securities purchased for Other Accounts. The portfolio managers may place transactions on behalf of Other Accounts that are directly or indirectly contrary to investment decisions made for the fund, which could have the potential to adversely impact the fund, depending on market conditions. In addition, if a fund's investment in an issuer is at a different level of the issuer's capital structure than an investment in the issuer by Other Accounts, in the event of credit deterioration of the issuer, there may be a conflict of interest between the fund's and such Other Accounts' investments in the issuer. If an Adviser sells securities short, it may be seen as harmful to the
performance of any funds investing "long" in the same or similar securities whose market values fall as a result of short-selling activities.
BNY and its affiliates, including BNYIA, Sub-Advisers affiliated with BNYIA and others involved in the management, sales, investment activities, business operations or distribution of the funds, are engaged in businesses and have interests other than that of managing the funds. These activities and interests include potential multiple advisory, transactional, financial and other interests in securities, instruments and companies that may be directly or indirectly purchased or sold by the funds or the funds' service providers, which may cause conflicts that could disadvantage the funds.
(a)(3) Portfolio Manager Compensation. The portfolio managers' compensation is comprised primarily of a market-based salary and an incentive compensation plan (annual and long-term).
INA has a flexible and progressive remuneration policy which allows it to attract and retain what it believes to be the best available talent in the industry. INA's approach to remuneration is designed to ensure that top performance is recognized with top quartile industry pay. This includes matching each individual with a suitable peer group that reflects competitors at every level and specialism within the industry. The components of remuneration are base salary and variable pay which is made up of two elements: discretionary annual cash amount and a deferral into the INA Long Term Incentive Plan. Cash and deferred pay play a significant role in total compensation. The overall value of these payments is based on company performance while individual payments are made with the dual aims of ensuring that key individuals are incentivized and rewarded for their contribution and that their total remuneration is competitive. INA also has a competitive benefits package (including eligibility for company pension and private medical plans) broadly aligned with the firm's parent company, BNY.
Discretionary pay is allocated following a detailed annual evaluation and performance appraisal against individual objectives, based on key performance indicators such as mandate performance (including effective management of risk and generation of relative returns where appropriate), contribution to team-based investment decisions, team management and professional development. Account is also taken of non-investment related issues such as business wins, client feedback, product and service development and internal relationship building, as well as experience, tenure and status within the team. For investment teams, including portfolio managers, performance is typically assessed over a multi-year framework including fund performance over one-, three- and five-years performance cycles. This is also supported by the INA Long Term Incentive Plan, which typically vests over three years.
The application of the above policy and principles are reviewed at least twice each year by the INA Remuneration Committee, where compensation proposals in respect of the relevant performance year are considered and approved.
(a)(4) The dollar range of Fund shares beneficially owned by the primary portfolio manager is as follows as of the end of the Fund's fiscal year:
| Primary Portfolio Manager | Fund | Dollar Range of Fund Shares Beneficially Owned |
| Jeffrey Burger | BNY Mellon Municipal Bond Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | None |
| Thomas Casey | BNY Mellon Municipal Bond Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | None |
(b) Not applicable.
| Item 14. | Purchases of Equity Securities By Closed-End Management Investment Companies and Affiliated Purchasers. |
Not applicable.
| Item 15. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. |
There have been no material changes to the procedures applicable to Item 15.
| Item 16. | Controls and Procedures. |
| (a) | The Registrant's principal executive and principal financial officers have concluded, based on their evaluation of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures are reasonably designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant on Form N-CSR is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant in the reports that it files or submits on Form N-CSR is accumulated and communicated to the Registrant's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. |
| (b) | There were no changes to the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
| Item 17. | Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities for Closed-End Management Investment Companies. |
Not applicable.
| Item 18. | Recovery of Erroneously Awarded Compensation. |
Not applicable.
| Item 19. | Exhibits. |
(a)(1).
| (a)(2) | Not applicable. |
| (a)(3) | Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940. |
(a)(4) Not applicable.
(a)(5) Not applicable.
| (b) | Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
BNY Mellon Municipal Bond Infrastructure Fund, Inc.
By: /s/ David J. DiPetrillo
David J. DiPetrillo
President (Principal Executive Officer)
Date: April 22, 2026
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By: /s/ David J. DiPetrillo
David J. DiPetrillo
President (Principal Executive Officer)
Date: April 22, 2026
By: /s/ James Windels
James Windels
Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
Date: April 22, 2026
EXHIBIT INDEX
| (a)(1) | Code of ethics referred to in Item 2. |
| (a)(3) | Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940. (EX-99.CERT) |
| (b) | Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940. (EX-99.906CERT) |