10/25/2025 | Press release | Archived content
The SFF program is not working because most nursing homes that graduate from the program do not keep the improvements they made over the long term. Between 2013 and 2022, nearly two-thirds of the nursing homes that were in the SFF program improved enough to graduate but soon afterward showed the type of quality problems that put them in the SFF program in the first place. For nursing homes in the SFF program that violate Federal requirements, the SFF program relies too heavily on financial penalties that do not require changes in nursing home operations. Our findings point to ways in which CMS could make the SFF program more effective:
Staffing: CMS minimally includes staffing in the SFF program, but nursing homes that graduate from the SFF program and sustain improvements maintain higher staffing levels than those that do not sustain improvements.
Ownership: CMS does not consider ownership at all in the SFF program. However, a handful of owners stand out as owning many low-quality nursing homes, which points to poor management practices. Also, State agencies told us that owners play an important role in whether nursing homes improve quality.
States' quality improvement efforts: Some States build on the SFF program requirements with their own initiatives to support improvements in nursing homes. CMS can learn from these efforts to increase the effectiveness of the SFF program.
We recommend that CMS:
CMS concurred with our second recommendation and did not concur with the first and third recommendations.
This report may be subject to section 5274 of the National Defense Authorization Act Fiscal Year 2023, 117 Pub. L. 263.